Internationalist
Says West Fears African Union
|
Panafrican News Agency (Dakar)
April
21, 2001
Posted to the web April 21, 2001
Yaounde,
Cameroon
"The
African Union works against major world interests, which explains
why no Head of State has received congratulations from the West
after the Lome summit," Prof. Jean-Emmanuel Pondi, Director
of the Institute of International Relations (IRIC) has averred
at a public lecture.
The
market of 700 million of consumers would certainly try to impose
its own interests on the world arena if it awoke to the enormity
of its strength, its riches and potentialities, Pondi asserted.
"There
is no tenable explanation why what is good for the others is
not so for Africa," he argued in reference to other emerging
blocs.
"Why
are people afraid of Africa's unity? Who stands to lose in this?"
the IRIC administrator queried early this week at a a round
table conference on the African union in Cameroon's coastal
city of Douala. Dr Pondi drew a parallel between the hostility
that the name of Colonel Kadhafi alone arouses, and the opposition
Dr Kwame Nkrumah earlier encountered in his efforts to unify
the continent.
Even
today, Pondi noted, "the promoters of the African Union
are as assailed as those who 37 years ago defended the Panafrican
plan."
He
wondered aloud the real motives of currents that hold the union
initiative to be Colonel Kadhafi's, not Africa's.
"How
can one find it normal that the European Union and other economic
blocs like South-East Asia be strengthening themselves and yet
turn around to talk advise caution when it comes to Africa?"
the Cameroonian scholar in international relations challenged.
"The
truth of the matter," he said, "is that detractors
of the Union are fully aware that Africa is steering in the
right direction, hence they (detractors) must do all they can
to cloud the issue and further delay things, if possible."
Pondi
said it was wrong to think that the OAU was found in 1963 to
unite Africa, affirming the venture has no more than the fruit
of failure. He posited that when real panafricanists signed
the charter of the OAU in Addis Ababa, what they had in mind
was the liberation of the continent from colonialism and apartheid
- so far the only elements of consensus.
The
practical consequence was that its texts were adopted rather
with a view to avoiding that the OAU becomes the hostage of
one of the ideologies in vogue at the time.
The
OAU Secretary General, for instance, wielded little power, a
muzzling that has for a long time restricted his leverage of
action and initiative.
At
the time, Pondi recalled, it was being said just like today,
that one needed be careful about Nkrumah: "He wants to
be the President of the whole of Africa ... the time is not
yet ripe for an African union ... we must wait until the year
2000, etc".
Pondi
spiritedly maintained that because it listened to other voices
rather than its own, Africa's failure can today be seen in all
spheres."
He
warned that the continent's "subjection to the whims of
the international system could only get worse if continued to
let others dictate what course to take in the global system."