| home | links | notes | asemanari | impreuna | perfect | e.mail |





| cartea 1 | cartea 2 | cartea3 | cartea4 | cartea 5 | cartea 6 | cartea 7 | cartea 8 | cartea9 | cartea 10 |
cartea 11 | cartea 12 | cartea13 | cartea 14 | cartea 15 | cartea 16 | cartea 17 | cartea 18 | cartea 19 |
cartea 20 | cartea 21 | | cartea 22 | cartea23 | cartea24 | cartea 25 | cartea 26 | cartea 27 | cartea 28 |
cartea 29 | cartea 30 | cartea 31 | cartea 32 | cartea 33 | cartea 34 | cartea 35 | cartea 36 | cartea 37 |
cartea 38 | cartea 39 | cartea 40 | cartea 41 | | cartea 42 | cartea 43 | cartea 44 | cartea 45 | cartea 46 |
| cartea 47 | cartea 48 |




Invatatura 5.....
Audio


Dis-identificare
Caseta 5
In ultimele saptamini am studiat omul cum este in starea sa de conditionare; ca trebuie sa fim constienti de situatia actuala asa cum este cu fiecare din noi, nu cu ideea de condamnare sau justificare, dar simplu fiind contienti de ce este. Toata ideea scolii este pentru om ca sa fie constient de „Ce este” asa cum este.
Toata ideea a lumii este ca sa cream „idealuri” si ignorind „Ce este” si luptind sa-l schimbam intr-un ideal de „ce ar trebui sa fie”. Omul gindeste ca el stie mai bine de „ce ar trebui sa fie” in loc de a descoperi „ce este,” si posibil altceva va apare, rezultind intr-un om noi nu unul cu petice. Undeva a spus ca unul nu poate coase un garment vechi cu bucati de fabric noi ca nu cumva ca fabricul noi sa-l stirce pe cel vechi si va fi si mai rau. Unul nu poate sa puna vin ou in sticle vechi, pentru ca vinul nou ar rupe sticlele vechi si totul e pierdut. Am studiat garmentul vechi si sticlele vechi ca sa stim ceva despre ele. Ca si un preliminar ca sa incepen alt nivel al muncii, pe care il vom lua saptamina viitoare, vom incepe in aceasta saptamina cu intelegerea si observarea pentru noi insine, functia fiecarui aspect al omului. In poza omului avem corpul fizical, constiinta, X si functia. Acum daca putem, vom lua aceste patru aspecte ale omului si incepem sa vedem functia lor in relatia. Nici unul din aceste aspecte ni se pare sa functioneze vreodata singur, este interrelatia celor patru aspecte sau factori ale unui om. Primul lucru vom face o incercare sa studiem pe X. Vom incerca sa vedem cu X lucreaza. Acum, aici este gidul sau harta pentru obsevare, si tu trebuie sa faci observarea. Primul hai sa vedem daca putem observa si vedea cum X lucreaza. X in totdeauna face lucrul potrivit pentru informatia primita din constiinta. Acum, nu spune ca este intotdeauna lucrul potrivit, dar lucrul potrivit pentru informatia primita din constiinta.
Povestea pianului, al delusiei gasului
O data intr-o institutie mentala, o femeie tinara a fost observata care a avut o deluzie ca camera era plina de multe ori cu otrava de gaz. Ea incepea sa aiba aceasta deluzie dintr-o associatie. Primul lucru pe care ea l-a facut era sa se urce pe un scaut de pian. Acest lucru i-a pus capul mai sus de unde ea a crezut ca otrava gazului era. Cind gazul umplea camera pina la nivelul unde ea ar trebuit sa respire din noi, in deluzia ei, ea s-a urcat pe keile pianului. Acest lucru a pus-o mai in sus si cind a simtit ca otrava a ajuns la nasul ei din noi, s-a urcat mai sus pe pian cu capul aproape atingind tavanul. Cind ea a simtit ca gazul s-a apropiat de tavan, a lesinat. Camera a fost continuu umpluta cu gaz, spune ea, dar restul oamenilor stateau pe scaune in camera. Ea nu a luat acest lucru in consideratie; ea a fost intr-un spital mental. Dupa un timp isi revenea si continua cu afacerile ei obisnuita pina cind acea deluzie incepea din nou. Ce a facut ea (ce a facut X pentru fiinta) a fost sa se urce pe un scaun de pian, pe keile pianului; lucru corespunzator de facut pentru informatia pe care X a primit-o din aceasta „constiinta inselata si amagita”.
