Table of Contents
Frank B. Finite (a "true" atheist)
The Blind Fools Guest Entry Log
Letters to the Editor
Issue 7
Letters Policy:
Basically the only thing we have to officially say is this, "Your letter may be directed to another member of the staff, rather than I, the Editor in Chief, answering it". This is done to insure that you get the most highly qualified answer that we can possibly give.
Also, sometimes I am on vacation every week or so.
And I, the Editor in Chief, reserve the right to edit all letters posted. Sometimes the "colorful" language has to be omitted or changed which would be distinguished by italicized (parenthesis) because it it causes nice elderly church ladies thump their Bibles too hard.
And with their fragile and delicate fingers, this causes considerable pain. And since we love and respect them dearly, we choose to save them from such pain so that they can continue to bake us cookies.
Your's truly,
The Editor in Chief.
Brilliant web site. Comparable to Matthew Marquez's page
http://www.oocities.org/evononsense
I just went over your site
and it appears you are trying to debunk
evolution. Is that the case?
Elsie
Dear Elsie,
First I have to apologize for taking so long to respond. It's just that when we saw 'Brilliant web site' in connection with 'Blind Fools' - well, we fainted.
Our church leaders came in a few days later and poured water (Holy H2O) on us and we came to. Then we shared the good news (gospel?) with them that Blind Fools was considered 'brilliant', but they told us that it was sarcasm.
We asked them, "Oh great church leaders, what is sar-cas-m?" They said that we were too smart to understand such a simple concept and not to think about it ever again. We obeyed.
Then they gave us a letter to send to you with orders not to read it ourselves. Again we obeyed.
So the following is from our church leaders . . .
Elsie,
Look here - we invented religion well before others invented evolution.
Since we were here first, we got the choice of which bunk to get. Naturally we chose the bottom bunk. And, of coarse, the evolutionists were stuck with the top bunk.
If there is going to be any debunking around here, the evolutionists are going to have to debunk us. But we rather like the bottom bunk - it's easier to access. So it will be a bit of a struggle.
May the fitter human animal primates win.
Hope this clears thing up,
Church Leaders
Hi! How are you?
I send you this file in order to have your advice
(Editors note: There was an
attatched file to the e-mail letter, much like a pilot fish attatched
to a shark)
See you later. Thanks
Hi! I'm fine 'n dandy! How are you?
I send you this letter 'cause your file failed to open. What application is it in?
But judging by the title of it, 'UFOsEvolutionandtheBible,' it must have something to do with panspermea.
It is so obvious that life generated on this planet as a result of "seeding" by an advanced alien race from a far off planet.
But what about THEIR planet? Did life spontaneously generate on THEIRS?
Of coarse not. It was seeded by another more advanced alien race from another far off planet.
But what about THEIR planet? Did life spontaneously generate on THEIRS?
Of coarse not. It was seeded by another more advanced alien race from another far off planet.
But what about THEIR planet? Did life spontaneously generate on THEIRS?
Of coarse not. It was seeded by another more advanced alien race from another far off planet.
But what about THEIR planet? Did life spontaneously generate on THEIRS?
Of coarse not. It was seeded by another more advanced alien race from another far off planet.
But what about THEIR planet? Did life spontaneously generate on THEIRS?
Of coarse not. It was seeded by another more advanced alien race from another far off planet.
But what about THEIR planet? Did life spontaneously generate on THEIRS?
Of coarse not. It was seeded by another more advanced alien race from another far off planet.
But what about THEIR planet? Did life spontaneously generate on THEIRS?
Of coarse not. It was seeded by another more advanced alien race from another far off planet.
And so the process has gone on for eternity.
Hope this clears things up.
Sincerely,
Editor in Chief
Blind Fools
Response . . .
DONT open ANY ATTACHMENTS! My computer has contracted a virus, I have reason to believe it is the "CODE RED" virus, and it makes my email sned it to people that aren't even on my list!!!!
DO NOT open it, and if yu already have, SCAN FOR VIRUSES and DELETE IT immediately.
Love In Christ,
Chase
Hey-really, whats up?
a/s/l?
Not to worry my good buddy. I have a random text generator (RTG) that automatically answers e-mail when I'm not here.
The attachment was never attempted to be opened. It's just a coinky-dink that the RTG spit out some letters and words which appear to be in context with your initial letter.
This letter is also being produced by the RTG.
As for the virus, it is just a chance computerized evolutionary product. No evil person generated it, and the virus is not really "bad" either.
These viruses just somehow mutate and become resistant to anti-virus programs (thus proving the fact of evolution).
And if these viruses are more fit than the regular programming of our computers, they will eventually rise to the top of the code chain and dominate.
Hope this clears thing up a tad.
Apathy in Chance,
Editor in Chief
Blind Fools
P.S. - a/s/l = a few million years/have not asexually divided yet/this pale blue dot
Dudes,
I'm a unrepetant heathen (bleep-tard) militant atheist, but I must say I just love your website. Very funny. Well thought-out and articulated. Great production value. Found it through Sackcloth and Ashes.
Keep up the good work!
Andy
Dear unrepetant heathen (bleep-tard) militant atheist dude Andy,
Thanks for the unrepetant heathen (bleep-tard) militant atheist kudos.
It's refreshing (like dryer-warmed toasty underwear on a cold winter morn') to see that there's people on both sides of the issue with a (good) sense of humor.
Thanks for dropping the line.
Sincerely,
The blind fool fundy Editor in Chief