|
CHAPTER
THIRTEENCHAPTER FOURTEEN
INCOMPATABILITY, ATTRACTIVENESS AND SINGLE PARENTING
Here are ten more questions single adults commonly ask
about their sexuality and relationships with the opposite
sex.
What about sexual incompatibility?
"My first marriage was a nightmare
largely because of sexual incompatibility. When
my marriage fell apart, I vowed that I would
never get married again unless I found out first
if my future partner and I were sexually
compatible. Is it wrong of me to want to make
sure?"
This woman caller on a radio program is similar
to many singles. They want a guarantee that there
will be no sexual problems in their marriage. One
of the ways they seek the guarantee is to
discover whether or not they are sexually
compatible before marriage.
But the idea that a couple can discover sexual
compatibility before marriage is a myth. Sex is
not merely a mechanical process. Two people don't
just fit together like a nut and a bolt or a foot
in a shoe. That type of image depreciates what
sex is all about. Good sex doesn't occur just
because the parts fit easily. Sexual
compatibility is a pilgrimage, a process. A
couple has to journey down the road of
compatibility because they have to deal with the
baggage, and the expectations that each person
brings to the relationship.
A couple cannot deal with such adjustments in a
short period of time. It takes years to develop
sexual compatibility- and then only with hard
work and communication. The idea that someone can
"try out lovers in the same way as trying on
a shirt or a coat reveals a low view of
sexuality.
Physiologically, the notion that "only one
shoe will fit" is a myth. Remember the story
of Cinderella? The prince had a glass slipper
that only Cinderella's foot would fit. People are
not like that, especially in the area of sex. God
has created sex with incredible flexibility and
variety. Sex is possible between people of all
sizes, shapes, colors, and emotional makeup.
Before you kiss somebody, you don't worry if your
lips are going to fit. Lips are amazingly
flexible. Any two people who have the desire can
work it out so they can kiss. The same is true
for the rest of the body. God created our sexual
apparatus with such amazing flexibility that men
and women of any size and shape can find ways to
be compatible sexually. Sex is possible even
between people who are disabled.
Even if a man is impotent, he and his wife can be
involved and fulfilled sexually. There may be
certain acts that can't be performed, but the
body has such diversity that a couple could still
experience deep intimacy. A loving couple will
work out their own compatibility rather than try
to force their sexual relationship to fit some
cultural norm.
Furthermore, sex is only one area of
compatibility. In order to have a successful
marriage, couples have to work out their
relationship in several areas, such as
financially, emotionally, and spiritually. If a
man is a spender and the wife is a saver, the
couple would have to work out compatibility in
the financial area. But just because they are
different in their financial habits and views
does not mean they should not marry. It is as
couples work out these compatibility issues that
they cement their relationship and their intimacy
becomes deeper. The same is true in the emotional
area. If the woman is very emotional and the man
resembles a robot, there will be incompatibility
that will need to be worked out.
Sometimes it is these very differences that first
brought the couple together. Opposites do
attract. People are often attracted to each other
because they are incompatible in some areas. The
joy, the intensity, and the passion in their
relationship sometimes come in discovering how to
relate with another person and how to become
one--in spite of the differences. In this regard
relationships are like a puzzle. If the puzzle
pieces are all similar, the puzzle will not hold
together well. It is the distinctiveness in the
pieces that adds to the strength of the puzzle.
The idea that a couple can discern before
marriage whether they are compatible or not is a
myth. There will be many areas of difference that
they will discover after the marriage. The task
then becomes making those differences become
assets. With hard work and creativity, the couple
can make the puzzle pieces fit and in the process
strengthen the marriage even more.
Since the baby boomers in our culture are growing
older, lots of new information is now surfacing
about seniors and how active they are sexually.
Often the seniors claim that sex is better for
them than ever before. Why is that? Why are older
people (even though not able to perform as well
physically) more sexually fulfilled than younger
people? It is because compatibility is a process.
By loving and respecting each other over several
years, a couple can develop sexual intimacy and
depth that becomes so much more fulfilling than
what is experienced in youth. We are not talking
about a compatibility of body parts, but a
compatibility of spirit and soul. The physical
union is only a minor part of it.
What about couples that actually cannot have
intercourse?
A woman wrote to me about a couple she knew
who remained celibate before their wedding day.
