Cleansing Culture

 

Home ] Up ]

 

CLEANSING CULTURE
The ruling BJP and its saffron parivar
go about their task of imposint a moral code
on the nation in systematic fashion

RASHMI SAKSENA and K. SUNIL THOMAS in New Delhi & MARIA ABRHAHAM in Mumbai

"Well, I'd like to take you, as I find you
Imagine our clothes are on the floor
Feel my caress so soft and gentle
So delicate, you cry for more"

The stage Performance Scrutiny Board in Maharashtra went through these lyrics from the song Universal by the Australian pop band Savage Garden with a fine-tooth comb, mulled over them twice and (sigh!) finally gave the group the go-ahead. So, the concert happened in Mumbai on May 3 but not before the board had viewed videos of the band's live performances elsewhere to ensure there were no lewd steps or 'dirty' dancing. However, it was not only the performers who were expected to observe a moral code. Out went behavioural guidelines that audiences to the show were expected to observe: no hugging, no kissing, no stripping and no intimate body contact while dancing!

The conditions could become even more stringent for two other rock concerts by foreign artists scheduled for this month, that by heavy metal act Iron Maiden's Paul Dreamo and that of Jess Cox of Tygers of Pan Tang. Perhaps it is a lucky coincidence that pop superstar Madonna, who is expected to tour Indian cities later this year, has turned all spiritual and more importantly, Veda oriented (she even sings a Sanskrit song about spirituality Shanti, Ashtangi in her latest album Ray of Light).

Hardly one month into governance in New Delhi, the BJP dispensation aided by the other parivar compatriots, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, the Bajrang Dal, the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) and comrade-in-arms the Shiv Sena, has begun to enforce a moral code, which smacks of RSS ideology. While the BJP is being subtle, for the others the power to enforce this seems to be flowing from the barrel of threats, persuasion and plain old goonda gardi.

There have been a spate of incidents reflecting the bigotry and intolerance of powers that be to anything or anyone that does not conform to their standards of decency, morality and what is appropriate for the Indian milieu.The Vajpayee government was just a few days old, but its parivar organisations the Bajrang Dal and the VHP were emboldened enough to break up a beauty pageant in Ahmedabad. On the eve of the show goons confronted Himangshu Shah, managing director of the SOI group, a herbal beauty products manufacturer, who was organising the show, and forced him to cancel the contests for the titles Miss Gujarat and Man of Gujarat besides the swim suit round. Activists even occupied the front seats dislodging invitees and monitored the show.

On May 1, activists of the Bajrang Dal stormed the south Mumbai apartment of artist M.F. Husain, vandalised his house and tore down several priceless paintings. The activists were incensed at Husain's painting 'Sita Rescued' which depicted a nude Sita riding on the tail of Hanuman. Bal Thackeray reportedly said that "We have let Husain enter Hindustan, why can't we enter his house."
One of the first steps taken after BJP-supported students groups took control of Lucknow University last fortnight was to declare a blanket ban on fashion shows on campus and beauty pageants.
The irrepressible S.S. Gill, the endangered CEO of Prasar Bharati, banned the telecast of the Miss Universe pageant. Denying that he was under orders from Information and Broadcasting Minister Sushma Swaraj, he said such contests were not in keeping with the profile of India's national channel.

Even as the BJP has been subtly making fundamental changes, its ministers shy away from accepting that there is any link between the "moral code" for preserving of the "normative moral order" mentioned in the BJP manifesto and their actions. They insist their moves are purely a response to a public outcry against moral degeneration and the growing influence of western culture.

Soon after taking control of the information and broadcasting ministry Sushma Swaraj attempted to cleanse the small screen. She put together a video cassette of all 'offensive' ads that were being beamed by satellite channels. Showing her concern at ads that promote the American way of life instead of the Indian one, she said, "Wherever I go, people urge me to do something about obscene advertisements. Now that we have come to power, they expect us to do something. They have faith that we will address ourselves to this."

