State of the Tsolum River
Previous
Next
Section 9


HOME
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledge ments
Report Contributors
SECTION 1. SUMMARY
SECTION 2. 

PROJECT AND WATERSHED DESCRIPTION
SECTION 3. 

VOLUNTEERS AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
SECTION 4. MEDIA AND PUBLIC EVENTS
SECTION 5.  ACID MINE DRAINAGE
SECTION 6.  WATER MONITORING
SECTION 7.  FISH HABITAT MAPPING PROGRAMS
SECTION 8.  REFUGE POND STUDIES
SECTION 9.  RESTORATION PROJECTS
SECTION 10.  FLOWS AND STORAGE REPORT
SECTION 11.  ENHANCEMENT


CONTACT US

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed

 

SECTION 8.  Refuge Pond Studies

Introduction

In the summer and fall of 1998, TRTF, Environmental Youth Team members worked with volunteers from the Portuguese Creek Watershed Stewards and a North Island College student to investigate water quality conditions and carrying capacities of nine ponds in the Portuguese Creek and Smit Creek - Forsythe Creek drainages. 

The Portuguese Creek Watershed Stewards identified thirty-four ponds in the rural residential and lowland agricultural areas of the watershed (Appendix A). This habitat has become the critical link for survival of coho and trout stocks in tributaries to the Tsolum River. Over the last 80 years, land development has resulted in the ditching of many natural watercourses, reducing habitat complexity and eliminating natural pool habitat.  Deep pools are important as rearing habitat for juvenile salmonids, and refuge habitat for migrating adults. Where no natural pools occur, constructed ponds offer the only shelter and cool water available to fish (Norm Sieffert, 1998). 

Nine ponds in the Portuguese Creek and Dove Creek sub-basins were monitored for temperature and dissolved oxygen concentrations during the summer and fall of 1998.

There are two basic types of refuge ponds used by salmon and trout in these sub-basins.  Instream ponds (Appendix B, Fig. B2) maintain a connection to the adjacent stream, while near-stream ponds (Appendix B. Fig. B1) have no water inflow or outflow  during months with low stream flows.  As the water level decreases in nearby streams, fry retreat into near-stream ponds where they live until water levels rise in the fall.  In summer, water levels drop in these ponds due to evaporation, and rainwater is the only source of new water.  Dissolved oxygen levels are controlled by photosynthetic activity in these ponds.

In-stream ponds have year round water flow that helps to maintain higher levels of dissolved oxygen in the pond.  Flow rates may be reduced in dry periods as water levels decline in the streams that flow though them. 

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed

Methodology

A Lowrance differential receiver Garmin 12XL handheld Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to determine location of the ponds.  GPS data was transferred to ArcView GIS format for inclusion in watershed maps.  An OxyGuard MKII portable dissolved oxygen meter with temperature probe and a portable pH meter were used to monitor water quality.  Baited Gee minnow traps, and a customized netting device known as the “Super Dave”, were used to capture salmon and trout fry for length-weight sampling. 

In the spring of 1998, the Little River Enhancement Society salvaged coho, chum and cutthroat trout fry, from various locations (Little River Enhancement Society, 1998). Fry salvaged in the Tsolum River watershed were relocated to the Tsolum River mainstem or to refuge ponds near their streams of origin.  These salvaged fry added to the natural population of fish in the refuge ponds.

Water quality was sampled weekly in the nine index ponds from July 29 to September 21.  Dissolved oxygen and water temperature were measured  at three depths: surface, 0.5 m and 1.0 m. and ambient air temperature was  also recorded.  Measured physical dimensions and characterization are documented for five ponds by Raudzins, 1998.

Fish sampling occurred at five ponds in October 1998 using a  ‘Super Dave’ trawl sampler.  This is a netting device made of a light PVC box frame with one side open to capture fish as it is pulled through the pond.   Bait is thrown into the pond to entice fish into the trawl’s path and facilitate capture. 

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed

Site Descriptions 

All ponds in the study area had an average surface area less than 100m2.   Depths in the ponds ranged from 1.7 m. to 3.0 m.  The riparian cover density differs for each pond. Site descriptions are reported in Appendix C.
Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed

Results

Water quality data collected in all sampled ponds indicated conditions were below optimum levels for salmon survival, however fry condition recorded for the five sampled ponds showed that these fish were healthy and well fed.  Multiple species (cutthroat trout, sticklebacks and coho salmon) were sampled from some ponds.