After their marriage, they discovered they had a
physical problem; the man's penis was too large
for the woman. "Sex is extremely
uncomfortable and painful for them," the
woman wrote. "The relationship is in trouble
as a result. Doctors cannot help. Counseling was
holding the line at best. Both believe that had
they had premarital sex, this difficulty could
have been avoided--even if it meant ending the
relationship."
We sometimes think that the act of intercourse is
necessary for sexual fulfillment. Not true. There
are many ways a couple can bring pleasure to each
other and communicate a sense of worth and value
without intercourse.
Actually, every couple faces the possibility of
living without sexual intercourse. People get
sick, healthy bodies become disabled by
accidents, and impotence and vaginal disorders do
occur--all of which mean that intercourse
sometimes is not possible. But an inability to
perform intercourse does not mean that such a
couple would be unable to find sexual fulfillment
together. Adults that care for one another deeply
can be sexual people together and experience
profound intimacy without sexual intercourse.
Frankly, to question the wisdom of marriage
simply on the basis of not being able to have
intercourse suggests a shallow relationship. That
reveals that they view intimacy in a limited way,
that they have a superficial view of marriage,
and that they have a lot to learn about the whole
kaleidoscope of how God has created them.
Again, comparability is a process, not a starting
point. Every couple will have issues to work
through. If the couple doesn't have problems with
penis size, they may have problems with lack of
desire or too much desire, with fatigue or
disease, with impotence or premature ejaculation,
with honesty or deception, with fear or lack of
trust. There are a million obstacles that could
stand in the middle of any couple's road to
fulfillment. And unfortunately, we aren't allowed
to choose our obstacles in life. They just
appear, and we have to deal with them or exit the
road.
Obviously, true intimacy and closeness result
when a couple learn that together they can face
any obstacle--no matter how tough--and conquer it
together. I would encourage the couple with the
size problem to see it as a real opportunity for
growth and strength. If they can navigate that
problem, they will have the confidence to face
anything in life and win.
Is sexual sin more devastating than any
other? Is sexuality more important than other
areas of life?
There are two extreme positions that are often
taken regarding sexual sin. One of them is that
sexual sin is absolutely the worst thing that a
person can do and is unforgivable. I will never
forget how, in a church youth group I worked
with, one high school age teen struggled over
this issue. It finally came out that he thought
he had committed the unpardonable sin. He was too
embarrassed to talk about it in public but told
me later privately that the unpardonable sin he
had committed was oral sex. He was convinced that
what he had done was unforgivable. The Bible does
not say any one sexual act is unforgivable, but
instead talks about attitudes and motives.
The other extreme is to say that sexual sins are
not anything special and are weaknesses similar
to cheating, overeating, or losing one's temper.
Both extremes contain kernels of truth. Sexual
sin is harmful (1 Corinthians 6:18-19), but
sexual sin is also forgivable. The correct answer
lies somewhere in the middle of the two extremes.
During a seminar on single sexuality, a man in
the audience responded to a panelist who said
sexual sin is no different than losing one's
temper. He said: "I have both lost my temper
and committed sexual sin. And let me tell you
from personal experience--sexual sin has been a
lot more damaging to my emotions and
relationships than losing my temper. Expressing
ourselves sexually involves our whole being.
Because of this, to be used or misused in this
area has serious results. I don't agree that you
should mutually explore and decide what feels
good for you, and if it feels good it's OK. Two
people are involved in a sexual relationship, and
it's much more complicated."
Although all actions in life have natural
consequences, some have worse consequences than
others. If I cut my finger with the sharp edge of
a piece of paper, the consequences would be
minor. But if I cut my finger with a chain saw,
the consequences would be major. Sexual sins make
deep wounds and leave terrible scars on the body
and soul--wounds that are not easy to heal and
scars that are not simple to get rid of. A person
who has given up his or her purity finds it very
difficult to feel pure again. There is hope, but
the way back to value and purity in the sexual
arena is not cheap or easy. It will require an
extended period of celibacy.
Restoring value is similar to repaying a credit
card debt. If I run up a bill of $100 on my
credit card, it won't take long to pay off that
debt. But if I run up a bill of thousands of
dollars, it will take much longer to recover from
that debt. Sexual sins leave a person more
destitute than many other sins, so we need to
take them more seriously. However, we must never
forget that God's grace is sufficient for all.
