|
|
|
|
Wed, 21 Dec 2005 Carole Noreiko for Hull FoE
Tue, 20 Dec 2005 Barry
Sun, 18 Dec 2005
Sue Jolliffe
Thu, 8 Dec 2005 Meanwhile, Stephen is organising a public meeting with help from other members of the group. This involves a fair bit of work. We need to know if other FOE members are prepared to support this campaign.
Please could those of you who are interested let me know so that we can gauge the level of support & decide whether or not to proceed.
Sue Jolliffe
Wed, 7 Dec 2005 If Hull CC gets all the biodegradable material out of the waste stream - ie paper for recycling, kitchen waste to compost or anaerobic digestion, garden waste to compost - the stuff that would be left for burning would be mainly things like plastics, nappies, batteries, light bulbs and any other nasty stuff that people put in their bin - ie not very mush that would be seen as a renewable energy source.
Btw - Humberside radio have asked me to be on a programme tomorrow all about waste. Are there specfic things that you as the FOE group there would like me to mention. Can you aslo let me know a bit more about the site on Heddon Road - I knwo it is fairly industrial but are there communities near there too.
Anna Watson
Tue, 6 Dec 2005
Message about anti-incinerator campaign, from Holderness MP.
Graham Stuart MP
Sat, 3 Dec 2005 We are looking to fill two vacancies on the Advisory Group, and we are trying to ensure that we have a mix of local campaigners from around the country who are able to think widely and strategically about a range of waste and resource use issues. Nominations can come from any registered campaigner, but we would especially welcome nominations from:
If you would like to nominate yourself for the group, please fill in the attached form and return it to me by 6th January 2006. If you would like to know more, do contact Michael Warhurst at Michael@foe.co.uk, or by phone on 020 7566 1685.
The team would also like to take this opportunity to thank all the current advisory group members for their work, in particular Nigel Lee, who is stepping down after 3 years on the advisory group.
Becky Slater
Friends of the Earth
Sat, 3 Dec 2005
Sat, 3 Dec 2005 There was a letter received from Preston Against Hutton Enlargement who were demonstrating at the same time. They support the campaign, but underlined that we should be against incineration anywhere. There was some nimbyism, but general approval of opposing incineration wherever. Is the campaign Holderness Opposing The Incinerator, or Hedon, Hull, Haltemprice...? Approval was expressed for inclusiveness ("Humans opposed to incineration" got a round of applause). Graham Stuart is leading the campaign, offered to channel letters to planning committees, promised a web site by middle of next week. Carole and I were photographed with him (see the site when it goes live!), saying Hull FoE will work with any party for the aims which we support. Much talk of people power and lobbying, but acceptance and reiteration that we need planning arguments. Stephen
Fri, 2 Dec 2005 ? The main point to remember is that, even if incinerators are 100% safe, they are expensive, divert waste from recycling, and do not eliminate the need for landfill (because the ash has to go somewhere and some of it is toxic) ? The proposed incinerator will bring 35 jobs, but Doncaster's zero waste strategy aims to create over 500 jobs in the first five years as well as creating new local businesses to use the recycled materials made available. ? The proposed incinerator will generate electricity, but greater recycling could save energy, and what the incinerator burns is biodegradable waste, which is compostable (and some processes can generate gas), and plastic, which is not renewable: it's made from oil. Waste is not a renewable resource. ? The consultation upon which the incinerator decision is based was incomplete and biased, and the majority for incineration was not clear.
? We should try to remember that we are unlikely to change the minds of the Hull and ERYC councillors and officials who are pushing for incineration. To defeat the incinerator proposal we need planning arguments. And "this is going to spew out toxic chemicals and poison our grandchildren" is not a planning argument. Stephen
Thu, 1 Dec 2005
The Landfill Tax Credit Scheme Course Tutor: Simon Settle/Ben Walker (WREN) A short 2-hour course that examines how local community environmental projects and community organisations are benefiting from the landfill tax credit scheme. It will be delivered by WREN the Humber region's main Registered Environmental Body that distributes landfill tax credits. The course covers regulatory and administrative procedures, eligibility criteria for projects, the potential for developing local partnerships, aspects such as budgetary considerations and planning adequate monitoring and evaluation systems. It also includes how to make your project as attractive as possible.
Who is this course aimed at? The provision, maintenance or improvement of a public park or other public amenity in the vicinity of a landfill site. The delivery of biodiversity conservation for UK species or habitats The maintenance, repair or restoration of a building or other structure, which is a place of religious worship or of historic or architectural interest. Booking
Adam Fowler
Tue, 29 Nov 2005 If you can't attend the Pub Moot, but would like to make contact with us, then you are very welcome to phone Philip on Hull 445747 or e-mail philip@pubmoot.com.
Tue, 29 Nov 2005 For more information, click onto http://www.thisisrecycling.co.uk Contact the Beehive team on 0870 2403508 for pre-paid envelopes to send in your cartridges and stand a chance of winning a free printer, digital camera or 5 free inkjet cartridges.
Sun, 27 Nov 2005
Martin Deane
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 If you or I were dedicated enough to take on the onerous task of being a county councillor, wouldn?t we bust a gut to do the job properly? I would. Yes, as you know, because I have spent so long trying to affect decisions by ?nice-guy? methods I have become rude & abrasive to politicians. I just don?t understand anyone who flinches fighting the Parnabys, the Stephensons, the Roberts, the Pearsons of this world. God, why on earth should we be afraid?
I will, with pleasure pass on your message. Oh bu**** it, they know what it?s all about. They know what the Party says. Let them either pluck up the courage to face a mirror. I hope that you do not mind. I refuse to pass on the message. Will YOU pass on the message to, Cllr. Stewart Willie, Liberal Democrat Group Leader, ERYC.
Barry Robinson PS. I believe that I am going to be sent a FREE e-mail copy of the 170 pages of the contract that I am being allowed to see. PPS. I have downloaded the Executive Summary of the BPEO and the complete BPEO. In the summary, it specifically states that small scale incineration, (Or whatever the phrase is), is use of 60,000 ton incinerators. Use of large scale incineration, (which is specifically described as use of a 240,000 tons incinerator), came FIFTH in the choices. I am not looking at the summary at the moment, but I believe that there were only eleven choices all told!! PPPS. I must point out that at least the ERYC Liberal Democrat councilors voted en bloc (23 of them) to totally oppose incineration. Disgracefully, the 6 Labour members and the 8 Independents, who hold the balance of power, and so could turn the tables, voted with certain reservations for incineration, and yet, now that they have been sold down the river, I do not hear any of them complaining.
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 Stephen
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 Stephen
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 I believe that I wasted two days valuable campaigning time preparing for an event which wasn?t worth the space it took up. Two speakers. The Co-op rep., (the most highly qualified person I have yet come across with I think 4 degrees), spent so much time talking the talk with the acronyms and the speak, that I now realise that the decision-makers and I live on different planets. I was impressed by the sincerity of the Hull City Council, Agenda 21 Officer, Martin Budd, who spoke second. He spoke with sincerity, and came across as a very nice person. I simply ask, ?What had his presentation specifically to do with climate change?? I feel that this merely gave an opportunity for yet more council propaganda. (Sorry Martin!!). Maybe it?s sour grapes on my part, as I had desperately tried to get a 3-minute slot on the platform to talk about the possibility that incinerating one-third of a million tons of household waste might cause local climate change, only to have it indicated that my aspect might be too specific. I feel it was a lost opportunity to allow local environmental (climate-change) issues to be addressed. I find it so frustrating that an organisation such as the Co-op, (in whom I had had such faith), should come to TELL us uneducated simpletons, that if we switch off our computers at night, we can save enough electricity to make a cup of tea the next morning In actual fact the event seems to have been intended merely to trumpet the (excellent) environmental steps that the Co-op is taking, in order to boost their commercial image This is quite justified tactics, but I?d rather the Co-op did not waste my time and make me yet more aware that my only importance is as a recipient of the message of commerce. Barry Robinson
Tue, 22 Nov 2005
Bob's Music
Tree Planting in Hull
Time 10am to 2pm. Bring a spade and wear suitable
footwear/clothing. Ensure under 16s are accompanies by
an adult.
Hull Pagans On-Line Discussion
Heroes for Peace
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 Ian White
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 "Councillor Wareing holds the portfolio for the environment, transport, and waste, so it was logical to invite him," said Fair organiser Carole Noreiko. "Obviously, he's a very busy man, and we're delighted he's managing to make the time for us. We don't agree on all issues, but that's a very good reason to make opportunities to meet and talk. We hope he'll have time to look at the different stalls, buy some books or plants, talk with campaigners, maybe sign a petition, and perhaps drink a cup of Fair Trade tea. I don't suppose he'll be able to stay for a relaxation session or a head massage though, but he's welcome!"
For further information please contact Stephen F. Noreiko Cllr Wareing will arrive at 10.45
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 The training coincides with the re-opening of Hull's North Bridge on Monday, November 14 after being closed for repairs for eight months. It is one of a number of measures to encourage alternative forms of transport to the private car to reduce congestion. The training is open to any one and is particularly suited for people working in the City Centre. The sessions will operate on a ?drop in? basis suited to people?s individual needs. The Cycle Buddy Training sessions are aimed at increasing people's skills and confidence. Whether you have never ridden before or are already a regular urban cyclist our qualified trainer will help you improve your skills. The sessions will be delivered indoors and teach you how to share the road safely with other road users and negotiate common road situations, from how to use a T-junction to cycling on multi lane roads. The training will also include tips on cycle maintenance and how to keep a bike in good working order. Learn to fix a puncture or change your brake blocks. You do not have to bring a cycle. So if you were considering using your bike again (or for the first time) and would like a little refresher on cycle safety / road craft, then this is just the session you have been waiting for.
These sessions are being supported by Hull City Council?s Road Safety Team.
The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum (01482) 324223 Mobile: 07985917923 Help shape your environment. Become a member of CHEF. Contact us for details.
Tue, 15 Nov 2005
pulses chick peas beans
Toiletries Your donations will be gratefully received
SCULLYBANK PROJECT
Tel: 01482 331422
Wed, 9 Nov 2005 This will be the first Surgery since the Hull Bus Forum held on 2 November 2005 which raised a wide range of issues. The Bus It will provide full details of public transport services including all train and bus services over the festive period. As well as providing comprehensive public transport information for all bus and train services, Liz Robinson, Hull City Council?s Public Transport Quality Assurance Officer will be onboard with a bus surgery. The Bus Surgery enables travellers to make comment about local bus services in Hull. Anything from timetables and routes, reliability of services to bus stops and subsidised services. Bus It will can also help with Christmas shopping trips using public transport. Bus It is a converted single deck low floor bus complete with computer journey planners, meeting and display spaces. This service is provided by The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum (CHEF) in partnership with Hull City Council Passenger Transport Team. ?Bus It is a really good opportunity to have your say about local public transport or simply pick up a timetable.? said Adam Fowler, Community Environment Officer, The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum.
The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum (01482) 324223 Mobile: 07985917923 Help shape your environment. Become a member of CHEF. Contact us for details.
Sun, 6 Nov 2005
Dear Charles,
For example, of course people are going to want to answer that our laws should be up to date! But what a non question. What exactly does that mean? There are good laws and bad laws. Hard cases make bad law. Outrage makes worse. Of course we want our police to do complete investigations, but what about some evidence, eg a study, that shows police need 3 months with someone incarcerated rather than, what is it now, 2 months? The police have a (rightly) hard job - and a poor record - when it comes to sorting out terrorists. What about that much vaunted ricin plot. Where is the public inquiry into July 7th? Don't we all have a right to know exactly why our services failed so abysmally despite higher terrorism warnings prior. More safeguards to protect the innocent? Yes please, but make sure these are the sorts of safeguards that would protect the civil rights of men like the so-called terrorist Guildford 4 or Birmingham 6 (by the way who did carry out those atrocities please?); safeguards that ensure our government and police are free from the shame and ignominy of executing innocent men running for the Tube.