Acum aceasta a fost un caz extrem, posibil, dar fiecare din noi vedem ca felul de a merge pe aceasta lume este prin a ne plinge, sarind la drepturi, a-i multumii pe oameni, prin a referii si a cita autoritatile, fiind diferit si dind vina si am vedea de asemenea ca tot motivul trairii este ca sa nu fim Deranjati si Tulburati. Atita timp cit aceasta informatie continua, X face lucrul necesar pentru informatia primita.
Continuind sa studiem, am gasi ca daca informatie diferita ar merge la X, de cum a mers de obicei. Apoi, de sigur ar fi un complet de diferit de stare ale acelei fiinte. Mai mult, X primeste ca si „adevar” toata informatia din „constiinta omului.” Chiar daca constiinta spune adevarul, X opereaza ca si cum este „adevarul”. Cind fata saraca a reportat (cu simtamint) ca camera se umplea cu gaz si ca ea va fi otravita sau sufocata, x a acceptat acest lucru ca si adevar si a facut actiunea necesara pentru informatie (cum i s-a parut) si acceptind ca fiind adevarat. Deci daca spunem ca tot motivul trairii este ca sa nu fiu tulburat, X opereaza pe acest lucru.
Daca spunem ca felul ca sa nu fim tulburati este ca sa omorim pe cineva, X ii omoara. Daca am fi sa spunem ca lucrul corespunzator ca adevarul lucrului a fost ca ar trebui sa fim morti in schimb ca sa ne simtim mai bine, X trage pistolul care impusca creierii.
Functia contiintei este o functie, nu un lucru. Constiinta este simplu o functie a lui X, nu o identitate separata sau un lucru. Are constiinta si, deci poate fi amagita in a crede „ca este un lucru”. X genereaza energia pentru orice act care funtia contiintei” Eu, spune ca este valoros sau bun. Daca unul vede ceva ca fiind adevarat dar de nici o valoare catre unul, X nu opereaza asupra acelui. Este ca simplu vedem ca si nici o valoare sau „constiinta” il vede ca fiind de nici o valoare, deci nici o actiune nu e luata. Constiinta functioneaza fiind 100% subiect catre sugestie 100% din timp, accepting ideile ca sint false si fiind adevarate, ca si cele pe cre le-am bservat in trecutele saptamini. Acesta fondeaza ce ne referam ca si parti din conditionare sau Nu euri – personalitati care nu sint defapt adevarate, dar fiind conditionati sa observam lucrurile intr-o lumina falsa.
Toata aceasta conditionare are efectul de a pune pe Eu intr-un somn hipnotic in care se identifica cu Nu Euri. A se identifica inseamna „A trata la fel ca si” In alte cuvinte, aceste bucati de informatie (conditionare) care merge la X este tratata ca si cum este defapt constiinta, si constiinta reala identifica cu bucatile de conditionare si simte ca totul este la fel. Este ca si cum un corp inteligent intr-o armata ar fi sa indentifica cu vreo 5 agensti spunind „Pai sint toti la fel ca si mine. Sinti in inteligenta si desigur ar putea reporta catre general, si generalul ar actiona pe totul ce primeste de la inteligente ca fiind adevarat.
O alta parabola mica...
Este ca si cum au fost hoti care au invadat casa ta si toti au fososit telefonul in numele tau. Au putut sa sune un magazin si sa trimita lucruri si a pune toate cumparaturile in contul tau. Ar putea sa-ti cauzeze un lucru considerabil de dificil, fara ca tu sa stii pentru ca au folosit telefonul in numele tau. Cind aceasta este starea de existenta, partea de Eu, fiind identificat cu Nu Erurile, X face ce este necesar si da energie conditionarii ca si cum ar fi un Eu. Toata energia umana vine de la X. Este toata energie spirituala. Nu eurile, bucatile de conditionare ar, desugur incepe sa se investejeasca si sa nu aiba nici o putere nici o energie sa expresioneze except ca Eu identifica cu ele si ei primesc energie de la X.
Ca si un paralel, hai sa spunem ca ai un fiu sau o fiica si ca copilul a cazut in miinile unui hipnotist. Hipnotistul l-ar avea pe copilul tau sa sune si sa-ti spuna ce hipnotistul vroia in timp ce a tinut copilul intr-o stare de somn hipnotic si numai i-a spus prin sugestie, „Spunei parintilor tai asa si asa si sa-ti trimita banii”. Dar ar veni si hipnotistul i-ar folosii. Aceasta este mult din cazul Nu Eurilor.
Acum aceasta conditionare ale Nu eurilor primind energie de la X si aceasta se socoteste pentru miseria si desintegrarea omului. Lupta catre iluzia „idealului” catre lupta pentru imbunatatire proprie, catre lupta de a sarii la drepturi catre lupta de a-i multumii pe toti, catre lupta de a se plinge catre lupta de a da vina. Toate acele lupte rezulta in razboaie, certe, etc. Acesta continua lupta rezulta in si este datorita desintegrarii omului.