Results of the pond fish sampling carried out October 21, 1998 are summarized in Appendix D.  Table D2 summarizes physical dimensions for five of the ponds, while  Table D3 tabulates the quantities of juvenile salmonid species sampled at these ponds.  Table D4 summarizes fry length and weight measurements.  Water quality parameters are summarized in Table D1.

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed

Discussion

Little is known about  the refuge ponds in tributaries to the Tsolum River.  In most cases no information exists on pond volume, temperature profiles or water quality.  It is known  that fish do survive in the ponds, and that without this habitat no fish would be able to remain in streams which dry up over the summer. 

The main threats to fry survival in refuge ponds is believed to be poor water quality and predation.  This predation may be from other fish in the pond or from terrestrial predators. Survival in refuge ponds may be increased if a greater understanding of pond carrying capacity was developed.  This would require a survey of pond volume as well as regular monitoring of water quality.  Monitoring diurnal patterns of temperature and dissolved oxygen would indicate which ponds have critical oxygen shortages.

This information would be useful to groups conducting fry salvage operations for determining which ponds offer suitable summer rearing habitat and have excess capacity.  Ponds which require increased oxygenation, more shade or more refuge habitat could be enhanced to become better rearing and refuge areas for juvenile and adult salmon.

The condition index [wt (mg)/fork length (mm)3 ] is an indicator of fish health.  Optimum condition is reported with an index of approximately 1.0.  In all cases, coho fry sampled from refuge ponds in October 1998 had condition indices > 1 suggesting that pond carrying capacity had not been exceeded.

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed

Recommendations

1. Recommendations for future Tsolum River watershed refuge pond initiatives include more extensive water quality testing, aeration, riparian planting, and in-pond habitat complexing.  Water quality testing may help determine the suitability of other ponds in the watershed.  Ponds found to have suitable water quality can be stocked with salvaged fry. 

2. Fry sampling should be conducted in October when water temperatures are lower.  It is important that samples be taken before water levels rise in the adjacent streams to ensure that fish sampled are summer residents, and not recent migrants from the adjacent stream. 

3. Increasing pond dissolved oxygen levels is recommended for ponds 2, 29, and 30.  Pond aeration may be accomplished with mechanical aerators, oxygen cylinders, and/or with oxygenating plants.  Such plants may include the creeping underwater coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum) (Pettinger, 1996).  For pond 29 and 30, diverting stream flow to the ponds may be another method for increasing pond dissolved oxygen levels.

4. More vegetated rafts are recommended to increase riparian cover.  Earlier spring planting and initial plant maintenance will improve survival rates for plants surrounding the ponds.  It is also advisable to protect this vegetation from deer by using fencing or vexar tubes.

5. Strategic placement of logs, stumps and boulders will increase the value of refuge habitat by providing cover and shade.  Pond habitat complexing is recommended for ponds 18, 19, 20, 29 and 30. 

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed

References

Dobbs, Rahsaan. 1999. Tsolum River E-team crew member, Courtenay, BC. Personal Communication, January 1999.

Kuta, Christine. 1999. Tsolum River E-team crew member, Comox, BC. Personal Communication, January 1999.

Little River Enhancement Society. 1998. Smolt/Fry Salvage Report.  Little River Enhancement Society, Courtenay, BC. 19 June, 1998.

Pettinger, April.  1996.  Native Plants in the Coastal Garden – A Guide for Gardeners in British Columbia and the Pacific Northwest. Whitecap Books, Vancouver, BC.

Raudzins, Ilze. 1998.  A Biophysical Assessment of Five Salmon Summer Refuge Ponds in the Portuguese Creek Watershed.  Renewal Resources 290 Course Project, Environmental Assessment Program, North Island College, Courtenay, December 7, 1998.

Sieffert, Norm. 1998.  Resident and Streamkeeper, Courtenay, BC. Personal Communication, September 1998.