Even during her first, though short, stint as information minister in 1996, Sushma had made the headlines with her remarks that women news readers on Doordarshan "zaroorat se jyada dikhate hain" (expose more than they should). This was followed by a blanket ban on condom ads and some other ads which she found 'objectionable'. Minister for Human Resource Development Murli Manohar Joshi told THE WEEK that he is talking to government, educational and private organisations to bring about changes in textbooks so that young children are exposed to the "right things". According to Joshi, there is concern that history books do not contain enough about the freedom struggle.

Way back in 1991 the BJP made certain changes in the school syllabus soon after coming to power in Uttar Pradesh. Haldi Ghati, a poem glorifying Rana Pratap, dropped earlier because it was seen as containing overt anti-Muslim sentiments, was reintroduced in the Hindi literature textbook. In the history textbooks RSS leaders like Deen Dayal Upadhyay got predominance, while the earlier perception of freedom struggle, which was dubbed a 'Congress version', was altered. Vedic mathematics also got a boost.

Joshi also disclosed that his ministry was interacting with the department of youth affairs and sports to see how the youth can be made to participate in rural development. A proposal to have graduates do a stint in the rural areas before securing their degree, made by Minister of State Uma Bharati, is with the planning commission. Joshi said these steps were being contemplated to safeguard the moral fibre of the people which is under threat. He emphasised that they had nothing to do with party policy but were a response to the concerns expressed by the general public. The minister said the people were drawing his attention to these by telephone calls and letters.

Interestingly the BJP manifesto promises that the government will set up a 'Bharat Punarnirman Vahini' "whose voluntary members will devote one year of their life for national reconstruction".

These moves have sparked off a debate of sorts. While one section of the populace feels perturbed by what they fear is a 'moral raj', being thrust on them, others have welcomed the moves as a means to arrest the steady erosion of cultural and ethical values among youngsters choosing role models from American soaps.

Can a democratic government be allowed to lay down the dos and don'ts of how to dress, what music to appreciate, how to dance, what to read and what to paint? This is the question uppermost in the minds of those who fear the return to the dark ages by a fundamentalist regime. On the other hand there is the lot happy about the fact that the government has taken the initiative to cleanse the society of all that is immoral and obscene.

A section of the people suspects something more than a bid to weed out all that is perceived as not "correct". Does the BJP have a 'hidden agenda' to indoctrinate the masses? Are they implementing a well-chalked out plan under the garb of moral conscience-keepers responding to what the public wants them to do? The artists fraternity has been the most vocal in expressing its fears on attempts to regulate their freedom. Several leading painters including Manjit Bawa, Manu Parekh and others got together and released a statement condemning "the invasion of the private space of an eminent citizen (showing) the brazen confidence these forces have recently acquired".

At a press conference, painter Jatin Das, who was the target of a Hindu right wing mob's fury on the streets of Delhi a few months back, lashed out at the insensitivity of the rest of the society: "What are we after all...We just want to go about our work...Engineers, journalists, intellectuals. This could happen to you all. It could be your turn next." Das also spoke elaborately on the whole issue of fine art and nudity. "What is naked, nude, nudity? It is fine art for us. Doctors also study physiology. For us, just like the face, the rest of the body is also like ears and nose etc." Added Anjolie Ela Menon, "If Indian culture has reached global levels, it is because it has enjoyed absolute freedom so far. Our lives, our works, they depend on being free." She went to the extent of exhorting for a mass movement: "If this should mean bringing down the government, then we should do it."

Anjolie (pic: left) was of the opinion that the attack on Husain was simply minority persecution. She referred to her painting Shakti which had three goddesses in the nude. "But nobody dared to attack me because I had a Hindu name." Tahir Mohammed, chairman of the National Commission for Minorities, does not seem to agree with her. He described the touch of obscenity in Husain's drawings of Hindu gods and goddesses as unIslamic, unconstitutional and immoral.

Husain's was only the latest in a series of attacks on artists. Quite a few art shows, including that of Bhupen Kakkar, an out-of-the-closet gay artist, were stopped recently. Though this was before the new government came to power, the fears have increased now. Anjolie says that the government should give everyone an assurance that this sort of moral policing will be stopped. "Today you raise a hue and cry when you find a naked Sita riding on Hanuman's tail. But don't they know that Sita is the epitome of Indian women. And that way, they don't care if she gets raped 20 times on screen in every movie."