Am studiat acest lucru prin cunoscind-o. Scaparea este pentu Eu, constiinta reala ca sa dis-identifice din tot ce unul posezeaza, din tot ce unul numeste „Al Meu.” „Opinia mea” Gindurile „Mele” simtamintele „mele” atitudinea „mea” casa „mea” totul „al meu” totul ce unul posezeaza pentru ca ce posezam noi depindem de ele si depindem pe ele sa ne dea idealurile si sintem foarte dezamagiti cind nu ne da. Cind dezamagiti, ne simtim raniti, uitindu-ne dupa a da vina, si cind avem suparare, invinovatie, frica insecuritate, si o gazda celor subdivizii ale acelor foarte neplacute emotii pagume neplacute. Deci, felul scaparii este pentru constiinta, Eu, sa dis-indetifice din tot ce unul spune ca posezeaza, totul ce unul spune „al meu” catre.
Acum, acesta rezulta intr-o stare ale afacerilor unde „eu” observa „individualitatea” ca si cum ai travela pe o nava cosmica din Martie si ai venit inauntru si observind „un om pamintesc pe care il cheama cum il cheama” Observina aceasta este fara condemnind sau justificind, dar este dis-indentificare totala din aceasta „individualitate conditionata.” Acum au vedea de ce am studiat „individualitatea”. Nu este defapt ceva ce unul vrea sa se indentifice cu. Este o stare de conflict; este putin a nu nimerind marca a motivului trairii. Este folosind metode foarte infantile ca sa incercam sa recuperam. Este dezamagire cin acest ideal al motivului trairii de netulburare nu este obtinut. Deci poate il face mai usor pentru noi sa dis-identificam din „individualitate” „Individualitatea este acea poza a omului pe care am desenat-o cu decizia de baza la poala, cu trei intr-o parte mergind intr-o directie si trei pe cealalta parte mergind in alta directie.
Acum, Eu se va trezi si observa aceste Nu Euri in munca lor su cum ii reporteaza lui X. Dar unul intercepteaza aici. Unul Spune, (folosind numele de Bula pentru toti oamenii, si Maria pentru toate femeile) „Maria” face asa si asa, dar Eu apoi reporteaza lui X si nu opereaza nici nu da energie Nu Eurilor

-Eu observ ca maria este suparata
-Eu observ ca Maria este jeloasa
-Eu observ ca Maria incearca sa aibe dupa placul ei prin a se plinge, ea pune lacrimile
-Eu observ ca Maria incearca sa aibe dupa placul ei prin a sarii la drepturile ei si mai mult beligerind.

-Eu vad ca Maria da vina pe Bula pentru ca ea se simte aspru.
-Eu vad ca Maria da vina pe Bula pentru ca nu a venit acasa la 4:05 si deci ea este dezamagita si se simte ranita.
Unul incepe sa observe din pozitii separate toate lucrurile ce aceasta „conditionare” face. Am observat-o luind note si deci acum ne vom dis-identifica. Nu mai este ca Eu fac asta, dar
Eu observa pe Bula sau maria facind asta. Incepem sa simtim un cu totul diferit simtamind de Eu. Este inceputul, si numai inceputul unui statut permanent numit Eu. Eu a sarit din unul care vrea sa se plinga catre unul care vrea sa multumeasca, catre cel ce vrea sa imbunatateasca, catre ala care da vina, inapoi catre ala care crede in autoritati. Nu a fost un permanent Eu, a sarit peste tot.
Acum acest mic lucru de dis-identificare si incepind sa observam individualitatea nu va fi posibil 100% din timp, dar poate fi facut considerabil si fiecare moment care este petrecut pe el este acumulativ si slabeste toti nu Eurile.
Deci, vom incepe acum pe prima cale afara din acest stat de a fi conditionat si controlat, fiind mecanic, de a avind povare si fiind plin si tras in jos cu toate lucrurile din trecut prin a incepe sa di-identicicam din individualitate, deci, individualitatea stapineste lucrurile, dar Eu nu le stapinesc.
Individualitatea are o rochie sau un costum, o casa, opinii.
Bula are o opinie si el protejeaza acea opinie
Maria are simtaminte si simtamintele ei sint ranite. Eu reporteaza catre X. Eu a luat pozitia corecta. Fiul risipitor s-a trezit din porcacir din Egipt, unde ce„conditionarea” reprezinta, si a inceput o casa. El este totul departe, dar el a inceput inapoi sa fie servitor in Casa tatalui.