Meanwhile 82% of Iraq has polled against occupation troops - in a secret Ministry of Defence poll (which Ive helped pay for). In case the MOD don't let you see it, it goes like this -
Let's take great care with what we call terror and what we call law. Regards, Martin
Also, does anyone know any local producers of interesting and env friendly goods that we could sell on our stall? Perhaps someone who doesn't want tohave a stall themselves, but we could buy some stock from? We really are down to rock bottom, but I don't want to buy from the FOE local groups catalogue unless we can't get anything else as they don't sell very well. We'd be happy I'm sure to give a bit of promotion to anyone who is producing some good stuff. Hilary
John Lynes on Palestine
What Really Happened in Fallujah
The 9/11 Truth Movement
Hull Friends of the Earth Green Fair
Climate Change Demo
International Peace Conference
---------------------------------
"We're already at war with Iran"
Support Snaith Wind Farm
Playing with Flags, see
Dear Supporter
The Steering Group
I believe that East Yorkshire EYE, as a body, is totally behind a campaign. I believe that Douglas as a founder member of Citizens Against Toxics, is fully behind the campaign. I believe that Ralph Ryder, who runs CATs, is spending precious time which he could be using to forward his own, perilously under-funded, dedicated work, is for free doing some work for us. I believe that Alan Watson is willing to listen to my pleas and take the risk that we will drop him in it by not paying him in full for his services. I have just, unintentionally upset a dear friend, Arnold Woolley, who constantly, for free, helps me when he could be spending his time fighting the Environment Agency.
I constantly neglect Gwen, the love, of my life for the campaign. I believe that I tried to make it absolutely clear that I hoped Hull FOE would be partners in a campaign because I have nothing but total respect for you all. Barry Robinson
The aim of the evening is to educate and inform the public about the environmental initiatives that are currently being developed across the Group to address the issues of climate change and energy efficiency. As well as telling participants what their Co-op is doing, this is an opportunity to find out about how we can all make difference in our community. By looking at some local examples, the evening will give the opportunity to find out more about what climate change means in our city and how we can all be more energy efficient. Competitions, pledges and a range of promotional items will be up for grabs in addition to practical suggestions that will make a real difference.
I hope that some of your members may be interested in this event - I
would also be grateful if you would be knid enough to help me publicise
this event - I was going to send some flyers to one of the co-ordinators
listed on this website. Please can you let me know if this is ok?
Simon Plunkett
b) set up a display to promote their work, or c) provide materials (leaflets etc) for the students to take away with them I therefore wondered whether any of the above would be of interest? If you would like any further information, please don't hesitate to contact me. I can send you a list of participating colleges, a draft agenda and a list of the proposed topics. My e-mail address is yootha.arnott@wyke.ac.uk (I am based at Wyke College, off Bricknell Avenue in Hull), and telephone number is 01482 462415.
with best wishes
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 Stephen
Though I'm no fan of uPVC windows, I came across a firm the other day who make their replica sash windows partly out of recycled plastic. Hilary
Haris
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 Workshops (You need to indicate preferred option) are: AM - City Centre as development focus; Environmental quality and design; Transport - connections and barriers; Deliverability; Sustainability appraisal. PM - Humber Quays, Quay West; East Bank and Blaydes; Fruit Market; Heart of City; Urban Design and Public Realm. Adam Fowler
The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum
Sat, 15 Oct 2005 Meanwhile, Britain has undermined the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, manufactured a war to help conquer Iraq, pretends it has brought peace, remains the 4th largest economy, and the 11th donor of aid, far short of 0.7% promised 34 years ago, is making battlefield nukes as we speak, has cost 100s of millions of pounds through PPP and PFI schemes to sweeten up business with large tranches of what used to be public space, allowed the recking of pensions, the scandal of failed investments and endowment mortages. And still wants impoverished African countries to sell us their national water provision. How does this work? -
Dear Africa, Africa, Africa,
Yours truly Martin Deane
Thu, 13 Oct 2005 Yes, Doncaster signed a waste contract. For six years, with review and option to extend. In other words, in Doncaster it's shape up or ship out.
Hull City Council signed for twenty-five, count them 25, years. So in Hull, it's "don't like it? Tough."
"Duh". Stephen
Tue, 11 Oct 2005 Stephen
SUNDAY 2ND OCTOBER 12 PM MEET AT JUNCTION OF BEVERLEY ROAD AND MIZZEN ROAD (OPPOSITE TESCO) SUNDAY 9TH OCTOBER 12PM AS ABOVE Please try and make both dates or at least one if you can. If you need further info call HULL UAF on 07985 169934 Martin Deane
Why not become a collector and receive funds directly for your group or organisation? For more information, click onto http://www.thisisrecycling.co.uk Alternatively contact the Beehive team on 0870 2403508 for pre-paid envelopes to send in your cartridges.
just a thought
Cheers
The training day will explain the Government?s new planning system and tell you what Friends of the Earth thinks of it. It will provide a forum for campaigners to discuss specific local issues and it will discuss what resources Friends of the Earth could provide for local campaigners to tackle waste planning issues. Participants will be able to participate in workshops on PPS10, Waste Development Frameworks and look at how a real waste disposal application progresses through the planning system. The day will also be interspersed with presentations by Friends of the Earth local campaigners, talking about their own experience campaigning against inappropriate waste facilities and using the planning system. The day is open to Friends of the Earth members as well as non-members. It is free but we will not be providing lunch. The deadline to apply for a place is Friday Oct 14th. You can confirm your attendance by replying to the address below or emailing annaw@foe.co.uk Please include your full name, local group, address and phone number. A pack for the day will be sent out nearer the time.
Best wishes
Anna Watson Tel:07921 039636
1. Remember Nov 4th meeting Guildhall, when said gentleman started the meeting saying that if he had his way, things would be different. Then we went on, (after he had assured me that the meeting was not a con), to discuss the six possible alternatives for dealing with the alleged ?residuals?. Strangely enough, we ended up being told that incineration is the only solution. (this was BEFORE the results of the public consultation on waste had been made public). 2. Cllr. Wareing will make it an election issue. So? Have you come across a politician you can believe? Which election? The planning application will go in in June 2006. Is there a convenient election? Does he mean that he will make it a part of the Labour Group?s manifesto, or only of his own? 3. The Liberal Democrats? position? What is it? Well, an indication came up in the notorious Scrutiny Committee Meeting a few days ago, when a councillor with whom I have worked, a councillor whom I thought I knew, decided that , yes burning 55% of our waste IS the answer, as long as we do it by pyrolysis or another method. Of course, even if this was valid, (and I think that this may be the discredited SWERF system), how many citizens are going to vote Liberal Democrat, because they prefer their method of burning to Cllr Wareing?s? 4. I think the message that Wareing will make it an election issue, is all the evidence we need to show us that the incinerator will be built in the East Riding, not in Hull. Then where is the general public?s opposition to incineration going to come from in Hull? And the East Riding? Well the Liberal Democrat Group Leader seems to talk along similar lines. I agree totally with you that we need to keep on and on trying to change attitudes. I see the big winner coming along. WASTE MINIMIZATION. They are even talking about it in France, (there?s something!) All the evidence is piling up that this must come. Oil prices. Work by WRAP. Waste minimization is a part of the Waste Joint Local Plan. And much more. However, I?m still going to look for that fatal flaw in the contract. The important thing is that,
We here do not damage your work, by clumsiness. Barry
But I still think the contract is a side issue. And Haris's letter as it stands is worse than useless. It is too general: the Councils would just come back and ask for details. And it is too aggressive: getting officials backs up could just result in landing ourselves with a big search fee! There are reasonable councils around the country where kerbside recycling is soon to work and create jobs. Gary Wareing says he's willing for incineration to be made an election issue. It surely will be. We will need to make noise about what goes on elsewhere and how Hull has sat on its hands for more than 25 years (Hull FoE were campaigning on waste that long ago!). Stephen
Regards
From CND / Dear supporter, Clare Short MP, who came third in the recent Private Members' Ballot in Parliament, has adopted the Bill, so we now have a great chance of getting this Bill onto the statute book. But we need your help. Our first hurdle is the Second Reading of the Bill, due on Friday 21st October We will need 100 MPs supporting the Bill to be present in Parliament, in order to move a 'closure motion' - a resolution to end the debate. If we win such a vote 99-0 we will still lose, as the debate cannot close and the Bill may fall. It is vital that we get 100 MPs to this vote. Getting MPs in the House on a Friday is difficult: most return to their constituencies. We need to persuade them to stay at Westminster - and it is constituents who can do that. So we do ask you please to: a.. Write to your MP (at House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA) as soon as possible (before s/he gets booked up with constituency appointments) saying that you want him/her to attend the House on Friday 21st October and vote to ensure that the Armed Forces (Parliamentary Approval for Armed Conflict) Bill gets a second reading and seeking an assurance to this effect. a.. At the same time please ask your MP to 'please sign Early Day Motion No. 85 in support of the Bill', entitled 'Parliamentary Approval for Participation in Armed Conflict' proposed by Neil Gerrard MP. Your MPs' signature on this does at least show a commitment to the Bill - which will be vital as the campaign progresses. Please try to do this urgently - and please let us have any replies that you receive as we will need to be able to see just how the campaign is progressing. Thank you.
Best wishes
Secondly what is the point of asking for the contract? We know that it is for WRG to handle the waste, that if they can't get permission for an incinerator the have to find another solution. We know also that the contract can be changed, if there is the will. The contract in a sense is irrelevant. What is needed is to persuade the Councillors (and the officers) that they should be finding other solutions. Other authorities do it. But in Hull, Gary Wareing starts from the position, we'll have incineration, we have to persuade the people. It should be, what is the best solution (or group of solutions)? Finally, in any case, the draft needs correcting before it is sent, if it is to be sent. Stephen
Haris As an environmental group Friends ofthe Earth is interested in waste issues and so could you pleaseprovide us with a copy of all current contracts between yourauthority and any company for the disposal, keeping or treatment ofwaste as referred to in Part II of Schedule 2 of the EnvironmentalProtection Act 1990 (Waste Disposal Contracts). We would like this information as soonas possible in accordance with the Environmental InformationRegulations 1992, and we are hoping that this will be sooner than the20 working days you are entitled to. We would like to know of anycharges relating to this request, keeping in mind that you could sendus the information electronically or on CD-ROM. We are especially interested in anyreferral in this contract to an incinerator or to 'energy from waste' or any other similar euphemism The fact that a contract might includea commercial confidentiality provision does not, of course, preventyou from releasing that contract (or any particular parts of it) tous under the Regulations. Separately, we would appreciate it ifyou could provide us with the information set out in Reg. 16(2) ofthe Accounts and Audit Regulations 2003 concerning public rights toinspect accounts, contracts etc (under s.15(1)(a) of the AuditCommission Act 1998) in respect of your next audit. If these are notfully known please would you let us have those details that are knownat present and confirm that you will send us the remaining detailswhen they are known to you. We look forward to receiving theinformation requested under the Environmental Information Regulations 1992 and thank you in advance for your assistance and cooperation.
"Identity and the Surveillance State:
Palestine Solidarity Campaign - Relaunch
Speaker Fady Abu Sidu.
If you have broadband you can hear Hitchens and Galloway battle it out on Iraq at
More see
Cheers
I would like your suggestions for topics. To give you a flavour Cllr Wareing has suggested the following: Park & Ride, City Council's Environment Policy, Vehicle Excise Duty Evasion, Decrimilised Car Enforcement, Review of Concessionary Bus Fares and achieving 45% Recycling Target/Energy from Waste. Adam Fowler
The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum (01482) 324223 Mobile: 07985917923
Help shape your environment. Become a member of CHEF.