For most people, the problem is not being
forgiven by God but learning to forgive self. I
believe the key to feeling forgiven is to
voluntarily undergo a period of sexual
abstinence.
What role does being overweight play in our
sexuality? What role does physical
attractiveness, intelligence, and so on, play in
our sexuality?
We all feel inadequate in some areas. Feeling
inadequate is another obstacle on the road to
relational intimacy. Inadequacies are a part of
the challenge in relating. Being able to help
another in spite of his or her inadequacies is a
way of asserting the depth of a person's value
and love.
Tennis partners, for example, both have strengths
and certain weaknesses they use to help each
other. One may be a better forehand player; the
other a better backhand player. One might be
stronger in serving; the other better at net
play. Will they be able, in spite of their mutual
inadequacies, to become championship players? Of
course. The challenge of teamwork is accentuating
the strengths and compensating for the
weaknesses. Teams become champions in spite of
their inadequacies and become better because
those very inadequacies force them to work harder
than those without weaknesses. Though less
talented, they can become a better team. That's
why the top singles tennis players often don't
play doubles well, and why the best doubles teams
are sometimes made up of mediocre singles
players.
The same is true in relationships. Rather than
thinking that our inadequacies disqualify us, we
should look at them as a tool to make our
relationships better and deeper.
That doesn't mean a person should not be
concerned about his or her weight or hygiene or
health, but it does mean that people can help
each other improve in these areas. Tennis
partners will help each other by practicing
together to overcome weaknesses. If you struggle
with being overweight, seek a friend to join you
in your journey to lose weight. This does not
mean using negative motivation such as berating,
demeaning, or criticizing. It means setting
goals, encouraging, and supporting one another. A
loving, caring atmosphere must prevail.
We also need to realize that being overweight can
be a way of insulating oneself from involvement
with other people. It's similar to a king in a
castle. One reason a king insists on huge stone
walls, a moat, guards, and a drawbridge is the
enemies who threaten his kingdom. If there were
peace in the land, there would be no need for the
walls or moat. Discord and strife naturally
result in walls being constructed.
It is the same emotionally. When people discover
that they have
put up big walls in their lives, they need to
find out why and seek to take them down, rather
than withdraw and isolate themselves from
relationships. Many times this type of discovery
will help in the struggle of being overweight.
When the walls start coming down, relationships
become a priority, acceptance is found, and the
weight problem takes care of itself.
What if my partner (though we are not
married) makes me feel like a "billion
dollars" sexually?
Ernest Hemingway was wrong when he said,
"What is moral is what you feel good after
and what is immoral is what you feel bad after.
Feelings are notoriously poor guides to truth and
value. An example of this is extreme forms of
sexuality, whose adherents claim moral
correctness based on feelings. Certain activities
"feel right" to the participants, even
though the Bible (and sometimes society) sees
them as immoral.
Gay rights groups have made a political movement
out of the "alternate lifestyle" of
homosexual intercourse. There is a smaller but
similar political movement in Britain called the
Pedophilia Society, which lobbies for the rights
of child molesters. A recent publication of a
Christian theological group even had a kind word
to say about bestiality.
Clearly, value cannot be based merely on
feelings. Yet people often feel of low value when
in reality God has created them with great value.
Conversely, a person can feel an exaggerated
sense of self-importance, which may affect
his/her behavior adversely.
Neither can we gauge relationships by feelings.
For instance, if a couple lives together and one
morning the man wakes up and says, "I feel
married," that doesn't mean he is married.
Or if a couple is married and one morning the
wife wakes up and says, "I don't feel
married anymore," that doesn't mean she is
suddenly single. Feelings alone are not enough to
convey the truth of a situation.
Once a young person discovers how to get a credit
card, he could start spending and feel very rich.
He would be enjoying all his toys and feel
valuable, but in reality the value is negative
because he has a huge debt. Sooner or later, the
bills will come and the bankruptcy will become
obvious; then reality hits. The same thing is
true morally. A person can be bankrupt morally
and not feel the results for a long time. A
couple can be involved sexually and feel good
about it for a while, but just because they feel
good does not mean they are building a foundation
for value that will last.
I always thought the Bible said that only
sexual intercourse outside of marriage was wrong.
That meant to me that "anything goes"
except penetration. Now I'm confused. What's the
Bible actually say?