Deci aceasta este inceputul lui Eu, fiind real si observind Nu eurile in tot ce cara ele, si le vom numi individualitate (Sau numele tau – Letitia). Eu observ individualitatea facind asa si asa, sau eu observ pe Bula facind asa si asa.
Acum, acesta rezulta in Eu fiind simplu un observar si un reporter fara nici o condemnatie sau justificatie. Eu a luat lucrul lui de a observa si vazind „ce se intimpla” vazind „ce este” Nu este gata inca sa inceapa sa aplica valori, care vor vine un pic mai tirziu. Continuind ce observ eu este individualitatea, „Bula” sau „Maria”, sau conditionarea” sau „Nu eurile”.
Este o legiune de ele. Sint doua grupuri, si se lupta unul cu altul de asemenea. Deci eu observa toate nu eurile si Eu observa pe „Bula” sau pe „individualitate”. Acestea sint interschimbate termeni si pot fi folosite in discutii varioase in timp ce mergem inainte interschimbatori. Pe cind observam nu eurile fara condemnatie sau justificatie, X le da inoperative una dupa una.
In alte cuvinte, poate ca te-ai intrebat. „Ce pot sa fac despre acest Lucru”
Multi au intrebat acest lucru, cind ei observa aceste conflicte si aceste varioase bucati de conditionare. Tot ce poate face unul este sa le observe si sa le reporteze. X face munca de le-a da inoperative. Cum face aceste lucru? Nu stiu. Ce face cu ele dupa ce le da inoperative? Nu stiu. Noi doar stim ca ele opresc sa fie conditionare si ele se lasa sa fie luate si sa opereze corpul si fiinta.
Este imposibil pentru Eu care a fost adormit, mort sau chior (asa cum multe povesti si parabole spun) pentru asa de mult timp, ca dintr-o data sa fiu 100% capabil, deci eu voi merge la dormit de multe ori. Dar cind eu ma scol din nou, eu deabea spun Ca am benit inapoi la munca si sa reportez lui X.
Acum, vor fi multe acuzind nu eurile, imbunatatirile de euri care spun, „Ar trebui sa crezi si sa faci asa cum iti este spun de autoritatile tale” (o familie foarte mare din ele pentru ca au fost multe autoritati).
Unul spune „ar trebui ca sa fi diferit” si „Ei” il vor acuza pe Eu pentru a merge la culcare din timp in timp dar Eu nu se identifica cu ele, nu le accepta acuzatiile lor sau condemnatiile lor, si nu vorbeste inapoi catre ele. Doar reporta ca sint acuzati „Nu eurile” spunind ca observatorul niciodata nu ar fi trebuit sa mearga la culcare, si X le da inoperative. Unul nu se multumeste cu acesti Nu euri. Eu este un observator si un reporter catre X si nimic altceva. Nu se cearta, nu se joaca, Numai observa si reporteaza.
Vom vorbi despre acestea de multe ori dar observa ca Nu eurile vor sare in sus si incercind sa-i dea lui Eu un timp greu de a fi pentru ca dintr-o data Eu se trezeste si realizeaza ca nu a observat „individualitatea” pentru multe ore sau chiar zile, cine stie.
Din inselatorii ale Nu Eurilor sint multe si foarte manipalative si chiar vazind sa fie de ajutor cu munca de a incerca sa-l indrepte pe Eu inapoi. De obicei, observind cei multi multi Nu euri si dis-indetificind total din individualitate.
Il observ pe „Bula” „Bula” face asa si asa. „Bula” se supara” „Bula” viseaza o poveste el va spune sa se puna pe el intr-o lumina buna. „Bula” da vina pe „Maria” pentru al face nervos. Eu observ totul ce se intimpla cu individualitatea ca si ceva cu totul separat, si este defapt ceva separat. A fost ceva care a fost adaugat, nu este persoana reala de oc. Este conditionarea. Este un grup de Pinochios, si Eu ii reporteaza catre X.
Acum, care este functia constiintei? Este sa fiu un observator mai intai si reportind „ce este” Reporteaza ce este adevarat, fara nici o condamnare sau judeca. De oicei reporteaza. Celalalt lucru care functia constiintei va face mai tirziu este sa inceapa sa puna valori relative. Nicionada nu judeca. Numai „individualitatea sau conditionarea” judeca.
Judecata spune ca este bine sau ca este rau, in concordanta cu orica m-a facut comfortabil sau nu sau orice produce durere. Spune ca este Adevarat sau Fals in concordanta cu cit de aproape imi da dreptate cu o opinia sau un Nu Eu. Eu, observatorul real, functia lui X, reporteaza „ce este” si mai tirziu, va reporta valoarea sa relativa. Dar acum este mai mult reportarea de „ce ete”.