8 October '05 ANNUAL DEMO PART OF AN INTERNATIONAL WEEK OF PROTEST
KEEP SPACE FOR PEACE'
at
on Saturday 8 October 2005 Organised by the Campaign for the Accountability of American Bases (CAAB)
for details contact:
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 Parks and Green Spaces Forum The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum (CHEF) is holding a public forum about the future of the City?s parks and green spaces. The Forum will be held at Noon, Wednesday 14 September 2005 at CHEF?s office within Hull Business Centre, Guildhall Road, Hull (Ground Floor meeting room). Free, all welcome. Mike McWilliams from Hull City Council will outline how the City Council is devising a Strategy that is intended to give a framework and guide to the way we improve and care for our parks and public spaces. The Strategy encompasses a broad range of green spaces under the ownership of the City Council ranging from parks and public gardens to outdoor sport facilities, allotments even cemeteries and churchyards. This is the first time such a strategy has been commissioned. Parks and Open Spaces are an essential part of life and good quality green spaces are fundamental to the well being of a community. However, they have generally suffered from a lack of investment. A government report in 2002 revealed that spending on urban spaces dropped from a quarter of councils overall spending in the mid 1970s to just 8.3% in 2001. The City Council is optimistic that the Strategy will help to provide good quality parks and open spaces that people need. By doing so developing their full potential enhancing image and building on civic pride. Comments from the Forum is will help inform this Strategy. For further detailed information, please contact Mike McWilliams on (01482) 615662. ?Parks and Green Spaces are the lungs of our City so it?s crucial that we have a Strategy that carefully manages them.? Said Adam Fowler, Community Environment Officer, The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum.
The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum
Politicians and pundits wonder how to engage the public, how to regain people's interest. On the Web, there are folk who are providing tools to do something about this from the other end.
At the site You can enter your post code and find a list of your local councillors, MPs, and MEPs, and the site will forward your message to them. What is even better is that two weeks later, the site will e-mail you to ask if the b*gg*r has replied, because they keep stats of politicians' performance. And if you want, you can check up on your MP's attendance, voting record, speaking record.
And there's more. At you can register by giving your name, e-mail, and post code. When there are 50 people registered for one constituency, the pol gets a message: "Hey, there are 50 constituents out there who want to know what you are doing. Tell therm!". And when there's no reaction, the messages repeat at 100, 200, ... and so on. We have the technology, we have the equipment, and now the tools are readily available for making politicians realise that we are not just urn-fodder, that we are watching, concerned, engaged, and interested. And that they should shape up or ship out. Yeah. Stephen
Regards Trish
Trish Dalby
Barry Robinson
THURSDAY 8th SEPTEMBER 7.30 pm WITH ANDREW MURRAY Chair, UK Stop the Coalition Co-author, Stop the War: The Story of Britain's Mass Movement Organised by the Hull Stop the War Coalition www.stopthewar.fsnet.co.uk
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 March and rally in Hull Provisional date: Sat, September 17, 2005
So far, it has led to death and destruction on a massive scale, in Afghanistan and Iraq and, last month, to a completely innocent man being brutally killed by British police. Bush and Blair have no answers to this madness. In fact, they thrive on it. The only way it can be stopped is by ourselves, the people, getting together and calling a halt. Let's start a new war - the war on the warmongers of both sides.
Hull City UNISON has given its backing to a demonstration with the organising slogan of "No to war, no to terrorism." We now invite all interested people to an
5.30 pm Wednesday, August 31st UNISON Canteen, opposite city-centre end of Hull Guildhall. Be part of the fight to reclaim the future and make it safe for our children. Information provided by Rob Rooney, Hull City UNISON shop steward (personal capacity)
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 Copied to Rick Sumner (East Yorkshire EYE), (I am sending Rick multiple copies for distribution to members), to Douglas Marcham (Citizens Against Toxics), and to Dr. Haris Livas. ERYC and KHCC, separately, have been instructed by Government to draw up their own, ?Statement of Community Involvement?. I have written to many of you about this, but I have inadvertently missed some of you. I will explain much more fully to those people if they will just ask me to. I believe that what follows is important, and ask you to be patient and read on, as I have two important comments to make towards the end of this e-mail.
The document (I believe) will determine whether we have any influence on planning issues in the future. These issues include incinerators, windfarms, building on Greenfield sites etc.In the East Riding, we are now involved in a consultation period.
(Hull City council is to carry out its consultation in the near future).
My two important comments.
(01482) 391737
Dear Sir,
The second comment that I wish to make is on the second consultation document.
Once again, just to get you in a turmoil, I believe I know what I?m doing, but you never know! I am keen to accept constructive criticism.
Barry Robinson
Wed, 24 Aug 2005
Sue
Wed, 24 Aug 2005
Further to the discussion on Barmston Drain, I have spoken to David Longthorn. He asures me that the scum is in fact duck weed ( harmless )and the drain is healthy which is good news. He is still tree planting and is hoping to arrange another session in November/December. David will be in touch with Debs at Hull DOC.
Regards
Sat, 20 Aug 2005
I became interested in doing something about the cemeteries a few years ago, but the idea didn't progress due
to the discussions between the church commissioners and the council. It would be good if we could do something about it now.
Alan
Fri, 19 Aug 2005
I'd very much like to encourage an environmental management project in the cemeteries which have become very overgrown in the last 6 months or so. I was getting similar comments when I took a tour round [possibly from the same people?!]. We'd need to work with the Boidiversity Partnership to ensure that the right things are removed and the wrong things not. In practice i guess we'd be looking to you for advice, Alan? My understanding is that the cemeteries are still owned by St. Mary's Sculcoates Church and that though they wanted the Council to take them over the Council didn't want them. I've no doubt the church would appreciate the efforts. Last I knew they were cleared as a Manpower Services project about 10 years or so ago.
Cleaning the drain itself is a much more difficult job and needs the involvement of the Environment Agency as the operators of the drain. They do dredge it themselves from time to time.
I've heard the stories about swimming in the drain before. I suspect it was just as polluted then but people didn't worry as much, though there wouldn't have been the shopping trollies to injure themselves on.
What do other Hull FOE members think about a joint project on the cemeteries with the local residents?
Hilary
PS Hope you feeling better now, Sue.
Tue, 16 Aug 2005
The theme will be recycling and each day a different location in the area will be visited featuring a different sort of recycling .
The presenter would appreciate any ideas we may have on which commodity to focus on in Hull and if we know of any other groups that could be involved ...I suggested Recycling Unlimited.
Any bright ideas please could you let me know by this Friday lunchtime
Sue
Tue, 16 Aug 2005
Any help would be much appreciated.
Sue
Tue, 16 Aug 2005
Btw - Mark tells me that Wilmington is now transformed: safety
procedures are in place, no queues, and the staff are very helpful!
No response to my email suggesting some sort of bring/buy/exchange
activity for our bbq - so probably not a popular idea. But I hope
people will come along for the hedge-building. We are accumulating lots of
material for it.
Chrys
Text of email to Editor, Hull Daily Mail:
Designed in consultation with local residents, it's a cool and
attractive place - with meeting space for small groups, and even an
elegant balcony from which you can watch the recycling system at work.
To date, almost 90% of the material taken to the site has been recycled
- not taken to landfill.
Hull Friends of the Earth (supported by Hull City Council) has been
operating a successful garden waste collection service using an ex-milk
float, in a small area of Hull, for the past three years
(www.hfoe.org.uk). Now we're looking forward to our council taking
over. "Yet another bin to remember to put out" I hear people groan... Well,
householders need to get rid of garden waste, and not everyone is able
or willing to compost it. Let's go for city-wide garden waste
collection and recycling - soon!
Chrys Bavey
Tue, 9 Aug 2005
I believe that I have already got some good ideas on how the language should be tightened up so that they realise that we do not intend to roll over just because officers have to repay the developers.
I further believe that, as well as sending in a submission in the group?s name, we need to send in many individual submissions. They?ll just laugh at one.
I ask any of you who is already thinking of sending in your comments to just give me a few days to submit to you my thoughts. You don?t have to take ANY notice but I may just think of something that you may not.
Please send me YOUR thoughts because I can GUARANTEE that I won?t have thought of them.
Barry Robinson
PS. You may be interested to know that I got Hull FOE, CATs, and East Yorkshire EYE put on the list of consultees!!
Mon, 8 Aug 2005
I set out with the excited belief that the Government?s idea was to force Local Authorities to involve residents more closely in planning issues; to give us more say in vital issues such as incinerators,.
In my opinion, ?Statement of Community Involvement? is intended to fool the gullible into believing that our Government, bankrupt of democratic principles, cares what we think.
It is full of guff about ?. ? Well I?m not sure what.
In fact it merely allows Local Authorities to legally justify the present immoral situation.
It makes no attempt to address the real problem ?.. those entrenched officers and councillors, (I exclude the large number who try to serve us well), who fear that real consultation procedures will expose their personal inadequacies.
I am now going away to try to justify talking to my parish council on a document that I, in a naï©¶e moment of total insanity, described as ?Comparable to the Magna Carta?.
Barry Robinson
|
Wed, 21 Dec 2005 Carole Noreiko
Wed, 21 Dec 2005 Graham Stuart MP
Sat, 10 Dec 2005 Stephen
Sat, 10 Dec 2005 Stephen
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 Interview on radio Humberside “ Elliot Morely says the Govt does not support mass burn incineration “ all recyclable material needs to be got out first “ but energy from waste better for residual waste left than landfill. Surely you can use this snippet to argue that the Govt does not support what Hull CC and ERCC are planning - one as it is a mass burn incinerator and all recyclable material will not have been removed as two Ben Bradshaw - Minister for Waste has said 60 per ecnt is possible and as Hull only going for 45 per cent - does not fit with govt thinking. In interview tried to get message across that Incin for Hull not needed if council had the political vision to really tackle waste and that it is very expensive option for dealing with waste. Stephen
Fri, 9 Dec 2005
Quote. However, it is made clear in the BPEO document (the document that ‘justified’ the incinerator), that a 45% recycling rate will soon be inevitable because of pressure from the Government. So why did this irrelevant question appear on the questionnaire? b). The negatives and positives for the 11 different technology scenarios for dealing with residual waste are carefully evaluated in the BPEO document. In the reports resulting from the KC Stadium presentation announcing the incinerator, it was mentioned that incineration will produce so much electricity that we will save 80,000 tons of coal per year. I see on page 61of the BPEO, that a more sober evaluation indicates that, if one considers all meaningful aspects of saving virgin raw materials and recovering energy, then there is only a difference of 309 tons per year ‘materials value’. (my phrase), between any of the technologies. The best performing technology has a positive value of 1,040 tons per year, whilst the worst has a positive value of 731 tons per year. Do you feel that the ’80,000 tons of coal’ phrase should be retracted?
Barry Robinson
Wed, 7 Dec 2005 I believe that we have in our possession so much evidence that seems to point to ‘dirty tricks, ‘dodgy tactics’, over the alleged consultation, the argument ‘justifying’ incineration, even the waste contract, that we have the material for a best-selling work of fiction. Unfortunately, the facts are so incredible as to be almost unbelievable. Our website, www.hoti.org.uk will soon be up and running. Truly, Hull and East Yorkshire are about to lead the country, nay the world, out of the era of ‘spin’ Since writing the above, I have started to study the BPEO document. This report, published by consultants Enviros for the councils, is the document which has been used as the basis for justification of the incinerator. It is 187 pages long. Years ago, I gained 10 ‘O’ levels and 3 ‘A’ levels. Having qualified to degree standard in Chemistry, I worked in technical / medical information for a never-ending number of years. Despite this, I am constantly having to remind myself of the relationship of MSW to BMW. Where does the waste figure of 697,000 tons come from? Why do they claim that waste increases by 4.8% a year? Why is 17,000 tons of rubble included?. And so on. With due respect to our councillors, who are good, hardworking, conscientious people, I suggest that there are not enough of them to have been able to make a valid analysis of this document, and the necessary decisions from it, in the time at their disposal. Once I have studied this document, there are the ‘Residual Waste Technology Review’ (166 pages), and ‘The Joint Waste Contract’ (170 pages) to evaluate. There is the information that I have winkled out of (what seems to me to be), a reluctant council, to collate. There is a set of statistics that just doesn’t seem to add up. It is my personal opinion that the manner in which the Saltend incinerator has been progressed, is an insult. Barry Robinson
Wed, 7 Dec 2005
This is how the NEF answers the question, "What is Green Energy?"
