Home Page
Archives—Index of Issues
About Sentry
Contact Us
Letters to the Editor
Register

The Farcical Fools

at Free Republic

 

Go To Sentry Over America's

Free Republic
Moron of the Morning

 

Sentry Over America
Hall of Reverence
Hall of Shame
Right Resource Directory
Talk Show Host Misfires

Proof Jim Robinson is a Liar

 

Free Republic's Moron of the Morning

 

Sentry Over America
 
Sentry Over America
 
Presents Issue 1
The Farcical Fools at Free Republic—Asswiper Rankings
 
What is more hilarious than people who think they are conservative but support liberal agenda...
the Farcical Fools at Free Republic, that's who!
TOP 10 ASSWIPERS
 

The TOP 10 ASSWIPER awards go to those members who are anxious to wipe the ass of Jim Robinson and then refuse to wash their hands. And, they support socialist agenda from Bush because Jim Rob (RimJob) tells them to.

These members will defend their beloved braindead buddy no matter what stupid post he makes. They also attack any member who dares to express an insightful opinion of conservative thought. That would run contrary to Jim Robinson's continual backing of leftist agenda.
Last Issue
This Issue
ASSWIPER
-
1
Jim Robinson
-
2
The Old Hoosier
-
3
OldFriend
-
4
nopardons
-
5
Texasforever
-
6
Miss Marple
-
7
Southack
-
8
Kaslin
-
9
Howlin
-
10
Kevin Curry

 

Examples of Comments that Lead to Suspension

The following comments were made in a thread by Sentry Over America in response to one of Free Republic's resident idiot's constant claiming that Bush is a conservative. I pointed out that Bush was spending money on social/foreign waste at a clip far greater than Scumbag and is a liberal on social and fiscal issues.

Because this idiot and a few little friends in his clique of cheerleaders for Bush found that they could not dispute the following facts, they asked the moderator to ban me. I was suspended for seven days for posting "spam" when in reality they were all distinct quotes from Bush on wild liberal spending since the September 11th attack. No profanity, no personal attacks, nothing like that. It was a suspension for posting pure conservative opinion in response to posts by this idiot "Southack" about supporting liberal and socialist moves by our government . What follows are a few of the posts I made from President Bush and are an example of what can get you suspended or banned on "Free (LOL!)" Republic, namely free speech and conservative thought:

1/10/02

"Today I have signed into law H.R. 2506, the "Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2002. . . The Act will provide $15.4 billion . . . and includes essential funding to support America's war on terrorism. The Act supports such key Administration initiatives as the campaign against HIV/AIDS, with up to $100 million available for the global fund to fight HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis and an additional $100 million is also provided . . ."—President Bush (instead of protecting us from nuclear attack, the war on terrorism will be fought by the campaign against global HIV/AIDS—are you ready to run to the hills yet?)

***

3/14/2

. . .the United States provides more than $10 billion a year for development assistance for food and for humanitarian aid. That is also why my administration has committed $500 million to the global fund to fight aids and other infectious diseases. . .

We will increase our development assistance by $5 billion over the three -- over the next three budget cycles. This new money above and beyond existing aid requests -- is above and beyond existing aid requests in the current budget I submitted to the Congress. . . .

. . .we will expand our fight against AIDS; we will bring computer instruction to young professionals in developing nations; we will assist African businesses and their people to sell goods abroad; we will provide textbooks and training to students in Islamic and African countries; we will apply the power of science and technology to increase harvests where hunger is greatest."—President Bush

Does this look like Bush is aggressively spending money wisely to prevent the "inevitable nuclear attack on America"? Is money being spent on preventing this nuclear attack or on social waste and foreign waste?

***

3/22/02

"I have proposed a 50-percent increase in our core development assistance over the next three budget years. Eventually, this will mean a $5-billion annual increase over current levels. . . We should give more of our aid in the form of grants, rather than loans that can never be repaid. . . Developing countries receive approximately $50 billion every year in aid."—President Bush

"There will be another terrorist attack. We will not be able to stop it," FBI Director Robert Mueller told a meeting of the National Association of District Attorneys on Monday [May 20, 2002]. "It's something we all live with."

Does this look like Bush is aggressively spending money wisely to prevent the "inevitable nuclear attack on America"? Is money being spent on preventing this nuclear attack or on social waste and foreign waste?

