Disadvantages Of The Worm Virus
Related links:
El Virus Es Un Micoorganismo
Microsoft Virus Current
Virus Informatiques
Is Giardiasis A Virus Or Bacteria
Computer Virus Protection Comparison
Security Software Suites No Match for Custom Attacks - Security Fix Security Fix Subscribe to The Post recent posts Microsoft's Patch Tuesday Includes New Rating Index Security Software Suites No Match for Custom Attacks Microsoft Stock Price Routinely Dinged by Security Patches Phishers, Virus Writers Exploit Global Financial Crisis Apple, Opera Ship Security Updates Stories by Category Cyber Justice Fraud From the Bunker Latest Warnings Misc. New Patches Piracy Safety Tips U.S. Government Web Fraud 2.0 Stories By Date Full Story Archive related links The Archives Security Fix Live: Web Chats About This Blog Password Primer 7 Security Tips Technology Section syndicate RSS Feed Brian Krebs on Computer Security About This Blog | Archives | RSS Feed (What's RSS?) Security Software Suites No Match for Custom Attacks The all-in-one security software suites from the major anti-virus vendors fail spectacularly at detecting custom-made malware that exploits the latest software vulnerabilities, according to testing done by security analysis firm Secunia. Secunia tested how well nearly a dozen security suites fared against malicious files and direct attacks that leveraged more than 150 known software flaws. All of the vulnerabilities used in the test are publicly documented -- details of them can be found in the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) database -- and most of the vulnerabilities can be fixed by applying a software update currently available from the program's maker. Secunia says that out of the 300 test cases, 126 are particularly important avg anti virus se because they affect very popular products and have either been discovered as zero-day threats or Secunia has developed working exploits. Secunia CTO Thomas Kristensen said all of the vulnerabilities used in the test merit a moderate security rating or higher, meaning they can be used to remotely install software on the victim's PC, with little or no help from the user aside Detect Boot Sector Virus from opening or viewing the malicious file. The company found that nearly all of the security suites -- including those from McAfee, F-Secure, Microsoft and TrendMicro -- detected between just 1 percent and 3 percent of the attacks. Symantec's Norton Internet Security 2009, dramatically outperformed the rest, detecting more than 20 percent of all threats and more than 30 percent of the most dangerous threats, according to the results. Still, that means in at least 7 out of 10 cases, the bad guys using a targeted exploit will slip past Norton's defenses. That also suggests that the other products detect roughly 3 percent of targeted attacks. At any rate, new virus mozilla readers can find a detailed breakdown of Secunia's test results and interesting methodology here (PDF). I emphasize the word "targeted" because most anti-virus products are still reactive, in that they focus on protecting customers by figuring out what people are getting attacked by and then creating custom "signatures" to computer virus name detect that specific threat going forward. While i need a computer virus most anti-virus companies claim to virus detection have incorporated technology capable of detecting programs that exhibit suspicious behavior or that attack specific software vulnerabilities, it appears that Symantec is alone in making significant strides in this respect, at least as it relates to the virus mac latest, known vulnerabilities in widely-used software. Secunia's study is useful, but it ignores the unfortunate reality of today's threats, which rely not Virus Models on software vulnerabilities but mainly on tricking people into installing software. Interestingly, Symantec itself documents this fact in its Internet Security Threat Report, which found that in the second half of 2007, only 10 percent of the new malicious code threats affecting consumers used software flaws. At west nile virus the very least, Secunia's study is a stark reminder that having security software installed is no substitute for keeping the rest of the software you use up-to-date with the latest security patches. On this front, I've recommended Secunia's vulnerability scanners, which work either through the company's Web site or a free, installable program. Some readers have said they refuse to use Secunia's scanners because they require users to have Java installed, a program that needs frequent security updates itself infected by trojan virus and clutters the user's system norton virus definitions with old, outdated versions of itself. My take on it is that 90 percent of the planet already has Java installed. What's more, anything that raises the average user's awareness on the need for regular patching is overall a irs virus good thing, Sun's clumsiness with its Java software notwithstanding. Incidentally, if you're looking to see how well the products named in this study detect the latest threats that are actually in circulation, check out the stats released in chicken pox virus September by AV-test.org(Microsoft Excel file). The group's battery of tests also examined how the software super bug virus suites fared in terms of system memory usage, proactive malware detection, false positive rates and on-demand scanner performance. By Brian Krebs | October 13, 2008; 4:44 PM ET Latest Warnings , Misc. , New Patches , Safety Tips Previous: Microsoft Stock Price Routinely Dinged by Security Patches | Next: Microsoft's Patch Tuesday Includes New Rating Index Comments Please email us to report offensive comments. What's the most common method for targeted malware to be put into individual computers? Spam? Drive by from infected websites? Dedicated deceptive websites? Others? Posted by: Kfritz | October 13, 2008 9:00 PM Are we to therefore conclude that both BitDefender and Kaspersky did well in these test, i.e., did better than Norton Internet Security 2009? Posted by: brucerealtor | October 13, 2008 9:15 PM This points out the need for a multi-layered defense (defense in depth). Relying on just one layer such as security virus identification software virus buster serge pictures is foolish. When that one layer is compromised, game over. Instead, in a multi-layered defense, a system compromise may be averted by another layer. Typical layers of defense: 1. Hardware firewall - protects the system(s) from external intrusion should the software firewall need to be turned off or is inactive for any reason. Also, is much more difficult to hack past than a software firewall alone. 