Sentry Over America
Farcical Fools at Free Republic
Hall of Reverence
Hall of Shame
Right Resource Directory
Talk Show Host Misfires
Coming Soon--America's Road to Communism

Some make you laugh. Some make you angry. But they all give you that "shake your head in amazement feeling" and make you wonder if they really believe what they said.

BY THE NUMBERS

Number of times Slick said I, me, my, I've, I'm, or I'll in his farewell address:
26

"Accomplishments" mentioned:
45

Number of times he gave some credit to Congress for the "accomplishments":
0

To corporate America:
0

Number of times Slick was directly responsible for these "accomplishments":
also 0

1/31/01
From CNN Crossfire
Long ago, Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA) crossed that divide that defines the boundaries between a partisan extremist and a deranged lunatic. Thus, most of us just put "Mad Max" on perma-mute and ignore her racist rantings.

So it came as a surprise to stumble upon some quite entertaining dialogue from Mad Max recently on Crossfire. Host Tucker Carlson asked simply, "Can you name one thing, just one thing on which you agree with the new president?"

Waters (startled): "No. I mean, that is just an irresponsible question on your part."

Carlson: "You can't name a single thing you agree with George W. Bush on"?

Waters (visibly shaken): "That is not the question you should ask. You should ask—you should be asking me why is it Bush is doing all this ceremonial backdropping, imaging and and profiling? . . . What does he agree with me on?"

Mad Max, never known to be at a loss for words or to be shaken easily, clearly could not fathom actually agreeing with the most powerful man in the world, the freely elected leader of our country. How crude, how hateful it was for Tucker Carlson to ask such a heinous question on national TV, she thought.

Rational leaders always find some agreement with the ideas of others in any organization. Mad Max may represent a district in CA but she still votes with national repercussions. Thus, we all suffer from her lunacy.

Examples of Waters hatemongering are plentiful and well documented. She called the 1992 LA riots an "uprising" and "a rebellion." The toll? More than 50 killed over 4 thousand injured. Some of your tax dollars went to pay for the more than $1 billion in property damage. In defending the "hoodlums and thugs" in Mayor Tom Bradley's words, Mad Max said "the anger in my district is a righteous anger."

As for her racist remarks, she did not come to the aid and support of the Korean-American shopkeepers, many who were murdered, but practically blamed them for having businesses and more things than some of her other constituents.

As crack cocaine became a bigger problem in her district, she tried to pin it on the CIA who she claimed was in the trafficking business.

Volumes abound on this crazed zealot but take this one home—Mad Max was one of only seven Democrat wackos the other day who did not vote yes on a resolution to wish Ronald Reagan a happy 90th birthday.

In September of 1997, at the annual gala of the Congressional Black Caucus which she chaired at that time, she called Slick the "greatest president ever."

After vowing that "we [Congressional Black Caucus] would be the fairness cop" regarding the impeachment hearings, click here to read Mad Max's 5 minutes plus of hypocrisy to see for yourself if you define fairness the same way.

Farcical Fools at Free Republic

Somehow, they have gotten off track. Was it just a bad day? An urge to be politically correct? Or have they been sucked in to that vacuum created by the Democrats flying at Warp Factor 9 headed to leftist land? You decide.

---

Unequal Justice Around Law

Friday, February 9, 2001 7:00 p.m.

Days before independent counsel Robert Ray yanked the eject lever on the Clinton escape pod, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Newt Gingrich, and John Kasich were on the airways. Like the Olivia Newton-John song "I Honestly Love You," I honestly love these three who have served America well.

However, "Orrin Newt-and-John" did the big 180 as all three sang sweet songs of pushing a pardon for the Most Famous Felon.

But why? Perhaps it was an urge to join the kumbaya kooks—the "trade principles for traction" troupe—who believe throwing the Dems a bone gain you firmer footing in moving the Republican agenda forward.

We all want our president to have a good working relationship but these three should know the outcome of extending olive branches to leftists. They are grabbed, whittled razor sharp, then chugged back to where they came from as the conservatives run for cover. Orrin Newt-and-John, you guys are veterans! You don't know the game yet?

