Table of Contents

 

The Janitorial Page

 

Frank B. Finite (a "true" atheist)

 

Amazing Transitional Animals

 

This Day in Evolution History

 

Chatter Box

 

Great Bible Contradictions

 

Ask Miko

 

The Book of Chances

 

Evolution in Action

 

Alternate Resurrection Theory of the Month

 

The Evolutionary Classifieds

 

Toon Dig

 

EvoNews!

 

Letters to the Editor

 

The Blind Fools Guest Entry Log

 

Who Are We?

 

The Real Story

 

Past Issues

 

Linkage

 

Contact the fools

Frank B. Finite

A "True" Atheist

 

 

A hairy situation for some individuals:

All of us have seen the very detailed scientific renderings, drawn by scientist artists, of what the ancestors of man (and early man) actually looked like a long long time ago. For your viewing pleasure, here are a couple:

 


Looking for a wife (mate).

 


Vegetation conspicuously added by the Editor in Chief
for closed-minded fundamentalist censorship reasons.

 

The commonality we observe here in the scientific data is that they all had a thick lavish coat of hair. And you can notice the earlier (top) specimen had more than the other.

As all mammals, man needed this furry protection to survive the elements. But as we evolved (or rather, our surroundings evolved us), we slowly lost this total follicle canopy to where today we only have a few patches left in some key areas.

Scientists can only speculate as to what may have caused this shedding. Some believe in a global warming of temperatures.

Others may speculate that before the wheel was invented, early man would roll down hills to get to the valley faster. After thousands of years of man (women and children too) rolling down hills, friction slowly rubbed their hair off.

I personally subscribe to this latter hypothesis.

But it doesn't matter how it happened, but that it DID happen. Modern man does not have this covering of hair - at least most of us don't.

There are those among us, however, who do have a great deal of hair on their body. Some have chest hair that even crawls out of their shirt at the neck hole. Others have a liberal spreading across their back.

Still others, on very rare occasions, have this full thick covering across 100% of their bodies which is absolute proof that man descended from ape-like creatures.

And of coarse we don't need to mention today's infamous Big Foot and Sasquatch creatures - but we are going to anyway.

But for these individuals, this is not good news. Following the evolutionary time-line as presented by the visual evidence constructed by our best scientists, they are not as highly evolved as the rest of us.

For some reason they have the earlier genetic code for hairy bodies. And this can be a problem in most of today's societies in the realms of survivability and mating to pass off genes through offspring, because it's not viewed as attractive . . . anymore.

Now there are some things that can be done to help one's hairy self out if needed. For this information, I suggest reading my earlier article in issue seven.

It may be brought up that there are women who like a hairy chest and/or back and/or whatever else. They find it attractive and usually mate with them. Like this one:

 

This, however, is a bad idea.

First of all, if you are a female human animal that does find hairiness attractive, it is obvious that you too are less evolved than the rest of society. Apparently you inherited the lower genes for such attractedness.

(Note: this is not a moral judgement based on religious reasons, it is an Amoral judgement based on scientific ones. Morally, you can do what ever the heck you want.)

Second, if you produce offspring with a hairy man, the chances are greater that these defective genes will get passed off to your cub(s). You should find this naturally repulsive directed by your maternal instinct for high survivability and reproductivity of your embryos-to-be-birthed.

There is a war waging within the members of your body. Your "hairy attractive" genes are dueling with your "maternal instinct" genes over which type of mate you will choose.

Only time will tell which genes will be naturally selected, and which ones will not.

Of coarse the "fundy" position is that there is a loving God who created ALL people and that he loves them all equally. This would make everyone's personal worth equal no matter what you look like.

But that's a bunch of malarkey!

Truthfully,
Frank B. Finite's brain
(a chance evolutionary byproduct since the accidental dawning of time, space and matter)