2. Software firewall - protects the system when used outside the confines of the hardware firewall and provides outbound filtering and possible indication of malicious system activity. 3. Non-admin account - prevents system wide changes or software installation whether intentional or not (including malicious code should it get past other defenses). 4. Ypolio Virus Family And Shape Patch all software - prevents system compromise via bugs (especially important for Internet facing software such as browsers, e-mail clients and media players). 5. Limit amount of software installed on a system - lowers system attack surface and reduces patching. 6. Backup data on a regular basis - protects data in Free Virus Scan Windows the event of free virus protion system compromise resulting in data loss. 7. Blocking hosts file - blocks access to known malicious websites. And finally, 8. The human layer (computer user) as they can override all the other layers. Posted by: TJ | October 13, 2008 10:03 PM TJ Thank you for that very useful list. For those of us who do not leave our systems on 24/7 [like that 'standby' option on XP, which I presume Vista also has] what is the advantage of a hardware firewall? Some years back a friend of mine explained a hardware firewall by using the trendmicro virus analogy to an incoming phone call, where the 'firewall' in effect 'takes a message' and then calls the supposed originating number back before allowing a call to connect, whereby IF the incoming call says its coming from number 202-123-4567, but when that number is called back and 'not at a working 202 exchange, the bogus communication from a phoney incoming number is prevented. We will ignore, Online Virus Sacn for the purpose of this example, the ability to manipulate the number appearing on a caller ID device. Posted by: BRUCEREALTOR | October 14, 2008 1:36 AM I skimmed the 6-page PDF, and it seems that the "malware" that most of the suites failed to detect is actually in-house Proof-of-Concept malware code provided by Secunia, not actual "in the wild" malware. Testing anti-malware software against academic code isn't a real-world test IMHO. Posted by: Angus S-F | October 14, 2008 1:46 AM "what is the advantage of a hardware firewall?" Think of it as a fence around a fort protecting every building. Whereas a software firewall would protect only a single building assuming it's turned on (doors and windows locked). Even if you have only one building, it still provides another layer of protection, in particular if for some reason the doors or windows are left unlocked as would happen when you’re either installing a fresh copy of your operating system or troubleshooting a problem that requires disabling your software firewall. At least then, the hardware firewall would still protect your system from the outside world. This provides more info: http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/Hardware_Software/2004/firewall_types.asp Posted by: TJ | October 14, 2008 12:30 PM TJ Thanks I guess my question is that if my machine is for whatever reason not online, that seems certainly as effective as a hardware firewall, right. I clicked on your link and thought I had hit gold under 'online' firewall testing services. Alas, the definition of 'online' polio virus appeared. LOL Posted by: brucerealtor | October 15, 2008 virus msnmobilefix 4:07 AM kfritz - most common medium for malware attack are from "botnets". botnets are hoards of zombie computers (computers already at the mercy of malware) that push out all forms of spam, including phishing and other tactics. Another common one now is embedding malicious code within legitimate ads on otherwise legitimate websites. Can't trust anything these days can ya? Posted by: Jay | October 15, 2008 10:49 AM TJ, let's not forget Network Intrusion Prevention Systems (NIPS) and Host Intrusion Prevention Systems (HIPS) in our layered defense model. Posted by: Intrusion Prevention | October 15, 2008 11:27 AM Post a Comment We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features. User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. Name: Comments: Blog Archives RSS Feed Subscribe to The Post © The Washington Post Company
HuntsvilleForester.com - HPV vaccines well underway
Auctions Autos Classifieds Events Flyerland Garage Sales Goldbook My Holiday Home Rental Insurance Hotline Restaurants
Search
Home
News
Opinion
VideoZone
PDF Issues
Supplements
Games
Horoscopes
Lottery
The Forester
Contact
Links
Area News Business News Community Dining & Entertainment Election 2008 Health News Obituaries Photographic Memory Sports & Leisure Top Stories Vintage
Cartoon Columns Editorial Letters Opinion Submit a Letter
About The Forester Employment Opportunities Website Advertising Your Account
Article Tools
Smaller Text | Larger Text
E-Mail Article
Print Article
Comment
Share
HPV vaccines well underway
October 15, 2008 - by Laura MacLean
Over the course of this year, the Simcoe-Muskoka District Health Unit anticipates that almost 50 per cent of Grade 8 girls in the Muskoka district will receive a em virus vaccination for the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV).
