| home | links | notes | asemanari | impreuna | perfect | e.mail |
| cartea 1 | cartea 2 | cartea3 | cartea4 | cartea 5 | cartea 6 |
cartea 7 | cartea 8 | cartea9 | cartea 10 |
cartea 11 | cartea 12 |
cartea13 | cartea 14 | cartea 15 | cartea 16 | cartea 17 | cartea 18 |
cartea 19 |
cartea 20 | cartea 211 |
|cartea 22 | cartea23 | cartea24 | cartea 25 | cartea 26 |
cartea 27 | cartea 28 |
cartea 29 | cartea 30 | cartea 31 | cartea 32 |
cartea 33 | cartea 34 | cartea 35 | cartea 36 | cartea 37 |
cartea 38 |
cartea 39 | cartea 40 | cartea 41 |
| cartea 42 | cartea 43 | cartea 44 | cartea 45 | cartea 46 |
| cartea 47 | cartea 48 |
Audio
Teachings Tape #23-Rhondell
[brackets for clarification]
Talk covers:
African diamond mines
Teaching in ancient days
Alchemy,architecture, agriculture, fishing
Matthew 22-24-"The Lamp of the Body"
Serving God vs serving mammon
Observing the "self"
For as long as we have records of any kind and as far as traditions of myths and stories go, the Teaching--or the Work--has always been available for man. It has generally been in the form of parallels, parables, and stories, etc.--stories that anyone could read, but may or may not get anything other than a little entertainment.
They may have found the stories incomprehensible or possibly listened to the story with not "i" family #5 working for the infant decision that the whole purpose of living is to be non-disturbed. So they try to self improve by putting on a different front. [such as trying to please or quote authorities when they've been habitually complaining and sticking up for rights.]
Now always when the teaching is alive (when there is an active instructor somewhere around), the parallels are used; but also, specific people are given specific instructions as to what the parallels refer to.
This is called Teaching from lip to ear. We are using that method at this moment, even though we are using the media of recorded tapes. It is still from speaker to a specific individual, and this specific individual is given the inner meaning of many of these little stories and parallels that are in many many places. One may have these parallels and parables at his command, and one has the challenge of seeing the tremendous rich meaning. This continual source of instruction to one can have tremendous value if one understands the meaning of the little stories.
There is a story told of a man who lived in South Africa who had a little farm on which he was trying to produce crops. The soil was so very rocky and unproductive that he finally decided to go to a city and seek his fortune-he was going to try to find an easier way to make a living. After a number of years someone, who knew about little rocks and various things, came across this particular farm and found that the rocks, which the farmer had cursed and found of no value to him, were diamonds. The farmer walked off and deserted the little farm; however, it was the beginning of the great diamond mining industry of South Africa.
Whether the story is true or not, no one knows, but it is a very common story and illustrates wonderfully the fact that we have so many things of great value available to us. By taking them literally, as the farmer took the diamonds for rocks, one is not seeing their inner structure--their inner meaning. One then passes over much that is of great value to one's development of one's inner state-the development of a spiritual body. Now, outer life is really a parable of the inner state, and there are many of these little stories that relate to simple everyday incidents, or describe something that one doesn't see.
Up until a very few years ago, the study of the inner state of man was taboo. It had been taboo for many many long years-the reason being that all of the so-called spiritual writings and spiritual material came into the hands of institutions. Institutions insisted that the meaning of all these parables was really the moral code that related to one's outward behavior. Their interest was in people behaving differently; in being, shall we say, domesticated. Their interest was in people believing and doing as they were told. This way, they would obey and be what is called "good" according to the "ideals" of the world. This was the intent. So any effort to study the inner state of man was considered heresy and subject to severe penalties.
So in order to preserve the Teaching, little stories began to be told that could still carry on the inner meaning of the ideas. There were fairy tales telling about miraculous creatures, about a sleeping princess and that a prince comes and kisses her and she awakens. Some of the stories were about people who had had evil spells cast upon them by witches or sorcerers. Always there would be some sort of a
prince come by and break the spell. Now we saw these as fairy tales. The children read them, and the grown-ups seldom saw any value in them-[they missed the teaching ideas].
