Loss of Freedom
Take All Those Turn¢oat$ With You
ALL Republicans Should Resign
Tuesday, June 5, 2001 12:00 a.m.
On the Neil Boortz Show last week, I said
Bush and company should have told Traitor Jefford$ "don't
let the door hit you in the ass and take all those other
turn¢oat$ with you," namely $pe¢ter, ¢hafee,
$nowe, ¢ollin$, and M¢¢ain. I also said
ALL Republicans should resign from the Party and become
independents. Lincoln is the father of the party. He freed
the slaves. The current group of Republicans are helping
to reintroduce $lavery through a two trillion dollar budget.
Out of respect to Lincoln, ALL Republicans should resign.
Instead of slamming the door on Jefford$'
ass, he was offered billions more for Edu¢ation and
Lott offered to create a new "moderate" leadership
position if he stayed in the GOP. It did not matter to
these idiots in the GOP that Bush's budget grew Edu¢ation
at three times the rate of inflation. Does not matter
that the more money $pent, the lower our students rank
in international comparison rankings. All these billions
to Edu¢ation simply bloat the membership rolls of
the ¢ommunist NEA.
A "moderate" leadership position
to Jefford$ you say? The Jefford$ who voted against impeachment
because 15 felonies were not enough? Jefford$ was not
happy with triple the rate of inflation for fraud ridden
and wasteful Edu¢ation. So, with triple the felonies,
Jefford$ would have voted against impeachment even if
¢linton had 45 felonies.
The GOP leaders wanted this guy to stay
in the Party? The same guy who voted for HilLIARy'$ ¢ommuni$t
style health care plan? Against the tax cut? Wants more
money for the Endowment of the "pissing on paintings"
Art$?
If there was even the slightest hope for
this group of Republicans to fight for our freedom, they
would have used this event to ostracize the other five
or so turn¢oat$ and tell them we do not want them
in the Republican Party. From this day forward, if you
do not believe in liberty and an efficient government,
we do not want you. You either want freedom or you want
a so¢iali$t taxing $lave $tate.
Sadly, our Republican leaders want that
so¢iali$t taxing $lave $tate.
It is over, folks. All we have now is the
piling on. I know, you love the way the country once was
and you are a patriot. This is what makes it hard for
good citizens to admit freedom is fading fast. The patriot
in you believes there is still hope.
Forget it.
It was over when Newt and friends swept
into power and tried to be "civil." War should
have been declared then as it was clear the so¢iali$t$
were out to overthrow freedom through legislation and
tax policies. That is when the line should have been drawn.
All policy should have been based on either retention
of freedom or transition to the $lave $tate. Here is we
stand—here is where the liberal$ stand. It was not,
the battle is over, we have lost, and the piling on continues.
Since 1994, the Republicans allowed tax
confi$cation to grow to the highest level since World
War II. Take a look at this chart and tell me if this
is "governing from the right." A 55% increa$e
in tax confi$cation since 1994? The Demo¢RAT$ fight
like rabid street dogs, lie, and sabotage all Republican
efforts so as to gain propaganda for the next election.
But they and their liberal comrades in the pre$$ effectively
label the Republicans "mean spirited" because
the highest tax confi$cation in history still is not enough
for them.
Olympia $nowe, (R-ME), re Traitor Jefford$'
move to the $o¢iali$t$' camp: ". . . should
be a wake-up call for our party's leaders that the voices
of moderate Republicans must be welcomed and respected."
It seems both Jefford$ and $nowe are unhappy with a budget
that is $o¢iali$t to the core, growing fa$ter than
the rate of inflation. What do they want? $ix time$ the
rate of inflation? Since $nowe has never initiated a bill
that demands audits, accountability, new technology, and
cutting the expense of these fraud ridden departments,
why didn't Bush and friends ostracize her?
Chuck Hagel, (R-NE), said, "Bush
and the party need to do more to accommodate its more
moderate members." Hey Nebraska, so this your
savior of freedom that represents you? He thinks blazing
$ocialist$ are "moderate"?
In pouting over Jefford$ joining the red
army, chief of staff Andy Card said "I wish I
had served the president better," regarding the
point he did not know it was about to happen.
Andy, you could serve our President better
by drawing him a few charts showing the growing tax confi$cation
along side the fraud and wa$te. Then tell him, "Mr.
President, draw the line now. You are either for freedom
or $lavery. Which is it." Then have him go on national
TV and declare war on the internal enemies of freedom.
¢linton, with a Demo¢RAT minority
in the $enate, was able to continue the transition from
freedom to $lavery with huge tax increa$e$ and sapping
our freedom with mounds of regulation$.
Can Bush, with a minority in the $enate,
reverse course and be as effective downsizing the government
as ¢linton was growing $o¢iali$m? Yes.
Will he? No.
Demo¢RAT$ fight to win the war. Republicans
avoid fights so they can look "civil".
My previous article ended with:
Our Republican "leaders" have
resigned themselves to the sheepish serfs in $lave $tate
USA.
