Personal Website of R.Kannan
Integrity In Public Life and Service - How Indian
Public Services came to be infested
with Corruption?

Home Table of Contents Feedback

How Corruption & lack of Integrity in Public Services
came about in India

The second World War provided a fillip to the growth of corruption. It got an impetus in the post war flush of money and consequent inflation. The subsequent period from the Seventies witnessed the start of the era of political corruption and criminalization of politics, of conducting or allowing corruption in the electoral process using money power and with links between criminals and politicians resulted in the total demoralisation of our public lives. Despite all this, what little progress we make to produce eminent intellectuals in our society is solely on account of our ancient culture and traditional family way of life. Today the good majority is mute in public life. Many educated citizens do not even cast their franchise.

Personal Integrity at the Social, Business & Industrial Environment

Though man is a part of the larger societies like Country, State, District etc. his interactions are far more at the immediate levels within his family and at the organization to which he belongs. Most of his time is spent with members of his family, its surroundings (relatives and friends) and the place that he works. Life within the family is informal, while that within the service center is based on formal rules and structured code of conduct. His prosperity and success in life are dependent on his career accomplishments. Service is both a challenge and an opportunity. What determines his interaction at this place and the level of discipline that prevails there becomes primarily relevant for him to shape his career and personal profile.

At this point personal greed replaces personal sacrifice. Today Indians at home are religious, god-fearing and honest individuals. They look to the happiness, growth and progress of all members in the family. However outside the home, in their public life, they are otherwise? Why? People who strive for the family growth do not work for the progress of the country. A silent majority keeps dumb to the ravages of a corrupt minority. Employees organize powerful trade unions and secure service benefits, but they do not fight corruption widespread in their organization practiced by small few. Our society suffers and its progress is retarded due to the lack of social consciousness. A petty thief picking the pocket of a traveler if caught is beaten mercilessly, but a public servant openly demanding bribe is not looked down with the contempt it deserves. But this is meekly condoned and accepted as a way of our social life or order.

Checking indiscipline at the Organization Level

Growing indiscipline prevailing at the business and industry adversely affect the entire society and set pace to all our present social problems. Engaged in commercial or industrial activities and dealing with vast resources, business units as part of their industrial, commercial or other activities build wide interactions with the government and public authorities. Prompted by greed and the desire for making quick or easy money, and possessed with vast resources garnered through black money hoarding, there is adequate scope for businessmen and industrialist in this environment to use corrupt ways of getting their things achieved. Corruption is fueled by greed. It is an attempt to look for short cut means for getting quick money. Business and industry promote corruption and public service thrives as the beneficiary of this evil source of earnings. This phenomenon is well documented in Santhanam Committee Report, as described below.

Origin of Corruption in our Society - Analysis by Santhanam
Committee Report (1964)

Corruption can exist, as the Committee for Prevention of Corruption has observed, if there is someone willing to corrupt and capable of corrupting. Both this willingness and capacity, it adds, is found in a large measure in the industrial and commercial classes. The following is an extract from Santhanam Committee's (1964) Report:

"Corruption can exist only if there is some one willing to corrupt and capable of corrupting. We regret to say that both this willingness and capacity to corrupt is found in a large measure in the industrial and commercial classes. The ranks of these classes have been swelled by the speculators and adventurers of the war period. To these corruption is not only an easy method to secure large unearned profits, but also the necessary means to enable them to be in a position to pursue their vocations or retain their position among their own competitors. It is these persons who indulge in evasion and avoidance of taxes, accumulate large amounts of unaccounted money by various methods such as obtaining licences in the names of bogus firms and individual's, trafficking in licences, suppressing profits by manipulation of accounts to avoid taxes and other legitimate claims on profits, accepting money for transactions put through without accounting for it in bills and accounts (on-money) and under-valuation of transactions in immoveable property. It is they who have control over large funds and are in a position to spend considerable sums of money in entertainment. It is they who maintain an army of liaison men and contract men, some of whom live, spend and entertain ostentatiously"

Public Service invests officers with enormous powers for due exercise for public welfare, but which is abused or misused tempted by the operations of these corrupt bureaucrats and politicians. We therefore find the Public Services entrenched in corruption. In turn the atmosphere is vitiated by spread of the virus amongst the enforcement authorities, who themselves indulge in corruption. In the net result there prevails all types and varieties of indiscipline and lack of integrity in different levels. Today this is a global phenomenon. Erosion of religious values and advent of consumerism fueling a multiplicity of wants and desires of mankind, results in falling standards everywhere and a motive not to earn money through hard toil but to hunt for money by all crooked means. The experience of people in the richest country, the United States of America, will be of particular interest to study here.

