![]() |
|
Movie
Reviews
![]() ![]() ![]() P-Z These movies have about as many merits as they do flaws, but they're not the worst movies ever made Without a Paddle (2004) The Stepford Wives (2004) Timeline (2003) The Scorpion King (2002) Zoolander (2001) SLC Punk (1999) (Movie Reviews Links Page) (3 AMHB: A-G) (3 AMHB: H-O) Without a Paddle (2004) Seth Green, Matthew Lillard, and Dax Shepherd star in the tale of 3 buddies who travel to Oregon for a childhood friend's funeral and discover that he may have figured out the landing site of D.B. Cooper, a lost and presumed dead hijacker/robber from the 1970s who parachuted out of a plane and supposedly landed in the mountains of Oregon. They realize that there could be hundreds of thousands of dollars still up in the mountains at that site, so they embark on a journey to find it. Along the way, everything that can possibly go wrong does go wrong. They are attacked by a bear; they go over a waterfall, and come to be hunted by mountain men who are harvesting marijuana. By the end, through the help of D.B.'s accomplice Del (Burt Reynolds) all three realize what the true treasure to be sought out is. The description doesn't really do the movie justice. If I were to pitch it to a movie executive, I'd say it's "Goonies" meets "Planes, Trains, and Automobiles". While the plot is predictable and some of the dialogue ridiculous, the interaction between Seth, Matt, and Dax is enjoyable. Thankfully, that takes up 99% of the movie. Several key hilarious moments bring this movie out from 1 AMHB territory to 3 AMHB territory. I shan't ruin these for you, but I will say that the trailer does not contain any of these moments. If you are in the mood for a movie where you can just sit back and relax and let the film do the work, this is the movie you'll want to see. Not every movie has to be a thinkfest, especially during the summer. As long as it's enjoyable, it's all good. Whether you'll find it funny is up to you individually, but I doubt any tenure-track Harvard English professors will be seeing this film, so the film is safe from extremely high-brow criticism in that department. It's a respectable summer film. Of course, after having seen "Monkeybone," anything's a respectable summer film to me. The Stepford Wives (2004) Based on the book by Ira Levin, this remake of the 1975 original sees the reunion of Frank Oz and Paul Rudnick after their collaboration on “In & Out” (1997). The original was a suspense/horror movie. This version’s played for laughs. So, some changes went on, we can say that much. The cast is all-star, the premise is a classic, and the director is Frank Oz. One would think this would guarantee the movie a place in the highest echelons of cinematic quality. However, this was not to be. While I agree that changing the movie to a goofy satire was the only way they could have viably remade it (the twist was revealed 30 years ago, after all), that doesn’t mean they can change everything around and hope for the best. However, this doesn’t mean that the movie has absolutely no merit. The writing is acceptable. Nothing terribly fake in there. There are even some random bits of hilarity. The acting is all right. I’ve seen better from both Matthew Broderick and Christopher Walken, but that’s beside the point. Nicole Kidman displays the perfect mix of freaked-out horror and comically-exaggerated incredulity. Bette Midler is at her best since “Hocus Pocus” (1993). Jon Lovitz is…in this film as well. Timeline (2003)
Ah, time travel. Though the premise has suffered much in the past few years, through the failings of such movies as 'Planet of the Apes', 'The Time Machine', and 'Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 3: Turtles in Time', I remain hopeful about the prospect of a movie treating it with the same passion and respect as 'Back to the Future'. Alas, with the movie 'Timeline', it was not to be. Following in his proud tradition of writing novels where eccentric millionaires fund archaeological digs for purposes all their own, Michael Crichton returns to the big screen with this adaptation of his best-selling novel. The premise: a team of archaeology students at a dig in present day France discover the eyeglass lens of their professor buried in a previously unearthed chamber. Intrigued, they test it and find that it is over 600 years old. Looking for answers, they go to ITC, the company funding the dig. Robert Doniger, ITC's owner, informs them that the company has accidentally stumbled upon time travel. However, they can only travel back to France in the year 1357. When the professor discovered their secret, he insisted on being sent back, but has not yet returned. Doniger needs the four 14 th Century France experts to go back to 1357, retrieve the professor, and come back to the present. If I were pitching the script to a movie producer in standard style, I would say the movie is 'Time Tunnel' meets 'Back to the Future Part 3' with some 'Jurassic Park' thrown in for good measure. If you liked all these, you'll like 'Timeline'. Then again, if you liked 'Back to the Future Part 3', there's something wrong with you. To sum up, my complaints are these: not enough time travel, too much sappy romance. Also, all of the time travel plotline inconsistencies remain with this movie, I.e. paradoxes. I would rate it better than 'The Time Machine', but it could have done with a few more rewrites if it wanted to be on the level of 'Back to the Future' If you go to see it, do not expect new and bold ideas on the subject of time travel, because for the most part the movie is a period piece about the 14th Century
Truth be told, this is a good movie and as others' reviews have put it, it is fully aware of its own silliness and never takes itself too seriously. The Rock does his job in the title role, and his performance is light years ahead of Hulk Hogan's misguided cameo in Muppets From Space. The rest of the cast is virtually all unknowns, with the proud exception of Michael Clark Duncan, who possesses the power turn any crappy movie into an enjoyable one (See Tim Burton's Planet of the Apes for strong evidence). A sight gag involving him got the strongest laugh from the theater crowd. It's hard to believe that the screenplay took five people to write. No new cinematic ground is explored in this film, but there are enough elements successfully taken from other films to merit watching and enjoying. I can practically guarantee that every single shot in the film will contain one of the five following things: 1.) The Rock looking intimidating.