Now, in domestic waste, the biomass iskitchen waste and garden waste. That is, the wet yucky bits. Butthese wet yucky bits are to be taken care of in a compostingplant, and quite right too. Composting is the simplest and cheapestway of using organic material. Stephen
Sun, 4 Dec 2005
Dear friends every where,
SIGN THE URGENT APPEAL: Four members of Christian Peacemaker Teams were taken this past Saturday, November 26, in Baghdad, Iraq. They are not spies, nor do they work in the service of any government. They are people who have dedicated their lives to fighting against war and have clearly and publicly opposed the invasion and occupation of Iraq. They are people of faith, but they are not missionaries. They have deep respect for the Islamic faith and for the right of Iraqis to self-determination. C.P.T. first came to Iraq in October 2002 to oppose the US invasion, and it has remained in the country throughout the occupation in solidarity with the Iraqi people. The group has been invaluable in alerting the world to many of the horrors facing Iraqis detained in US-run prisons and detention centers. C.P.T. was among the first to document the torture occurring at the Abu Ghraib prison, long before the story broke in the mainstream press. Its members have spent countless hours interviewing Iraqis about abuse and torture suffered at the hands of US forces and have disseminated this information internationally. Each of the four C.P.T. members being held in Iraq has dedicated his life to resisting the darkness and misery of war and occupation. Convinced that it is not enough to oppose the war from the safety of their homes, they made the difficult decision to go to Iraq, knowing that the climate of mistrust created by foreign occupation meant that they could be mistaken for spies or missionaries. They went there with a simple purpose: to bear witness to injustice and to embody a different kind of relationship between cultures and faiths. Members of C.P.T. willingly undertook the risks of living among Iraqis, in a common neighborhood outside of the infamous Green Zone. They sought no protection from weapons or armed guards, trusting in, and benefiting from, the goodwill of the Iraqi people. Acts of kindness and hospitality from Iraqis were innumerable and ensured the C.P.T. members' safety and wellbeing. We believe that spirit will prevail in the current situation. We appeal to those holding these activists to release them unharmed so that they may continue their vital work as witnesses and peacemakers.
Signed,**
-- ABOUT US: The Electronic Intifada (EI) is a not-for-profit, independent publication committed to comprehensive public education on the question of Palestine, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the economic, political, legal, and human dimensions of Israel's 38-year occupation of Palestinian territories. EI, found at http://electronicIntifada.net provides a needed supplement to mainstream commercial media representations of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. More information about our work can be found at http://electronicIntifada.net/v2/aboutEI.shtml
To find out about other EI/eIraq lists available, see:
http://electronicintifada.net/
SUPPORT OUR PROJECT: Our work needs funding. We accept
donations via credit card and cheque. U.S. donations are
tax deductible. More information can be found at:
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 Barry Robinson
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 Haris
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 The cost of a coach round trip to London is around ?900 (two drivers required) so we could either charge ?17 per seat or do 25 seats at ?16 (students, unwaged etc.) and the rest at ?20. It is possible (though not certain) that the Green Socialist Students' Group at the University might be able to sponsor the coach which might bring the cost of tickets down a bit. I am pretty confident that we could fill a coach from Hull but obviously there is a slight risk involved and this means there are three possible options:
I would be grateful if you (or someone else from FoE) could indicate at your earliest convenience whether you would be interested in taking up any of these options. email is s.radford@bigfoot.com Steve Radford
Thu, 10 Nov 2005 When: Last week January? Mid Feb? Offer expenses to all out of town speakers. If inviting Mayor of Doncaster it would perhaps be polite to ask Mayor of Hull too.Or do we go for a big venue and invite all Councillors? They might give us the Guildhall; they let CHEF have it for their public meetings. But perhaps we would prefer neutral territory. Title/ subject: 'Zero Waste without Incineration' How Doncaster is doing it. or some such? Barry Robinson has asked CHEF to organise a meeting on incineration. I'll find out more about it and see if we ought to join forces. Hilary
Thu, 10 Nov 2005
Or, is the aim of the meeting to find out what?s been going on in Doncaster so that we can form our own proposals?
Sue
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 Green Fair Saturday 19 November, Cott Rd Baptist Hall, corner of Chanterlands Avenue -- head and foot massage, and -- Buddist relaxation
Come and get pampered. Oh yes, good grub and music in the background, interesting stalls (at least one selling 2nd hand books, lots of crafts, cards, produce, plants,...). Stephen
Thu, 3 Nov 2005
This charge is an obstacle to her plans to buying it and I wondered if anyone knows if there any local alternatives.
I noticed in the HullFOE Newsletter that Diana Wallis mentions she was intending having one fitted- do you have any local contacts Diana?
Sue
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 Gary originates from Blackpool and has become one of the City Council?s most respected Councillors. A train driver, his portfolio includes Environmental Policy, Transport Strategy and Waste. He is responsible for issues as diverse as car parking and footways to Conversation Areas and recycling. The Council is currently introducing a new Environment Policy and next year will see Decriminalised Parking Enforcement. Similarly, Gary has overseen the Council?s commitment to introduce 45% recycling rate for all residents but more controversially an Energy from Waste facility. A decision is expected in the next few months on where an incinerator will be located. This is the first time Gary has addressed a meeting that will solely focus on his Portfolio issues and is intended to raise awareness and develop greater understanding. ?Cllr Gary Wareing is a frank and open politician with a passion for the environment. We are delighted that he has agreed to address Hull?s first Environment Surgery.? Said Adam Fowler, Community Environment Officer, The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum.
The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum Help shape your environment. Become a member of CHEF. Contact us for details.
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 A very good discussion showed that everyone there wanted kerbside collections of green waste. Many were far more enthusiastic than I about amenity sites, (I believe that one possibly creates as much pollution as one prevents, by using them). Then, almost at the end, a very, very senior officer and a very, very senior councillor, pointed out that, if it hadn?t been for the unfair decision of the Deputy PM to refuse the Foster St. energy-from-waste facility, the councils would have been in a better position with regard to recycling. But that we need not worry as they are protesting vehemently about this disgraceful situation. A certain very senior officer explained that another real problem is that they will have to pay ?150 for each ton of waste landfilled. I (metaphorically) grabbed the microphone and castigated them for ?this inexcusable propaganda?. I pointed out that I had come to the event with an open mind. That I had deliberately not leafleted for that reason. I pointed out that it will cost about ?35 per ton to landfill treated waste. That landfilling this will be about as dangerous as filling a hole with gravel. That it will cost ?150 per ton to landfill raw waste, beyond that limit that the Govt. gives them permission to landfill. I pointed out that an energy-from-waste facility is a polluting incinerator. I later asked the ?attentive, solicitous councillor? to, at his leisure, castigate these gents. The shutters came down, the eyes turned to ice. I am obliged to consider that I was mistaken in thinking that he may not be a p****. Saddest of all, when I approached another very, very senior councillor, whom I would have expected to have grasped the political opportunity with which he had been presented, and who should have been jumping up and down, he indicated that I should not get excited. That the gentlemen had a point [that the unfeeling decision by the Deputy PM was a little unfair]. I agreed with him that there was a point. That the Foster St. decision was a DEMOCRATIC DECISION. He seemed a little stunned to think that one could be so gauche. I am now convinced that we have only the slimmest chance of stopping an incinerator. That all who say, ?What?s the hurry?? are wrong. BUT I hope you will allow me to continue to fight shoulder to shoulder with you. Anyone who feels that they do not wish me to fight alongside, please tell me as soon as possible. I am hoping, just hoping, to be invited to be a speaker at the Co-op Environment Evening on the 23rd Nov. I hope to concentrate on, ?The possible environmental hazards of incineration?. I believe that it would be counterproductive to take up a political stand, to castigate anyone, council or otherwise. Barry Robinson
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 I must make it clear that I have no interest in a personality cult. If I achieve anything, I wish all credit to go to us all Regarding, the question of, ?Does Hull FOE wish to back such an approach as mine?, I am in total agreement. I admire our democratic approach as members of the Hull branch. I am beginning to see that there may well be a real case for a softly, softly approach by Hull FOE (and the rest of us keep out) towards KHCC, but see absolutely no case for such an approach towards ERYC. The ERYC officers refuse to talk with Douglas or myself. (By the way, are you aware that there is to be NO further public discussion on incineration as far as ERYC and KHCC are concerned)? In conversations with Trish Dalby and Doug Sharp, they simply couldn?t understand why, after the extensive consultation, I should expect any Maybe, a looser federation of our groups than the cheek to jowl one that I have advocated may be better. I realize that such matters cannot be rushed and must be discussed. Where I will speak out, is about what I see as a dangerous attitude of, ?Why the rush? What?s so important?? Suffice to say, the two councils are, I believe, (maybe incorrectly), in the process of incorporating incineration into the regional strategy. If this happens, what value is there in ?attempting to change attitudes?? What hope do we have of changing anything? Again, the officers already know which are the potential sites for the incinerator. They refuse to tell us. Suddenly, shortly before the planning application goes in in June 2006, they will let us know. How on earth, in the six weeks that they will allow, are we going to drum up support? When it is clear exactly where the incinerator is going to be, who is going to speak out? If it is to be at, say Goole, no resident of Hull or Beverley or Preston, is going to care a jot. You and I are totally opposed to incineration. To most it?s NIMBY. Barry Robinson
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 1) Public Order Act: Using threatening abusive or insulting words or behaviour or disorderly behaviour within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress. 2) Criminal Justice & Police Act: Contravening a police direction to come down from the Prescott's roof because their presence was likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress. Your support (for the day) at Hull Magistrates during the trial would be much appreciated. The court day starts at 10am and finishes around 4.30pm. The address is below; please call Natalie on the mobile if you are coming to join us. 07801 212 958.
Kingston-Upon-Hull Magistrates Court Louise Muston
Sun, 30 Oct 2005 I think we should be going at the Councils, and using economic arguments. Incineration and 25-year contracts are not best value, incineration blocks off recycling options, locks us in to having to maintain levels of waste, while recycling, as in Doncaster, can be expected to increase jobs. The advantage of this kind of argument is that it is positive, that it does obviate the risk of the "we've got to do something" retort. Of course, it has the drawback that it supposes the Councils and public will llisten to reason.
What do we all think? Carole & Stephen
Thu, 27 Oct 2005
Thursday, 10th November - 7.30pm "As both a testimony to the plight of the Iraqi people under occupation, a glimpse of what really happened in Fallujah during the April siege, as well as the remarkable work of Jo Wilding, who has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize along with the 'One Thousand Women for Peace Group', this film is a must see.
Watching it brought me right back to the devastating scenes from the heart of Fallujah." FREE ENTRY -----ALL WELCOME
Thu, 27 Oct 2005
For more information, click onto
http://www.thisisrecycling.co.uk
Hilary
What they would like to do in relation to the Incinerator proposals is to form an alliance with other groups in Hull and the Riding to achieve a degree of coordination in addressing the issue and coordinating campaigning. In the first instance it was suggested that a brief (one page) leaflet be prepared and sent to as wide a range of bodies as possible to alert the general public and enlist support. They hoped the text could be agreed in the next week or so. Maybe a meeting with Hull FoE rep could take place before 1 November to work on it. The chair of the group, Rick Sumner (01964 532954 - no email), would be happy to attend the Hull FoE on 1 Nov, and, ideally, to 'sign off' an agreed leaflet (no shirkers, this EYE lot). Barry and others agreed to make a start on a draft. I think that gives the gist - apologies for any inadvertant misrepresentations. Bill Rigby
VOICE International
3 Norwood, Beverley
Christopher Cox was the Commercial Director of Waste Recycling Group plc. For those who have not kept all this precious paper, I quote paragraph 4.11: "In the event that planning consent is refused for Waste Recycling's proposed EfW plant at Foster Street then the Councils will be entitled to terminate the contract. Equally they can terminate in due course if consent has not been granted by a date specified in the Contract." Paragraph 4.12 quotes the relevant clause of the said Contract, 53(b). It is also worth quoting from the report of the Inspector, paragraph 459, page 96: "In terms of the waste planning process a refusal of permission would focus attention upon the emerging JWLP [Joint Waste Local Plan] and the need to develop a robust set of policies and proposals to accord with the guidance in paragraphs 28-29 and 33-34 of PPG10." Those engaged in correspondence with LGOs and elected representatives might like to quote from all this. Stephen
Quote. Gosh, even I?m sickened by the pomposity of that last bit. Barry Robinson
VOICE International
3 Norwood, Beverley
The key phrase is: Admittedly, further on, there is a reference to "proposed energy from waste plant", but there it is in black and white: no incinerator in the contract. The letter also affirms "the Council's aspirations of (...) minimisation, recycling and recovery". So there you go. Steve Noreiko
http://www.facts-online.org.uk/ I know about the project as I'm doing some consulatancy work for the developers, EON, but the action group and website is entirely the work of local people who want to do their bit and feel passionate about mitigating climate change. It's inspirational stuff. Please find time to use the site to add your name to the list of supporters and forward the link to others in the Yorkshire area who might like to do the same. You can even send the action group a message of support as well. The following page which allows you to quickly email a standard letter of support to politicians (inc. Euro MPs). It only takes a minute to send one off a letter - just choose appropriate politicians for you:
http://www.factsonline.org.uk/
If Hull FoE would like me to come to the next meeting and talk about the project, I'd be very happy to do so.