***

1/8/2002

President Bush today signed into law the No Child Left Behind Act . . .Implements President Bush's Reading First initiative by increasing federal funding for reading programs from $300 million in FY 2001 to more than $900 million in FY 2002,(a 200% increase when inflation is running less than 3%!!!) . . .Strengthens teacher quality by providing $2.8 billion for teacher quality programs . . .Federal Title I funds (approximately $500 to $1,000 per child) can be used to provide supplemental educational services - including tutoring, after school services, and summer school programs . . .combining categorical bilingual and immigrant education grants . . . (nuclear attack you say?)

Does this look like Bush is aggressively spending money wisely to prevent the "inevitable nuclear attack on America"? Is money being spent on preventing this nuclear attack or on social waste and foreign waste?

***

1/10/02

"Today I have signed into law H.R. 3061, . . .$10.4 billion for title I grants to close the achievement gap, . . .$1 billion for Reading First and Early Reading First. . . $2.9 billion for State grants for improving teacher quality . . . $7.5 billion for State Grants for Special Education, an increase of $1.2 billion over FY 2001 (19% increase when inflation is running less than 3%)

Does this look like Bush is aggressively spending money wisely to prevent the "inevitable nuclear attack on America"? Is money being spent on preventing this nuclear attack or on social waste and foreign waste?

***

1/11/02

President Signs Brownfields Bill!!!!!!!!!!!

The White House says the request would be $200 million, compared with the 2002 level of $98 million. (that's a 104% increase when inflation is running less than 3%)

Will you be dead or alive when President Bush signs the Radioactivefields Bill?

***

1/18/2002

National Sanctity of Human Life Day, 2002

"This Nation was founded upon the belief that every human being is endowed by our Creator with certain "unalienable rights." Chief among them is the right to life itself."—President Bush

Thank you, Mr. President. I can see since September 11, the sanctity of life itself shows up in your spending habits as you aggressively prepare for the inevitable nuclear attack on America!

</sarcasm>

***

1/30/02

President Bush will demonstrate his support for this effort by requesting more than $560 million in new funding for the USA Freedom Corps in his FY 2003 budget. . . The President's budget for FY 03 will request $144 million in matching funds to support the formation and training of local Citizen Corps Councils . . . The President's FY 03 budget provides more than $230 million for these efforts, including: Volunteers in Police Service (VIPS) Program . . .

Does this look like Bush is aggressively spending money wisely to prevent the "inevitable nuclear attack on America"? Is money being spent on preventing this nuclear attack or on social waste and foreign waste?

***

2/12/02

"On Tuesday, February 12, 2002, the President signed into law:

H.R. 700, which reauthorizes appropriations for the Asian Elephant Conservation Fund through FY 2007."—Office of the Press Secretary to the White House

Does this look like Bush is aggressively spending money wisely to prevent the "inevitable nuclear attack on America"? Is money being spent on preventing this nuclear attack or on social waste and foreign waste?

***

2/14/02

"Overall, my budget devotes $4.5 billion to addressing climate change -- more than any other nation's commitment in the entire world.  This is an increase of more than $700 million over last year's budget."—President Bush

Does this look like Bush is aggressively spending money wisely to prevent the "inevitable nuclear attack on America"? Is money being spent on preventing this nuclear attack or on social waste and foreign waste?

***

2/14/02

"My budget includes over $220 million for the U.S. Agency for International Development and a global environmental facility to help developing countries better measure, reduce emissions . . ."—President Bush

AND

2/14/02

"The new budget also provides $40 million under the Tropical Forest Conservation Act . . .our commitment to provide $25 million for climate observation systems in developing countries."—President Bush

"We can tap the power of economic growth to further protect our environment for generations that follow."—President Bush

OK, but how do we protect ourselves from radiation death from the inevitable nuclear attack that you are so viciously fighting against with your spending of the national treasury?

The idiot I was responding to in these posts was "Southack" the #7 ranked ASSWIPER. He kept posting non-stop that Bush did not sign the Kyoto Treaty like it was some verification that Bush was a conservative. This guy's world, BTW, revolves around the "Kyoto Accords".

I posted these and a number of other actual quotes from George Bush pointing out that we should be concentrating our resources on defending OUR nation, not on all this social and foreign waste.

. . . AND I GOT BANNED FOR 7 DAYS!

Again, Free Republic is no longer a forum for serious debate and for the pro-conservative cause.

