Arte
Povera: Art from Italy 1967-2002 Museum
of Contemporary Art, 23 August -10 November.
After the lightweight, possibly amusing but ultimately forgettable
trivia of the Sydney Biennale at the Museum of Contemporary Art,
a breath of fresh air swept through that institution in the form
of the historically significant Arte Povera: Art from Italy
1967-2002. Judith Blackall from the MCA, the curator of the
exhibition, has worked at the Prato Museum of Contemporary Art,
Tuscany, Italy which has given her firsthand insight into the
ongoing movement, its art and theory. Through personal contact
and direct knowledge of all the artists and their champion Germano
Celant, Blackall brings a depth of considerable understanding
to this exhibition. The exhibition is everything the lamentable
Biennale wasn't.
Celant's book, Arte Povera of 1969, was one of the first
English publications on the fledgling movement. At that stage
he cast an international net to include Minimalists such as Carl
Andre, Joseph Beuys's performance/installations, Eva Hesse, whose
major and significant piece in the ANG is rarely seen, Robert
Smithson and a bevy of similar 'earth' artists and conceptualists
such as Joseph Kosuth.
Since 1969, with the making of many reputations through the defining
of new stylistic boundaries, Celant has weeded out all but the
Italian exponents. The English translation of Arte Povera, 'poor
art', does not adequately define this movement of still-productive
artists thirty-odd years on. It is their use of humble materials
that unites them. It seems that the conceptualisation of the work,
a paring down to a choice of just two or three contrasting materials,
the site specific installation of the work, be it in an architectural
context or a natural environment, and its subsequent documentation
were new strategies and practices for artists to be undertaking
in the early 1960s. No suggestion of painting in its purest form
is to be seen anywhere within their works.
One may see this paring down as a minimalist concern and indeed
it was but the sensibilities of the Italians' practices were far
removed from the Americans who were to claim that movement as
their own. The Italians' humanism is what is different. Their
choice of materials and their purposeful contrasting of surfaces
and textures are loaded with meaning and suggestion whereas the
Americans such as Donald Judd stood for purely reductive and geometric
exploration. In this exhibition you could smell the huge lump
of timber of Penonne's Albero di 11 metri (11 metre tree,
1969 - 1989) that was carved back to expose the core of the towering
tree within, and also the caged laurel leaves in his more recent
installation. Marisa Merz's bubbling water emanating from its
wax violin was its 'music' and even the rich hues in Kounellis'
steel and cloth ensemble smells of remnants of fire and dying
heat. This is possibly where the late twentieth century passion
for alchemy and mystery started.
Then
there is the question of elegance. The Italians dominated the
20th century in terms of style and design. In a fine art context
this exhibition is so fresh, clean, crafted, elegant and sophisticated
without being overly design conscious or sentimental. The contradiction
now is that at the time this loose movement was about anti-consumerism
and 1960's Utopianism. This can be readily appreciated in the
'mirror' works of Michelangelo Pistoletto. His partially framed
and overlapping sections of mirrors casually resting against the
wall are realised by walking through, past, and in front of the
works. There is an ordinary but beautiful, ephemeral nature to
the mirror works whose geometric placement is a reminder of what
Frank Stella was to produce as conventional paintings in his later
Protractor series. There is nothing too conventional about
the beauty and lingering subtleties to be found in all of the
works in this exhibition. Except for a touch of a machine aesthetic
in the work of Gilberto Zorio, with his stars made of javelins
and electric fibre light, nothing is without connections to a
universal inner consciousness or the history of Italy itself.
The developing theories and experiences of Post Modernism as applied
to the visual arts had its earnest beginnings in these seminal
works. One cannot conceive that a younger generation of artists
could be tolerated and/or lauded without the ground-breaking work
of the Arte Povera artists of Italy.
-Graham
Blondel
back
to top