Functia corpului fizical este un instrument al expresiei lui X. Corpul este o functie a lui X, ca si constiinta este o functie a lui X. Este functia ca sa expresioneze in activitale fizicala ceea ce a spus constiinta ca a fost adevarat si valoros. Corpul este un instrument a lui X ca si constiinta este. Prima functie este ca sa mentina instrumentul in existenta. X il tine intr-o stare de reparat si-l prepara pentru orice. Constiinta reporteaza circumstantele actuale.
Daca constiinta reporteaza este un pericol mare pentru ca cineva dezaprobeaza cu ea, X prepara corpul ca sa se lupte sau sa fuga si, cum am vazut, trebuie sa se adapteza catre acest lucru. Daca acea adaptatie este vazuta ca si pericol si nu ca si munca lui X, apoi din noi este peparata sa fuga sau sa se lupta si incet merge intr-o deterioratie si corpul cade la pamint.
Daca Eu este sculat si constient si reporteaza ca corpul functioneaza, corpul se adapteaza catre adaptatia ta, arde mobilizarea si energia ne eliberata in care intr-un timp cin Eu am fost adormit, unul din Nu Euri reporteaza catre X ca este in pericol, apoi vede si toate simptomele fizicale sint terminate si foarte repede corpul este reinnoit complet.
Daca informatia corecta merge la X de la Eu si conditionarea este din disidentificare, corpul merge in reintinerire, la fel ca si constiinta, este un om nou pentru ca nu mai este folosit pentru motivil care nu mai exista dar care a fost reportat de un Nueu in numele lui Eu catre X. Acum, observind aceasta, vom vedea cum corpul se schimba complet cind eu observ „individualitatea” si nu se identifica cu „individualitatea”. „individualitatea” are case, masini, opinii, conturi in banca, drepturi. Dar Eu numai le observ. Eu este o functie a lui X si observa „individualitatea si X le da neoperative, acele multe bucati ale conditionarii unul dupa altul. Unul nu trebuie sa judece, sa condemneze sau sa justifice Nu eurile.
X stie ce sa face, la fel cum si stiu ce sa faca daca casa arde. Unul ii reporteaza acel lucru, X scoate fiinta afara. Daca unul aude de la corp ca are nevoie de apa si este reportat lui X, X nu spune ca este „bun” sau „rau”. X se scoala, merge la chiuveta, sau la frigider, bea, o inghite, totul din ce sint intimplari miraculoase daca unul le observa. Tu sti cum sa mergi? Sau tu eti constient ca vrei sa mergi catre usa?
Tu experientezi mergerea, esti constiente de mergere.
Daca ne-a fost lasati ca sa aflam care din muschi sa miste in schimb ca sa caram activitatea mersului, nu ar mai fi nici un mers.
Functia este ca sa aducem joaca lui X in constiinta, sa aducem seriile de schimbare continua care mereu ii da omului tot ce valoreaza si fericirile trairii cind le putem reporta corect.
Cind a fost luat de uzurpari si ele vorbesc in numele lui, acea functie demonstreaza foarte clar ca eroarea este reportala lui X, dar X numai accepta ca si un fapt totul ce constiinta reporteaza catre el cind din Nu euri sau un Eu. Deci, vedem foarte excelent motivele pentru observare, nu eurile. „Ele” vorbesc in numele tau catre SURSA ENERGIEI TOTALE.