Free Republic is a farcical caricature of itself, a pro-socialist site for fools who call themselves conservative but are practicing socialists.

For those few good conservatives still at Free Republic who hate the liberal bias and the censorship, we invite you to join some great forums and sites of outstanding conservative thought.

For starters, try Ether Zone. It has insightful and creative writers and also runs a forum the way it should be run.
 

Proof Jim Robinson is a Liar

Jim Robinson (RimJob) comes in with the #1 ranking in this, the inaugural issue, of the Farcical Fools at Free Republic. On a 6/27/02 thread by "balzizras" from the web site "lewrockwell.com" titled "Good Riddance to the Pledge" RimJob chimed in on post # 2 with this brilliant post:

To: balzizras

Hey Lew, Put a sock sock in it. Who asked you anyway.

2 posted on 6/27/02 2:34 AM Pacific by Jim Robinson

Well, what do we expect from itsy bitsy minds. Poor 'ol RimJob does not have the, shall we say, "computing power" to look and see that Lew Rockwell did not write the article! It was written by Brad Edmonds.

balzizras then came back and pointed this "bit of fact" out to the idiot RimJob in post #5:

To: Jim Robinson

"Hey Lew, Put a sock sock in it. Who asked you anyway."

Good ole Lewie didn't even write that article ... And even if he did why should he "put a sock in it"? And if he should, shouldn't you too? I mean no one asked you either. ;-p

5 posted on 6/27/02 2:40 AM Pacific by balzizras

Right you are, balzizras. RimJob is too stupid to see that Lew did not write that article--he did host it since his web site offers free speech, unlike the pathetic and heavily censored Free Republic. But you see, RimJob has a one-track goal and that is to shoot down, deride, delete, or ban anyone who dares write an opinion that differs from his foggy thought process.

And how did the idiot RimJob respond? Like this:

To: balzizras

Hey, I didn't go to his web site If I wanted to read what he publishes, I would go there. And those who come to this web site (for the most part) do want to read what's here. So you put a sock in it. It's for damned sure no one asked you. Thank you very much.

9 posted on 6/27/02 2:45 AM Pacific by Jim Robinson

Now RimJob has banned numerous outstanding conservative thinkers for being courteous to other members but their problem was they simply expressed an opinion that was pro-conservative.

For being a hypocrite and using abusive language, and for banning good members who were far more courteous than what the owner of the web site has proven, RimJob comes in with the #1 ASSWIPER ranking. (BTW, idiot, you did not have to go to Lew's web site--it clearly stated on your own web site that Brad Edmonds wrote the article, not Lew Rockwell).

The Old Hoosier comes in at # 2 for the following:

According to Joe Hadenuf: Official Free Republic Position Parallels GOP On Immigration. No Big Deal

6/23/02 | Joe Hadenuf

Joe Hadenuf:

"Last night during a conversation/debate between myself and the leader/owner of the Free Republic, Jim Robinson, a rather stunning revelation was brought forth. I asked Mr. Robinson, which Republicans were vocally backing, and supporting Tancredo in his fight for our sovereignty? After some delay, Jim answered, “I have no idea. Immigration is not a big concern of mine.”

So the idiot RimJob, with the national security concerns we have, showed us once again what a flaming idiot he is. Jim R states immigration (and thus illegal immigration) is NOT a concern of his.

Along comes "The Old Hoosier" and, without commenting on the important article, says:

"JimRob went out of his way and got a lot of people angry in order to make sure that this forum allows for diverse conservative opinions, and not just yours or his own."

For "The Old Hoosier" being blind to the facts that RimJob does NOT allow diverse opinion, and simply starts wiping the ass of RimJob and fails to comment on Joe Hadenuf's inquisitive article, he earns the # 2 ASSWIPER ranking.

Coming in at # 3 is one certain to be a regular in this ranking. "OldFriend" never seems to have anything to comment on other than wiping the ass of Jim Robinson. For a good laugh, check out this character's intellectual depth by monitoring his posts. You will generally see a brown nosing exhibition.

"We have our opinions and people can agree or disagree but I don't appreciate you or anyone else criticizing the person who made this place possible."

