
|

|
|
|

The Gospel of Barnabas - Is it to prove that the Holy Bible is
in error?
The Gospel of Barnabas
first appeared in the latter part of the sixteenth century in the hands of Fra
Marino, a monk who had converted to Islam. The document was written in Italian.
It is likely that Fra Marino himself put it together, using a number of sources.
It did not become known until this century. The manuscript is now in the
imperial library of Vienna.
In recent years Muslims have
been claiming that The Gospel of Barnabas was written by the Barnabas of
the Bible and is the true story of Jesus. They take great delight in charging
Christians with "hiding" this "gospel." It is worthwhile,
therefore, for Christians to know at least a little bit about this fraudulent
book.
(Reference: David Sox, The Gospel of Barnabas, 1984, London, George Allen
& Unwin)
The Gospel of Barnabas at issue today contains Islamic ideas, which
does not conform with 4 Gospels in the Bible. As Islam originates only
in 610 A.D., the Gospel of Barnabas cannot dates from the early
Christian period. The Gospel of Barnabas by its name is not a prophecy
that predicts the emergence of Islam over 500 years after the Bible
was written. A number of statements in the Gospel of Barnabas, moreover,
are irreconcilable with the history and geography of Palestine,
so that it appears hardly conceivable that the author of the Gospel of
Barnabas could have lived in Palestine. A reliable source which reports
about the contents of the gospel and which dates from before the beginning
of 8th century is lacking. Several indications in the text itself
speak in favor of a late medieval or early modern date of composition.
The following examples thus make it most probable that the text was composed
between 14th and 15th century:
-
The Gospel of Barnabas makes the accusation of the falsification of the
Old Testament through the human traditions of the false Pharisees, although
the party of the Pharisees originated only between 135 and 104 B.C.
-
In the Gospel of Barnabas, Adam even recites the Islamic confession of
faith, which, of course, no one could have known in the early Christian
period, since Islam originated only in 610 A.D.
-
As the Gospel of Barnabas reports, the promise of the birth of Jesus was
given to Ishmael, and not to Isaac, and Ishmael was to be sacrificed by
Abraham instead of Isaac: this is the Islamic view of the story of Abraham
which contradicts with the Bible till today.
-
Several prophets, such as Adam, Abraham, Ismael, Moses, David, and Jesus,
the son of Mary, are confirmed as messengers of Allah. This is, of
course, the view of the Quran, but it is not a conception in Christianity,
which Bible draws a considerable distinction between Adam, Abraham, and
Jesus and does not characterize all equally as messengers.
-
According to Gospel of Barnabas, Jesus is not descended from David. In
the Bible, the statement of Jesus' descent from David is clearly recorded.
-
In the Gospel of Barnabas, the command is given by God to Mary and Joseph
to keep Jesus away from wine, strong drink, and impure meat -- that is,
pork: the prohibition of pork and wine is, however, an Islamic prohibition,
not a Biblical one.
-
According to the Gospel of Barnabas, Jesus is sent only to Israel, this
corresponds to Muslim theology, which assumes that each historical prophet
was sent only to his own particular people. Gospel of Jesus have to be
preached to the whole world according to the Bible.
-
In the Gospel of Barnabas, when Jesus receives his revelation at the age
of thirty, he is bathed in a bright light and surrounded by angels while
accomplishing his midday prayers, while the angel Gabriel gives Jesus a
book which penetrates to his heart. It is a Muslim view that Gabriel
conveyed Muhammad's message to him. Jesus Christ receives the revelation
from God the Father and not from angel or book.
-
In the Gospel of Barnabas, Jesus refers to Muhammad as the greater of the
two whose
shoelaces he is not worthy enough to untie, which contradicts with Quran.
The original version is that Jesus assumes the role played by John the
Baptist in the New Testament.
-
In the Gospel of Barnabas, Jesus announces the coming of Muhammad and already
speaks the name of Muhammad. Jesus asks God to send Muhammad to save the
world. In Jesus' time, no one knew that, six centuries after Jesus' death,
Muhammad, on the Arabian peninsula, would claim to be sent by God and to
preach the truth. In the Christian view, it is impossible that Jesus announced
Muhammad and asked God, his father, to send Muhammad. There is no prophecy
about the birth of Muhammad in the Bible and no signs to authenticate it.
However, Jesus has many proven signs from prophecy.
-
The crucifixion of Judas in the Gospel of Barnabas does not agree with
the eye-witnesses such as Apostle Matthew, Apostle John and Apostle Peter
recorded in the Christian Gospels. An Islamic interpretation of the Crucifixion
is offered which, however, could be reconciled with the only reference
in the Quran to the Crucifixion (Sura 4, 157-158).
-
The Gospel of Barnabas undertakes an apologetic interpretation of Christianity
when it alludes to the idea that the Apostle Paul has deviated from some
Christian dogmas. For example, Barnabas laments having been seduced by
Paul into adopting the teaching of Jesus' divine sonship. The idea that
Paul was the spoiler of original Christianity is a view repeated again
and again by European Bible critics and Islamic apologists equally. This
view is totally unfounded as Paul receives revelation from Jesus Christ
and He is most learned in religious laws amongst the 12 Apostles.
