Lessons Of the Black Sunday
Sellout
Over the May Day weekend, many thousands of working class people
around B.C. were confident that something truly wonderful, yet
something also deadly serious, was going to flower in the coming
week, beginning Monday, the 3rd. Behind it all, what it was all about
was what has been sometimes called the 'social question'. But what
was at the forefront of this burgeoning movement was the question of
the provincial government's treatment of hospital workers
particularly and of the public health care system in B.C. more
generally. Yet these two issues, which combine the government's
'labour relations policy' with its public health care policy, just so
happen to be the two most important for the majority of working class
people in B.C. today. So when the Campbell government made a huge
miscalculation in both legislating the striking HEU workers back to
work AND at the same time directly imposing a contract on those
workers involving more concessions and reductions than the Health
Employers Association had been demanding during previous negotiations
with the HEU, there was a tremendous surge of both anger at the
government and solidarity with the viciously attacked workers in the
HEU across the province, a surge which I dare say surprised everyone
in B.C. The anger was truly palpable from Thursday (April 29) on, but
so was the sense of solidarity, especially from Friday on. The
difference was that while the anger remained more or less constant,
the sense of solidarity was growing rapidly throughout Friday,
Saturday (May Day) and Sunday, until
that fateful moment when
most involved learned that the planned escalating general strike was
called off as the HEU with the help of the B.C. Federation of Labour
had agreed to a deal with the government.
But that moment on what some are now calling Black Sunday was only
fateful in that it spelled the death of the particular general strike
planned to unfold this past week. The determination to fight the
Campbell government must still be there in hundreds of thousands of
working people and their families, and we now know that there exists
within this sector of the population a sense of solidarity far
stronger than anything the B.C. Fed. or any union leader in the
province has led us to believe. It is true that an extremely
favourable opportunity for launching an all-out class war against a
viciously anti-working class government has been lost. And it is true
that if only two or three days of the planned escalating mass strike
had been allowed to develop, that a massive surge forward in class
consciousness and in the political maturation of the entire working
class in B.C. would have undoubtedly occurred. Fundamental
social-political truths about this society and the forces that,
confronting one another, comprise it, truths which have been well
hidden for most working class people for 20 years now, would have
been clearly exposed not only for the 200,000 to 300,000 workers who
would have been directly involved in the strike, but also for the
rest of the roughly 2 million working class people in B.C. Most
important of these would have been the enormous power that the
working class is capable of wielding when it is united in active,
defiant class solidarity against the treachery of the ruling class.
The new generation of workers which has arisen within the past 20
years has not had direct experience of that power, and thus, for the
most part, is not convinced that it really exists. They would have
been irreversibly convinced of the reality of that power had even
just a couple of days of the expected general strike taken place.
They would have learned quite well where the class lines are that
separate the working class, the middle class, and the ruling
capitalist class, and that the basic interests of the working class
are not compatible with those of either the ruling class or the
middle class. All of this was so close to being achieved, and it was
lost, and that is truly unfortunate. But I for one don't feel like
mourning, and I think there many others who feel the same way.
I think there are many others who feel confident that just a few
days of the general strike that had been planned to develop would
have won the HEU workers far, far more than what the union leadership
and the 'help' of B.C. Fed. got for them (really, forced on them,
since they have no say in it). I think there are many who feel very
emboldened as working class militants as a result of the experience
of the surge of solidarity around the province. And the beyond
palpable sense of disgust and rage at the betrayal of the struggle by
the leadership of the HEU and the B.C. Fed., while negative in
itself, can only confirm and strengthen that conviction that we
really are all together in this, that the ongoing HEU workers'
struggle is OUR struggle, and that we need to now look forward to, to
plan and organize for the general strike we were all hoping to bring
about this past week.
There is one crucial lesson that we all need to draw from this
latest defeat, and the way the events unfolded, it shouldn't be too
difficult to do so. What happened this time that we want to make sure
we avoid next time? Clearly, it is the sell-out by the HEU and B.C.
Fed. leaders. How can we make sure that doesn't happen again? Why do
we allow these leaderships to do this to us, to even be in a position
to do this to us? Why don't we, the rank and file, have any control
over them at the most crucial of moments? It is the power structure
and the mode of functioning of the trade unions as they are today
that allows these betrayals by the leaderships to occur. So if we
want to make sure that such betrayals can't possibly occur again, we
need to either change the power structure and mode of functioning of
the trade unions we are in OR we need to simply bypass those
structures, their rules and laws, to organize ourselves in our own
general assemblies and committees, with directly elected, mandated,
and revocable delegates, in other words, to take the struggle
directly into our own (collective) hands. Dedicated union activists
have tried for decades to reform the power structures and mode of
functioning of their unions, all to little if any effect. The second
alternative, which unfortunately didn't take shape amongst the bulk
of the HEU and CUPE membership on Monday (and when it has happened in
other places at other times it has appeared spontaneously), is in
reality the only way for rank and file unionized workers to take
control of their workplace struggles away from the union bosses and
bureaucrats. Class struggles around the world for decades have
clearly shown this to be so. The unions everywhere stand in the way
of workers' self-determination. But this strategy requires a far
greater level of involvement and commitment on the part of the
membership, of those involved in the struggle, than working through
the existing channels of reforming the unions. In any case, what
occurred on Black Sunday should have put to rest all strategies for
bringing about a general strike (or strikes) and beyond it a renewed
militant working class movement based on pressuring the union
leaderships from below. We all should be able to see now that that
road is a dead end.
May 7, 2004
Contact Wage Slave X or
visit the home
page
Home Page / Index
/ Articles / Reviews
/ History / Links /
Publications/ Martin
Glaberman Archive /