Where corruption and lack of integrity are global phenomenon, there is equal rectitude and a powerful vigilant awareness effectively tackles these menace in the western countries. This checks the evil effects of corruption and the common citizen is capable of getting benefits from a near-honest bureaucracy. This social consciousness is lacking so far in India. But with the assuming of office by the present Chief Commissioner for Central Vigilance, the issue is put to public debate and a serious though still insufficient attempt is being made by a single soldier to wage a war against the giant in proportion. Recently with the advent of the Internet bringing about great social changes, a number of virtual agencies are springing up. The objects and functions of some of these virtual agencies on the web are described later. One significant example of India Policy Institute, Hyderabad based web site is worth mentioning here

Preventive Strategies to Curb Misconduct

One interested in plant protection should invariably study pest control. He should get well versed with information about pests that devour the crops and the pesticides that protect the plants by annihilating the pests. The duty of establishing discipline in life and at work centers, should similarly concentrate on knowing the perverse deeds, called misconduct, in the work centers and the crimes committed on innocent public by anti-social elements violating the established law of the country. This is needed to enforce strict preventive action on these violators and to restore cleanliness and order in work centers and at the society at large.

We have earlier seen the prophetic words of Santhanam Committee four decades ago giving an insight into growth of corruption in our society and the causes that had contributed to it. It is also very significant to learn the remedies suggested by Santhanam Committee for the eradication of the evil made at that time. The extract hereunder is from the Manual ofg CVC in Chapter-18.

Recommendations of Santhanam Committee to Curb and Weed out
Corruption in our Society

The Santhanam Committee, while outlining the preventive measures that should be taken to significantly reduce corruption, emphasised four major causes of corruption and how, in respect of each of these causes, preventive measures could be planned and implemented in a sustained and effective manner. These causes are:-

  1. Administrative delays

  2. Government taking upon themselves more than what they can manage by way of regulatory functions.

  3. Scope for personal discretion in the exercise of powers vested in different categories of government servants.

  4. Cumbersome procedures of dealing with various matters which are of importance of citizens in their day to dayaffairs.

With regard to administrative delays, the Committee recommendedthe following steps:-

  1. Undertake a review of existing procedures and practices to find out the case of delay, the points at which delay occurs and device suitable steps to minimise delay at differentstages;

  2. Prescribe definite time-limits for dealing with receipts, files etc., which should be strictly enforced;

  3. Notings at levels lower than that of Under Secretary should be avoided, particularly in Ministries/Departments whichdeal with grant of licence or permits of various kinds; and>

  4. Levels at which substantive decisions could be taken should be prescribed and any attempt to involve as many as possible should be discouraged and dealt with severely, if found to be persisted in.

With regard to the second cause, the Committee recommended that each Ministry/Department should undertake a review of the regulatory functions which are its responsibility, with a view to see whether all of them are strictly necessary and whether the manner of discharge of these functions and of the exercise of powers of control are capable of improvement.

With regard to the third cause, the Committee recommended that adequate methods of control should be devised over exercise of discretion. The right to act according to discretion does not mean right to act arbitrarily. The fairness of the method by which the discretionary decision was arrived at may certainly be looked into.

With regard to the fourth cause, the Committee recommended that citizens should be educated properly with regard to the procedures of dealing with various matters and they should also be provided with an easy access to administration at various level without the need for the intervention of touts and intermediaries.

Some of the other important preventive measures recommended by the Committee are:-

  1. Only those whose integrity is above board should be appointed to high administrative positions;

  2. In making selections from non-gazetted to gazetted rank for the first time, all those whose integrity is doubtful should be eliminated;

  3. Every officer who sponsors a name for promotion should be required to record a certificate that he is satisfied that the government servant recommended by him is a man of integrity;

  4. An essential condition for grant of extension/re-employment should be that the person concerned has a good reputation for integrity;

  5. In every Ministry/Department, there should be a proper agency which a person with a genuine complaint can approach for redress. Bonafide complainants should be protected from harassment or victimisation;

  6. All visitors to offices dealing with licences/permits should enter their names and purpose of their visits in a register to be kept at the Reception Office; and

  7. Steps should be taken to prevent sale of information. Information not treated as secret should be made freely available to the public.

Organizations define conduct rules to secure good conduct by its employees. Misdeeds and misbehaviour by individuals are curbed at the organizational level, by identifying specific acts as misconduct and taking disciplinary action and awarding punishments including dismissal from service.

What is misconduct and how action is taken against the same at the work center? What are crimes and how crime prevention work is conducted in the country and by whom? These we will study in the coming chapters.



The Center for Public Integrity
(http://www.publicintegrity.
org/ dtaweb/home.asp)

The Center, founded by Charles Lewis in 1990, is a non-profit, non-partisan educational organization The Center for Public Integrity's mission is to provide the American public with the findings of its investigations and analyses of public service, government accountability, and ethics-related issues via books, reports and newsletters. An extract describing the functions and mission of Centre in its web portal will make significant reading:

"There was a time in this country when public service was held in high esteem, when the best and brightest were drawn to the nation's capital to work for the public good and in the public interest. Now, the landscape has changed. As The New York Times put it, "Americans are being insulted by a political culture that places private gain ahead of public trust." The result is an ever-growing mass of alienated Americans. The largest group today in the United States is not Republican, Democrat or independent, but the approximately 100 million nonvoters who choose not to participate in selecting their leaders.