Rich
Richard Claxton
I don't know who are in more important positions than ours: national FoE employees are not necessarily better qualified and are quite often less experienced than local campaigners. Anything anyone needs to know about the FoIA is available in the official leaflet that can be found in most public libraries. The tone of Haris's draft letter went beyond a "legitimate request for information": it was hectoring, aggressive, even bullying. It could well have alienated readers. Another point: Haris's letter asked for information about all waste matters. This could have been interpreted to include chewing gum on Whitefriargate, dog richards in the Avenues, Hull Fair litter, and all sorts of other stuff, not obviously germane to our concerns. The contract is for WRG to deal with waste. WRG collects it, it belongs to them. If they cannot get planning permission for an incinerator, they have to find other methods. The contract can be altered. All this came out in answers at the inquiry. Even someone who attended every session of the public inquiry (I only sat through most of them) would have been hard put to read the whole of the contract, which was on the tables at the back with all the other documentation. And if they had tried, they would have missed most of the evidence. The problem is not the contract, the problem we have to deal with is the political will of councillors and the advice given by officers; At the moment, this is for incineration. We need to persuade the public, the Council, and the media, that if Doncaster can aim for zero waste, the same is possible in Hull. Now some suggestions about that would be useful. Stephen
Five million people in two million properties in England and Wales live in flood risk areas, yet despite this, Environment Agency research indicates that as many as two fifths (41%) of these people are still unaware of the threat. On the fifth anniversary of the Autumn 2000 floods, some of the worst to hit England and Wales, the Environment Agency is launching a campaign in the national and local press to remind people that devastating floods happen here too. The campaign will urge people to find out if they live or work in a flood risk area and how to prepare in case the worst happens this winter. Barbara Young, Chief Executive of the Environment Agency, said: "Whilst we can reduce the effects of floods through awareness, education and investment in flood defences, we can never prevent them. That?s why we?re urging people to try to reduce the massive financial and emotional costs of flooding. So the message is: be prepared for flooding." At 2pm on Tuesday 18 October 2005, The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum (CHEF) in partnership with Hull City Council and The Environment Agency are holding a public Forum at The Guildhall, Hull. Free, all welcome. Disabled access. Philip Winn, Humber Strategies Manager, Environment Agency will discuss the Humber Flood Risk Management Strategy ? planning for the rising tides. The Environment Agency is currently consulting on how best to protect the region from flooding and this event will form part of that consultation. ?Today?s announcement by the Environment Agency to tackle flood apathy sums up why we all need to take this issue seriously. Particularly, as most of us in this region live near the sea or estuary.? Adam Fowler, Community Environment Officer, The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum (CHEF). For more detailed information about Planning for Rising Tides please contact Philip Winn, Humber Strategies Manager, Environment Agency on (01709) 312962.
The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum (01482) 324223 Mobile: 07985917923 Help shape your environment. Become a member of CHEF. Contact us for details.
Support FACTS - Snaith Wind Turbine Group
Sam and Rich help a credit union in Laos
The ladies that run the "banks" basically sit in the village hall or someones house for 2-4 days counting, sorting and recording all the transactions, loans and repayments. This is a hell of a security issue for the village as a whole. What we are going to suggest to the project is that we try and set a common treasury which will hopefully include a couple of laptops/ computers and counting machines, to make the whole process much easier.
I've included the CDEA literature so have a look and see what you think, and please forward it to anybody else you think maybe interested or could help. My next quest is to find a couple of spare counting machines!! If anybody wants to contact us about anything they can reach us at: cdealaos@gmail.com
AND Don't Forget - ! Cheers, Martin
Defra to recognise role of energy-from-waste in PFI (07.10.05) Defra has proposed changing criteria for waste PFI projects to "make moreexplicit the recognition that energy from waste is part of the waste management landscape". The Department issued a consultation yesterday on criteria for Private Finance Initiative projects, in which multi-million pound government credits are used to bring private sector investment into the provision of local authority waste services. The draft criteria simply seeks to state more explicitly that the government supports the use of incineration with energy recovery for the disposal of residual waste.- Defra spokeswoman The consultation aims to updatethe criteria set for the PFI waste scheme in September 2000, when then environment minister Michael Meacher decided to change the waste PFI focus "away from incineration towards recycling led solutions". But, Defra is now looking to address this "perceived negative stance on incineration".
Incineration A spokeswoman from the Department explained: "Because of previous uncertainty in the market place regarding the role of energy from waste, the draft criteria simply seeks to state more explicitly that the government supports the use of incineration with energy recovery for the disposal of residual waste left following re-use and recycling, or where materials cannot be safely or practically re-used or recycled. "The criteria also places a greater emphasis on waste minimisation. It is expected that when authorities develop their strategies they will pay due regard to the waste hierarchy," the spokeswoman told letsrecycle.com. If there should be any criteria at all, it should take a broader stance and give local authorities the flexibility to decide what is best for their own circumstances.- Alice Roberts, LGA LGA Commenting on the issue, the Local Government Association said that if there is to be any fixed criteria at all for PFI waste contracts, it is better that the scope is broader. Alice Roberts, executive officer for waste at the LGA, said: "The PFI criteria were apparently being used to push local authorities in a particular direction. This runs counter to LGA policy, that is if there should be any criteria at all, it should take a broader stance and give local authorities the flexibility to decide what is best for their own circumstances."
Funding
Related links:
Consultation on the proposed criteria runs until Friday January 6,
2006.
Alan Watson C.Eng
We share ideas and advance projects to promote peace.
These include organising speakers to come to the city, holding stalls, petitions, vigils and demonstrations,
promoting progressive events across the city, and building for local and national demonstrations.
Philip Winn, Humber Strategies Manager, Environment Agency will discuss the Humber Flood Risk Management Strategy ? planning for the rising tides. The Environment Agency is currently consulting on how best to protect the region from flooding and this event will form part of that consultation. Other meetings are being held elsewhere in the region, but this is the only public event in Hull. All comments will be taken into account and the Agency is working on producing a final report for submission to central government in November 2005. The Humber Flood Risk Management Strategy aims to develop a coherent and realistic plan for the estuary?s flood defences. This can only be done by involving key stakeholders and partners so the Agency is keen to hear what people think. In 1997, the Environment Agency began to develop a co-ordinated approach to managing flood defences around the River Humber and in 2000 produced the Humber Estuary Shoreline Management Plan. Much work has been done on strengthening flood defences whilst in some places ?Managed Realignment? and ?Flood Storage? is being introduced. The size of the task cannot be underestimated. The Agency suggests that 600 ha of inter-tidal habitats is likely to be lost with increasing sea levels and many of the region?s settlements are at risk of flooding. On the East Yorkshire Coast a debate is on going on whether to protect an area near Spurn Point. The Planning for Rising Tides Forum follows Hull?s first Climate Change Seminar held at The Guildhall in May 2005. Flooding was highlighted as one of the greatest threats to us locally. ?We tend to think of flooding as something that doesn?t affect us locally. But it will unless we doing something about it. This Forum is a practical way of managing this threat and combating rising sea levels.? Adam Fowler, Community Environment Officer, The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum (CHEF). For more detailed information about Planning for Rising Tides please contact Philip Winn, Humber Strategies Manager, Environment Agency on (01709) 312962.
The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum (01482) 324223 Mobile: 07985917923 Help shape your environment. Become a member of CHEF. Contact us for details.
So, copy soon please. Stephen
There will be music and lots of stalls: "green" organisations, arts and crafts, bric-à¢rac, stalls for rummaging on. To book a space (?10 for a table, or ?7 for the space if you bring your own table) phone Hull 448 222, or e-mail hullgreenfair@aol.com Stephen
Sue
I commented that we were low on "manpower " so weren't able to easily supervise volunteers...but apparently HUll University Social Services Organisation will provide supervisors Is anyone interested ...please let me know if you are Sue
Dear Friends, Martin Deane, Hull
From CND Clare Short MP, who came third in the recent Private Members' Ballot in Parliament, has adopted the Bill, so we now have a great chance of getting this Bill onto the statute book. But we need your help. a.. At the same time please ask your MP to 'please sign Early Day Motion No. 85 in support of the Bill', entitled 'Parliamentary Approval for Participation in Armed Conflict' proposed by Neil Gerrard MP. Your MPs' signature on this does at least show a commitment to the Bill - which will be vital as the campaign progresses. Please try to do this urgently - and please let us have any replies that you receive as we will need to be able to see just how the campaign is progressing. Thank you.
Philip Winn, Humber Strategies Manager, Environment Agency will talk about the current public consultation about what the Environment Agency proposes to do to protect the Humber sub region from flooding. THIS IS THE ONLY EVENT IN HULL! This event follows the recent Climate Change Seminar which has now resulted in the formation of a Task Group within Hull City Council. I look forward to seeing you.
Kind regards
The City of Hull & Humber Environment Forum (01482) 324223 Mobile: 07985917923 Help shape your environment. Become a member of CHEF. Contact us for details.
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 As a part of the Joint Waste Local Plan, ERYC and KHCC (pretend?) that they are going to actively pursue a policy of minimising waste. As justification for the incinerator, they claim that waste is increasing at rate of 3.66% per year. They seem to believe that this will continue for ever. So, what will be the effect of the waste minimisation programme? Apparently nothing, as they make NO allowance for it to affect figures. Nationally, waste DECREASED 1%, (or was it 1.5%?) last year. The private organisation, WRAP, funded with ?8 million by Government, is setting up all sorts of projects that will clearly reduce growth in packaging waste and in food waste, by preventing it in the first place. The organisation has already discovered that recycling of wood waste has gone up from 5% to 14% in ONE YEAR. It has set up a project with the 13 major supermarkets that will bring about DECREASE in packaging waste by 2010. This is only 5 years time. There are signs everywhere that waste is going to DECREASE. That as soon as entrepreneurs realise that there is money to be made, waste will stop. And what do our councils do? They use HISTORICAL figures to ?prove? that we must have an incinerator that will take 240,000 tons pa (2012), and it will probably have to be increased in size to 326,000 tons by 2020. Why such funny figures? Because these are the maximum amounts of what they call residual, unrecyclable waste that we can possibly produce by those dates. They say they hope to recycle 45% if they sweat their sweet little brows. Yet WRAP state (I believe) that it is perfectly feasible to recycle 60% We need to know just what the two councils intend to do by way of waste minimisation. We need to know just what measures they could be taking. We need this at our finger tips ready by the time of the incinerator application. I have asked ERYC what they are doing. I intend to ask KHCC. I need your help. Many people believe that there HAS to be a pubic inquiry. I don?t. I believe it will all be decided by the Planning Committee, and that Conservative / Labour councillors will rubberstamp it. Please think about waste minimisation. Discuss it with me. WE need to work on this together. I Believe this idea has value. Reduce waste produced, or re-use materials, and we can soon prove that there is no need for the incinerator. (For example, vast improvements can be made in efficient methods by the councils. They have a tremendous responsibility, but I feel they will pay lip service to the idea). Will Hull FOE, East Yorkshire EYE, and any other group, discuss this, in committee, and come forward with ideas, comments. Barry Robinson
Tue, 3 Aug 2004
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 He was looking for gigs and also sessions in pubs in and around Hull. Thought you were the first point of call for info on that. He gave me his card (I think he'd like to find a guitarist: he sings unaccompanied, nice voice). I couldn't give him your contact details, nor coudl I remember where you guys meet now. Stephen.
