Saints and Seasons
http://www.oocities.org/saintsnseasons

Beloved disciple

by Mike Oettle

JOHN – ah, yes, the Beloved Disciple, you might say. Few people on the calendar of the Church are as familiar and as well loved as John the Apostle, whose day is some­times kept on 6 May in memory of a reputed miracle, although it offi­cially falls on 27 December. We do know a good deal about him: his father was Zebedee, his mother Salo­­me. (If you’ve seen the musical The Witness, you’ll remember Salome [“Mrs Zeb­e­dee”] pleading with the Lord for good positions for her sons and enthusing about “my boys”.)

Zebedee was a Galilean fisherman, and John[1] and his brother James[2] were work­ing on their nets when Jesus called them to be “fish­ers of men” – the brothers who were known as Boanerges, or the Sons of Thunder. Perhaps this was because of their fiery temper: they were the ones who urged Christ to call down fire from Heaven on the Samar­i­tans who had rejected Him. John was present, with James and Simon Peter, when Jesus went up “into the mountain”, in the words of the King James Bible, and was transfigured.[3]

But for all we do know about John there’s a great deal we don’t know. Was he in fact the “disciple whom Jesus loved” [4] who reclined next to the Lord at the Last Sup­per, and who Jesus spoke to from the cross, saying to Mary: “Woman, this is your son,” and to the disciple: “This is your mother.”[5] If he was, he must have been the one who ran ahead of Peter to the tomb on the Sunday morning after the crucifixion and, seeing it empty, believed. When the disciples returned to Galilee and spent all night fishing in vain, it was the same disciple who recognised his Master on the shore and told Simon Peter, who went splash­ing through the water to Him. John 21:2 clearly identifies the sons of Zebedee as being there, although they are not named invidually.

We know all these things because they are mentioned as acts of this “beloved disciple” in John’s Gospel, and it is traditional to identify them with the author, self-effacingly avoiding naming him­self in the narrative.

But even the authorship of the Johannine Gospel, of the letters of John and of the Revelation to John is in dispute. When textual crit­icism was first developed during the 19th century, great atten­tion was paid to the vocabulary of the text. Marked dif­fer­en­ces were found in the Greek usage of the Gospel, Epistles and Revel­ation of John, and it was concluded that they could not possibly have the same author. More recent scholarship has not been so dogmatic, and many scholars now believe that while John was perhaps not responsible for the final editing (redaction, it is called) of these docu­ments, he at least is the source of the traditions contained in them, and wrote them in large part.

If he is indeed the author of Revelation (the most disputed of the three), it is probable that he left an assem­blage of rough notes and verbal recollections of his vision which his disciples finally pieced together. As for the Gospel, early tradition (the verbal teach­ing of the Church) makes John its author. Tradition is not always a reliable authority, but the earlier it is found written down, the more likely it is to be correct.

John is mentioned in Acts (for instance the healing of the beg­gar at the Gate Beautiful, when Peter said: “Silver and gold have I none . . .”). However, precise details of his later career are given in neither Roman documents nor the Scriptures.

Early tradition places him at Ephesus, however: Polycrates, Bish­op of Ephesus towards the end of the 2nd century, identified him as the beloved disciple and says that he “was a priest, wearing the sacerdotal plate, both martyr and teacher”. Irenæus, Bishop of Lug­du­num (Lyon) around AD 180, says John wrote his Gospel and letters at Ephesus and Revelation at Patmos, and later died at Ephesus. Two sites at Ephesus were claimed as John’s grave. The North African Ter­tul­lian, also in the 2nd century, reports that John was plunged into boiling oil and survived miraculously. This may have given rise to a later belief that John did not die, but was taken up to heaven like Enoch and Elijah.

John’s symbol as a Gospel author is the eagle. His name, vari­ous­ly interpreted as meaning “God’s grace” or “gift of God’s grace”, has become one of the most popu­lar names in the Western world. I will trace its many forms when we look at John the Baptist.



[1] In Hebrew, Yochanan.

[2] Or Jacob; Ya’acov in Hebrew.

This name was taken up in some dialects of Italian as Giacopo (pronounced Jacopo), but in others as Giacomo. The form with the M in it was the one that was carried to Scotland as James, and then to England in this form.

[3] Matthew 17:2; Mark 9:2.

[4] John 13: 23.

[5] The word “woman” as used here translates the Aramaic use of the equivalent word as a term of great respect. It has no connection with the Western tendency to use “woman” as a demeaning form of address.


Counter

Back to top of page

Vir Afrikaans, kliek hier

  • This article was originally published in Western Light, monthly magazine of All Saints’ Parish, Kabega Park, Port Elizabeth, in May 1993.

  • Back to saints index

    Back to chronological index

    Back to Saints & Seasons index


    Comments, queries: Mike Oettle