Or, was it is possible these three were told the Ray deal was coming and they were asked to send up trial balloons to ease the future shock of decent Americans?

Why did Orrin Newt-and-John, who have served their country so honorably, denigrate justice and equality? Why complain about Marc Rich being pardoned because he "never even served any time" if you did not want Slick to even be prosecuted? Why?

Bill Bennett was right. Where is the outrage? Not with these three.

I saw outrage firsthand in November from the commoners. I walked among young children coloring signs for a rally saying "we love George Bush" and "Al Gore is a liar." I talked to their parents who took off work and were willing to march on Washington to prevent Gore from overthrowing the next government-elect. Why can't these three have the same outrage that their constituents have when it comes to justice and Bill Clinton?

Another possibility is Orrin Newt-and-John bought the bogus belief that world stability would crumble if the ex-leader of the free world was seen by all not to be free but sitting on a concrete slab in jail.

Isn't that a great safety valve for all future Clintonites. Trash the laws and commit felonies yet Senators will not convict you while you are in office. "Wait till he leaves office," they say. Then when you do leave office, they suggest you be pardoned! With this perverted thought process, elected leaders won't let any president ever be held accountable for crimes. It presents a bad "image" to the rest of the world.

Image! It's all about image.

On George W. Bush's inaugural day, in typical crass Clintonian style, Slick shamelessly reviewed the military troops at Andrews, deftly holding back smirks for the cameras as he walked by these men of honor. When a grin did breakout from thinking of his pardon, he thought, "if Reagan was the 'Teflon President' then I am axle grease laced with WD-40."

Orrin Newt-and-John helped draw the blueprints for continued future corruption. Do anything and everything while in office and your golden parachute is a combo box of million dollar speaker circuit fees wrapped with a non-pardon pardon.

The Statue of Liberty was restored between 1984 and 1986 including replacing some iron ribs with stainless steel so that this symbol of enlightenment would stand for many years to come. Concurrent action by Clinton involved revving up corruption in Arkansas to maximum RPMs.

In 1998, some granite and marble stones in the Washington Monument were restored. As proud craftsmen painstakingly restored that symbol of our nation, Clinton was having a felonious good o'l time but the Senate did not have the backbone to squash his corruption. Just ask David Schippers.

Granite.

Marble.

Stainless steel.

Materials of strength are used so our most precious symbols can endure for decades to come. Our values, laws, and our proud history do not need that type of restoration these structures received as written words do not succumb to corrosive elements.

Yet, our most precious words now rot—not from the elements—from the spit of Bill Clinton.

Stop the mockery in our courts! That precious oath should be changed to, "Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, even though you don't need God's help?" Slick did not need to fear God if he had no need to fear the Senate. And if it is OK for Slick to commit perjury, why threaten the common folk?

Orrin Newt-and-John, grab those three chairs. We are headed over to the U.S. Supreme Court. . . . OK, fine. Now sit down. Slick has some free time nowadays and he is up there on the architrave, with a jackhammer, where the "Equal Justice Under Law" is—or was. After all, you did not want equal justice. If you are more into adding than subtracting, then go have him engrave "Unequal Justice Around Law." Another Clinton legacy.

Or, was it the image thing? Is image more important to you than "all men are created equal"? Slick is our equal. Abe Lincoln said so. Now don't tell me you three scratched off Lincoln's words from that old document, did you?

Go ahead, Abe. I know you have to turn.

 

 

E-mail Sen. Hatch

E-mail Newt Gingrich

John Kasich's New Century Project

 

---

In the previous issue of Sentry

"Part II Legacy Lies: Employment," a very special award is handed out to one of your favorites, E.J. Dionne makes a nice addition to Leftist Chronicles, and comments from some of the best on the Clinton "legacy" including Peggy Noonan, Linda Bowles, George Will, and others.

Copyright © 2001 Sentry Over America

Archives

Go To Navigation Links