Over the years, money has become the dominant influence in our political system: Money dictates how lawmakers are elected, who has access to them, and the career paths they choose after leaving government. Ultimately, those voices in the country without connections or money just don't seem to get heard.

This country sorely needs an ombudsman, an institution that serves as an objective purveyor of truth, outside of party, ideology, economic, or other interests, with strong credibility with the news media. Fulfilling this role as an honest broker of information, the Center for Public Integrity exposes abuses of the public trust. Accordingly, the Center has been called a "watchdog in the corridors of power" by National Journal.

The Center's mission is to provide the American public with the findings of its investigations and analyses of public service, government accountability, and ethics-related issues. The Center's books, reports, and newsletters uniquely combine political science and investigative reporting, unfettered by the usual time and space constraints. For that reason, The New Yorker has called the Center "a journalistic utopia." The president of the National Press Club has described the Center as "a significant force in the nation's capital, a new government watchdog . . . [which has] developed a reputation for being tough but a fair conscience for the news media and politicians alike".

Center Projects

Some of the findings in the projects undertaken by the center make interesting reading

In their new book, The Cheating of America, Charles Lewis, Bill Allison and the Center for Public Integrity exhaustively document how wealthy individuals and corporations avoid paying their fair share of taxes.

The 50 States Project: View an on-going state-by-state analysis of lawmakers' conflicts of interest, based on their sources of income and assets, committee assignments, leadership positions and legislative duties. (You can view any pone of the 50 States and view the findings in the web site)

Campaign 2000: The Center looks at select Congressional and the presidential races. Introducing the Influence Matrix-a new look at money in campaigns, candidate profiles, media links and Top Career Patron Lists are available.(You can browse any candidate that contested for congressional elections and view the details in the web site)

International Consortium of Investigative Journalists extends globally the Center's style of "watchdog journalism" in the public interest by marshaling the talents of the world's leading investigative reporters. More information about ICIJ is furnished below

International Consortium of Investigative Journalist
http://www.icij.org/

In an increasingly frontierless yet complex world, there is a need for in-depth information that transcends national boundaries. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists was created to meet that need.

Launched in 1997, ICIJ is a project of the Center for Public Integrity, a nonprofit, nonpartisan investigative research organization, based in Washington, D.C.

ICIJ extends globally the Center's style of enterprise journalism in the public interest by marshaling the talents of the world's leading investigative reporters to focus on issues that do not stop at water's edge. ICIJ supports and showcases the best international investigative reporting and, through that, hopes to be a force for greater global accountability. moral virtue

- - -: (o0o) : - - -
We Support... India Policy Institute

India Policy Institute, Hyderabad

(http://www.indiapolicy.org)

IPI was registered as a Trust in Hyderabad on the 16th of April, 1999 and currently fostered by a small group of eminent public men consisting of professionals and retired public servants of repute. IPI began as an internet mailing list on the 8th of April 1998. Its mission and objects are described in its web site as under:

Objectives of the Institute

  • National Debate on System Reform

    To host and facilitate The National Debate on System Reform primarily through the internet. This debate would focus on the production of A People's Manifesto, an internally consistent document with various levels of detail compatible with the rights of, and integrity of, each of us as Free Citizens of India. The document would essentially amount to making explicit the National Social Contract, authorizing specific tasks to the government and prohibiting it from others not so specified.

  • Publication of Annually Updated People's Manifesto
    To publish, annually, an updated version of a People's Manifesto. The first edition was published on the 1st of January 2000 AD, and subsequent editions would be published on the 1st of January, each year, thereafter, constituting the consensus of as many Indians as possible. This primary publication of IPI would be on the web or otherwise priced merely to meet the costs. Other, priced (or free), documents might be published from time to time at the discretion of the Board.

  • Building Bridges and Communication of Best Ideas
    To network with various advocacy and political economy institutes/ citizens groups all over the world which seek to determine and influence public policy in India, in order to involve them in this thinking process. To help communicate and train people in these best ideas without deviating from the primary purpose.

  • In the small period the web site has published a number of thought provoking articles to wake up public consciousness on all hot topics of social importance today. "The National Debate on System Reform was started as a small debate between friends in April, 1998, and has, within a short time, reached widely and involved many people, professionals, academicians, civil servants, social workers, civil society institutions, and others."

    "What we need are policies and laws which ensure that in the event that the government is in any way less than perfect, the system will make it impossible for anyone with ulterior motives to even attempt to be dishonest and corrupt".(Courtesy: web site of indiapolicy.org

- - - : ( Conduct Rules in Public Service - What is Misconduct? ) : - - -

Previous                 Top                 Next

[..Page Last Updated on 22.08.2004..]<>[Chkd-Apvd- ef]