There can be no doubt that the impact of films is more powerful than rock concerts and plays. Songs in Telugu, Tamil and Hindi are very provocative with skimpily clad heroines clinging sensually to bare-chested heroes. But who would want to take on the mighty film industry? Especially when members of the Shiv Sena first family are into film production?

Actor and Samajwadi Party leader Raj Babbar is convinced that the latest moves by the Shiv Sena such as the disruption of the Ghulam Ali concert, are political. In the last week of April, over 100 Shiv Sainiks stormed the stage and snatched the mike and instruments, leading to the cancellation of the concert. Reason: Ghulam Ali is a Pakistani. "Those who have done this are intellectually bankrupt. They have always been goondas so they can do anything. The law and order machinery is not protecting citizens," Babbar says. He also argues that Maharashtra's Culture Minister Pramod Navalkar does not have the credentials to police Mumbai's culture or morals.

But Babbar is not against laying down norms for behaviour in public places. "It is fine to have restrictions on kissing and cuddling during rock shows. There are many folk songs in the country which can be classified as vulgar. So there should be some sort of guidelines on these matters." Both he and film director Mahesh Bhatt suggest self-censorship among artistes. Bhatt also wants everyone to come together on a common platform and have a frank discussion to remove fears and misgivings.

Another disturbing trend is the please-the-powers-that-be attitude. S.S. Gill, the diffident CEO of Prasar Bharati, decided to scrap the telecast of the Miss Universe pageant because he realised that this act will go down well with the powers that be and may save him his job. But Sushma is in no mood to oblige.

How far will the culture cops go? Will a moral raj lead to state coercion or confine itself to a cosmetic weeding out of ads that trigger the passion, draping air hostesses of private airlines in demure saris and putting a stop of the MTV generation. Only time will tell.

Don't kiss, don't yell

If obscenity or licentiousness made rock shows objectionable and perceived blasphemy made M.F. Husain undesirable. Ghulam Ali's only fault was his nationality. All in Bohemian Mumbai, the most liberated Indian city.The person who sounded the clarion call was the preserver of Mumbai's fragile morality, Pramod Navalkar (pic: right), Maharashtra's minister for cultural affairs. He wanted to ban western music concerts outright but the resulting furore made him back off. Now, all western music performers have to get the lyrics of the songs cleared by a script scrutiny board.

Not that Navalkar can't stand western music. He enjoyed the Michael Jackson extravaganza in November 1996 along with his party chief Bal Thackeray, who came with his sons, daughters-in-law and grandchildren, and Chief Minister Manohar Joshi. "I remember reading Navalkar's statement then that he considered Michael Jackson's music a part of Indian culture! He is now discriminating against Indian rock," says Rohinton Poonawala of Amp Entertainment which has been organising an annual rock event called Independence Rock from 1985.

Navalkar's objections were that western music was against Indian culture, that the spectators danced during such concerts and that people drank and smoked. Coming from Navalkar, who goes to discos and pubs, these were strange objections.Wrote Pritish Nandy in his Rediff on the Net column: "What saddens me is that we are still allowing foolish polticians, corrupt law-enforcers and a stupid bunch of educationists to denigrate rock as something vile, wicked, decadent and corrupting."

Film maker Mahesh Bhatt has this to say: "On one hand you talk of freedom for the individual but when that individual expresses himself you muzzle him in the name of public interest." Noted ad man and theatre director popular for his spoofs, Bharat Dabholkar, has a different point of view. "Only the government can enforce censorship. It is good that they are doing it," says the creator of plays like Bottoms Up, Carry on Bombay and Circus. "No one decides social customs. It evolves and changes from time to time. Kissing in public is not part of our culture. Every country has its own norms," he says, pointing out that Singapore banned pop singer Janet Jackson's cassette because they found the cover picture objectionable. He says that all programmes in the US too are censored.

"Every man would like to see a nude woman on stage, but is that right?" asks Nadira Babbar, a renowned stage director and wife of actor Raj Babbar. She is glad that the scrutiny board has withdrawn permission to eight Hindi sex comedies. The names are suggestive enough: Ladki Jawan, Padosi Pareshan (young woman, troubled neighbour), Pati Anari Devar Khiladi (inexperienced husband, expert brother-in-law) and Marathi play Bayko Peksha Mehuni Bari (wife's sister is better than wife).