Dis-identifying From "The Teachings" Tape 5 For the past several weeks we have been studying man as he is in his "conditioned state;" that we may be aware of the actual situation as it is within each of us, not with the idea of condemning or justifying, but simply being aware of what is. The whole idea of schools is for man to be aware of "what is" as it is. The whole idea of the world is to set up "ideals" and ignore "what is" and struggle to change it into the "ideal" of "what ought to be." Man thinks that he knows better of "what ought to be" rather than finding out "what is," and possibly something else would appear, resulting in a new man not just a patched-up one. Somewhere it said that one cannot patch an old garment with a piece of new cloth lest the new cloth will rend the old garment and it will be worse. One cannot put new wine in old bottles because the new wine would break the old bottles and all is lost. We have been studying the old garment and the old bottles so that we will know something about it. As a preliminary to begin another level of work which we will take up next week, we will start this week with understanding and observing for ourselves the function of each aspect of man. In the picture of man we have the physical body, awareness, X andfunction. Now if we can, we will take these four aspects of man and begin to see their function in relationship. No one of these aspects ever seems to function alone, it is an interrelation of four aspects or factors of one man. The first thing we will attempt to study is X. We will try to see how X works. Now here is a guide or roadmap for observing, and you must do the observing. First, let's see if we can observe and see how X works. X always does the proper thing for the information received from awareness. Now it doesn't say that it always does the proper thing, but the proper thing for the information received from awareness. Piano story of gas delusion One time in a mental institution a young lady was observed who had a delusion that the room frequently filled with poison gas. She would begin to have this delusion from some association. The first thing she did was climb up on the piano stool. That got her head above where she thought the poison gas was. When the gas filled the room up to the level to where she would have to breath again, in her delusion, she climbed up on the cover of the keyboard of the piano. That got her still higher and when she felt that the poison gas was to her nose again, she got up on top of the piano with her head almost to the ceiling. When she felt the gas reached there, she passed out. The room was continually filling up with gas, to her, but the rest of the people were sitting around in chairs. She didn't take that into consideration; she was in a mental hospital. After a while she revived and would go on about her usual affairs until that particular delusion set in again. What she did (what X did for the being) was climb upon the piano stool, keyboard cover and the top; the appropriate thing to do for the information X received from this "deluded awareness." Now this was an extreme case, possibly, but each of us sees that the way to get along in the world is by complaining, sticking up for rights, pleasing people, quoting authorities, being different and blaming and we might even see that the whole purpose of living is to be "non-disturbed." As long as this information goes on, X does the appropriate thing for the information received. As we continue to study we may find that different information would go to X than that which has always gone. Then, of course, there would be an entirely different state of being. Further, X receives as "truth" all information furnished from the "awareness of man." Whatever the awareness says is truth, X operates upon it as "Truth." When the poor girl reported (with feeling) that the room was filling up with gas and that she was going to be poisoned or suffocated, X accepted that as true and did the appropriate action for the information (as it "seemed") and accepted it as being true. So if we say that the whole purpose of living is to be non-disturbed, X operates upon it. If we say the way to be non-disturbed is to kill someone, X kills them. If we were to say that the appropriate or the ultimate thing that the truth of the matter was that we should be dead in order to be better off, X pulls the trigger that blows the brains out. The "AWARENESS FUNCTION" is a function not a thing. The "awareness" is simply a function of X, not a separate identity or thing. It has awareness and, therefore, can be deluded into believing "it is a thing." X generates the energy for any act that the "awareness function", I, says is valuable or good. If one sees something as being true but of no value to one, X does not operate on it. It is that we simply see it as no value or "awareness" sees it as being of no value, so no action is taken on it. The awareness function being 100% subject to suggestion 100% of the time accepts ideas that are false as being true, such as the ones we have been observing these past weeks. This establishes what we refer to as bits of conditioning or Not-I's--personalities that are really not true, but being conditioned to observe things in a false light. All this conditioning has the effect of putting I into a hypnotic sleep in which it identifies with the Not-I's. To identify means "to treat the same as." In other words, these bits ofinformation (conditioning) that goes to X is treated as though it is really awareness, and the real awareness identifies with the bits of conditioning and feels it is all the same. It is as though an intelligence corps in an army were to identify with some fifth agents saying, "Well, they are the same as I. They are in the intelligence corps and, of course, they could all report to the general, and the general would act upon everything he received from the intelligence corps as being true. Another little parallel: It is as though there were burglars invading your home and they all used the telephone in your name. They could call up the store and have things sent out and charged to your account. They could cause you considerable difficulty without you knowing it because they could use the phone in your name. When this is the state of existence, the I being identified with the Not-I's, X provides energy to the conditioning as though it were I. All