There was a whole system of chemistry called ALCHEMY, (The study wasn't interested in chemistry particularly; however they did make some discoveries-it was possibly the forerunner of modern chemistry), but their ideas as far as chemistry was concerned were preposterous. What they were really attempting to do, under the guise of making gold out of base metal and finding the elixir of life or forming something called the philosopher's stone, was really to take a base-conditioned man and turn him into a fully objective, conscious man. They did all this under the symbols of chemistry as it was known in those ancient days.
Other groups tried to teach with symbols during the forming of buildings and the various forms of ARCHITECTURE. They taught through these symbols and built very beautiful and wonderful buildings-many, of which, are still standing. If one knows how to read the various symbols put into the buildings, then one can read the same ideas of the Teaching over and over again.
The Teaching was also used many times in AGRICULTURAL ideas. Here was the whole parallel of planting, cultivating, harvesting, getting rid of weeds and many other things. Agriculture is not a popular subject to most people today as we are mostly interested in industry and electronics, etc. So obviously many of these old symbols are seen only as being the talk of an ancient pastoral people that really doesn't relate to us today.
The teaching was also used in commercial FISHING, the gathering of many fish, catching them and throwing out the evil ones, which we have remarked somewhat about, seeing that the personality had all the "not I's" in it. Though some of personality might be useful such as knowing how to dress ourselves, etc; all the trashy stuff is thrown out. Today we can be more direct and more concise as to what the ideas mean because today psychology is a popular subject.
Phrases that were used 1000 to 4000 years ago sometime seems rather strange unless one is aware of what these teachers were talking about. Unless one is aware of how they used various symbols as parallels for the inner state of man--the conditioned state of man-then one is unable to understand the meaning. As we said, there was a long dark age of the study because the institutions had power. They had a stranglehold on all information and were only giving out what they wanted to. It seems to be really a revival of the old Scribes and Pharisees. They were concerned with outward behavior only, outward form and with being what's called "good". They were not concerned with being conscious because a conscious man is not under control. A conscious man is a free man, and of course, an institution sees a free man as a heretic-as someone practicing heresy. Not all of that effort is dead today. Although, the institutions do not have the power they once had, they still have power over a few million which is a lot of people if we stop to think about it.
We will read one of these little parallels so that we can see how it is constantly being referred to. It gives one the possibility of having continual instructions. In this way if one cannot find a Teacher (an instructor or any kind of guide), then it shows that there is adequate material all around that one can use to understand the inner meaning of this material.
We will read today from the Book of Matthew in the New Testament, Chapter 6, verses 22-24. It reads:
"The lamp of the body is the eye (it is singular, it doesn't say the eyes). So it says,
"The Lamp of the Body is the Eye. If thy eye be sound, thy whole body will be full of light; but if thy eye be evil, thy whole body will be full of darkness. Therefore, if the light that is in thee is darkness, how great is the darkness itself. No man can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will stand by the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon."
Now let's take as a reference point the picture of man we drew sometime ago. It might be advantageous to redraw it. In the picture of man the center section is the AWARENESS. The Awareness is referred to as the inner EYE. It was referred to as the third eye at one time (and considered to be blind in the usual conditioned man)--the third eye being closed, blind, unused, evil, contaminated. It is full of something or other. It may have blocks of rock in it; it may have salt in it. At any rate, the person cannot see and understand.
So the eye is the awareness factor that sees that which is true, that sees what is and the value of what is. When it is contaminated or conditioned it sees as to "what ought to be" or the "ideal"; and that is the only thing that has value to the conditioned one.. There is no connection between the two. What is and "What ought to be" are two different ideas that are mutually exclusive. This leaves only conflict, struggle and resistance to change what is into what one thinks "ought to be". In this case the eye is considered to be dark or evil and the awareness is the only light that is in one--light meaning that which comprehends--that which sees relationships, that which comprehends all the situations about one.
So "if thy eye be evil, the whole body will be full of darkness." We have the picture of man that is taken over by the four dual basic urges and the six means of self-improvement, three in one camp [the "A" side] and three in another [the B side]. They are at war and this is considered to be evil.
The word evil does not mean bad--(not as an opposite to good). It means something in a state of contamination--not serving the purpose for which it is designed. The awareness is designed to see what is and what is valuable about what is on a varying scale. However when it is dark-conditioned--the awareness is dark--it is blind; and when it is conditioned it does not operate as it was intended--all is chaos.