Yogesh Kondkar's Hindi play Saali Poori Gharwaali (Sister-in-law is like wife) was a runaway hit in Mumbai till the board refused to grant an extension after the licence expired on March 31. Kondkar claims to have made the highest collection for a single show (Rs 1.75 lakh) and the highest collection for a single day (Rs 3. 65 lakh). He is disappointed but the Stage Performances Scrutiny Board president Shantaram Nandgaonkar says that Kondkar changed the script after getting the licence.

Over the last couple of months, Pramod Navalkar's statements were appearing regularly in the papers, yet he now denies making any of those. "I have not said a word on this issue in the last six months. It is all cooked up. It is someone's imagination. Let me see how far the press will go," said a visibly irritated Navalkar who insists he has not said anything about rock concerts either. As for obscene plays, it is Nandgaonkar's responsibility.

Nandgaonkar takes his work as president of the Stage Performances Scrutiny Board of Maharashtra very seriously. Though the board was set up in 1954, it came into the limelight last month when it suspended performance of several sex comedies. "Literature, drama and films are the base for our cultural values. We should make sure that these are clean. We are not after anyone but this is the best way to clean society. We should give people good values," says Nandgaonkar. After he was appointed president in January 1996, he tried to curb plays with explicit sexual dialogues and obscene language.

He extended the gamut of duties by imposing conditions on the audience of a concert by the rock group Savage Garden (pic left) on May 2. "I heard that people do dirty tricks in rock shows, kissing, hugging, youngsters removing shirts and dancing. So I told the organisers that all this should not be allowed." says Nandgaonkar. He, however, admitted that the board did not have specific laws against such misdemeanor. "Enjoyment should have a limit. Don't do these things in public. Then what is the difference between animals and men? This board is like a parent. We will put restrictions on youngsters."

Nandgaonkar defines obscenity as anything that has a bad effect on Indian culture. Plays with obscene dialogues, abusive language, or anything that condemns national leaders will not be permitted. The present ruckus was set off when minister of cultural affairs, Pramod Navalkar, alerted him after seeing a play. Curious after seeing an ad in the Times of India, Pati Naram Naram, Patni Garam Garam, Band Kamre Mein, Navalkar went for the play. "He phoned me right after that. Navalkar saw the play only for a few minutes and he found it very vulgar," says Nandgaonkar. Behind a thin curtain a man and woman were 'doing things' on a bed.

Nandgaonkar got an affidavit from director Anees Javed that he would not have any such scenes in the play. The board has 17 members, which the president says is inadequate to screen the thousands of scripts that pour in every month from various parts of the state. The board scrutinises scripts in 18 languages and has stopped issuing permanent licences after the controversy over Hindi sex comedies.

The board can only revoke licences, it does not have the power to take action against errant directors. This is done by the police who issue the licence to sell tickets. In Aurangabad recently Police Commissioner Ulhas Joshi asked his men to videotape a Marathi play Bhogdasi which apparently had vulgar scenes. During the interval, the police arrested the cast.

"We are doing this for public good. Many people congratulated me for what I did," says Nandgaonkar, who has written songs for 70 films. But can he make people sing to his tunes?

 

INTERVIEW: SUSHMA SWARAJ
AIDS campaign must advocate sex only with life partner, not just safe sex

Information and Broadcasting Minister Sushma Swaraj is determined to sweep out all that is obscene, inappropriate or not in tune with "our culture" from the small screen. She is confident that the steps she takes will put a smile on the face of parents if not the hip generation or the advertisers who pay through their nose to add a zing to their message. She spoke to the Week about her campaign to ban all that is perceived as not "correct" for the Indian masses.

You seem to have decided to enforce a moral code on TV. How will you determine what should be on screen and what should not?
I have a very simple yardstick. The answer to the question 'can this be viewed by a family together'?, is my touchstone. If the answer is yes I will clear it without any hesitation. If the answer is no then something has to be done about it.

