Ignorance in America
1 Disney and 75%
of Enron
What's the Difference?
Sunday, Jan.13,300 p.m., 2002
COMPANY
|
VALUE
AT PEAK
|
VALUE
TODAY
|
DIFFERENCE
(
loss in billions)
|
CISCO
SYSTEMS
|
$502,899,081,250
|
$148,238,329,000
|
$355
b
|
INTEL
|
$500,883,000,000
|
$231,899,600,000
|
$269
b
|
GENERAL
ELECTRIC
|
$595,968,600,000
|
$379,730,944,000
|
$216 b
|
YAHOO!
|
$135,280,000,000
|
$11,483,136,000
|
$124
b
|
ENRON
|
$66,951,000,000
|
$498,413,000
|
$66 b
|
DISNEY
|
$88,296,862,500
|
$44,584,182,000
|
$44
b
|
Chart
by Sentry Over America. Data from Zachs, BigCharts, and
annual reports
|
With all the buzz, screaming, and crying going
on about Enron, the employees' 401k plan, shareholder losses,
and with all the political fingerpointing, a dose of reality
is in order
the two year drop in the value of Disney equals
the same drop in the value of Enron . . .
. . . well, within 4 billion, but who's counting
pennies. Why isn't Representative Henry Waxman (RAT-CA) taking
his massive nostrils and sniffing in the corners of the big
RAT house, the Mouse headquarters at Buena Vista Street in Burbank?
Could it be because Enron is headquartered in Texas, home to
President Bush, and the big RAT house is headquartered in Waxman's
home state? I have not heard of Senator Diane Freakandswine
(RAT-CA) complain about the $43.7 billion dollar loss to shareholders
and employees of Disney, have you?
If Waxman took his nostrils to Disney, what would
he find?
In 1998, Mike Eisner sold $575.6 million in Disney
stock. Since 12/31/98 Disney stock has fallen $16.5 billion
dollars. Since that same time, Enron's stock has fallen $20.7
billion (as mentioned above, within 4 billion or 75% of Enron's
loss--see footnote 3). So who does Waxman contact? He contacts
Chairman Kenneth Lay of Enron saying ``you had already sold
$40 million of Enron stock during 2001 and over $100 million
since October 1998'' but he never questioned Eisner selling
5 times as much stock while Disney's stock proceeded
to tank about the same value as Enron's over the same period.
The table above shows that Cisco Systems lost
more than 5 times as much as Enron from its peak until 1/11/2002.
What is common to Cisco, Intel, Yahoo!, and Disney? They
are all headquartered in CA. General Electric has their
HQ in CT, home to Senator LIEberman (RAT-CT) and Senator Dodd
(RAT-CT). General Electric lost more than 3 times as much as
Enron for its shareholders and employees so why is there no
finger pointing there? (footnote 6)
JDS Uniphase, HQ in CA, has lost $161 billiontwo
and one-half times Enron's lossfor employees' 401k plans,
for shareholders, and sobbing retirees. And, with a stroke of
the pen, wrote off $30 billion dollars of goodwill from all
their acquisitions, a record (until, that is, AOL-Time Warner
the other dayHQ in NYannounced up to a $60 billion
write off of goodwill, about equal to Enron's loss).
Oh . . . wait a minute. NY is home to Senator
SCUMBAGETTE (RAT-NY) and Senator Schumer (RAT-NY). That explains
the silence.
A lot of this Enron buzz rests on the fact that
it is an 1] energy company and 2] that is is headquartered in
Texas. You don't see the investigations going on in California
where all the venture capital dealings took place and where
the high-tech industry has their HQs. The losses to 401k plans
and employee sob stories are more plentiful and have a greater
magnitude than with Enron but Waxman wants to sniff elsewhere.
Alan Greenspan happens to be "headquartered
in Washington D.C." and the 5 trillion in stock market
value loss since March of 2000 can be attributed in a large
part to his raising of interest rates in 1999 and 2000 in the
face of a pending slowing of the economy due to the post-Y2K
unwinding. Where is the subpoena for Mr. Greenspan from Waxman's
office? Even the RATs can figure out 5 trillion is a bit larger
than 66 billion. Or can they?