Our picture of man shows what it is that makes it dark. It is what I (the capital I with a line drawn under it), the first personal pronoun, observes when it is observing "self". The light has been contaminated and has been turned into a "self" instead of awareness. It says the whole body will be full of darkness. In other words, one is unaware of the whole nature of what goes on. We have been talking about what happens when one has "expectations"-"expectation" that everything should fit the "ideal"-and that it will be the "ideal". Then when the actual what is comes along (giving one an opportunity to evolve) one sees it as bad; one then is disappointed, feels hurt and looks for blame.
Then one gets the unpleasant emotions of anger, guilt, fear, insecurity and all their many subdivisions which is a state of stress, and which mobilizes the body to fight or run. The body is in a state of chemical imbalance and neuromuscular tension. Then an adaptation has to take place. That adaptation is experienced in the form of unusual cellular activity, unusual sensation and unusual action of the cells; in other words, a change or alteration in the tissue cell itself. We do not know what is going on with the discomfort and so we blame disease for having attacked us and others. We want to stop all of this. We never consider that it is a signal, [a signal to observe the "self" and see what's going on and what "not i's" are working]--so darkness fills the entire body.
It says, "If thy eye be sound, thy whole body will be full of light." The body will be filled with understanding and seeing what is. That is the picture of man when I stands in the middle of the awareness function (see the picture of man under definitions on this website or www.pictureofman.com ). One has a spiritual body and that body is full of light. That body is based upon experimentation with the ideas of the Teaching.
Various experiences come into being and one is being fully aware that one cannot confess, surrender, repent or be baptized by some act of will. There is an experiencing that comes from observing this "self"--this darkness. I (the observer) is throwing a light through all that dark area; and one, thereby, is beginning to understand conflict and is beginning to be cleansed of many conflicts. One is seeing what is as some value and one sees "what ought to be" is totally without value. One sees that which is very harmful, and X casts it out. The whole purpose of I observing "self" is to be filled with light. It is to heal the blind, because the awareness function of man was totally blind.
It says,
"No man can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or stand by one and despise the other."
The four dual basic urges is the master when man is in a conditioned state, when he has not observed "self" over a long period of time.
If you have kept records, and as you continue to do so, you will see that there is the constant temptation (which we have been studying for weeks) to identify, or to agree with, or to allow mammon to agree with us. (The four dual basic urges referred to is mammon-and of course all the means of self improvement which are three on the A-side and three on the B-side which are ever in war with each other.) This is to be in the dark and to serve the master (mammon), and everything concerned with it is misery. This is why we see tremendous amounts of illness. This is why you see so much conflict in the world. This is why you see so much violence in the world-because mammon is being served by those involved. Those involved are serving the "ideal" that the whole purpose of living is to be non-disturbed.
When one serves mammon, one is serving the "ideal" that the whole purpose of living is to be nondisturbed. Then one practices self-improvement on the "self", and tries to improve other selves who resent it. Then comes the blaming down the way when things do not work right.
In blaming we always feel ready for violence because blaming goes back to that "expectation" that if we blame them, they will apologize, straighten up, pay their accounts payable to us, and will begin to be different and do what they "ought to do". But other persons have exactly the same thing within them and so there are fights, law suits, contention, maybe even wars (little brush wars in southeast Asia or eastern Asia, maybe in the Near East, or maybe world wars). Wherever it is, it is only an expression of those inner states of man that is serving mammon.
Whether there are millions on one side and millions on the other, it makes no difference because the picture of man, as we have seen, is the picture of any organization. It can be the picture of an army or it can be the picture a nation. It is also the picture of the whole world. The picture of man is the master parable of this day because it shows what is going on.
It is a parable of how each came into being--how two great nations in it were formed. In the ancient days of the books we are now reading, the A-side was called the gentile nation because they were struggling to have their way, sticking up for their rights and blaming. B-side was called the Jewish nation because they were living by rules, regulations, "thou shalt", "thou shalt not", thereby behaving differently, trying to please people and they were believing and doing as they were told by their authorities--the Scribes and Pharisees.
So we see this same situation goes on through the years. As one begins to understand this parable of the picture of man, which is being referred to here as the inner eye, (the third eye, the aspect of inner comprehension), we are seeing that it is not only related to one person but to everyone--and that all have it until one comes upon Teaching a bit and begins to observe that "self" to see it.. One, then, has stepped into the world of real living beings, and has stepped out of the man-made world which is mammon's world.