Does this not amount to enforcing your own values on the nation? After all, what may be inappropriate by your standard may not be so for someone else.
No, I am not going by what only I think is right or wrong. In fact, when the broadcasting bill comes into effect there will be a broadcasting council that will debate these things. The council will be made up of eminent personalities from all walks of life and from all political parties. They will look into complaints as well as recommend what can be broadcast and what cannot (be). They will set the standard.

But you have already come out openly against liquor, condom and the AIDS campaign insertions.
My action in these cases has been prompted by complaints made by parents, teachers and people I meet when I go to address meetings. I have letters and phone calls from lots of people complaining how such advertisements are adversely affecting the younger generation. I have realised that people are disturbed about watching these things while sitting together. We must not forget that TV in India is a drawing room thing not a bedroom one. It is also watched in a jhuggi where people of all ages sit together to view programmes.

Are you following a BJP-formulated moral code? Has there been a decision at the party level to carry out this agenda?
The BJP has openly said that it believes in preserving our culture and moral order. But let me make it clear that there is no directive to the ministers from the party organisation to take any particular step towards this end. Whatever I am doing is related to my ministry and is based on what the people tell me they would like.
Don't you think it is prudish to talk about banning alcohol ads when it is a drawing room thing in most urban homes?I am not bothered about drinking that goes on in homes. What is disturbing is that consumption of liquor is being virtually glorified in certain advertisements. What is the connection between drinking and sports? These are watched by children of impressionable age. What is the message we are giving them? That is why I had a meeting with representatives of satellite channels that air such ads. I requested them to put aside commercial considerations and view the ads as parents. This provoked some thinking. Having a law is one thing and realising one's responsibility to society and the younger generation is quite another.

What in your opinion are the other ads which should be kept out?
Look at the party and friendship lines that are advertised. These are in reality phone sex ads. You have this sexy woman saying, 'Waiting for your call for a hot chat', and other such loaded statements. These things are very common in other countries. Do we want our money also spent on such calls? This is something which has to be looked into.

You have objected to ads by AIDS groups, for family planning and even sanitary napkins. These are facts of life and youngsters need to be educated about these things.
I am not against making people aware of all these things, but it has to be done carefully. Even those who advocate sex education for children talk of the age group that has to be targeted. Sex education is not for a four-year-old. But TV is watched by all age groups. So we will have to consider the time slot that can be allotted to such ads. The other point we have to be careful about is that we are not giving a wrong message while talking about AIDS or family planning. For the AIDS campaign I have said that we should change it around to advocate sex only with your life partner instead of stressing only on safe sex. The same holds good for condom ads.

 

Resurrection of Hindu Fundamantalism
Hostile Intentions
Cleansing Culture
BJP's Rise
Past & Present
A Left View
Facilitating Genocides
Fighting For secularism
Extermination
Minorities
Intolerance
Defame
Looking Back
Who are the minorities?
Challenges of pluralism
In crisis
Soft on Hindutva
Back to a Century
Hindutva
Realisation
Chronology
On the Road of fascism
Cultures of Cruelty
Against Communalising History
Communalism Guide
The politics of hate
Towards a Hindu nation
Towards an Agenda for Secularism
Fundamentalism
Communalism and its impact on India
BJP  fascist face
Logic
Assault on Culture and Democracy
India towards fascism
Minorities Rights
Resources

HINDU ,Dalit, Muslims, INDIA , 

Fascism, Nazism, GenocidesHuman rights

Indian fascism :Intro,Myths, Organizations, Cultural Fascism,Babri Masjid, Bombay Riots , Role of Govt. 

Images  Posters  Cartoon  Audio & Video   News & Events  What'sNew E-Zine About US

Discuss The Topic Further On Our Public Bulletin Board 

To subscribe our newsletter and to get future update notifications, Join our mailing list! Enter your email address below, then click the button
 

1 Add this page to Favorites * Share it with a Friend : Make it your Homepage!

Your suggestions  will keep us abreast of what do u like to see in these pages.

FAIR USE NOTICE: Opinions expressed in the articles are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the publishers. This Web contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making these available in our efforts to advance understanding of human rights, democracy and social justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a `fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use these copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond `fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Last updated: October 29, 2000 .