An Open Challenge to Sankara Mutts (cont'd)

108 Questions
To
Sankara Mutt

You who came from outside without any religion, brought the Indian Dravidian religions under your control and domination, and by utilizing the Indian religious beliefs you have been annihilating, enslaving, degrading and plundering the Indian people. You used the Sudras who were enslaved by you, against the Panchamas who opposed your domination, for your purposes. Could you deny this historical fact?
To enslave the Indian Dravidians through the ages on the basis of their religious beliefs and to maintain your supremacy, the deceptive and satanic doctrine was devised by your ancestors, the Aryan Purohits, and this doctrine is known under various names, Varnashrama Dharma, Manu Dharma, Sanadhana Dharma, Advaita concept, or Hindu Dharma. Can you deny this?
This satanic doctrine mentioned above which was devised by your white Aryan Purohit caste, has no connection or relationship with the basic concepts of the Dravidian Indian religions, such as 'One God one race', 'Every country is my country and all are my relatives', etc. Can you deny this?
Since the satanic doctrine of your Aryan Purohit caste mentioned above in it's various names has nothing to do with the basic concepts of the Indian religions, the Supreme Court of India has firmly decreed that Hinduism is not a religion but a way of life, and by saying this, it has been proved that you have been deceiving and plundering the Indian people through the ages. Can you deny this?
Can't we expect that you should have known completely the full history of Siva worship since you claim that you are the leaders of Hinduism and smear on your forehead, the 'holy ash', which is a symbol of Saivism?
Should not the development of Siva worship be authenticated with substantial historical evidences transcending the stories, Puranas and Ithihasas, so as to be accepted by the research scholars? Sivalinga which is established as the Dravidian worship on the basis of historical evidences, is found in the Indus Valley excavations. This could be treated as the first stage of Siva worship.
We witness the emergence of the 'Six-fold religions', a long interval after the Indus Valley civilization. These Six-fold religions based on Siva worship are linked through the names of the family relationship of Siva. Siva has two sons through Sakthi and two sons through Vishnu and totally seven members are mentioned in the family of Siva. They are Siva, Sakthi, Kumarakkadavul, Pillaiyar, Vishnu, Brahma and Aiyappa. Amongst the seven, Brahma was cast away as a cheat and a liar, and you must be aware that hence according to tradition there should not be any temple or worship or religion in the name of Brahma, the one who is spoken highly of by you the Brahmins. Discarding Brahma, there are six religions in the names of the rest. As you are aware of the fact that it was Adi Sankara, the First head of your Mutt, who in the 8th C.A.D, amalgamated the Six-fold religions, Saivism, Vaishnavism, Saktham, Gaumaram, Ganapathyam and Sauram which are the offshoots of Siva worship, with the motive of paving the way for the supremacy of the Aryan Purohits.
The Six-fold religions to this day are in the control of the Aryan Purohit Brahmins who came in from the outside into India without any religion.
The historical growth of Siva worship that took place during the period between Siva worship of the Indus Valley civilization and the rise of the Six-fold religions of the family of Siva in India may be termed as the second stage.
The period starting from the origin of the above mentioned Six-fold religions to the present day may be termed as the third stage.
For the first stage of development we have the Indus valley civilization, and for the third stage of development we have Six-fold religions of the family of Siva as evidences. However, the four Vedas, Rig, Yajur, Sama and Atharva are said to be the basis for the development of the second stage of Siva worship which falls between the first stage, Indus Valley Siva worship and the third stage, Six-fold religions which form the relationship of Siva family. Do you accept this? Do the four Vedas say anything about the development of the Sivalinga worship which falls in between the period of the Indus Valley civilization and the period in which the Six-fold religions based on the family relationship of Siva were developed?
Do you find any reference concerning the family relationship of Siva in the four Vedas starting with Rig? Could you refute that there is no reference to show the family relationship of Siva in the four Vedas?
Do you find the Sivalinga, the Sacrificial Altar and the Bull, which together form the basis of Siva family's Six-fold religions, in the four Vedas? Can you refute it if we say 'no'?
In addition to the Sivalinga, the Sacrificial Altar and the Bull which are the developmental aspects of Indus Valley Sivalinga worship, God has given His son to be born into this world and the birth of Kumarakkadavul (Son of God) has given rise to the concept of Siva family, which in turn has given rise to the Six-fold religions. Do the four Vedas, which you hold in high esteem, speak about the above concepts? These concepts do not find a place there and the Vedas have no relationship with these concepts. Can you refute this?
