Some make you laugh. Some make you angry. But they all give
you that "shake your head in amazement feeling" and
make you wonder if they really believe what they said.
11/5/00
From CNN BOTH SIDES
When asked by Jesse Jackson what issues had the most appeal to
African-Americans this election, David Bositis replied
that "it has not been about issues" but the record unemployment,
the Clinton record, the "Cabinet that looks like America."
He said that African-Americans "want 20 more years of this
administration."
OK folks, let's see if you want 20 more years of this: Impeachment,
Joycelyn Elders, the first president to be held in contempt of
court, first president to give perjured testimony before a federal
grand jury . . . and in a civil deposition, Janet Reno, cigar
jokes, "I never had sex with that woman" while a finger
is wagged in your face on national TV, turning 200 years of proud
US history in the Oval Office into the Oral Office, Ron Brown,
attempted socializing of the best health care system in the world,
Henry Cisneros, Waco, a semen stained blue dress, sellout of our
nuclear secrets, Hazel O'Leary, "it depends on what the definition
of the word 'is'is", Mike Espy, pardons of crooks like Rostinkowski,
a body count of over 50 dead people connected to Clinton, . .
.
Mr. Bositis, there is about another megabyte of info I could
give but liberals just don't bend.
And by the way, this economy and prosperity that you people like
to hang on Clinton and GoreI have a few words for you to
research: demographics, supply and demand, worldwide economy,
corporate restructuring in the late 80s . . . that is what self
drives the economy, not Billy Boy pushing buttons in the Oval
Office at some master control panel making the earth spin and
creating that "record unemployment" you refer to.
To put it bluntly, Mr. Bositis, Clinton and Gore did not have
a damn thing to do with the prosperity over the last eight years.
And what little politics had to do with it, a Republican Congress
wrote the laws. Clinton was the worst president in U.S. history.
Strip away the economy, that he had zilch to do with, and you
are left with a felonious liar who tarnished our proud history
and trashed our justice system throughout the impeachment and
his entire eight years.
Care to go for 30 more years Mr. Bositis?
David Bositis is an analyst with the Joint Center for Political
Economic Studies, a DC based think tank for issues of concern
to African Americans
12/17/00
From NBC NEWS MEET THE PRESS Jesse Jackson:
"The right-wing Supreme Court subsidized this illegitimacy
on one of its lower moments. The election was essentially taken
and stolen."
12/15/00
From PBS POLITICAL WRAP
Mark Shields: "I don't think justice was done. I think
that Al Gore showed enormous respect and great example, almost
an inspiration for following the rule of law."
Four Part Series
Legacy Lies
Starts in Issue # 2
|
|
You remember that statistician from Yale that the Gore legal team
trotted out in Judge Sauls' court in Tallahassee. Are your ribs
still sore from the laugh you got as he tried to explain how his
graphs showed Al Gore should have more votes?
Perhaps the Democrats will drag him out again to help the Census
Bureau in their effort to get more votes once again, this time for
future elections. It seems they feel there are serious undercounts
(something akin to undervotes) in the Census for minorities, a core
constituency of the Democrats.
Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-NY,
sits on the U.S. Census Monitoring Board. It seems that Rep. Maloney
is circulating a letter in the House asking that the Senate not
confirm Don Evans for Commerce until the Bush Administration says
what it tends to do regarding the Census numbers. Actual head count
numbers would be used if the GOP had its way. The Democrats are
insisting on using "fuzzy math" and sampling to help them
in their pursuit of Congressional seats. It will be fun watching
how the districts are redrawn this go around. There were some real
interesting districts drawn last time. In addition, state legislatures
would also see their districts affected.
I wonder if these types of letters were circulated by Republicans
before Ron Brown got confirmed for Commerce or before William Daley
got confirmed for Commerce.
So when you hear Republicans talk of "reaching across the
aisle," I hope their arms don't get sliced off by the machete
wielding Democrats.
Corrupt Leaders
Bipartisanship's First Act of 2001
1/3/00
As the 107th Congress convened, the Democrats preached
bipartisanship. Then, they turn around immediately and kick D-OH
Rep. James Traficant out of the House Democratic Caucus and told
him he would not be getting a committee assignment.
Why? Some major scandal?
Try voting his conscious as he voted for Rep. Hastert for speaker
calling him a "man of the people."