FWIW

38 posted on 6/23/02 1:28 PM Pacific by OldFriend

But tell me OldFriend, do you think your master "criticized" balzizras? Just like ASSWIPER "The Old Hoosier" "Old Friend" is first out of the gate to wipe the ass of RimJob instead of commenting on the article. However, "Lazamataz" did put these idiots in place with the following:

"But to say anyone is beyond criticism, is beyond foolish."

45 posted on 6/23/02 1:39 PM Pacific by Lazamataz

Seems there are a few clear thinkers, like Lazamataz, still at Free Republic.

nopardons enters the picture in the #4 ranking as one of the "poll watchers" that somehow believes a high approval rating by Bush more than 2 years before the next election somehow is more important than the huge lurch to the left George Bush has taken the country today.

"THREE CHEERS FOR PRESIDENT BUSH, AND MAY HIS EXTRODINARILY HIGH APPROVAL NUMBERS HELP THE GOP THIS FALL !"

Posted by nopardons to SentryoverAmerica
On News/Activism ^ May 3 0:18 AM #107 of 120 ^

I had to point out the following to no pardons that she can wait around for election results in two years but my family and I live for the next two years under increasing socialism, even greater future tax slavery, and a failed national security with too little spent on security and too much wasted in social and foreign waste that AFFECT US TODAY, e.g., a 70% increase in the Farm Bill. Bush actually is adding MORE socialism by reversing some past control over it!

May 2,2002

WASHINGTON (AP) - The House on Thursday passed an election-year farm bill that will boost spending by 70 percent and increase subsidies to grain and cotton farms while adding thousands of other producers to the federal dole.

The bill marks the reversal of the market-oriented policy of the 1996 Freedom to Farm law that was supposed to wean farmers from government subsidies. (Link to article)

Posted by SentryoverAmerica to nopardons
On News/Activism ^ May 3 0:42 AM #119 of 120 ^

Although she comes in at #6 in this inaugural issue, look for Miss Marple to move up in the ranks. Look at these incredible statements she made about "Bush moving the country to the right" and believing that "compromising" with the RATs is some how helpful in getting the country out of leftist land. Here are some of my responses to her:

Dear Miss Marple:

the name of the game is compromise. [Miss Marple]

No, the name of the game should be VETO when it comes to the fiscal/social issues that have crossed the President's desk, and

But he is moving the country to the right,

Are you serious? I mean really, are you joking here? The country is moving to the right? You are writing an article for Onion and you cut and pasted on a Free Republic post accidentally, right?

I mean Miss Marple, you actually said "But he is moving the country to the right,. . ."

Bush has helped move this country so far to the left that perhaps we are wrapping around the left border and are overflowing to the point that your radar scope is picking it up on the right side, . .

Posted by SentryoverAmerica to Miss Marple
On News/Activism ^ May 2 11:52 PM #96 of 120 

For sheer stupidity, and the failure to read a radar scope properly, Miss Marple makes our TOP 10.

Another tactic of the ASSWIPERS at Free Republic is the liberal tactic of making a statement that sounds like a fact but is just a plain lie. "Southack" has the #7 ranking and is one of the most energetic supporters of Bush's liberal agenda. No matter what facts you present, he is there to lead a cheer for GWB. For comic relief, watch this robot say "Bush did not sign the Kyoto Treaty" in practically every post he makes in response to a detailed thought provoking critique of liberal spending by some of the very few members left at FR who have not been banned yet. The following post is typical "Southack":

"GWB repealed OSHA's new ergonomic regulations that were about to put every home-based business in America out of commission."

I responded to him that "Legislators repeal, not the President."

He then says "Wrong. Guess again. OSHA's ergonomic rules were first created by Presidential Executive Order and they were repealed by a subsequent Presidential Executive Order (different Presidents, of course)."

I then had to set the record straight—again:

For your viewing pleasure, the truth again:

Last night, in an historic exercise of its responsibility to oversee the manner in which federal agencies exercise delegated legislative authority, the US House of Representatives voted to rescind OSHA's ergonomic program standard by a vote of 223-206. Two days ago, the US Senate had passed the measure to overturn the ergonomics standard by a vote of 56-44. President Bush has stated that he will sign the legislation into law. Article Link

Like I said, Southack, legislators repeal. It was NOT an executive order.--Sentry Over America

"Southack" also stated the following:

"You haven't been paying attention. GWB's missile defense program is on track to DEPLOY our first defensive interceptors in 2004, just 2 years away. Test after test of our ABM development have been successful, too."

