THE GREAT CHAM On March 16, 1759 the novelist Dr. Tobias Smollett wrote, on Johnson’s behalf, to John Wilkes, requesting his assistance in obtaining the release from the British Navy of Francis Barber. It is in this letter that the phrase “that Great Cham of literature, Samuel Johnson” was first used. The Great Cham was the title of the Sovereign of Tartory, and was applied to Johnson, the monarch of literature. (Source: G.B. Hill, Life of Johnson)
A CHARACTERIZATION OF DR. SAMUEL JOHNSON FROM THE JOURNAL OF A TOUR TO THE HEBRIDES BY JAMES BOSWELL Dr. Samuel Johnson’s character, religious, moral, political, and literary, nay his figure and manner, are, I believe, more generally known than those of almost any man; yet it may not be superfluous here to attempt a sketch of him. Let my readers then remember that he was a sincere and zealous Christian, of high Church of England and monarchical principles, which he would not tamely suffer to be questioned; steady and inflexible in maintaining the obligations of piety and virtue, both from a regard to the order of society, and from a veneration for the Great Source of all order; correct nay stern in his taste; hard to please, and easily offended, impetuous and irritable in his temper, but of a most humane and benevolent heart; having a mind stored with a vast and various collection of learning and knowledge, which he communicated with a peculiar perspicuity and force, in rich and choice expression. He united a most logical head with a most fertile imagination, which gave him an extraordinary advantage in arguing; for he could reason close or wide, as he saw best for the moment. He could, when he chose it, be the greatest sophist that ever wielded a weapon in the schools of declamation; but he indulged this only in conversation; for he owned he sometimes talked for victory; he was too conscientious to make errour permanent and pernicious, by deliberately writing it. He was conscious of his superiority. He loved praise when it was brought to him; but was too proud to seek for it. He was somewhat susceptible of flattery. His mind was so full of imagery, that he might have been perpetually a poet. It has been often remarked, that in his poetical pieces, which it is to be regretted are so few, because so excellent, his style is easier than in his prose. There is deception in this: it is not easier, but better suited to the dignity of verse; as one may dance with grace, whose motions, in ordinary walking - in the common step – are awkward. He had a constitutional melancholy, the clouds of which darkened the brightness of his fancy, and gave a gloomy cast to his whole course of thinking: yet, though grave and awful in his deportment, when he thought it necessary or proper, he frequently indulged himself in pleasantry and sportive sallies. He was prone to superstition, but not to credulity. Though his imagination might incline him to a belief of the marvellous, and the mysterious, his vigorous reason examined the evidence with jealousy. He had a loud voice, and a slow deliberate utterance, which no doubt gave some additional weight to the sterling metal of his conversation. Lord Pembroke said once to me at Wilton, with a happy pleasantry, and some truth, that “Dr. Johnson’s sayings would not appear so extraordinary, were it not for his BOW-WOW WAY”: but I admit the truth of this only on some occasions. The Messiah played upon a Canterbury organ, is more sublime than when played upon an inferior instrument: but very slight musick will seem grand, when conveyed to the ear through that majestick medium. WHILE THEREFORE DOCTOR JOHNSON’S SAYINGS ARE READ, LET HIS MANNER BE TAKEN ALONG WITH THEM. Let it however be observed, that the sayings themselves are generally great; that though he might be an ordinary composer at times, he was for the most part a Handel. His person was large, robust, I may say approaching to the gigantick, and grown unwieldy from corpulency. His countenance was naturally of the craft of an ancient statue, but somewhat disfigured by the scars of that evil, which, it was formerly imagined, the royal touch could cure. He was now in his sixty-fourth year, and was become a little dull of hearing. His sight had always been somewhat weak; yet, so much does mind govern, and even supply the deficiency of organs, that his perceptions were uncommonly quick and accurate. His head, and sometimes also his body, shook with a kind of motion like the effect of a palsy: he appeared to be frequently disturbed by cramps, or convulsive contractions* of the nature of that distemper called St. Vitus’s dance. He wore a full suit of plain brown clothes, with twisted-hair buttons of the same clour, a large bushy greyish wig, a plain shirt, black worsted stockings, and silver buckles. Upon this tour, when journeying, he wore boots, and a very wide brown cloth great coat, with pockets which might have almost held the two volumes of his folio dictionary; and he carried in his hand a large English oak stick. Let me not be censured for mentioning such minute particulars. Every thing relative to so great a man is worth observing. I remember Dr Adam Smith, in his rhetorical lectures at Glasgow, told us he was glad to know that Milton wore latchets in his shoes, instead of buckles. When I mention the oak stick it is but letting Hercules have his club; and, by-and-by, my readers will find this stick will bud, and produce a good joke. This imperfect sketch of “the combination and form” of that Wonderful Man, whom I venerated and loved while in this world, and after whom I gaze with humble hope, now that it has pleased Almighty God to call him to a better world, will serve to introduce to the fancy of my readers the capital object of the following journal, in the course of which I trust they will attain to a considerable degree of acquaintance with him. *Such they appeared to me; but since the first edition, Sir Joshua Reynolds has observed to me, “that Dr Johnson’s extraordinary gestures were only habits, in which he indulged himself at certain times. When in company, where he was not free, or when engaged earnestly in conversation, he never gave way to such habits, which proves that they were not involuntary”. I still however think, that these gestures were involuntary; for surely had not that been the case, he would have restrained them in the publick streets.
INTRODUCTION TO THE RAMBLER Essays that Johnson considered to be "Pure Wine" “Johnson was, I think not very happy in the choice of his title, The Rambler, which certainly is not very suited to a series of grave and moral discourses; which Italians have literally, but ludicrously translated by Il Vagabondo; and which has lately been assumed as the denomination of a vehicle of licentious tales, The Rambler’s Magazine. He gave Sir Joshua Reynolds the following account of its getting this name: “What must be done, Sir, will be done. When I was to begin publishing that paper I was at a loss how to name it. I sat down at night upon my bedside, and resolved that I would not go to sleep till I had fixed its title. The Rambler seemed the best that occurred, and I took it”. (Life) “The first paper of The Rambler was published on Tuesday the 20th of March, 1750; and its authour was enabled to continue it, without interruption, every Tuesday and Friday, till Saturday the 17th of March, 1752, on which day it closed.” (Life) “The only assistance that he received was in No. 10, by Miss Mulso, now Mrs. Chapone; No. 30 by Mrs. Catharine Talbot, No. 97 by Mr. Samuel Richardson and Nos. 44 and 100 by Mrs. Elizabeth Carter.” (Life) “Posterity will be astonished when they are told, upon authority of Johnson himself, that many of these discourses, which we should suppose had been labored with all the slow attention of literary leisure, were written in haste as the moment pressed, without even being read over by him before they were printed”. (Life) To the best of my knowledge the Internet does not have a summary of the 208 Ramblers. I expect to do this in consecutive order, five of them every month or so, replacing them with the next sequential five. The interpretation of the essays will be my own, however, extracts will be taken from the Yale Edition of The Rambler. Discussion and differences of opinion as to significance, interpretation or meaning may be forwarded to me and if considered appropriate will be reproduced on this website. I sincerely hope that this approach will stimulate study and promote dialogue of Johnson’s moral values and his approach to life. To see the Index to all of Johnson’s Rambler’s click the Rambler Index Link.
|
James Boswell | Hester Lynch Piozzi | Samuel Johnson | Miscellany
|