So this is the "bipartisanship" and the "reaching
across the aisle" the Democrats refer to. If I am correct,
these are the same Democrats who wanted Bush to smoke the peace
pipe and choose some Dems for the Cabinet.
If this is how they treat their own, it will be interesting too
see how they treat Bush in this bipartisanship lovefest this year.
Corrupt Organizations
Tip of the Iceberg
So far, David Kidwell of the Miami Herald reports that of the "144
illegal votes in Miami-Dade reported by The Herald on Sunday included
97 people who weren't registered, 25 ineligible felons, 20 people
who had moved out of the county, one person declared legally incompetent
to vote, and someone who voted on behalf of André Alismé, a Little
Haiti man who died of cancer in 1997."
As the various groups continue the count of the ballots, it is
more important to pry deeper into what actually happened on Nov.
7th as the Miami Herald is doing. There are reports of up to 2000
illegal votes by felons statewide in Florida. Who is actually comparing
voter signature lists counts with the actual ballot cast counts?
With reports of dimples made by putting more than one ballot at
a time in the machine, should we not see these comparative numbers?
What happened in Florida is not unique. Had New Mexico, Wisconsin,
or any other state been the been the swing state, you would have
seen their ballots put under the microscope as well. The only difference
would have been the Democrats' villains would have had different
names and people in Bismarck would not know who Kathleen Harris
was.
Wouldn't it be great to see the focus on Philadelphia, Detroit,
or some other liberal bastion and have Judicial Watch and tons of
others combing through the voter registration lists there?
If we want true election reform, we need to do exactly that. For
all the Democrats ranting and raving about counting, their home
turf is where the real corruption lies, not in the chad strewn office
floors of south Florida.
Copyright
© 2001 Sentry over America
|
|
Tired of the centrist mumble? Here are some refreshing comments
straight from the"tell it like it is" school.
12/24/00
From NBC NEWS MEET THE PRESS
Bill Safirefor saying
that a missile defense will be a top foreign policy challenge because
the "idea of the United States being defenseless against a
Saddam Hussein or North Korea is inconceivable."
12/17/00
From NBC NEWS MEET THE PRESS
Andy Cardfor not dancing around a key reason
for Bush receiving only 8% of the black vote, namely the racist
ad put out by the NAACP, calling it "really irresponsible and
unfair" and said that it "may have polarized that community."
From Moral Majority founder Jerry Falwell: "The journey
from Reno to Ashcroft is a journey from utter darkness to brilliant
light."
Off the Mark
Somehow, they have gotten off track. Was it just a bad day?
An urge to be politically correct? Or have they been sucked in to
that vacuum created by the Democrats flying at Warp Factor 9 headed
to leftist land? You decide.
12/24/00
From NBC NEWS MEET THE PRESS
Do we need to put Newt Gingrich
on some sort of watch list? Has he been hanging around too many
liberals lately? Maybe he needs to get off the speaker circuit for
a while since he is usually on one of those shows that always has
at least one liberal on it. Some of us catch bronchitis and sinusitis
this time of year. Newt, apparently, has caught liberalitis.
When commenting on lessons learned this election, he poured honey
all over Gore's concession speech, going so far as to say that people
worldwide would be "reading that speech for several generations."
Newt said Gore was clear that "we're all subordinate in the
end to the process of law."
You don't say, Newt. Is this the same Al Gore who insisted that
some votes "were never counted, not even once"? Is lying
part of the "process of law"? Al Gore's direction of 50
plus lawsuits in an attempt to steal an electionwas that part
of this "process of law also?" . . . or the Al Gore's
"process of law" that had to have the Supreme Court say
his methods went smack against equal protection?
Newt later referenced the demographic breakdown of the vote and
said that "people of color find it difficult to listen to the
issues because they've been so convinced that the Republican Party
isn't open to them." Newt, why didn't you explain WHY they
feel the Party is not open to them? How about these for starters:
what Andy Card said about racist ads, the usual liberal tirades
at their churches, the liberal press giving so much time to the
Al Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons . . . how often do you see Walter
E. Williams, Clarence Page, or Thomas Sowell on those talk shows?
Hope you get to feeling better soon, Newt. I like you too much
to see you in this condition.
Send an E-mail to
Newt
|