human energy comes from X. It is all spiritual energy. The Not-I's, the bits of conditioning, would, of course, wither away and not have any power nor any energy to express except that I identifies with them and they receive energy from X. As a parallel, suppose you had a son or daughter and that child fell in with a hypnotist. The hypnotist would have your child call up and tell you what the hypnotist wanted while he kept the child in a state of hypnotic sleep and only told him by suggestion, "Tell your parents thus and so and to send you money." But it would come and the hypnotist would use it. This is much the case of the Not-I's. Now this conditioning of the Not-I's receiving energy from X and this accounts for the misery and the disintegration of man. The struggle toward the illusion of the "ideal," to the struggle for self-improvement, to the struggle of sticking up for rights, to the struggle of pleasing, to the struggle of complaining to the struggle of blaming. All this struggle results in wars, fights, etc. This never ending struggle results in and accounts for the disintegration of man. We have been studying it to be acquainted with it. The way out is for I, the real awareness, to dis-identify from all that one possesses; from all that which one calls "my." "My" opinion, "my" thoughts, "my" feelings, "my" attitude, "my" house, "my" everything; everything that one possesses because that which we possess we depend on and we depend on it to give us the "ideals" and we are very disappointed when it doesn't. When disappointed, we feel hurt, look for blame, and then we have anger, guilt, fear, insecurity and a host of the subdivisions of those very unpleasant damaging emotions. So the way out is for the awareness, I, to dis-indentify from all that one claims to possess, everything that one says "my" to. Now this results in a state of affairs wherein I observes the "self," as though you were a traveler on a spaceship from Mars and you had come in and were observing an "earthling named (whatever your name is). This observing is without condemning or justifying, but it is totally disidentifying from this "conditioned self." Now you may see why we have been studying the "self." It is not really something one wants to identify with. It is in a state of conflict; it is somewhat missing the mark as to the whole purpose of living. It is using very infantile methods to attempt to gain those. It is disappointed when this ideal of the purpose of living of being non-disturbed is not achieved. So maybe it makes it a little easier for us to dis-identify from the "self." The "self" is that picture of man we drew with the basic decision at the bottom with three on one side going one way and three on the other side going the other way. Now I is going to wake up" and observe these Not-I's in their work as to how they report to X. But one intercepts here. One says, (using the name of John for all men, and Mary for all women): "Mary" is doing so and so, but I then is reporting to X and does not operate on nor give the energy to the Not-I. I observe that "Mary" is mad. I observe that "Mary" is jealous." I observe that "Mary" is trying to have "her" way by complaining; "she's" putting on the tears." I observe that "Mary" is trying to have her way by sticking up for her rights; "she" is rather belligerent." I see that "Mary" is blaming John because "she" feels rough." I see that "Mary" is blaming John for not having gotten home at 4:05 and, therefore, "she" is disappointed and feels hurt." One begins to observe from a separate position all the things that this "conditioning" is doing. We have been observing it, making some notes, so now we will dis-identify. No longer is it I am doing this, but I is observing "John" or "Mary" doing this. We begin to sense an entirely different sense of I. It is the beginning, and only the beginning, of a permanent state called I. I has been jumping from one that wants to complain to the one that wants to please, to the improver, to the blamer, back to the believer in authorities. There was no permanent I, it jumped all over. Now this little thing of dis-identifying and beginning to observe the "self" will not be possible 100% of the time, but it can be done considerably, and every moment that is spent on it is accumulative and it weakens all of the Not-I's. So we will start now on the first of the way out of the state of being conditioned and controlled, being mechanical, of having burdens and being loaded down with all the things from the past by starting to dis-identify from the "self." Therefore, the "self" owns things, but I does not. The "self" has a dress or suit, a house, opinions. "John" has an opinion and "he" is defending that opinion. "Mary" has feelings and "her" feelings are hurt. I is reporting to X. I has taken up its rightful position. The Prodigal Son has arisen from the hog pen in Egypt, which all the "conditioning" represents, and has started home. He is still a long way off, but he has started back to be a servant in the Father's House. So this is the beginning of I being real and observing the Not-I's in all their carrying on. And we will call it "self" (or your name). I observe "self" doing so and so, or I observe "John" doing so and so. Now this results in I being simply an observer and a reporter without any condemnation or justification. I has taken up its chore of observing and seeing "what is going on," seeing "what is." It is not ready yet to start applying values, that will come a little later. Further, what I observes is "self," "John" or "Mary," or the "conditioning," or the "Not-I's." There is a legion of them. They are in two parties and they fight with each other also. So I is observing all the Not-I's and I is observing "John" or "self." These are interchangeable terms and may be used in various discussions as we go along interchangeably. As I observes the Not-I's without condemnation or justification, X renders them inoperative, one by one. In other words, you may have wondered, "What can I do about it?" Many have been asking this when they observe these conflicts and these various bits of conditioning. All one can do is observe it and report it. X does the work of rendering "them" inoperative. How does it do it? I do not know! What does it do with them after rendering them inoperative? I do not know! We just know that they cease to be conditioning and "they" cease