Freedom 
                        and Relativity 
                     | 
                  
                   
                
                Posted: 
                  06 December 2001
                  By Tarty Teh 
                We 
                  Bush Grebos have a saying that whatever brings palm nuts to 
                  town is called a basket. But the container in which some praise 
                  was delivered to me would make even a Bush Grebo man stop and 
                  take notice. 
                In 
                  a two-part series of articles under the theme "Rethinking 
                  the Way We Africans Think," I drew fire from a South African 
                  writer named Mr. Mukazo Mukazo Vunda. Vunda simply titled his 
                  piece "I Defend Thabo Mbeki," as published in The 
                  Perspective online magazine, in response to my comments regarding 
                  the South African President's stand on the relationship (if 
                  any, in Mbeki's case) between the HIV virus and the disease 
                  AIDS. 
                However, 
                  whereas there had only been grudging concession here and there 
                  that I have ever made sense in my discussion of Liberian issues, 
                  I found boundless praise at home just when I decided to take 
                  my show on the road in search of "African intellectuals." 
                  
                The 
                  praise raises suspicion only by its unrestrained effusiveness: 
                  "I wholeheartedly concur with Tarty Teh's response to Mr. 
                  Mukazo Mukazo Vunda's retort," wrote Molley V. Paasewe, 
                  editor-in-chief of the nearly launched "Liberian Voice" 
                  newspaper. Mr. Paasewe was also public relations specialist 
                  for the government of President Charles Taylor until recently. 
                  Paasewe left the Executive Mansion post in protest. 
                No. 
                  The protest wasn't that Paasewe disagreed with any of the Taylor 
                  government's policies. Rather it was because the money that 
                  was budgeted for the Taylor government's PR efforts had been 
                  privatized (euphemism for "stolen," in deference to 
                  the Executive staff's sensibilities) by then Presidential Press 
                  Secretary Reginald Goodrige. This is, of course, according to 
                  Paasewe. 
                Anyway, 
                  let me not go into all of that, especially since I am the one 
                  being praised by Paasewe, no less. Well, Paasewe and I go a 
                  little ways. If I had guessed there would be a day like this, 
                  I would have kept a list of the names Paasewe called me, even 
                  when it appeared that I was in sympathy with him for the way 
                  he was ejected from Taylor's Executive Mansion. In one exchange 
                  Paasewe told me he knew of no wrongdoing by the Taylor government. 
                  For me this only explains why Paasewe would be chosen as the 
                  editor-in-chief for the next pro-Taylor newspaper. But I have 
                  no solid clue why I have begun to make sense - not gradually 
                  but - so suddenly. 
                Perhaps 
                  there isn't much that the theory of relativity cannot explain, 
                  at least partly. For an example, to press his case that freedom 
                  existed in the then Soviet Union, a Soviet journalist stood 
                  up to his American counterpart who had claimed that he could 
                  stand in front of the U.S. White House and say "To hell 
                  with President Richard Nixon" and not get arrested. The 
                  Soviet replied, "I too can stand in front of the Kremlin 
                  and say 'To hell with President Nixon' and not get arrested." 
                  
                So, 
                  relatively speaking, there is no risk in saying that South African 
                  President Thabo Mbeki belongs to the "Stone Age," 
                  as Paasewe has intimated. In fact, Paasewe can say this both 
                  in Pretoria and Monrovia. But if Paasewe should venture to ask 
                  for, say, the autopsy report for the death of President Charles 
                  Taylor's Vice President, Mr. Enoch Dogolea, he'd better be in 
                  Pretoria, because hiding even in his mother's womb in Liberia 
                  would not do him any good. Taylor has threatened, on many occasions, 
                  to invade the womb to get at his enemies. 
                Measured 
                  compliment is easy to take; but the one that comes as a torrent 
                  arouses suspicions. Even as the obvious beneficiary of Paasewe's 
                  adulation, I can see that (whether in praise and in rebuke) 
                  he knows only the extremes: "I was shocked when I heard 
                  Mr. Mbeki's stone-age commentary on HIV/AIDS. Such remarks, 
                  coming from just any African wouldn't have mattered much, but 
                  from the President of a renaissance nation like South Africa 
                  â ¦. it is uncalled for," wrote Paasewe. 
                  Perhaps this is because, in Paasewe's mind, Mbeki's stand on 
                  AIDS portends more danger for Liberia than for South Africa: 
                  "Mr. Mbeki's comments on AIDS only served to reinforce 
                  such belief among those Liberians who will bet you their last 
                  Unity dollar that the disease is not real." 
                And 
                  so, Paasewe's rave review of my performance on the road deserves 
                  my gratitude. But my ultimate aim is to get similar acceptance 
                  before the home audience. Yet, I am not so blind to the conditions 
                  under which Paasewe and other home-based writers operate. However, 
                  if I am expected to view their comments about me in the context 
                  of the difficult conditions under which they operate at home, 
                  then shouldn't they too be guarded in their rebuke of me even 
                  as the perceived enemy of their master Taylor when I turn to 
                  subjects closer to home? That, in my view, would be the political 
                  equivalent of the theory of relativity. 
                  
                Copyrighted 
                  (c) Tarty Teh 2001 
                  Washington, D.C., November 26, 2001