The Bible nowhere actually says, "Thou
shalt not have sexual intercourse before
marriage." Instead, it tells us, "Flee
sexual immorality" (1 Corinthians 6:18),
and, "Neither let us commit fornication' (1
Corinthians 10:8, Kjv). In both cases, the
original word for immorality and fornication is
the Greek word porneia, which has been translated
in many other ways: whoredom, concubinage,
adultery, incest, lewdness, uncleanness, and even
symbolically as idolatry. Obviously, the word
covers a wide range of actions and situations,
usually including sexual intercourse outside of
marriage, but is not limited to that. It is
interesting to note that the word porneia was a
derivative of the classical Greek word pernemi
and its root, porn, which meant to sell
(especially slaves) and thus came to refer to a
harlot who was for hire. Historically, some of
the first prostitutes were in fact slaves.
Prostitution grew with the increase in commerce
and prosperity, since both male and female slaves
were at the mercy of their masters' lusts.
Porneia, then, has its roots in the idea of sex
for sale, from which we get our word pornography.
I would suggest that fornication, then, could be
extended to include whenever one uses his or her
sexuality to gain a profit or manipulate an
outcome. If a woman uses her sexuality to control
a man, I would call that a form of porneia. If a
man withholds his sexuality to punish a woman,
that too I would call porneia.
But even in its limited denotation, fornication
has to mean more than just sexual intercourse. To
pretend that anything up to penetration is
acceptable for unmarried couples is to draw an
arbitrary line. Clearly premarital sexual
intercourse is prohibited in the Bible, but much
more is meant to be included in that prohibition
of fornication. The variety of ways in which the
word porneia is used in the Scriptures requires a
broader definition of fornication.
What about the tendency of our culture to
desensitize us to moral values? If some people
can live immorally and not feel guilty, will the
value or worth really depreciate for them?
It is easy to deceive ourselves. Some people
live their entire lives on credit. They never
learn the lesson that they can't keep borrowing
forever. I know of one couple who continued to
rent homes far beyond thew means. The family
would move or be evicted frequently which would
embarrass the children terribly--fhe parents
acted wealthy but in reality they weren't. As a
result, the children suffered and lived in daily
fear that their secret poverty would be
discovered. It is not a good way to live.
In a similar way, there are couples who are
extending themselves sexually until they are way
over their heads morally. Sooner or later, they
will have to pay the price. The emotional bill
for multiple abortions will come due. The social
bills for having sex with many partners will come
due. One partner may never be able to be
satisfied sexually in a monogamous relationship
because of former sexual conduct. The spiritual
bills for denying God's wisdom and direction will
come due. Sometimes the bills for sexual conduct
come due when a person gets married and has
children. Whatever the case and whenever it
happens, if you spend on credit, sooner or later
the bill will come due.
But the issue is deeper than just pragmatics.
There is also an important ethical issue at stake
here. It is the need for an objective standard
for morality. Right and wrong cannot be decided
by what feels right. Just because an action feels
good, it does not follow that it therefore is the
right thing to do. It may feel good to overeat,
to get drunk, or to do drugs, but in each case
harm can result. In spite of the words in some
current songs or what "free thinkers"
may say, feeling good or feeling like a billion
dollars does not make an action right morally.
Adolf Hitler no doubt felt good about his early
successes in World War II. In fact, he said,
"Success is the sole earthly judge of right
and wrong." Hopefully, even today's free
thinkers would disagree with Hitler on this
point, and in doing so, would agree with the
poverty of the "it feels good"
approach.
What about singles who won't ever marry?
The idea of celibacy helping a person retain a
sense of self-worth may be seen by some as just
another way of saying, "Save yourself until
marriage." But what about the person who
will never marry?
The main issue I have been emphasizing is not
"saving yourself until marriage."
Instead, temporary celibacy for single adults is
a positive way to assert, build, and protect
their self-worth. Whether such a valuable single
decides to marry or not, he or she will possess a
deep sense of self-worth and physical value.
Regardless of whether a person marries or not,
living a life of sexual purity to protect and
assert one's self-worth will enable that single
person to feel a deep sense of personal value,
which is essential to one's well being and
fulfillment. The issue is to save yourself so you
will be convinced and assured of your own value,
regardless of whether or not you marry."
Do you think youth are as sexually active
today as they have been in the past, and is this
why in biblical times marriage occurred when they
were so young?