-
As a matter of fact that there are also statements in the Gospel of Barnabas
which cannot be reconciled with either the Quran or with the Bible. Among
those statements deviating from the Quran are, for example, Barnabas'
comments concerning Hell as merely a temporary place of residence for the
sinner. The Quran leaves no doubt whatsoever that those who are once
exiled to Hell must remain there eternally.
-
Another contradiction with the Quran is the oft-repeated statement in the
Gospel of Barnabas that Muhammad is the Messiah, while it at the same time
repeatedly denies that Jesus is the Messiah. Sura It characterizes Jesus,
however, as chrissto (Christ). The assumption, therefore, is that the author
did not know that Christ is the Greek equivalent of the Hebrew word for
Messiah (the Anointed).
-
In the Quran, Jesus is born in Jerusalem; in the Gospel of Barnabas, in
Bethlehem. In the Quran, he is born under a palm tree; in the Gospel of
Barnabas, in an inn. In the Quran, Mary suffers much pain at Jesus' birth
(cf. Sura 19, 23); in the Gospel of Barnabas, she gives birth to Jesus
painlessly.
-
The Quran recognizes seven heavens (Sura 2, 29); the Gospel of Barnabas,
nine. The tenth heaven there is Paradise.
-
The Gospel of Barnabas clearly pleads for monogamy, while the majority
of Muslims recognize in Sura 4, 3 the permission for marriage with up to
four women.
-
The Gospel of Barnabas itself stresses that the original Biblical gospel
was falsified. If Barnabas actually would have been a contemporary of Jesus,
then the formation of the New Testament would not yet have been concluded.
With this statement, the Gospel of Barnabas would have forecast its own
fate. In addition, his geographical and historical mistakes make clear
that the author of the Gospel of Barnabas can neither ever have visited
Palestine nor can he have lived in the first post-Christian century:
-
In the Gospel of Barnabas, Nazareth is a town on the shore of the Sea of
Galilee. Nazareth, however, stands upon a hill some distance from the Sea
of Galilee. According to the report in the Gospel of Barnabas, Jesus ascends
from the Sea of Galilee to Capernaum. Capernaum, however, lies directly
on the shore of the Sea of Galilee. According to the description in the
Gospel of Barnabas, Nineveh lies near the Mediterranean coast. It, however,
is to be found in the interior on the banks of the Tigris.
-
In the Gospel of Barnabas, the dates given for the birth of Jesus, compared
with the terms of office of Pilate, Ananias, and Caiaphas, do not agree
with the historical record.
-
The Gospel of Barnabas reports 600,000 Roman soldiers in Palestine. There
were, however, perhaps so many soldiers only in the entire Roman Empire,
but certainly not in Palestine.
-
The Gospel of Barnabas also reports 17,000 Pharisees at the time of the
Old Testament; the party of the Pharisees, however, originated only in
the second century before Christ.
-
The Gospel of Barnabas describes a European summer: everything bears fruit.
In Palestine, however, it rains in winter, and in the summer the land is
dry.
-
According to the description in the Gospel of Barnabas, the year of jubilee
is celebrated every one hundred years, while the Old Testament names a
period of fifty years. In the year 1300, Pope Boniface VIII fixed the date
for the celebration of the year of jubilee as once in every hundred years.
But already in 1343, Clement VI shortened the period to fifty years and
announced the next jubilee celebration for 1350. Thus, the interval between
celebrations of the year of jubilee was fixed at one hundred years, as
the Gospel of Barnabas describes it, only in the period between 1300 and
1343. Urban II, in 1389, shortened the interval still further to thirty-three
years, and Paul II, in 1470, fixed a twenty-five-year interval, which
has been retained to the present.
-
The Gospel of Barnabas urges behavior patterns which remind one strongly
of monastic asceticism. Thus, in several passages, laughing is condemned
as a sin, but crying counts as a sign of the spiritual life.
-
The Gospel of Barnabas cites Bible verses according to the Latin Vulgate
translation, which was completed only at the end of the 4th century and
became the official Catholic Bible.
-
The Gospel of Barnabas reports that Jesus and his disciples had kept the
forty days. The forty-day fast before Easter was introduced only in the
4th century and is supposed to be a reminder of the suffering and death
of Jesus, which was impossible before his death.
-
The Barnabas gospel mentions a gold coin: the dinar, comprised of
60 minuti. This coin was used for just a short time in medieval
Spain, a point of argument which appears to support the thesis of a Spanish
origin for the Gospel of Barnabas.
-
In the Barnabas gospel, wooden barrels are mentioned as a method for storing
wine; in the Near East, however, leather wineskins were usual.
-
In contrast to the Quran, the Gospel of Barnabas describes how Mary delivers
her child without suffering pain, a teaching which first came into fashion
in the Church in the Middle Ages.
