|
No doubt, this can have great advantages. But we must also bear in mind that forming a co-mediators team is not an easy task.
Advantages:
1) Interdisciplinary look.2) Presence of both genders.
3) Possibility of forming a co-mediation regarding different races, religions, etc.
4) Use of special techniques, such as the reflective team.
5) Possibility of re-working the meeting.
6) Possibility of showing a live model of functional communication.
7) Possibility of enacting a collaborative model.
8) Possibility of a greater involvement of a mediator while the other plays the role of a participating observer, less involved.
Disadvantages:
1) Difficulties in the enunciation of different models.2) Difficulties coming from problems existing between the co-mediators.
3) Difficulties due to very legal and very psychological views, losing the mediation view.
4) Alliances.
5) Difficulties in the communication between co-mediators.
Even though the draft bill does not state it, working
in teams (co-mediators at one side of the mirror-window and the team at
the other side) with this device used for family therapy, enables the whole
team to have different views given their location, which can make the work
richer. This way of working also permits the use of the reflective team
technique from the other side of the mirror-window. In this case, we have
to keep in mind that the mediators that are with the parties are in charge
of the management of the mediation, no matter how experienced the people
who assist them from the other side of the mirror are.
Go
to Legal System
Back to Mediator
Back to Home Page
Make
Comments
How
to Publish
Copyright:
|
![]() |
![]() |