Sun, 11 Sep 2005 Dave Callaghan
Thu, 8 Sep 2005 The next bus forum will be held in November but we are holding a Bus Surgery on Bus It in Hull City Centre (Queen Victoria Sq) on Tuesday 27 September from 10am to 2pm. If people have complaints they will be able to report them to us and a City Council Officer. Every complaint is indivigually investigated. Generally, we very seldom receive any complaints about Bus Fares. Adam Fowler
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 It is truly and bitterly ironic that the natural catastrophe of Hurricane Katrina compounded by ecological mismanagement should push us into a course of action that will increase the likelihood of more and worse catastrophes. Climate change is a real threat, and we are contributing to it. As long as public transport is expensive and the real cost of private motoring stays low in comparison, there is little chance of improvement.
Stephen F. Noreiko
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 Dear all On Tuesday 20th September, Cllr Keith Taylor, male Principal Speaker of the Green Party and convenor of the Green group on Brighton City Council, will be speaking on the subject of "Identity and the Surveillance State: Why ID cards won't work". The meeting is open to all and will take place at 7.30pm in the Windsor Suite of the Quality Royal Hotel (next to the train station in Hull City Centre). Please let as many people know about it as possible. Apologies to those who have already been notified of this event - spread the word! The Windsor Suite holds 115 people, lets make sure its full and then some! Regards Ian Ibbetson
Fri, 2 Sep 2005 Keep your points clinically sound and correct. Avoid emotion or abuse. Be devastatingly polite, reasonable and well-informed. Argue with established facts. Show no political preference. The blander you make the target, the harder it will be for them to hit you. And if all else fails, courteously remind them who pays their salaries ! Wish I could help more, but Sept/Oct are very intense from both work and family perspectives. Very kind regards Jeremy Wilcock
Mon, 29 Aug 2005
Meeting Haris P.S. Let me know in whose name we should send the letter to the council asking for the contract -- or should we all sign?
Sun, 28 Aug 2005
Hi there
Best wishes,
VOICE International
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 The report was released a few days after the European Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) came into effect on 13 August. The directive, which regulates the handling of electronic waste in the EU by making electronics producers responsible, has yet to be implemented in many EU countries. The UK announced last week that it had delayed both the producer responsibility and take-back provisions until June next year. This is the second time the deadline has been put back. information supplied by Ian Jolliffe DEFRA CONSULTS ON PACKAGING RECYCLING TARGETS
Defra has opened a six week consultation looking at future packaging
recycling and recovery targets for businesses during 2006-10. The new
targets for businesses that handle or produce large quantities of
packaging waste are required to ensure that the UK meets key targets
under European legislation to recycle and recover between 55-80% of all
packaging by 2010. Any changes to business targets should come into
force by 1 January 2006.The Consultation Paper on Meeting Directive Targets in 2008 is
available in full at
http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/ USEFUL WEBSITE
BBC RADIO PROGRAMME: COSTING THE EARTH
BBC Radio 4's Costing the earth programme last week explored how
Britain's growing litter mountain threatens to engulf the streets and local
authority budgets. Hear about Barnsley's zero tolerance of littering
and Westminster's battle against chewing gum.
Click "Listen to 18 August" under LISTEN AGAIN to hear the
documentary online:
Thu, 25 Aug 2005
![]() Any ideas? Our wooden framed kitchen window has been reglazed. when Carole went to repaint the putty, she foudn holes in the putty. Not starlings this time (we've had problems with wooden framed greenhouses: starlings eat the putty!). This time we think it's snails. How< can we stop snails noshing the putty? They are even going through two coats of paint. Carole repaired, let dry, and painted, and they chewed through the paint. What can we do? I cut back the ivy before we started, but snails have been observed crawling up our bedroom windows way past the ivy. That I don't mind, but I'd like the putty to remain intact! Stephen
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 There have recently been a couple of key developments 1. Jo is willing to host a meeting to sort out what we are going to do. Please contact Jo if you are interested (01482 341696). The meeting is open to everyone, but it would be particularly helpful if anyone who wants to be actively involved in the future would contact Jo as soon as possible to make sure that a convenient date is found. 2. The woodland Trust has announced a "New Woodlands for Hull" initiative. It seems sensible to consider the possibility of contributing to this as all or part of the Land Fund activity (details below).
The Woodland Trust - Forest of Flowers in Hull
From recent research we highlighted a lack of accessible woodland in Hull, with less than 2% of the population having access to woodland over 2 hectares (5 acres) close to their homes. This compares to 44% of people in Sheffield having access to similar woodland! Our project aims to begin to redress this balance by planting around 17 hectares of woodland across the city over the next 3 years. At the heart of the project is woodland creation but it will also encompass programmes of wildflower planting, community engagement, active participation, volunteering, interpretation and educational activities to reconnect people with their local environment and the important role woodland can play in enhancing green space and the quality of life. We will also involve hundreds of local school children in planting trees, getting muddy and school based educational activities. We have already received support from the New Opportunities Fund and the Onaway Trust but even with this support we have the challenge of raising ?111,000 over the next 3 years from local businesses, authorities, charitable trusts and individuals. The total project cost is just over ?378,000 which covers the total costs of the woodland creation, establishment, engagement, tree planting and training days, woodland discovery days for local school children and associated education support. We have already raised approximately ?267,000 (70%) towards this target but to secure the remainder we need your help. Your thoughts and advice on this project would be greatly appreciated. For example do you think a fundraising appeal will receive the backing of local people, groups or companies? Are there any companies or organisations that you feel would be particularly interested in this project? Any information or suggestions will be extremely useful in progressing with our fundraising appeal. I will be applying to local charitable trusts and businesses for support but I will need help to distribute fundraising leaflets locally. If you can help and/or would be interested in acting as the Local Coordinator for this project, please do let me know. Or maybe you know someone else who would be ideal? In addition, it would greatly help our applications if you could consider providing a letter of support for this project. This is an important project, which will allow us to bring areas of woodland within city boundaries and at the same time offer local school children and the wider community the opportunity to be actively involved. This is why we are extremely excited about this project and 1 hope that you share our enthusiasm. I enclose a promotional leaflet for your information. If you would like any further details or would like to discuss any aspect of the project or appeal, please do not hesitate to contact me. 1 very much look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely
Tue, 23 Aug 2005
Dear Councillors Sincerely Barry Robinson
Sat 20 Aug 2005 ((DAAW))
Hello - please join our direct action network.
To join our network, please either reply to this message, or send a
blank email to the address below, & then wait for the confirmation
message: The DAAW message board was initially created in Jan 2003 to improve communication around direct action, as protests and demonstrations were carried out to protest the arrival of US B52 Bombers to the RAF Airbase in the otherwise sleepy Cotswold village of Fairford. Since then the message board has become home to a wide range of campaigns and protests, from info on the next Disarm DSEi 2005, to planning objections to the expansion of the Atomic Weapons Establishment, to defending the right to protest in Parliament Square. Most events or actions which are asking more than just the signing of another petition, or which are more than another march from point A to point B, will be considered for approval as a form of direct action. Information on environmental protests are also welcome. We look forward to receiving your subscription request.
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 Haris
Sun, 14 Aug 2005 At the moment 8% believe that they were adequately consulted. 92% believe that they were NOT adequately consulted. Of course, my survey, costing ?0.00, cannot have the sophistication of the Enviros survey which cost ?80,000, (or was it ?160,000 ?) Will you be so kind as to ask CEO Stephenson or Cllr Parnaby to justify their suggestions that the residents of the East Riding and Hull demand incineration? I will be unable to reply for a week, as my wife is dragging me away for a holiday. Barry Robinson
Haris
Bring and Buy/Exchange - own stall/blanket on ground, plus an HFoE one. Bring your own stuff to sell/exchange for yourself, or bring stuff to contribute to a HFoE stall. Ideas for stuff to bring and sell/exchange Eco jumble: tools, equipment (eg food handling, cooking eg we have a blender we don't want), materials (paint, plastic, wood, string, paper, tape, nails, containers), fittings, toys. All would be for re-cycle or reuse.
Books: esp eco-related
Chrys and Alan
|
|
Tue, 2 Aug 2005 Statement of Community Involvement Dear Councillors. I hope that you will consider this important matter in the spirit of constructive dialogue in which it is sent. I do not imply any criticism of any officer or Member.. I am presently researching this planning matter with a view to putting forward my comments during the consultation periods. I am particularly keen to avoid the situation in which campaigners found themselves when given the opportunity to comment on (I think it was), the Draft Joint Waste Strategy. This was organised by KHCC. Many residents made constructive comments. Unfortunately, (I believe), a large proportion of those comments landed on the wrong desk, and of course were not considered. That is what I heard was the explanation for the fact that our constructive comments were totally ignored. Result? A possibly totally improper strategy got through. I have been speaking to the officers of ERYC, and of KHCC who are leading the present SCI consultations. Both seem most helpful and willing to accept constructive comment. It is made clear in the draft document that each councillor has a vital role in the SCI, LDF, and planning. It is made clear that you have an unusually heavy responsibility in this matter, that your role with reference to residents is vital. In the light of the present severe limitations that we residents suffer in planning issues such as large housing estates being built on Greenfield sites, or, incinerators, or wind farms, etc, you are important spokespeople. I do not wish to imply any criticism when I ask you to involve yourselves deeply in the consultations. I ask that you do not consider any of the issues along party lines, but simply as our representatives. The SCI should not be treated ass just another Government task, to be dealt with, but as an opportunity to give residents, (and that of course includes yourselves), a real say in matters which affect our children?s children?s children. Barry Robinson
As you may be aware Hull City Council and East Riding of Yorkshire Council willl be putting in a planning application for a large scale incinerator in August.
One of the most ardent anti-incinerator campaigners Barry Robinson sent an e-mail whcih includes this: The Government has now told Local Authorities to involve the community more closely in planning issues. The authorities have been told to prepare a ?Statement of Community Involvement?. In this, they have to explain how they intend to ensure this involvement. They have to set down binding guidelines. Sounds good, but believe it or not, East Riding Council seems to have forgotten that one component of ?Community? is, ?Residents?. Oh yes, they seem to be (reluctantly) willing to involve parish and town councils, and certain ?organisations? in planning issues, but you and me? Forget it. As an example, I believe the following is true. In their Draft Statement, ERYC agree that it is important that a developer who wants to build an incinerator, should consult the parish council, and those vitally important people, the ?Statutory Bodies?. I believe they are even agreeable that the developer should have to consult residents living within 100 metres. If no-one lives nearer than 110 metres, I think that the developer doesn?t have to consult residents. Having spoken to the officer concerned, I do get the impression that there is nothing underhand going on, just simply that it is inconceivable that WE should be interested. It is vital that you and I involve ourselves. I don?t think that it is necessary to put ourselves forward for membership of those never-ending, non-achieving panels, but we must contribute to drawing up those guidelines. If we do, I believe that we stand to gain a little power. If we don?t, then I believe that we deserve what we get. I felt that I should draw your attention to this immediately. Call me a cynic (and I will be delighted), but is it a coincidence that East Riding have already drawn up their Draft SCI without consulting us, and that the consultation period is to be, (yes you?ve guessed), Aug. 8th ? Sept. 9th Another member Stephen Noreiko sent this: Declaration of Community Involvement or whatever it's called: Barry Robinson is looking into this for himself and FoE, and looking at the statements by ERYC and Hull. If ERYC has to consult, Barry is afraid they will contact FoE regional reps and not grassroots members. Could you ask Carole Z to be sure to pass on any such consultation requests to you to pass on to Barry? Any thoughts on this? Carole Zagrovich
|
Sun, 31 Jul 2005 If you are able to contribute a text to my database, I will be extremely grateful. Please follow the instructions below. Even if you do not feel able to complete this questionnaire yourself, I would be really grateful if you would forward it to half a dozen of your friends. I am trying to collect samples from a wide range of people with a variety of different jobs and social lives. I especially need texts from women at present.