Once again, I had to inject the truth to counter his "Bush babble" and set the record straight—again:

For your viewing pleasure, the truth again:

On March 19, 2002, the 6th test of this missile defense system took place. It was a success (if being helped by a GPS system labels this a success--some say it was rigged) but test # 2 and test #3 were FAILURES!

--a 33% failure rate.

Sorry Southack, a 33% failure rate and tests helped by some GPS rigging is not "test after test successful".

For those looking for serious debate with correct factual data, avoid Free Republic. Most of the great researchers that have the facts to counter these false statements, like "Southack" is prone to do, have been banned by their braindead buddy, Jim Robinson.

In at #8 this inaugural issue is Kaslin who shows that many of these bots lack not only intellectual depth but just plain do not know simple facts, even obvious ones like . . . well, see for yourself.

Al Whore got the majority of the popular vote [Sentry Over America]

If you believe that, will you also believe that I am the queen of Sheba?

Posted by Kaslin to SentryoverAmerica
On News/Activism ^ May 19 5:33 PM #75 of 131 ^

So, I had to point out the facts to the newly crowned "queen of Sheba" that Al Gore received 550,520 more popular votes than GWB. For the "good queen's" educational benefit, I even posted a table of data and the state by state breakdown and the official totals from the National Archives.

Kaslin represents the type of "greymatter" that still resides at Free Republic. Banished intellectuals gravitate to other sites like Ether Zone. LibertyPost.org, or Liberty Forum where free expression and great writing can be found.

The #9 ranking is "Howlin". One thing is assured here. If anybody can replace the Big Idiot RimJob at #1 it will be this idiot, devoid of any ability to debate. Her little shack has stacks of toilet paper with "for Jim Robinson" written on it and she uses this for furniture.

Finally, #10 goes to Kevin Curry who exemplifies the typical ASSWIPER at Free Republic. As he attacked one of the few remaining members who post conservative thought, Kevin Curry stated the following in the "Conservative, Cut Bush Slack" thread:

George W. Bush, on the other hand--for all the faults of his administration--does have power and is electable. His task is formidable: slow down the liberal leviathan.

2090 posted on 6/24/02 11:54 AM Pacific by Kevin Curry

Seems Kevin Curry has done one too many rah rah cheers for George Bush. Maybe someone will whisper to him that George Bush has "grown the liberal leviathan" at a faster clip than even Scumbag did in his eight corrupt years. Since posters of hard facts and data like myself are not there anymore to point that out with factual data, Kevin Curry will just go along and keep shaking his pom poms.

So there you have it. The TOP 10. #5 Texasforever posts such meaningless drivel that it is hard to even express what an idiot he is--but I assure you, he well deserves the #5 ranking. I was just too busy laughing my ass off at some of his crazy babble to show an example. Some may wonder where MJY1288, rintense, and other flaming idiots are, but do not despair. They will raise their ugly heads again and will crack the Top 10 at some point.

NOTE: Now that I no longer post at Free Republic, I am free to call these idiots idiots. I figure if RimJob bans someone like me who was not abusive, I might as well be free with my words now, right?

During the entire time I was a member, I was often courteous even in the face of vicious attacks from that core little clique of Jim Robinson ASSWIPERS. I never attacked anyone. If they attacked me, I would answer back in the same tone but never used profanity or the vicious attacks that they used (and they were NOT banned for).

I may add that I never saw any member of the 60,000 or so claimed who posted as many charts, tables, and factual data/quotes to back up their arguments as much as I did. It was the factual data that I used as support that drove these pro-liberal hypocrites crazy. They could not refute my facts.

For those like me who engaged in courteous, informative, and fact based input, we got censored and banned. Most of what remains at Free Republic are those who feel conservatives will rule the country after next election if they just keep supporting liberal and socialistic policy today. Say what? Well, that is what they believe.

For serious debate and discussion, try Ether Zone that allows conservative thought and free speech. Avoid Free Republic.

 

Send in your nomination for the #1 ASSWIPER along with copies of actual idiotic posts and your commentary why you feel they deserve the #1 rank.

GO TO ASSWIPER POLL

If you wish to remain anonymous, please state. If you are an ex-FReeper, please use your old FR screen name

New rankings and your commentary will appear on the next issue

Sentry Over America

 

 

Go To Navigation Links

 

 

Sentry Over America's

Free Republic Moron of the Morning