Some hardcore criticism: This film operates on the cinematic scientific law that when there is an explosion in a room filled with both good and 'bad' characters, the bad characters will burn in agony while the good characters are miraculously thrown from the inferno. Aside from the Rock being stung with an arrow full of scorpion poison, nothing else scorpion-related happens in this film. A more appropriate title might have been "The Rock Issues a Bevy of One-liners And Kills Many People, Who May or May Not Deserve Such a Stylized and Sadistic Death." Sadly for wrestler fans, the Rock never says his trademark line, "Can you smell what the Rock is cooking" which had the potential to be tremendously funny in several spots. But! he does do the eyebrow thing! Favorite Lines:
Zoolander (2001) Premise:
Comments:
Plus, I would like to say that I am very upset at the theater at not providing me with a "Happiness Edition" of my city's newspaper. Hey pals, I gave my dollar to charity, and I demand my Happiness! I'm watchin' you! Oh, don't think I'm not angry about this. Anyway, I would also like to thank the man near the front of the audience in the theater I saw it at who shouted out one of the funniest lines (and it wasn't even in the film). It went as such. Derek Zoolander: "Wait,
I've got a plan."
The guy practically yelled this remark in a total silent theater, and for that I applaud him. Not only did he make me laugh, he made many in the audience laugh. He picked up the movie at a dull part, and made it his own. I salute you, unknown theater-goer. One last thing: for any cinematic experts who say "the music montage" as an instrument of comedy is dead, I urge you to see this film. Because this film will prove you wrong. Favorite Lines:
(Derek looks up at sky)
Mr. Mugato (Will Ferrell):
Obey my dog!
Hansel: Derelique
my balls
(David Duchovny explains
a crucial plot point about male models and assassinations.)
Matilda: (In regards
to the last time she had sex.) Try a few years.
Mr. Mugato: Come on! Blue Steel?! It's the same freakin' look! I feel like I'm on crazy pills! SLC Punk (1999) Premise:
Comments:
I see reasons why I SHOULD like this film. I guess I just don't have the energy to. Matthew Lillard exceeds expectations, which is a good thing. The plot definitely goes nowhere after awhile though. I don't know. I feel bad saying this. I enjoyed the movie, but I wouldn't see it again if given a choice of something more substantial. Once is enough for me. It's not a movie I would purchase, and if given the chance to go back in time to 1999 and see it on the big screen, I'd probably skip out on the movie and do something more productive with my time back in the 20th Century. But Mark (the Russian rich guy) was a hoot, as was Heroin Bob. I enjoyed their characters immensely. I also liked Mike (Jason Segel), the most hardcore guy Stevo had ever met, even though you wouldn't think it by just looking at him. In retrospect: characters = good. Plot = relies on the characters too much. You could have the greatest characters of all time, but if you don't have them do anything substantial (for example, have them simply be punks), then it's pointless. It's not a movie for everyone, but I would suggest viewing it, if only to see Matthew Lillard doing something besides playing a cartoon character. He actually does really well in the part, and I commend him. Beyond that, however, SLC Punk is a mediocre flick. Favorite Lines:
Stevo: Do you love her?
Stevo: The sun never sets on the British Empire... well the sun never sets on my asshole! Mark (Russian accent): It has 7 comfort levels, and I would be glad to show them all to you right now. Bob: How much more is there?
Go back to
the Movie Review Links Page
|