| Stock Investment |
When and How to Use Cash Flow
Why look at earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization? Interest income and expense, as well as taxes, are all
tossed aside because cash flow is designed to focus on the operating
business and not secondary costs or profits. Taxes especially depend on
the vagaries of the laws in a given year and actually can cause dramatic
fluctuations in earnings power. For instance, CYBEROPTICS (Nasdaq: CYBE)
enjoyed a 15% tax rate in 1996, but in 1997 that rate will more than
double. This situation overstates CyberOptics' current earnings and
understates its forward earnings, masking the company's real operating
situation. Thus, a canny analyst would use the growth rate of earnings
before interest and taxes (EBIT) instead of net income in order to
evaluate the company's growth. EBIT is also adjusted for any one-time
charges or benefits.
As for depreciation and
amortization, these are called non-cash charges, as the
company is not actually spending any money on them. Rather, depreciation
is an accounting convention for tax purposes that allows companies to get
a break on capital expenditures as plant and equipment ages and becomes
less useful. Amortization normally comes in when a company acquires
another company at a premium to its shareholder's equity -- a number that
it account for on its balance sheet as goodwill and is forced to amortize
over a set period of time, according to generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). When looking at a company's operating cash flow, it
makes sense to toss aside accounting conventions that might mask cash
strength.
Cash flow is most
commonly used to value industries that involve tremendous up-front capital
expenditures and companies that have large amortization burdens. Cable TV
companies like TIME-WARNER (NYSE: TWX) and
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC. (Nasdaq:
TCOMA) have reported negative earnings for years due to the huge
capital expense of building their cable networks, even though their cash
flow has actually grown. This is because huge depreciation and
amortization charges have masked their ability to generate cash.
Sophisticated buyers of these properties use cash flow as one way of
pricing an acquisition, thus it makes sense for investors to use it as
well.
The most common valuation application of EBITDA, the
discounted cash flow, is a rather complicated spreadsheet exercise
that defies simple explanation. Economic Value Added (EVA) is
another sophisticated modification of cash flow that looks at the cost of
capital and the incremental return above that cost as a way of separating
businesses that truly generate cash from ones that just eat it up. The
most straightforward way for an individual investor to use cash flow is to
understand how cash flow multiples work.
In a private or public
market acquisition, the price-to-cash flow multiple is normally in the 6.0
to 7.0 range. When this multiple reaches the 8.0 to 9.0 range, the
acquisition is normally considered to be expensive. Some counsel selling
companies when their cash flow multiple extends beyond 10.0. In a
leveraged buyout (LBO), the buyer normally tries not to pay more than 5.0
times cash flow because so much of the acquisition is funded by debt. A
LBO also looks to pay back all the cash used for the buyout within six
years, have an EBITDA of 2.0 or more times the interest payments, and have
total debt of only 4.5 to 5.0 times the EBITDA.
Investors
interested in going to the next level with EBITDA and looking at
discounted cash flow or EVA are encouraged to check out the bookstore or
the library. Since companies making acquisitions use these methods, it
makes sense for investors to familiarize themselves with the logic behind
them as this might enable a Foolish investor to spot a bargain before
someone else.
^ back to top ^