Forum
Mundial de Mediación - World Mediation
Forum - Forum Mondial de MédiationForum
Mundial de Mediación - World Mediation
Forum - Forum Mondial de Médiation
|
|
1) The traditional model: it is the one set forth by Harvard and it is based on the search for underlying interests. It came from the simplicity paradigm, with a structuralist conception, since it searches, as I have already stated, the underlying interests. In William Ury's book "Getting Past No", he recommends the use of three questions which could be classified as circular questions. In Fisher's last book, "Beyond Machiavelli", he deals with the topic of relationships.
2) Bush and Folger's transformative model is defined as relational (complexity paradigm) but its two techniques are individualist approaches, even though they produce alterations in the relationship. I think it is at a middle stage between both paradigms.
3) Sara Cobb's circular-narrative model is completely set in the new paradigms. By basing itself in the post-structuralist theories of narrative, it can be considered as part of the cybernetics of cybernetics.
Go
to Mediator
Back to Railing
Back to Home Page
Make
Comments
How
to Publish
1.Why
a...?
2. Contents
3. Mediating
4. Family
5. Railing
6. Mediator
7. Legal System
8. Social System
9. Bibliography
| Copyright:
|
F M M: fmmediac@lander.es |
 |