LETTERS Of NOTE
Or
INTEREST.

The Disconnection Doctrine:

Special Thanks to:
Bob "Da Sloth" Bingham [http://www.sky.net/~sloth] for supplying
this excellent piece originally put forth by Dennis Erlich.

Bob:
This article was originally posted in two parts. I've HTML'ized it and combined the two parts. According to the article this is just a small part of a much larger work, thus coming under the heading of Fair Use.

Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: SUPPRESSIVE ACTS
From: dennis.l.erlich@support.com
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 94 18:15:18 -0700

8/28/94

In HIS words:

---------------------------------------------------------------

I am excerpting this from a larger work known as the policy of the Church of Scientology for the purpose of public examination and comment. My initial brief comment follows. [DE]

----------------------------------------------------------------

               HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
          Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

           HCO POLICY LETTER OF 23 DECEMBER 1965
        (Replaces HCO Policy Letter of 7 March 1965,
          Issue 1. This was originally misdated as
                       1 March 1965)
Post Public
Bulletin Board        (HCO Division 1)

                           ETHICS

                      SUPPRESSIVE ACTS

      SUPPRESSION OF SCIENTOLOGY AND SCIENTOLOGISTS

                    THE FAIR GAME LAW

The chief stumbling block, huge above all others. is the upset we have with POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCES and their relationslhip to Suppressive Persons or Groups.

A POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE is defined as a person who while active in Scientology or a pc vet remains connected to a person or group that is a Suppressive Person or Group.

A SUPPRESSIVE PERSON or GROUP is one that actively seeks to suppress or damage Scientolgy or a Scientologist by Suppressive Acts.

SUPPRESSIVE ACTS are acts calculated to impede or destroy Scientology or a Scientologist and which are listed at length in this policy letter.

A Scientologist caught in the situation of being in Scientology while still connected with a Suppressive Person or Group is given a Present Time Problem of sufficient magnitude to prevent case gain, as only a PTP can halt progress of a case. Only ARC Breaks worsen it. To the PTP is added ARC Breaks with the Suppressive Person or Group. The result is no-gain or deterioration of a case by reason of the suppressive connection in the environment. Any Scientologist, in his own experience, can probably recall some such cases and their subsequent upset.

Until the environment is handled, nothing beneficial can happen. ......the contrary. In the most flagrant of such cases the Scientologist's case worsen and the Suppressive Person or Group sent endless reports to press, police, authorities the public in general.

Unless the Potential Trouble Source, the preclear caught up in this, can be made to take action of an environmental nature to end the situation one has a PC or Scientologist who may cave in or squirrel because of no case gain and also a hostile environment for Scientology.

This policy letter gives the means and provides the policy for getting the above situation handled.

A Potential Trouble Source may receive no processing until the situation is handled.

A Suppressive Person or Group becomes "Fair Game".

By FAIR GAME is meant: may not be further protected by the codes and disciplines of Scientology or the rights of a Scientologist.

The families and adherents Of Suppressive Persons or GROUPS may not receive processing. It does not matter whether they are or are nor Scientologists. If the families or adherents of Suppressive Persons or Groups are processed, any auditor doing so is guilty of a misdemeanor. (See HCO Policy Letter of 7 March 1965, Issue 11.)

A Potential Trouble Source knowingly permitting himself or herself or the Suppressive Person to be processed without advising the auditor or Scientology authorities is guilty of a crime. (See HCO Policy Letter of 7 March 1965, Issue 11.)

SUPPRESSIVE ACTS

Suppressive Acts are defined as actions or omissions undertaken to knowingly suppress, reduce or impede Scientology or Scientologists.

Such Suppressive Acts include public disavowal of Scientology or Scientologists in good standing with Scientology Organizations; public statements against Scientology or Scientologists but not to Committees of Evidence duly convened; proposing, advising or voting for legislation or ordinances, rules or laws directed toward the Suppression of Scientology; pronouncing Scientologists guilty of the practice of standard Scientology; testifying hostilely before state or public inquiries into Scientology to suppress it; reporting or threatening to report Scientology or Scientologists to civil authorities in an effort to suppress Scientology or Scientologists from practising or receiving standard Scientology; bringing civil suit against any Scientology organization or Scientologist including the non-payment of bills or failure to refund without first calling the matter to the attention of the Chairman at Saint Hill and receiving a reply; demanding the return of any or all fees paid for standard training or processing actually received or received in part and still available but undelivered only because of departure of the person demanding (the fees must be refunded but this Policy Letter applies); writing anti-Scientology letters to the press or giving anti- Scientology or anti-Scientologist evidence to the press; testifying as a hostile witness against Scientology in public; continued membership in a divergent group; continued adherence to a person or group pronounced a Suppressive Person or Group by HCO; failure to handle or disavow and disconnect from a person demonstrably guilty of Suppressive Acts; being at the hire of anti-Scientology groups or persons; organizing a splinter group to use Scientology data or any part of it to distract people from standard Scientology; organizing splinter groups to diverge from Scientology practices, still calling it Scientology or calling it something else; calling meetings of staffs or field auditors or the public to deliver Scientology into the hands of unauthorized persons or [persons] who will suppress it or alter it or who have no reputation for following standard lines and procedures; infiltrating a Scientology group or organization or staff to stir up discontent or protest at the instigation of hostile forces; 1st degree murder, arson, disintegration of persons or belongings; mutiny; seeking to splinter off an area of Scientology and deny it properly constituted authority for personal profit, personal power or "to save the organization from the higher officers of Scientology"; engaging in malicious rumourmongering to destroy the authority or repute of higher officers or the leading names of Scientology or to "safeguard" a position; delivering up the person of a Scientologist without defense or protest to the demands of civil or criminal law; falsifying records that then imperil the liberty or safety of a Scientologist; knowingly giving false testimony to imperil a Scientologist; receiving money, favours or encouragement to suppress Scientology or Scientologists; sexual or sexually perverted conduct contrary to the well being or good state of mind of a Scientologist in good standing or under the charge of Scientology such as a student, a preclear, a ward or a patient; blackmail of Scientologists or Scientology organizations threatened or accomplished-in which case the crime being used for blackmail purposes becomes fully outside the reach of Ethics and is absolved by the fact of blackmail unless repeated.

Suppressive Acts are clearly those covert or overt acts knowingly calculated to reduce or destroy the influence or activities of Scientology or prevent case gains or continued Scientology success and activity on the part of a Scientologist. As persons or groups that would do such a thing act out of self interest only to the detriment of all others, they cannot be granted the rights and beingness ordinarily accorded rational beings and so place themselves beyond any consideration for their feelings or well being.

[futher, similar text deleted]

---------------------------------------------------------

Dennis Erlich:
Well gang, I guess the last sentence says it all. We don't deserve the rights of rational beings.

Now it's clear why they treat wogs the way they do.

There's no shortage of offenses one can commit against scienos. The list of "regular" crimes is longer.

Rev. Dennis L Erlich