PLEASE RETURN YOUR COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO s.a.blackwell@bham.ac.uk
Please put "Questionnaire" in the Subject field. For the "please tell me" questions below, you should use complete sentences, but apart from that be as informal as you like - imagine you were sitting talking to me.
2. Home Life You do not have to tell me their names or any other details if you don't want to; or you can change their names (but please don't change any other details). Now please tell me about your normal daily life at home in about 200-300 words. Please write in complete sentences.
3. Working Life I'd now like to know how many people you share your working area with. By "working area" I mean the space you occupy at work, surrounded by walls or partitions of some kind. It could be a room, an office, or a shop or factory floor. How many people work with you in the same working area as you? Now please tell me about your normal daily working life in about 200-300 words. Please write in complete sentences.
4. Recreation ........................................................................... Thank you for taking the time to write to me. In addition to my own research, the texts collected may be used by other people. At all times the data will be anonymous (i.e. your name and e-mail address and your employer's name will be removed) and it will be used for bona-fide academic research only. Any extracts published will be anonymous. Under no circumstances will any of this data be passed on to any commercial organisation. If you would like to know in more detail how I am using these texts, please visit my website: http://web.bham.ac.uk/sue_blackwell/research after Setpember 2005; or send me an e-mail after that date. Thank you once again for your help.
Sue Blackwell PLEASE RETURN YOUR COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO s.a.blackwell@bham.ac.uk Dave Callaghan
|
|
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 Statement of Community Involvement Until ten days ago, I had never heard of this. Since then, I have come to believe that it may be a document of the greatest importance to us, and so am researching it carefully It has been clear to me all the time that I have been campaigning against incinerators, that ordinary people are at a total disadvantage when faced with a major planning development such as, houses being built on that last green spot in the neighbourhood, or that incinerator that is to be built in a district which already has a record number of asthma cases. The Government has now told Local Authorities to involve the community more closely in planning issues. The authorities have been told to prepare a ?Statement of Community Involvement?. In this, they have to explain how they intend to ensure this involvement. They have to set down binding guidelines. Sounds good, but believe it or not, East Riding Council seems to have forgotten that one component of ?Community? is, ?Residents?. Oh yes, they seem to be (reluctantly) willing to involve parish and town councils, and certain ?organisations? in planning issues, but you and me? Forget it.
As an example, I believe the following is true. It is vital that you and I involve ourselves. I don?t think that it is necessary to put ourselves forward for membership of those never-ending, non-achieving panels, but we must contribute to drawing up those guidelines. If we do, I believe that we stand to gain a little power. If we don?t, then I believe that we deserve what we get. I felt that I should draw your attention to this immediately. Call me a cynic (and I will be delighted), but is it a coincidence that East Riding have already drawn up their Draft SCI without consulting us, and that the consultation period is to be, (yes you?ve guessed), Aug. 8th ? Sept. 9th I believe that we in the East Riding must make our contribution to Hull?s SCI as well as our own, and vice versa. I will pass details to Ian to put on the website as soon as I know what I myself am going to do. National FOE have produced a useful list of questions to be considered. I will be delighted to share my thoughts with you. But, it is essential that you act, both as members of Hull FOE, East Yorkshire EYE, and other organisations, and most important, as individuals. Contact me. Me? I?ll probably be back doing what I enjoy most, attempting to confound my favourite council. Barry Robinson
Greens worry about racist implications of ?shoot-to-kill? Would Menezes still be alive if he had been white? Greens call for public debate. "If this is Blair?s vision of Britain in the 21st century, where innocent people can be shot because they look or act differently to a norm, then it is a Britain that neither Greens nor British Muslims would want to live in." - Khalid Hussenbux, Green Party national executive. The Green Party issued a warning today that Britain could resemble a racist police state if issues surrounding the death of Brazilian electrician Jean Charles de Menezes are not openly addressed in public debate. Yesterday it was claimed that not only was Menezes not wearing a "bulky" jacket, but that he had not in fact leapt over ticket barriers after all... Khalid Hussenbux, a Muslim member of the Green Party?s national executive said ?Day-by-day the balance of evidence seems to be tipping away from the presumption that police were protecting the public towards a realisation that a terrified innocent man was hunted down and shot repeatedly in the head, with little justification, in front of horrified fellow passengers.? Khalid Hussenbux said ?Obviously, Menezes was not white. What Greens want to know is how this factor heightened police suspicions and therefore cemented Menezes' fate. Would they have shot him so easily if he had been white, if he had not arguably looked Muslim? "If this is Blair?s vision of Britain in the 21st century, where innocent people can be shot because they look or act differently to a norm, then it is a Britain that neither Greens nor British Muslims would want to live in. "Greens do not want to see a parallel of the stop-and-search phenomenon, which has so disproportionately affected black males, becoming not only an everyday but a potentially lethal value judgement put upon innocent people - especially Muslims - by the police and by their fellow citizens. If Labour cannot understand the pressure and distress that this puts on British Muslims and those from other minority ethnic groups, then they are not fit to govern this country in these complex times." ENDS Interviews and Comment, contact Green Party press office on 0207 561 0282 press@greenparty.org.uk Ian Ibbetson
I have sent the letter below to Charles Clarke, and modified it to Diana Johnson. You may feel inspired to, too. NO2ID Cards meeting - tnite, 7.30pm - St Cuthberts Church hall , Marlborough Ave. (down right, behind church)
Regards
Diana Johnson - johnsond@parliament.uk What happened on Friday with the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes was a tragedy. Everyone will accept that the police have a difficult job - but it should remain difficult. There are no shortcuts to justice in a society that truly wants to regard itself as free and fair. From what I have read and heard so far I do not accept that his death was an 'unfortunate accident'. Despite the threat from bombings that we have seen recently, and the stubborn refusal on the part of some to see these as related to international events, I do not want to see Britain descend down the path of 'guilty until proven innocent (posthumously)' or of 'summary executions on suspicion'. My first suspicions from reports on Friday have been confirmed. Will you support the carrying out of a full investigation? Do you expect the outcome likely to be just and fair to the memory of Mr Menezes? By this I am expecting that the officer(s) concerned do not remain immune from prosecution. However, if we were to agree that suicide bombers should be stopped at any cost then at what stage do we blow up the entire block of flats in Stockwell? (If you think this an exaggeration let's remember it's routine to drop a 500lb bomb in whatever general area is identified to be the origin of a mortar round - by our allies in Iraq). Would you tend to agree that it is not proportionate to chase a dark skinned man and put 5 bullets in his head. On suspicion. This way we can end up justifying anything and losing everything worth fighting for. Please remember too, the predecessors in the Home Office, who in a similar 'serious-minded' reaction presided over proceedings which found 4 then 6 Irish men guilty of bombings in Guildford and Birmingham. They were all innocent. Just as ID cards won't stop suicide bombers, neither will the use of fatal force by the police on innocent civilians. The indications so far clearly point to inadequate ascertaining by the police as to the true nature of this good and decent man. It hardly needs saying that the officer who shot him was white, nor does it need pointing out that the victim was of darker skin. Quotes today seem to be putting society on notice that more of these shootings are on the way. Please undertake to work against this. Yours sincerely,
Some questions to your councillors:
Carbon Trading - it could cost ?15 per tonne of carbon dioxide produced and carbon stable storage could receive ?10 per tonne. Has your county/waste operator planned to pay carbon taxes for the ?15 times the tonnage burnt? Will this appear on council taxes? Is there any scientific evidence to prove that the burning of plastic (oil based product) can be classed as "renewable energy"? (Carbon Fiddling)! Nitrous Oxides can causes many health problems, and is reported to be a stronger greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Again who is responsible for these emissions. Is it the operator, the local authority or the taxpayer? Chris
.. take care over such figures - rather more than a tonne of CO2; also costs can be quoted as tonnes of C within the CO2, which is 12/44 times less. ...much less than 2 tonnes of nitrogen oxides (NO, NO2, not nitrous oxide N2O) especially when NOx abatement is working (as required). Max Wallis
Bombing & Dissent 2 minutes for the dead last Thursday ought to translate as 88 hours silence for 100,000 Iraqi dead. But there won't be silence for them, there will only be the rainbow rhetoric of Blair and his acolytes 'extending hearts in sympathy for the (British) bereaved', and "condemning terrorism" (though not ours) and calling on Muslim leaders and parents to drive fanaticism from their communities. But it doesn't take much to subvert the rhetoric and show it for what it is. Just replace "Muslim" with "Christian". We call on all Christian leaders and parents to drive out the fanatics! Yes please! Fanatics who would lead us to war, so committed to war they lie and lie and lie, so committed to war that they spend more on their military than the entire remainder of the world (USA, 2004/5), so committed they are prepared to strike with nuclear weapons first. They will make the most of it they possibly can. Tony Blair, Charles Clarke and Jack Straw, today, ludicrously suggesting our illegal/immoral attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq, had nothing to do with the London bombings. It's an easy claim, "they are attacking our way of life". But whose way of life? Tony Blair's way of life certainly is not mine. I would not dream of joining George Bush and his wars, or keeping Britain number two in the arms trade, nor support sanctions on Iraq, now reliably estimated to have killed 1.5 million Iraqis, half of them children. (UN) Their words are like rat poison, Tony Blair, Clarke, Straw, the others. They are PR men for the Empire. Do they all have Bush's speechwriter nowadays? You don't have to listen to them. Feel free to turn off your TV or radio. Listen to your own instincts. Write your own speech! Send it in. Martin
The very idea that we should be considered intelligent enough to take part in such a process fills me with awe. However, having experienced, over the last six years ,the seeming efforts of our officers to make sure that we have no role, I suggest that we grasp the opportunity, cut through the hype, and TRY to have some influence on the matter. Our draft 'Statement of Community Involvement' went before the East Riding of Yorkshire Council Cabinet on 14th July. It will appear on council's website on 21st. Open for consultation in August. I?m afraid that I don?t know anything about Hull?s. Thanks to whoever it was who drew my attention to it. As usual, (WHY do they do it?), I expect it to receive minimum publicity. I had no idea this was at all important, nor that it was in the pipeline. Will all local campaigners in Hull and East Riding note that we need to take part in the consultation. Barry Robinson
Why not stay for a social after for a while? Contact: Tim Sander tims@foe.co.uk, or ring 0113 389 9954
Sue
Lindis and Anni
The fact is that there is little evidence to suggest that ID cards are effective in combatting the sort of terrorist outrage seen in London today. Unfortunately that is unlikely to prevent the government from using today's tragedy to leverage their plans to promote a police state in the UK at our expense. If you are concerned about this issue please try to make it on Monday Evening, or contact either myself or Alisdair. Regards Ian Ibbetson
Stephen
Tues 5th - Bournemouth, Hull and Bury
Many thanks for all your hard work and best wishes,
Lou Krzan Louise Krzan
Martin
Tues 5th - Bournemouth, Hull and Bury
Many thanks for all your hard work and best wishes,
Lou Krzan Louise Krzan
Hilary
WASTE STRATEGY REVIEW ACTION
To read Friends of the Earth Northern Irelands press release, please
visit:
To read the Northern Ireland Audit office's report please visit:
http://www.niauditoffice.gov.uk/pubs/reports/
2005/wastemanagement/fullreport.pdf
|