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed

SECTION 8.  APPENDIX A
Project map identifying pond locations

Tsolum Watershed Salmonid Refuge Ponds

Pond Locations

Pond Photos
Refuge pond sites
Pond Study Data
 
 








Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed

SECTION 8.  APPENDIX B
Photographs of typical near-stream and in-stream ponds


Pond Photos
Refuge pond sites
Pond Study Data
 
 







Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed

SECTION 8.  APPENDIX C
Refuge pond sites

SECTION 8 APPENDIX C
Refuge Pond Sites
Pond #
Stream Name Pond Type %

Cover

Site
Descrip- tion
UTM

North

UTM

East

Add- ress
2
Portuguese Creek Near- Stream <50%
Click
5510992 355286 Sunny- dale 
13
Portuguese Creek--Middle Branch Near- Stream >50%
Click
5515219 352563 Gunter Road
18
Portuguese Creek--Middle Branch Near- Stream >50%
Click
5516104 352027 Poulton Road
19
Portuguese Creek--Middle Branch In- Stream <50%
Click
5516227 351887 Poulton Road
20
Portuguese Creek--Middle Branch Near- Stream <50%
Click
5516380 351616 Poulton Road
21
Portuguese Creek--Middle Branch In Stream <50%
Click
5516545 351332 Merville Road
29
Portuguese Creek--East Branch Near- Stream >50%
Click
5517294 351882 N. Island Hwy.
30
Portuguese Creek Near- Stream >50%
Click
5517247 351911 N. Island Hwy.
34
Smit Cr. Near- Stream <50%
Click
5508681 353048 Conden- sory Rd.

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed

SECTION 8.  APPENDIX D
1998 Pond Study Data

Table D1 Refuge Pond Water Quality Data 
Pond Date Time (pm) O2 (mg/l) surf O2 (mg/l) 1/2m O2 (mg/l) 1m Air Temp p.m. Water Temp surf Water Temp 1/2m Water Temp 1m pH
2 Jul 29, 98 3:15 1.00      27.80  17.50       
  Aug 26, 98 4:00 0.50      22.40  14.20       
  Sep 08, 98 3:45 0.90      18.30  14.00       
  Sep 16, 98 3:55 2.40      24.00  13.40       
13 Jul 29, 98 4:30 8.30  7.00  5.60  24.00  27.10  24.00  23.20   
  Aug 26, 98 2:30 6.70  5.70    20.40  21.10 18.20     
  Sep 01, 98 2:25 7.20  5.40    21.10  20.60  18.70     
  Sep 08, 98 1:50 7.10  5.10    18.10  16.80  15.50     
  Sep 13, 98                  
18 Aug 12, 98 1:30 5.60  6.20    30.70  20.60  18.50     
  Aug 26, 98 2:10 10.80  10.80  8.30  19.20  16.60  15.60  15.40   
  Sep 01, 98 2:10 10.70  0.60  0.30  20.80  18.70  15.60  14.70   
  Sep 08, 98 1:30 6.40  5.60    15.70  14.60  14.00     
  Sep 21, 98 3:23 6.80  5.10  4.40  18.40  14.50  12.30  11.80   
19 Jul 29, 98 1:45 7.40  6.70    23.70  21.00  18.00     
  Aug 26, 98 1:58 7.60  8.00  8.00  25.40  21.10  15.90  15.30   
  Sep 01, 98 1:59 6.70  6.80  6.80  28.00  18.50  17.20  16.40   
  Sep 08, 98 1:05 6.60  6.60  6.60  19.30  14.30  13.80  13.70   
20 Jul 29, 98 1:30 5.80  6.10    22.80  21.30  20.40     
  Aug 11, 98 4:45 8.10  8.40    22.70  18.70  17.70     
  Aug 18, 98 1:10 3.80  3.20    18.00  15.10  14.60     
  Aug 25, 98 6:05 7.00  7.10    19.80  17.10  16.60     
  Aug 31, 98 2:58 6.10  6.10    25.00  18.80  18.10     
  Sep 08, 98 3:10 5.80  5.80    18.10  15.80  15.50     
  Sep 15, 98 4:18 6.90  6.80    17.90  14.50  14.10     
  Sep 21, 98 12:30 6.70  6.50  17.60  14.00  13.00  8.30 
21 Jul 29, 98 12:50 5.40  5.00    29.40  23.70  22.20     
  Aug 04, 98 4:22 6.60  6.70   24.20  20.40  19.60     
  Aug 06, 98 3:00 4.90  2.30  2.30  30.40  21.30  19.10  17.90   
  Aug 11, 98 4:30 6.40  5.70  5.60  24.30  21.20  18.90  18.10   
  Aug 18, 98 12:15 5.80  6.00  5.90  18.10  17.80  16.50  16.00   
  Aug 25, 98 6:00 6.50  5.60    20.40  20.10  19.00     
  Aug 31, 98 2:43 4.90  5.30  5.00  31.00  22.60  19.80  19.30   
  Sep 08, 98 3:05 4.40  3.80  3.80  19.60  18.80  17.50  16.80   
  Sep 15, 98 4:32 5.80  5.00  5.30  20.20  17.90  16.20  15.50   
  Sep 21, 98 10:26 7.20  7.20  8.00  20.10  13.30  12.90  12.50  7.59 
29 Jul 29, 98 1:08 0.50  0.10      16.80  12.60     
  Aug 04, 98 4:45 1.70  0.20    25.00  15.00  10.20     
  Aug 11, 98 5:05 2.20  0.60    23.20  14.50  10.20     
  Aug 18, 98 1:32 3.40  0.50  0.40  18.30  13.10  10.20  9.70   
  Aug 24, 98 2:30 3.00  0.20    23.60  13.40  9.70     
  Aug 31, 98 3:25 1.80  0.30    25.30  14.90  10.30     
  Sep 08, 98 3:30 2.80  0.80  0.30  16.80  12.00  11.40  16.80   
  Sep 15, 98 4:00 2.40  0.40    21.80  12.80  10.80     
  Sep 21, 98 1:45 2.10  0.20  0.20  16.90  11.90  9.60  9.40  7.94 
30 Jul 29, 98 1:16 2.60  0.10  0.10  19.80  20.20  17.80  15.60   
  Aug 04, 98 4:47 6.80  3.90    18.30  19.30  17.00     
  Aug 11, 98 5:12 5.50  3.50  0.70  19.50  17.30  16.30  15.70   
  Aug 18, 98 1:40 3.80  3.20    18.00  15.10  14.60     
  Aug 24, 98 2:40 4.80  1.30    18.30  16.70  15.20     
  Aug 31, 98 3:35 4.00  1.70    25.30  17.90  16.70     
  Sep 08, 98 3:30 2.80  0.80  0.30  16.80  12.00  11.40  16.80   
  Sep 15, 98 4:05 2.50  2.00    18.40  14.30  13.70     
  Sep 21, 98 2:15 2.40  1.50  16.70  13.10  12.60  7.34 
34 Aug 26, 98 11:40 12.10  10.30  1.40  22.30  20.00  18.60  18.60   
  Sep 01, 98 10:28 12.50  11.80  8.70  21.70  20.60  20.20  19.80   
  Sep 08, 98 10:50 4.50  2.30    14.80  16.10  16.10     
  Sep 16, 98 11:19 8.40  7.60    19.80  16.40  15.20     
  Sep 23, 98 2:12 12.70  10.40    22.20  16.20  14.00     

