____________________________________________________________
Switched beam systems
.....................................................................................................
Working...

   This is the simplest technique, and comprises only a basic switching function between separate directive antennas or predefined beams of an array. The setting that gives the best performance, usually in terms of received power, is chosen. Because of the higher directivity compared to a conventional antenna, some gain is achieved [1].

Pros & cons....

a.This kind of antenna will be easier to implement in existing cell structures than the    more sophisticated adaptive arrays, which also means low cost.
b.The signal strength can degrade rapidly during the beam switching. In addition, if the    interferer is at the center of the selected beam and the user is away from the center,    the interfering signal can be enhanced far more than the desired signal.


Dynamically phased arrays
.................................................................................
Working...

   By including a direction of arrival (DOA) algorithm for the signal received from the user, continuous tracking can be achieved and it can be viewed as a generalization of the switched beam concept.


Pros & cons...

a. In this case, the received power is maximized.
b. It does not null the interference.


Adaptive arrays

.................................................................................
Working...

   The adaptive approach utilizes sophisticated signal processing algorithms to continuously distinguish between desired signals, multipath and interfering signals as well as calculate their directions of arrival. The adaptive approach continuously updates its beam pattern based on changes in both the desired and interfering signal locations. The ability to smoothly track users with main lobes and interferers with nulls insures that the link budget is constantly maximized - maximum signal to interference ratio (SIR) is achieved [2].

Pros & cons...

a. Best performance in the three types of smart antennas mentioned above.
b. Transceiver complexity, resource management, physical size, etc



__________________________________________________________________________
Copyright © 2001, Michigan Technological University
1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton MI 49931-1295.Web Master