Morality in ancient times is an issue of
debate. Some sociologists and archeologists
believe that prehistoric tribes were very
sexually active and very clannish or communal.
Others disagree vehemently and say they were
monogamists and exclusive in their sexuality. You
can pretty much pick whatever view you want to
believe.
I believe that the further you go back in
civilization and relationships, the more complex
the relationships were. It has been shown through
a study of African tribes that their clanish
rules and rituals were complex--much more
involved than they are now. Personally, I think
that in prehistoric times, or in ancient biblical
times, people were not as sexually active as they
are today.
However, divorce was more common in biblical
times than it is now. Pliny the Younger wrote a
letter in which he mentioned a man who was going
through his twenty-fourth divorce. You have to
remember, though, that they also had multiple
wives.
I'm a single parent. I have struggled with
how to teach my kids about sex, but I also feel
like a hypocrite because I haven't been perfect
in that area myself. How can I help them?
I think a letter I received from a single
woman we will call Jenny best answers this
question. Jenny's parents warned her to date
little, monitored her social life closely, and
would not talk about sex or her fears. As an
adult, Jenny felt embarrassed and unqualified to
teach her children. Jenny's words show there is
hope.
I have felt at a loss to teach my children
"why" and have to admit that I also
have this "fear" that my parents
modeled. I have felt inadequate to discuss
sexuality with them and always wonder if I'm
doing or saying the right thing.
When I came home from the seminar, I actually
cried for hours--thinking back to my teenage
years. I was grieving the loss of not being told
how valuable I was and not being treated with
love and respect. I was grieving the fact that
things weren't explained and I wasn't trusted. I
was grieving because I wanted different
parents... parents who expressed their love for
me in spiritual ways and taught me about God and
His love for me. The taffeta dresses and patent
leather shoes were nice, but they were not
lasting....
I asked God to help me change that pattern--to
give me a deeper understanding--and to give my
daughter that feeling of value and the strength
to say, "No, I choose to wait until after
marriage. I choose God's way because I know it is
best for me and whether I marry or not, I will
still have my own sense of self-worth."
This woman took the correct first step toward
teaching her child about sex and value--she faced
squarely her past and began to work though her
own issues. Then, once she had a new base of
personal value and a sense of sexual worth, she
was able to begin teaching her daughter the same
things. Of course, that is just the start. She
then will need to follow through those lessons
with congruent actions and a pure lifestyle. She
will have to live out what she says. And her
daughter will be watching every move, listening
to every word, sensing every attitude--wondering
all the time if this approach to sex and value
really works. Is her mother really happier this
way? Or does she get angry, depressed, and moody
more often?
If their sexuality is approached with honesty and
confidentiality, she and her daughter can learn
the lessons together. What a great opportunity!
Their learning process can become a great journey
for a mother and daughter to make together. They
can benefit from one another's experiences, can
talk through their failures and frustrations, and
make and keep commitments to one another. A
college student told me that she was happy that
during her teenage years her mother was single
rather than married. Since this was not the usual
perspective, I asked her why she had felt that
way. Her response was heartwarming.
"It's not a problem for me now, but when I
first started being attracted to boys and then
started dating, I was really confused. Some
people were telling me that sex was no big deal,
and others were saying that I shouldn't do it.
All my friends' parents said it was wrong, but we
knew it was easy for them to say that--they were
married. But when my mom told me that she had
sexual desires too, but still said no to sex, it
really made me pay more attention to her
suggestions.
"She was going through the very same things
I was. When she came home from a date, I asked
her about it. I even asked her if they kissed or
whatever. She gave me honest answers. Then we
talked about why it was better to not get too
physical before marriage. When I came home from a
date, she asked me too."
Then this woman added, "My mom is my best
friend. We can talk about anything. I did miss my
dad, but having a single mom really helped
me."
Since single parents and single teens both have
to deal with loneliness, finances, sexuality,
dating, love, romance, betrayal, and many other
issues especially relevant to singles, they share
a common bond that married parents and teens just
don't have. Of course, not every single parent
and child may end up best friends, but they can
use their unique relationship as a bridge for
close communication. If single parents deal with
their own sexuality in a positive way, they can
powerfully influence their children to a healthy
and whole sexuality.
CHAPTER FIFTEEN
THANKS FOR
VISITING! GOD BLESS YOU!

[ Index | Internet | Salvation | Computer | Botany | Study | Personal ]
|