When you claim that the four Vedas belong to you, why then you smear the sacred ash, a sacred symbol of Siva on your forehead and follow the worship which is very much associated with the Sivalinga, the Sacrificial Altar and the Bull which are not found in the Vedas? Can you explain this historically?
Though you claim that Vedas are yours, you do not eat the meat offered in the Yajna fire and do not drink the Soma drink and the Sura drink. Can you give reasons as to why you are leading a life quite contrary to the Vedic principles?
From which period did your ancestors, the Aryan Purohits, start living a life which is totally contrary to your Vedic principles? Can you explain historically?
In the temples of the Siva family, which are under your treacherous control, there are sacrificial altars, but there is no offer of sacrifice. Do you know why sacrifice is not offered on the altars, and when were they stopped and the reasons behind this? Can you explain the reason by substantiating it with historical evidences?
Do you know that Siva worship belongs to Dravidians and it is as essential as their life and do you know that the Dravidians carried this worship in the world along with them wherever they went?
Do you know that there is a Veda which tells us the history of the worship of the Sivalinga, the Sacrificial Altar and the Bull incorporated together, and sacrifices offered on the altar in worshipping the Supreme God Siva?
Do you know that there is a Veda which explains historically that the supreme God Siva, the basis for the development of the Six-fold religions and the beginning of the Siva family, has made his Son to be born into this world?
The Veda with the Sivalinga, the Sacrificial Altar and the Bull, and also with sacrifices being offered on the Altar, had the written form and the name 'Veda' long before the period of Christ. The Veda claimed as your belongings, compiled by a Dravidian Veda Vyasa, doesn't have the Sivalinga, the Sacrificial Altar and the Bull. But it had the written form and the name 'Veda' only after the 1st C. A.D., and before that there was no Veda which could be claimed as your belongings. Could you deny this?
The Vedanta talks about the worship of the Son of Siva which is developed from the worship of the Sivalinga, the Sacrificial Altar and the Bull, and it has the doctrine of fulfillment of sacrifice which is developed from the doctrine of sacrifice. The Six-fold religions of the Siva family, such as the Saivism and others are the Vedantic religions have the doctrine of fulfillment of sacrifice. Can you deny these?
The Vedas, claimed as your belongings, have the doctrine of sacrifice. The Jainism and the Buddhism deny the doctrine of sacrifice. Vedanta has the doctrine of fulfillment of sacrifice. Can you explain the historical reasons for the development of these three different doctrines?
In the Vedas, which you claim as yours, can you refute the fact that there is no temple worship?
Could you refute the fact that the temple worship belongs to the Vedanta, which is the development of Dravidian worship?
Could you deny the fact that the Dravidian Veda Vyasa compiled the nomadic songs of worship and classified them as the Vedas in order to explain the Vedantic concept, which has the temple worship and the doctrine of fulfillment of sacrifice.
Could you refute this statement that the Dravidian Veda Vyasa compiled the four Vedas starting with the Rig, and the Upanishads, and wrote the Puranas, which have the trinity concept, which is not seen in the four Vedas starting with the Rig, in order to spread the Vedantic concept, which is totally contrary to the four Vedas.
Is it possible for you to deny that the Dravidian Vedantic concept has nothing to do with the Aryan worship? Also, Adi Sankara wrote distorted commentaries for the Brahma Sutra, the Upanishads and the Bhagavad-Gita, which are the Dravidian Vedantic literature, in order to corrupt the Dravidian Vedantic concept and elevate the Vedas.
Can you deny the fact that Adi Sankara has written distorted interpretations with a deceptive motive, so that the Aryan Purohits can deceive and plunder the Dravidians? Can you refute that the Advaita concept was devised with a wrong intention to elevate the Aryan Purohits, and though the Visishtadvaita, the Dvaita and the Saiva Sittanta established that the Advaita concept was wrong, the Aryan Purohits still have the objective to plunder the Dravidians without any regard for the truth, and they exalt Adi Sankara and the Advaita concept?
There are ample historical evidences to prove that the Aryan Purohits are the experts in conspiracy and deceit. The books written and the philosophies developed by Dravidians are for the welfare of the whole world. Similarly, can you point out any book written or philosophy developed by any Aryan Purohit for the welfare of the whole world? You cannot show any book or philosophy. Can you deny this?

Dr. M. Deivanayagam
Dr. D. Devakala

The Revival Movement of Dravidian Religion

dravida@eth.net