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed

Table D2. Pond Dimensions
 
Pond 
#18
Pond 
#20
Pond
#21
Pond 
#29
Pond 
#30
Surface area (m2)
77
95
235
35
36
Volume (m3)
44
102
210
22
26
Max. length (m)
17
12.8
31.5
12.1
8
Max. width (m)
6.5
12
13
3.2
5
Max. depth (m)
1.8
3
2.9
1.7
1.8

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed

Table D3. Fish Sampling Results, Oct. 19, 1998
 
Pond 
#18
Pond 
#20
Pond 
#21
Pond 
#29
Pond 
#30
Using ‘Super-Dave’:
 
 
 
 
 
Number of coho 
0
45
0
11
15
Number of cutthroat
0
0
0
0
2
Number of stickleback
2
4
2
0
0
Using Gee-traps:
 
 
 
 
 
Number of coho
0
-
0
0
0
Number of cutthroat
0
-
0
0
0
Number of stickleback
1
-
0
0
0
Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed
Table D4. Length/Weight data, Oct. 19, 1998.
  Number Caught  Avg. Length (cm)  Avg. Wt. (g)  Condition Factor 
Coho – pond #20 45  7.10  4.10  1.10 
Coho – pond #29 11  7.10  4.02  1.05 
Coho – pond #30 15  6.30  2.88  1.11 
Cutthroat – pond #30 12.20  17.06  0.88 

 
Previous
Top of Page
Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed
Next
Section 9

Refuge Pond Studies
Introduction
Methodology
Site Descriptions
Results
Discussion
Recommendations
References
Pond Locations
Pond Photos
Refuge Pond Sites
Pond Study Data

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Click on the fish to swim to the top of the watershed


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Updated August 26 2001
DF