-
The Gospel of Barnabas stresses the importance of alms, fasting, pilgrimages,
and fivefold daily prayer, which Jesus also performs, whereby the text
indicates a period after the origin of Islam in the 7th century.
-
The forbidden fruit in Paradise, which the Old Testament does not specify
by name, is said in the Gospel of Barnabas to be an apple, also
a development from later church history.
These and several other points form the basis of most of the treatises
and papers written by non-Muslim authors in rejection of the assumption
that the present-day Gospel of Barnabas in the Italian language is a document
from early church history.
Is the Gospel of Barnabas concealed from the public?
Papers rejecting the authenticity of the Gospel of Barnabas are published
in some Islamic countries -- above all by Christians -- while the efforts
of Muslim writers, also to the present, are aimed at proving that this
Gospel of Barnabas is the only true gospel, and that the four gospels of
the New Testament are forgeries. Jesus Christ says, “But if he will not
hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two
or three witnesses every word may be established “(Matthew 18:16). Under
Mosaic law, “At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he
that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness
he shall not be put to death. ” (Deuteronomy 17:6). By virtue of this law,
2 or 3 witnesses (who testify in truth) shall establish the matter. Even
if the Gospel of Barnabas is true (though known to be fake), it has no
authority to be admitted as evidence in accordance with Mosaic law. The
authors of the 4 gospels are Matthew (Levi), Mark, Luke and John, out of
which 2 of them namely Matthew and John are the eye-witnesses of Jesus'
ministry in addition to 3 other Apostles such as James, Peter and Jude.
Saul also seen Jesus Christ in a vision on his way from Jerusalem to Damascus
and later known as Apostle Paul (Acts 9). There are more than 3 eye-witnesses
against the fake Gospel of Barnabas. Judas Iscariot's vacant position was filled up by
Matthias and not Barsabas Justus as an apostle (Matthew 10:2-4 & Acts
1:22-26).
|
Matthew 10:2-4 |
10:2
|
Now the names of the twelve apostles are these; The first,
Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother; James the son of Zebedee,
and John his brother;
|
10:3
|
Philip, and Bartholomew; Thomas, and Matthew the publican;
James the son of Alphaeus, and Lebbaeus, whose surname was Thaddaeus;
|
10:4
|
Simon the Canaanite, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed
him.
|
|
Acts 1:22-26 |
1:22
|
Beginning from the baptism of John, unto that same day
that he was taken up from us, must one be ordained
to be a witness with us of his resurrection.
|
1:23
|
And they appointed two, Joseph called
Barsabas, who was
surnamed Justus, and Matthias.
|
1:24
|
And they prayed, and said, Thou, Lord, which knowest the
hearts of all men, shew whether of these two thou hast chosen,
|
1:25
|
That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship,
from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.
|
1:26
|
And they gave forth their lots; and the lot fell upon
Matthias;
and he was numbered with the eleven apostles.
|
In the final analysis, it is the ideology of the individual observer
which decides how much authenticity is granted to the Gospel of Barnabas.
For Muslims, it confirms the Quran and Islamic dogmas and is, therefore,
true, while for Christians, it stands in contradiction to the Old and New
Testaments and, thus, is false. It is for this reason, finally,
that it is endorsed by Muslims and rejected by Christians.
The endorsement of this gospel's authenticity always goes hand in hand
with the Muslim claim that the Christian church has attempted to conceal
this true gospel from the public. The opposite, however, is the case: the
first efforts to produce a complete text of the gospel were made by Christians
in 1907. Since this time, the Gospel of Barnabas has been available in
a number of languages. No one in Europe had any interest in a new apocryphal
text before the increase of Muslim statements in favor of the gospel. However,
propaganda of false doctrines is never the works of born-again Christians
and the truth can be never concealed from the public.
The original Barnabas is not an
apostle but a disciple of Jesus. He preached the resurrection of Jesus and
strongly contributed to the growth of Christianity in Antioch. This spurious Gospel of
Barnabas is rejected by Christians as a true Gospel and Muslims should reject it
as well.
The Gospel of Barnabas: Why Muslims
Shouldn’t Use It

Other Articles of
Interest:
a) Christian Views - Frequently
Asked Questions (FAQ)
b) Muslims Views - FAQ
c) Christianity & Islam
Views

|
Disclaimer:
The
information on this website is the sole opinion of the
webmaster but not extended to the links expressly stated which
is given for easy reference. If you find the material
offensive, kindly email to me and state your case based on
sound argument from Quran or Bible so that it
can be amended where necessary but if your case is
baseless then the article so written will remain status quo.
The webmaster has the eagerness to develop this website as God leads and provides.
Best
Viewed By Resolution 800 x 600
| Home
| About this site | Apologetics
| Belief | Testimonies
| Hot Links | Contact
Me |
Copyright
© 200 5
Gospel of Truth
All rights reserved
|
|
|