It says that mammon has charge over that entire world. Man ceases to serve mammon because he is no longer interested in the four dual basic urges--not because he is taught to do so, but because with careful experimentation of observing, he sees that every act to serve mammon results in conflict, struggle, resistance and disintegration. He sees that mammon entices one to struggle toward an illusion--an illusion that cannot be unless one be dead, because one who is living is going to experience all degrees of sensation.
The more conscious one is, the more sensations or more vibrations in the world around one, one experiences. Not all of them would be classified as pleasant; in fact, one would be in severe danger if one only experienced the pleasant sensations.
So as one observes this, one observes the inner eye, the comprehension faculty--the awareness. It has also been called the soul; and today we refer to it as the psyche (which is the Greek word for soul). We see that as we study the psyche, we then see it undergoes a transformation from an area of darkness to being filled with light. The only way it can have that light is from that light of self-observation which is like holding a flashlight. I has a light and throws it in all these dark areas which are from conditioning, and, of which. the person is unaware.
As one observes "self" serving mammon, one very easily sees that one's purpose is to be a conscious reporter to X of what is and the value of what is. One sees that the "ideals" mammon holds out are illusions, and that pursuing these illusions has one in a constant state of conflict, struggle and resistance.
Have you been through the state of trying to make a decision? A-side giving many reasons to do it one way, and B-side giving many reasons to do it another way? One calls this trying to make a decision.
As you have been doing the Work, you may have experienced in some areas by now [after you have studied so far] that when you see, you see it so completely that there is no choice. There is only the what is, and the value of what is, and X acts upon it. There is no struggle with choice. There is no going through all the agony of trying to come to a conclusion, and then convince one's "self" that one has free agency or free choice. Of course, the whole idea of free choice implies that one already is in conflict. However, we find that the idea of free choice is rather an illusion--that finally we never come to a conclusion; but actually, circumstances push a button and there is a reaction, and we say, "Oh yes, I decided to do it that way." But then if it doesn't turn out to be nondisturbing, one says, "I don't see why I ever did that." "I don't know what came over me to make me do that."
So you see, mammon says to deny responsibility. The only responsibility one truly has, is to be aware of what is and see the value of what is. X does all the work.
One cannot do anything. One cannot open this eye, but by being aware, one throws a light in it, and that whole spiritual body (called Awareness in the picture of man) begins to be strong and clear and filled with light. When the spiritual body is filled with light, light meaning conscious observation and conscious awareness (not reaction, not conditioning) then one sees that there is no choice to be made. One sees so clearly and so completely as to what is, and its relative value, that action is spontaneous, and X immediately acts upon it. This is called spontaneous living. It is a joyful state of existence.
So may we recommend that you take these words which we just read from the New Testament (verses 22-24, the sixth chapter of Matthew), write them down beside the picture of man and refer to them a number of times through the week so that one knows what the inner eye really is (eye-the comprehension, the seeing). One can begin to see whether one still has dirt in one's eye, or whether one's eye is clean. If it is clean the whole body is full of light, if it is injured, malfunctioning due to the dirt of conditioning in "it"; It, of course, cannot function adequately. So write the words and to the side of it put the picture of man with all the conditioning in it on one side. Then on the other side put the picture of man with the conditioning having been observed and rendered inoperative--removed by X.
One sees they are entirely different, one sees whether one is serving mammon; or whether one is serving X, Spirit, Life.
| cartea 1 | cartea 2 | cartea3 | cartea4 | cartea 5 | cartea 6 |
cartea 7 | cartea 8 | cartea9 | cartea 10 |
cartea 11 | cartea 12 |
cartea13 | cartea 14 | cartea 15 | cartea 16 | cartea 17 | cartea 18 |
cartea 19 |
cartea 20 | cartea 211 |
|cartea 22 | cartea23 | cartea24 | cartea 25 | cartea 26 |
cartea 27 | cartea 28 |
cartea 29 | cartea 30 | cartea 31 | cartea 32 |
cartea 33 | cartea 34 | cartea 35 | cartea 36 | cartea 37 |
cartea 38 |
cartea 39 | cartea 40 | cartea 41 |
| cartea 42 | cartea 43 | cartea 44 | cartea 45 | cartea 46 |
| cartea 47 | cartea 48 |
| home | links | notes | asemanari | impreuna | perfect | e.mail |