 |
 The
Politically Correct Way to NOT Have Sexual Relations
The best seller from Washington's own
First Lady of Form, Emily Pots!
Yes, folks, here is your once in a lifetime
chance to own this best seller about the ins and outs of NOT
having sexual relations.
Emily Pots, who has written on Etiquette
and Netiquette, now brings you her ultimate
book all about ...
NOTIQUETTE
|
 |
| Endorsed by prominent Washingtonians
who are busily didnotting ...
Here it is, the epitome of Notiquette!
Learn
how to handle those delicate matters of didnotting, such as clues on who
is responsible for the cleaning bills,
Who is the first to broach the matter
of plausible deniability and who gets to rehearse the statements for Ken
Starr.
This is a must for anyone wishing to engage
in any heavy duty didnotting, a sure hit!
But
Wait ...
There's
More!!!!
|
"I did not have sexual relations
with that woman," says this prominent Washingtonian (above), "but
I wish I had read this book before I didn't!" |
A
Midnite Zipper Company
Order
now and you'll also receive
The
Didnotter Scorecard,
a weekly subscription will
be yours
with the purchase of
The
Politically Correct Way to
NOT
Have Sexual Relations
As seen in the
Didnotter
Scorecard, at first she did did not, then she didn't did not,
then she testified before the grand jury, and no one know whether she did,
did did not, or didn't did not. |
 |
By purchasing this book, you
also get, at no added cost, a weekly subscription to the Didnotter
Scorecard. This a must have, if you want to keep up with the
week's highest rated didnotter and gives you an up to date listing of who
is didnotting whom and admitting they did didnot or denying they didn't
didnot!
You also get a blow-by-blow description
of who the win, place and show witnesses (not to mention the 'also rans')
are on Ken Starr's grand jury witness list.
The Didnotter
Scorecard is the only way to keep up with who will be called,
who might be called, who won't be called, who will and might be granted
immunity from did not testimony previously and who just doesn't give a
darn.
This man, while he appears to be a possible didnotter,
isn't really. He is really a no-cluer; that is, not only does he not didnot,
he also has no clue who did didnot or who didn't didnot. This, however,
is no problem, since no one has a clue who he really is, anyway. |
|
|