“We’re not quite finished, but we’re getting there,” said Laurie Stanford, manager of the vaccines preventable diseases program for the health unit. “We only found out about the program in August of last year, and the program was implemented in September, so it was fast. Last year, we know 65 per cent (of Grade 8 girls) did get the vaccine in Simcoe-Muskoka.”
A sexually transmitted epstein barr virus serology infection caused by a virus, there top secret virus are many types of HPV; some relieve from entistical virus cause warts, while others cause changes to a woman’s cervix which can lead to cancer. HPV is contracted by top anti virus program various forms of unprotected sex. Some people who have HPV do not have any signs of infection, but it can be transmitted without a virus scans person knowing it.
Grade 8 girls across the province are being vaccinated with norton security virus protection Gardasil, which can protect against four types of HPV dree virus scan infections—types 6 and 11 (the common cause of genital warts) and 16 and 18 (common cause of cervical cancer).
Last year, the federal government announced it would provide $39 million in funding for an immunization ha homology influenza virus campaign to prevent HPV.
A course of the vaccine, developed by Merck Frosst Canada Ltd., costs $404. The vaccine is given in three doses, all of which must be taken within a why start a computer virus year.
“This vaccine is expensive,” said Stanford. “We’re the second highest (in terms of participation) in the province…. 65 per cent (of parents) took advantage of the vaccine offer. We’ve had some parents call and ask us why are we doing this and what’s the big deal, but there’s been equally as many phone calls from parents saying, ‘My kid’s not in Grade 8. Why can’t my child have it?”
Stanford stated that the reason Grade 8 boys are not being immunized is because there isn’t enough current research to determine how the immunization would affect them. She said vaccinations are given to girls in Grade 8 “to get them before they start practising more risky behaviour and become exposed to the virus.”
“We’re not going to know for years down the road what effects vaccinations have had,” she said. “Basically, the girls who have been vaccinated are tracked, and it takes a while to compare, but it’s to find out what happened to those who had the vaccine as opposed to those who didn’t. weiyuan virus norton This is typical of all immunizations. We’re happy with the way the program is going, but we’d like to see perfect world virus 75 to 80 per cent getting vaccinated.”
While many people view the vaccination program as an important tool to combat the rapidly-spreading virus, there is some speculation as to whether memory resident virus enough testing was done to determine the side effects of the vaccine.
In Aug. 2007, an article appeared on the free home virus pertection CBC website featuring Abby virus and spyware protection for windows Lippman, a professor of the clamoxa and herpes virus Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health at McGill University in Montreal. Lippman believes the immunization campaign should be halted until a further study can be done.
She said because there’s a potential for unexpected effects, it is important to get the information to ensure that a system is in place that will protect and promote women’s health.
Admitting eppstein barr virus “we will never have all of the answers,” Lippman wanted a thorough governmental review of the vaccine’s safety, urban legend postcard virus cost and uses before a large-scale immunization program was initiated. She suggested certain programs, such as an immunization registry, be established to track patients, should the first round of limewire virusvaccinations prove ineffective and follow-up immunizations be warranted. She said she was not sure why the government pushed ahead with a costly vaccination program when scientific evidence of the vaccine’s efficiency and safety is lacking. She indicated only 1,200 girls aged 9 to 15 virus disables cd-drive bios were enrolled in clinical trials of Merck Frosst Canada Ltd.’s Gardasil and the youngest were only tracked for 18 months. In a report she wrote on HPV, Lippman said women should be reminded that cervical cancer is “not an epidemic” and HPV does virus sofware not necessarily lead to cancer. “Most HPV infections are cleared spontaneously, within one year for about 70 per cent of women and within two years for 90 per cent,” said the report. “Cervical browser virus cancer will not develop in most women who are infected with even a high-risk strain of HPV.” To learn more about how to keep from contracting HPV, visit the health unit’s website at www.simcoemuskokahealth.org. This article has been viewed 351 times. 0 comment(s) on this article. Add Your window virus check free Comment Add Your Comment Name: E-mail: Place of Residence: Subject Line: Comment: Once submitted, your comment becomes the property of Metroland North Media and we may dispose of it as we wish. This includes, at our sole discretion: - Disallowing the comment - Using the comment in other websites - Using the comment trojan virus info in promotional materials - Reprinting the comment in any of our print publications Your IP will be logged for identification purposes when you submit your comment. E-Mail Article pop up virus E-Mail Article Your Name: Your E-Mail: Recipient's E-mail: Subject Line: Message: Weather Events Advertisement Copyright © The Huntsville Forester 11 Main Street West, Huntsville, Ontario P1H 2C5 Phone: (705) 789-5541 • Fax: (705) 789-9381 |