to take on and operate the body and the BEING. It is impossible for I that has been asleep, dead, or blind (as so many stories and parables use it) for so long, to suddenly be 100% capable, so I will frequently go to sleep. But when I wakes up again, I merely say, I am back on the job and reporting to X." Now there will be a host of accusing Not-I's, the self-improving "I's" that say, "You ought to believe and do as you are told by your authorities" (a very large family of them because there have been many authorities). One says you "ought to be different," and "they" will all accuse I for having gone to sleep from time to time but I does not identify with them, does not accept their accusations or "their" condemning, and does not talk back to them. It merely reports that there are accusing "Not-I's" saying that the observer never should have gone to sleep, and X renders them inoperative. One does not contend with these "Not-I's." I is an observer and a reporter to X, and nothing else. It does not argue nor play the lawsuit part with the Not-I's. It only observes and reports. We will talk on these many times, but do observe that a Not-I will jump up and try to give I a hard way to go because suddenly I wakes up and realizes that it has not been observing "self " for several hours or maybe even days, who knows! The tricks of the Not-I's are many and very cunning and even seeming to be helpingwith the work of trying to straighten I out. Merely observe the many many Not-I's and totally dis-identify from the self. I am observing "John." "John" is doing so and so. "John" is getting angry. "John" is dreaming up a story "he" is going to tell to put "himself" in a good light. "John" is blaming "Mary" for making "him" mad. I observe all of this going on within "self" as something entirely separate, and it really is something separate. It has been something that has been added on, it is not the real person at all. It is "conditioning." It is a group of "Pinochios", and I is reporting them to X. Now, what is the function of awareness? It is to be an observer first and report "what is." It reports what is true, without any condemning or justifying. It merely reports. The other thing the awareness function will do later is to begin to place relative values. It never judges. Only the "self" or "conditioning" judges. Judging says that it is "good" or it is "bad" according to whether it made me comfortable or not or whether it produced pain. It says it is "true" or "false" according to how closely it agrees with a given opinion or a Not-I. The I, the real observer, the function of X, reports "what is" and later it will report its relative value. But right now it is merely reporting "what is." The function of the physical body is an instrument of the expression of X. The body is a function of X as the awareness is a function of X. Its function is to express into physicalactivity that which awareness said was true and valuable. The body is the instrument of X as the awareness is. Its first function is to maintain the instrument in existence. X keeps itin a state of repair and prepares it for whatever. Awareness reports the actual circumstance. If awareness reports there is great danger because someone disagrees with it, X prepares the body to fight or run and, as we have seen, it must adapt to that. If that adaptation is seen as a danger and not as the work of X, then again it is prepared to fight or run and gradually goes on into a deterioration and the body falls apart. If I is awake and aware and reports that the body is functioning, the body is adaptingto your adaptation, it is burning up the mobilized and unreleased energy that one time when I was asleep, one of the Not-I's reported to X that it was in danger, then I sees and all the physical symptoms are over with very quickly and very shortly the body is being completely renewed. If correct information goes to X from I, and the conditioning is dis-identified from, the body undergoes a rejuvenation, the same as the awareness; it is a new man because it is no longer being used for purposes that no longer exist but which was reported by a Not-I in the name of I to X. Now, as we observe this, we will see how the body completely changes as I observes "self" and does not identify with "self." "Self" owns houses, cars, opinions, bank accounts, viewpoints and rights. But I only observes. I is a function of X and observes the "self," and X renders inoperative those various bits of conditioning one by one. One does not have to judge, condemn, or justify the Not-I's. X knows what to do, the same as it knows what to do if the house is afire. One reports it and X gets the being out. If one hears from the body that water is needed and it is reported to X, it doesn't say it's "good" or "bad." X gets up, walks to the tap, or the refrigerator,drinks it, swallows it; all of which are miraculous happenings if one ever observes. Do you know how to walk? Or are you only aware that you want to go to the door? You experience the walking, you are aware of the walking. If it was left up to us to figure which one of the muscles to move in sequence in order to carry out the act of walking, there would be no walking. Function is to bring about the play of X in awareness; to bring about the ever changing series of events that continually give man all the values and joys of living when we can report accurately. When he has been taken over by usurpers and they are talking in his name, that function demonstrates very clearly that error is being reported to X, but X only accepts as fact everything that the awareness reports to it whether from a Not-I or an I. So we see very excellent reasons for observing the Not-I's. "They" are speaking in your name to the SOURCE OF ALL ENERGY.

| cartea 1 | cartea 2 | cartea3 | cartea4 | cartea 5 | cartea 6 | cartea 7 | cartea 8 | cartea9 | cartea 10 |
cartea 11 | cartea 12 | cartea13 | cartea 14 | cartea 15 | cartea 16 | cartea 17 | cartea 18 | cartea 19 |
cartea 20 | cartea 21 | | cartea 22 | cartea23 | cartea24 | cartea 25 | cartea 26 | cartea 27 | cartea 28 |
cartea 29 | cartea 30 | cartea 31 | cartea 32 | cartea 33 | cartea 34 | cartea 35 | cartea 36 | cartea 37 |
cartea 38 | cartea 39 | cartea 40 | cartea 41 | | cartea 42 | cartea 43 | cartea 44 | cartea 45 | cartea 46 |
| cartea 47 | cartea 48 |

| home | links | notes | asemanari | impreuna | perfect | e.mail |