Corrupt Leaders
Part II Legacy Lies: Employment
(January, 2001)

President
Reagan's 8 years Had Better Employment Growth Than Clinton's
|
In Part I, we examined GDP and saw how Clinton entered his Presidency
in a growing economy. That nice angle of ascent we had in late 1992
in GDP? Well, it became an angle of descent in late 2000.
(Read Part I).
1996 election? Clinton gets elected again comparing his economy
to the Bush years as the incredible stupidity of the general public
reared its ugly head.
Impeachment, 1998? Clinton gets a free pass in part because of
GDP strength, i.e., the economy, by the clueless masses and the
liberal press. You all heard that man in the street say "leave
the man alone, I am making ten bucks more a week than I was four
years ago. So what if he committed multiple felonies." If you
didn't hear that, the spineless Senators sure did as they gave a
wink to Bill Clinton for keeping their lame brained constituents
happy.
Election 2000? Al Gore...well, you know, all the "we must
not go back to the stone age" lectures.
Today? The Clinton legacy was never discussed, not even once,
(to use Al Gore phraseology) by the press without bringing up the
economy.
Part I debunked the GDP myth.
So what about all these new jobs, the 22 million new workers Clinton
crows about? For starters, another Clinton lie. Try 19 million.
Just like Gore tried to manufacture votes out of no votes, Clinton
creates workers out of non-workers to the tune of about 3 million
strong. Birds of a feather.
So are these 3 million phantom workers paying taxes?
Here is the raw reality: In January of 1992, there were 117,027,000
employed, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics official numbers.
In December of 2000, there were 136,092,000, for an increase of
19,065,000, 3 million short of Clinton's fabrications. As the chart
shows, this is an increase of 16.29%. Slick not only does
not know what the definition of the word "is" is, but
he must not know the definition of the word worker either.
You know that black hole that, the liberals say, sucked all the
workers into oblivion during the Reagan years? The truth is there
was an increase of 18.18% during the Reagan years in total
employment versus Clinton's gain of 16.29%. In January of
1981, we had 98,139,000 employed. By December of 1988, there were
115,978,000. The nearly 18 million more workers is less than Clinton's
gains, but it is the percentage gain which is more important. The
population grows also, right?
Not only was American pride restored under Reagan, but we had a
terrific economy. The employment gains shown here outpaced the Clinton
years. Yes, that's right Dan, Tom, and Peter.
What's more, the eight years of Jimmy Carter/Ronald Reagan (through
first term) had an even bigger percentage gain of 20.21%.
As the chart shows, the final four years of Reagan and the Bush
years produced the smallest percentage gain of the four periods
of 14.04%. There was some massive corporate restructuring
during the late 80s and early 90s that helped set the stage for
today's economy. This is when corporate America initiated the productivity
improvements, through technology, that reaped benefits during the
Clinton years. It did cost jobs, though, as companies got lean and
mean by replacing some workers with new technology. But the economy,
and job opportunities today, are far better because of this. No
pain, no gain.
We also had a recession and the Gulf War that hurt the economy
during this period. The liberals do not know what the term business
cycle means, and they certainly do not believe in the free enterprise
system, so we will not get into that here. But the short of it is,
cycles happen.
What the Clinton spinners found out, and used to great advantage,
was that you just throw out lies and false facts repeatedly and
they become etched in stone. Investigative journalism was no where
to be found. The press corps acted like an army of press secretaries
for Bill, Al, and Hillary.
So as Bill Clinton shamelessly gave his farewell speechoops,
make that his pat myself on the back while I tell you once more
how I saved the country speechhe once again mentioned his
two anchors of self pride. With GDP growth, it was a lie. With employment,
it ranked third out of four, as shown here.
What a charming last three days in office. The continuing lies
about the economy in his Thursday speech. The corrupt deal to save
his skin Friday. And pardoning more crooks that covered for him
on Saturday.
Such a fitting finale that was. Sort of has a poetic ring to it.
We would all like to say good riddance, I am glad it is over. But
with the new Clinton house near by and his cronies flooding the
airwaves,
the stench will linger for many a more day
as new whiffs of deceit keep blowing our way.
|