You know the "big pharmaceutical companies"
Al Gore and the Rats like to talk about making all this money
and not giving away the kitchen sink for free? Merck employees
and shareholders have seen their stock value drop $48 billion
dollars, more than half of Enron's. So much for Al Gore's next
speaking gig.
Why doesn't Waxman do some sniffing at Wall Street
analysts? Some things never change. After these analysts had
Yahoo! and Cisco and nearly all high-tech companies rated a
strong buy or buy in March 2000, they proceeded to keep those
ratings while those stocks got driven into the ground. More
recently with Enron, same story. What about the crying over
the employees 401k? It is quite common to force matching contributions
into company stock so nothing unusual there. Many of these Enron
employees were idiots by not seeking professional advice when
it came to investment planning and chose to keep most of their
"non-matching" dollars also in Enron. If they felt
they were smart enough to choose investment options on their
own, wellthey have a right to be stupid. In addition,
many of these people saw the value in their Enron stock soar
and never sought professional advice on proper diversification.
The loss figures the media sob stories will present will be
from the peak, not from their cost basis.
Let the investigation into Enron reveal what it
may and it may indeed uncover some criminal activity. But it
was simply the risk they took as a corporation that led them
to desperate measures (if undertaken). Some companies are going
to fail, and even those that don't, employees and shareholders
of countless companies have far more massive losses than those
at Enron. Eastern Airlines, K-Mart (soon to be) and countless
high-tech startups in recent years took the risk with some passing
and some failing. The difference is the high-tech failures by
the thousands have their HQs in RAT-infested California where
Waxman's nostrils don't sniff.
But, he can smell oil and gas from as far away
as Texas.
So far, the biggest culprit in the Enron mess
is not the company, but the Big Five firm Anderson. It was financial
problems that nailed the coffin, and Anderson, besides shredding
documents, was there right along. Management can make bad operational
decisions, but the accounting firm should have prevented the
financial screw-ups.
Oh . . .wait a minute. Anderson has their HQ in
RAT-infested Chicago, the stomping grounds of Jesse Jackass.
Maybe Jesse did one of his corporate shakedowns with Anderson
and the RATs don't want to go there.
Look for the sob stories to flood the airwaves
soon with the leftist media making sure many interviews are
done in Texas so Dan and Tom can repeat "now reporting
from Texas . . .".
Charles Prestwood is a retired Enron Employee
and he told the Senate Commerce Committee last month he lost
over $1 million and said "the rank and file got burned."
Well, there has been a lot of "burning"
going on in California at the Mouse HQ, at Yahoo!'s HQ, and
at many others but until Waxman pumps a case of Sinex Nasal
Spray up those massive nostrils, he will not smell the smoke.
Notes:
1. Peak value dates: CSCO 9/1/200;
INTC 8/23/2000; GE 8/28/2000; YHOO 1/3/2000; ENE 8/23/2000;
DIS 4/28/2000. Value at Peak and Value Today in the table are
from these dates to 1/11/2002.
2. Shares outstanding were kept
constant using latest share totals. CSCO 7.3349 billion; INTC
6.712 billion; GE 9.9328 billion; YHOO 569.6 million; ENE 743.9
million; DIS 2.0386 billion
3. DIS on 12/31/98 price $30.00;
ENE on 12/31/98 28.53. The $22 billion difference between DIS
and ENE in the table is peak to current. The $4 billion difference
is from 12/31/98--after Eisner's stock sale.
4. Data from corporate annual reports,
historical prices from Zachs.com and BigCharts.com.
5. Eisner's sale of stock was from
accumulated stock options. His salary now is in the $1 million
range and with his bonus of $8.5 million had total compensation
in 2000 of $9.3 million. He still has about $266 million in
options.
6. Author's note and opinion: CSCO,
INTC, and GE happen to have some of America's finest and most
respected management teams. The massive losses in market cap
are not a reflection on the management but resulted in part
from Alan Greenspan's assault on interest rates and Greenspan's
assault on the free enterprise system by raising interest rates
in the face of an impending post Y2K slowdown.
For more on the hideous moves of Alan Greenspan,
read Issue 12 of Sentry Over America in the article Pull
a Reagan, Mr. President.