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 To all Groups: The attacks on London by suicide bombers on July 7 and July 21, together with the killing of an innocent man by police on July 22 have led to a major increase in tension throughout the country. This situation imposes new responsibilities on the anti-war movement in articulating the desire of the majority of the British people to see an end to the occupation of Iraq and the ?war on terror? and to preserve our fundamental civil liberties in the face of both terrorism and the palpable risk of an authoritarian backlash by the state. The Stop the War Coalition has condemned unequivocally the bombings and attempted bombings in London. No disagreements with government policy can justify these acts. Those killed and maimed are not the authors of that policy, nor its instruments, nor its beneficiaries. Their killing is as unjustifiable as the killing of civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan or elsewhere, killings StWC has always condemned. We have likewise condemned the death of Jean Charles de Menezes. He committed no crime other than having the wrong coloured skin and wearing the wrong clothes. His death is in large part attributable to the anti-Muslim hysteria whipped up by sections of the media, allied to disastrously faulty police intelligence. There can be no question of any support for a ?shoot-to-kill? policy implemented in such a climate and in such a fashion. Regrettably, it is more than likely that we have not seen the last of either suicide bombing or police killings in this country. Under these circumstances, the critical issues we all face are the need to continue to address British foreign policy, to prevent any backlash against the Muslim community and the broader defence of civil liberties. We reject any attempts to close down debate on these issues, any tendency for analysis to be equated with appeasement, debate with treachery. The search for the root causes of the present problems is not merely defensible, it is essential. Those supporters of the Iraq war in government or in the media who are presently trying to deny debate, lest it implicate the policies they have advocated, are not serving the interests of the British people. 85 per cent of the British people now believe that there is a connection between the London bombings and the Iraq conflict. This linkage is acknowledged by the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre and the famous Chatham House think tank, amongst others. This argument is all but over. The invasion and occupation of Iraq is shorthand for wider concerns about Anglo-US foreign policy, as well as being a catastrophe in itself. These other concerns include the failure to secure justice for the Palestinian people, the occupation of Afghanistan, the imprisonment foe years without trial at Guantanamo Bay and the continued support for despotisms like that in Saudi Arabia, as well as earlier problems such as the immense suffering caused by the sanctions regime against Iraq. We repeat that none of these issues can justify what was done on July 7 or attempted on July 21, but nor can they be ignored if there is to be any hope of avoiding a repetition. We reject the view that the terrorism is rooted in Muslim fanaticism. This mistakes form for content. It is no more real than saying that George Bush is following a ?Christian fundamentalist? foreign policy, or that the IRA was animated by Catholicism rather than the Irish national question. The attempt by the Prime Minister to locate the problem as simply ?evil ideology? stokes the danger of a violent backlash against British Muslims, as well as being a wholly inadequate explanation of events. It may be convenient for Tony Blair to avoid confronting the part played by his own mistakes, but this rhetoric can only add to the climate of panic. The Stockwell shooting is the most extreme _expression of this panic to date. It must be said loud and clear: neither Muslims nor Islam are the problem. Terrorism is rooted in real problems here on earth. In particular, the StWC expresses its solidarity with the Muslim Association of Britain, our partners in the anti-war movement. Major attempts are being made to demonise MAB, no doubt because of its active political role in opposition to the invasion and occupation of Iraq. Immense pressure is presently being placed on British Muslim leaders to back the government?s policy in this crisis. This seems to have less to do with the security situation and more to do with giving the government shelter from criticism of its policies which have contributed to the disaffection of large numbers of people, both Muslim and others. It is totally unacceptable for ministers and media pundits to now assert that Muslims must ?choose between democracy and terrorism?. British Muslims have already overwhelmingly rejected terror for democracy. It was the government itself which ignored the views of the British people when it took this country to war against Iraq in defiance of majority opinion. Hundreds of thousands of British Muslims marched on February 15, and protested around the country against the war, most for the first time. They were ignored, democracy was denied. This contributes to the conditions that drive desperate and foolish people to commit terrible criminal acts. Today, the unity of the anti-war movement is more vital than ever. We must stand up for peace and freedom. The trade unions, peace and human rights organisations, socialists, liberals and Greens, the nationalists in Scotland and Wales, Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Sikh, Hindu and other religious groups must stand together for our common values. We must stand with the Muslim community in its time of trial and resist panic legislation which will do little to make people safer while handing vast new powers to the state and the expense of individual and collective liberties. Above all, we must redouble our campaign to secure the complete withdrawal of British troops from Iraq. We should not do this because of July 7, but because it is right. It is right because of the 100,000 civilian deaths recorded since the occupation began, many of them violent, and most of these attributable to the occupying forces. Right because of the terrorism that has mushroomed in Iraq since Britain and the US unlawfully constituted themselves the authority there. Right because of the terrible economic and social dislocation after two years of occupation. Right because of the torture and degradation of civilians carried out by British and US forces at Abu Ghraib and Camp Breadbasket. Right because the reasons advanced for the war have all been shown to be false, because the war was illegal, and the occupation is a continuing affront to international law. And right because of the 92 British soldiers killed, and the hundreds wounded, in the course of this adventure which has demonstrably failed to make our country safer. We must campaign for the troops to be withdrawn no later than Christmas this year. This is the policy of many trade unions, of the Liberal Democratic Party, of many other political forces and a considerable body of Labour opinion. It is also supported by most of the country. This campaign cannot be silenced by the tragedies in London. It must be redoubled. That must be the priority for our great people?s movement for peace and justice. Martin Deane
It is clear in Chester's that they like the idea of tick boxes. You know, you don't put in anything useful, you just tick airy-fairy ideas. BUT, the 'Soundness of the Statement will be examined by an Inspector at an independent examination' So get in there. Send in your comments along with your tick box list. Demand to be allowed to contact the Inspector. Then demand to be allowed into any meetings.. This may be OUR opportunity to get things done as we want them. If we act half-heartedly, then it will be the last chance w ever get as the mafia are just waiting.
If anyone wants any help then I'll be happy to help. Barry Robinson
With the tragedy of the London bombings coming so quickly after the euphoria of the winning Olympic bid it has been all to easy for the cause that brought millions of people together around the world in a common ideal to fade into the background, some E.U. governments are already being accused of reneging on or watering down promises made at Gleneagles. We all know that they were only prepared to go as far as they were being pushed in the first place, but hey, the door is ajar and i for one won't be removing my toe just yet. So, where do we go from here? Well, i will be going along to the Make Poverty History meeting on the 2nd August for a start, hopefully you wiil to. If you can't make the meeting stay in touch, anyone with ideas for actions to keep MPH high profile in Hull and surrounding areas please let me know. Cheers, Bryan Berue
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 Also remember...
Hull Pagans Online: * Saturday July 9th. The Suppressed Goddess. The Goddess hidden in Christian texts, Black Madonnas, forbidden gospels...Talk by Pippa (01482 492230).
Sun, 29 May 2005
LAND FUND
FOR SALE:
HULL PAGANS ONLINE: Pub Moots
Next Spring Bank Tavern Moot - Monday 6th June, from
8pm as usual. Sacred Grove
*11am at Beverley Westwood on Sunday June 12th * Saturday July 9th. The Suppressed Goddess. The Goddess hidden in Christian texts, Black Madonnas, forbidden gospels...Talk by Pippa . Open Rituals Does anyone want to organise a Summer Solstice open ritual? If so let me know the details an I will send a message to everyone. Quite a few of us will be at oakleaf for Lammas and there will be a ritual there. If people who are staying in Hull want to organise an open ritual I can pass on the details to everyone. Just let me know. It has been suggested that we do a ritual on a beach for the Autumn Equinox (we have done a beach ritual before and it was great). Not more details or ideas yet. For Samhain the curent idea is to move from house to house in the Avenues area, singing "The Soul Song" and picking up people as we go.
Forthcoming Moots * August - We usually do not have a moot in August as it is peak holiday time, but if anyone wants to do something please let me know. Actually here may be a mask making moot at the end of June, bu this is yet to be confirmed * September - Making magical tools - talk/workshop by Kim * October - Celtic Deities - talk by Ron Trips Camping at Anglesey and North Wales 13 June --19 June. Oakleaf Camp In the past few years quite a few of us have gone to the Oakleaf Camp(and had a great time there). The following information is taken from the Oakleaf web site. Note that this event is not organised by Hull Pagans. Their web address is www.oakleafcircle.org. (oakleafcircle@aol.com) "The next Lammas Camp is on the weekend of the 30th/31st July 2005, on a farm near Ripon in North Yorkshire. Although the Camp is officially on the Saturday and Sunday, people can arrive and set up from Friday noon onwards, and pack up and leave on the Monday morning. We haven't yet set ticket prices. Tickets have been or are being sent out around now. If you sent off an application a while ago and hav not got tickets yet it would be a good idead to contact oakleaf by email. New on-line discussion group for Hull Pagans!
Amy has set up a new on line discussion group (to
replace the yahoo one). The Land Fund Debate This is an attempt to document (in no particular order) the key issues for debate (written by Philip and Ian) For a while now we have (somewhat on and off) been raising money for what we call the "land fund" or sometimes "tree fund". From the very first moments of the idea being discussed (and the first money collected) in a Sping Bank Monday Moot different people have had different ideas of what it was about. After Tony's recent talk on Dion Fortune we discussed some of the issues relating to the land fund and it was clear that there was a range of opinions on the matter. It was decided we should have a meeting for eveyone interested in being involved in the project (including fund raising, "committee work", work with whatever land we might eventually obtain/use). Before the meeting we thought that it would be a good idea to write a paper describing all the issues, options and ideas so that it could be circulated and everyone would well informed before the meeting. Philip started writing the debate summary and I have added a few bits to it. Is the site primarily for use as a ritual site or for nature conservation? Levels of use/access we may consider: i) untouched conservation/wildness; ii) managed conservation; iii) conservation and ritual; iv) conservation, ritual and other uses and v) ritual and other uses with no specific conservation effort. If it's for nature conservation, wouldn't it be better to donate the money to one of those organisations (such as the Woodland Trust) who are doing this already, know what they're doing and can do things on a much larger scale? On the other hand if people have the time and enthusiasm we could probably learn how to manage a site for conservation and this may be a way of "connecting with nature". Could we work with a conservation group? joint ownership and/or management? If the site is for nature conservation should it be managed or simply be allowed to "grow wild". Most conservation groups manage their land to improved biodiversity and improve habitat for less common or more sensitive species. Particularly high quality (for a conservation point of view) sites can occur spontaneously on so called "waste ground", but this is relatively rare. But maybe "quality" conservation is not a primary issue and it would be preferable to allow some kind of "wild state" (whatever happens to grow/live there). Is there a problem with dual use (ritual and conservation)? Assuming only we had access to the land, ritual use would probably result in quite a small level of access/disturbance (e.g. compared to nature reserves open to the public). Also, we could stop use/access at particular times if we knew it was necessary (e.g. breeding season of sensitive species). We could go further with use of the land. E.g. coppice trees, harvest berries for ritual wine and herbs for magic, practice woodland crafts etc. This should of course be done in a spirit of living with/connecting with the land in a sustainable way. If the site is used for ritual will some kind of booking system for different groups be needed? Who gets priority when? Would we need a rota? Would everyone want access at the same time (seasonal celebrations, lunar cycles). Will this cause disharmony? But, if the site was large enough it may accommodate more than one group at a time? Should the site be somewhere in Hull or somewhere out in the East Riding? If it is Hull how would the site be protected? Would it too easily be used as a rubbish tip by non-pagan residents of Hull? Should it be an existing area of woodland or, in view of the fact that the East Riding is one of the least wooded counties, should we get a piece of open land and turn it into a wood either by planting trees (quick) or just leaving it for 50 years (slow - perhaps too slow for some of us!)? Then there are the boring things like whether we need to establish the fund formally, have a committee, constitution, bank account, etc.; also, the question of insurance will need to be raised. If our land is adjacent to a public road and a tree fell down on someone we would need to be insured. Then again, do we need land anyway? Many pagans feel that one of the advantages of paganism is that we don't have buildings to upkeep, like the Christian churches for example, and that we can just go out into the countryside and find somewhere to do a ritual: we don't need to own the land. Philip, for example, has performed many rituals in the countryside but never been stopped by landowners or gamekeepers. On the other hand, maybe owning the land would help us interact with it more deeply, so it maybe would be more than the equivalent of a church building?
|