Getting to Know The Numbers |
The ratios shown in Management Effectiveness Comparison Report
are widely regarded as the ultimate measure of corporate
performance. By combining the concepts of margin and turnover, they
let you make direct comparisons between vastly different businesses.
For example, you cannot properly compare a grocery chain to a
furniture manufacturer in terms of margin or turnover. But you can
make such a comparison based on the ratios presented here.
Management Effectiveness (%)
Company
Industry
Sector
S&P
500
Return On Assets
(TTM)
8.30*
7.03
5.18
8.45
Return On Assets - 5 Yr.
Avg.
9.47
8.76
5.08
8.29
Return On Investment
(TTM)
9.45*
8.09
7.50
13.51
Return On Investment - 5
Yr. Avg.
10.91
10.23
8.03
13.07
Return On Equity
(TTM)
17.34*
16.44
15.13
23.05
Return On Equity - 5 Yr.
Avg.
19.52
17.20
15.28
21.49
Return on Assets is calculated by dividing Net Profits by Assets. Along similar lines, you can divide Net Profits by Investment (defined as long-term debt, other long-term liabilities, plus equity) or Equity to compute Return on Investment or Return on Equity, respectively.
To truly see how this data works, it's best to think about what it shows, rather than the formula for calculation. All of these ratios, in one way or another, seek to measure how much profit management has been able to earn from the capital it is using. The most basic benchmark against which you can evaluate a return on capital is the U.S. Treasury bond rate, which tells us how much can be earned if all capital were to be invested in these securities. It's regarded as a risk-free investment since there's no uncertainty at all as to the dollar amount of income that will be received as well as the timing of all receipts (interest income and repayment of principal). If a business is consistently unable to earn as much from its capital as could be obtained from a risk free U.S. government bonds, shareholders would be well within their rights to believe they'd do better if they liquidated the firm, divided up the proceeds, and invested in treasuries. Any excess return earned by running a business, instead of owning Treasuries, is known as a "risk premium."
When evaluating risk premiums, it's best to avoid doing so in a rigid manner. Unlike a treasury portfolio, the world of business is subject to ups and downs. Anyone who invests in stocks must understand and be prepared to accept this. Hence at times, corporate returns will trail risk-free rates. Shareholder are compensated for accepting periodic bad years by the fact that they can earn much higher returns if they stay in stocks for the long term. And indeed, this expectation has been satisfied in this generation. Long-term corporate returns have been superior to those that could be earned from risk-free instruments (meaning that the good years do, in fact, offset periodic bad intervals). Because returns fluctuate, use the Trailing Twelve Month data you see here to give you a sense of whether the present is a strong or sluggish period for the company, its industry, its sector and the S&P 500. But to assess how effectively management utilizes the capital available to it, use the 5-Year Average Returns.
You'll notice that Market Guide presents three different ratios in this section. All three ratios use Net Profit as the measure of "return." The differences are in how we measure the amount of capital employed in the business.
These examples demonstrate that Retrun on Equity (owner's capital) reflects a combination of business performance and skillful financial management. In all three examples, business performance alone gave us returns on capital equal to 10%. But we saw that the Return on Equity was increased to 15% through effective use of long-term liabilities. Skillful use of short-term capital generated a still-higher 17% return.
^ back to top ^