|
Can You Get My Name in the Papers? |
|
BACK TO THE FOLD Jack Miller was an icon of Scottish Jewry and
had just become President of Glasgow Jewish Representative Council,
an elected body which exists to represent the myriad interests and views
of the Jewish community of Glasgow locally, nationally and even internationally,
although I have serious reservations
about the last named. Jack proved
to be an inspired President. He looked and sounded the part, too; with
his distinguished appearance, thin moustach, and slow measured speaking
voice. There was hardly an aspect of Jewish activity in which he had
not been involved. He was a general medical practitioner
by profession and an important figure in medical politics; a Fellow
of the British Medical Association and the Royal Society of Medicine,
and a Fellow and founder member of the Royal College of General
Practitioners. Later he was to become national treasurer of the BMA
and a recipient of the association's gold medal for distinguished service.
He was awarded the OBE in 1983. Jack took over the leadership of the Representative
Council with a number of laudable aspirations; to give the local community
a greater self-awareness and confidence and to improve the image of
the council and the community among the wider community of Britain.
He told me that although I was a member of the Jewish community I was
not identified with it and as I seemed to be working very effectively
for the city he decided to recruit me as the council's first Public
Relations man. He also
remembered I had interviewed him a couple of years earlier for a newspaper
article on the kosher schools meals service of which he was honorary
treasurer. I took
up Jack's offer to join him and became the Representative Council's
honorary propagandist. During his three years in office Jack was involved
in bringing to Glasgow many prominent speakers on Jewish and Israeli
affairs. He also initiated courses for local people to enable them to
give authoritative talks to Jewish and non-Jewish
audiences on the myriad aspects of Jewish affairs and life. Among the
things the Representative Council had always taken great interest in
was the plight of Jews in the Soviet Union who suffered every kind of
oppression and deprivation. Jack Miller promoted a number of events
to draw the problem to the attention of the British
public and perhaps even more importantly to make the Soviet government
aware of the strength of feeling world-wide about their treatment of
Jews. In the
Representative Council's report for 1970-71 its joint honorary secretaries,
The Rev. Dr I. K. Cosgrove, Garnethill Synagogue's dynamic minister,
and Mr Kenneth Davidson, a Glasgow business man, reported, The situation
of the Jews in the Soviet Union continues to be
more and more fully exposed, to the obvious displeasure of the Soviet
authorities, who give the impression of being exceedingly perplexed
and confused by the whole thing. They are unaccustomed to great masses
of courageous and intelligent people publicly demanding no more than
their rights according to the law of the land. The secretaries
also reported that Dr Golombok, editor of the Jewish Echo, and Mr Diamond
continued active in characteristic style and indeed are currently engaged
in ensuring that the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland pass
a motion deploring the plight of Jews in the Soviet Union. I don't remember what happened to the motion
but 14 years later, in May 1984, after a series of meetings lasting
two-and-a-half years between ministers of the Church of Scotland and
leaders of the Jewish community, the Church and Glasgow Jewish Representative
Council issued a Common Statement on the evils of anti-Semitism. A week
later I sat in on a session of the General Assembly in Edinburgh along
with a number of colleagues from the Representative Council to see Mr
Henry Tankel, a Glasgow surgeon, President of the United Synagogue Council
of Scotland, and a past President of Glasgow Jewish Representative Council,
become the first Jew to address the supreme court of the Church in its
424 years. His speech was received with enthusiasm and acclaim. Tankel
told the fathers and brethren, The
Deliverance (resolution) which initiated our discussions was a brave
and noble sentiment and you placed its execution into the hands of far-seeing
and upright men and women. It is not
in our hands to speak on behalf of the millions of our martyrs who have
died for their faith, but it was and is in our hands to grasp firmly
the hand of genuine friendship and co-operation, and this we have done.
We have learned much from the meetings we have held together. Mutual
respect and understanding have taken deep root and flowered into friendship.
The meetings
between the two groups started in 1981 when a Deliverance of the General
Assembly stated that its Overseas Council should initiate talks with
the Jewish community with a view to finding ways to strengthen the bonds
of friendship and understanding between Christians and Jews. Several
people from each side took part in the talks. The leaders were the Rev.
Alastair Lamont, former convener of the Kirk's Church and Israel Committee
and Mr Kenneth Davidson, President of Glasgow Jewish Representative
Council. Henry Tankel was another member of the Jewish group.
A close observer of the talks was the then Sir (now Lord) Immanuel Jakobovits, Chief Rabbi of Britain and the
Commonwealth. My part
in the operation, with the agreement and co-operation of Bruce Cannon, the Church's Director of Publicity,
was to translate the very formal Common Statement into a form
which would be easily digestible by the nation's news media and to organise
a press conference. I obtained
permission to mount the press conference in a committee room of the
City Chambers which was attended by a large number of newspaper, radio
and television people. The Statement was reported throughout Britain.
Later the Rev. John M Spiers, minister of Orchardhill Parish Church,
Glasgow, wrote to me, Last Tuesday
will be long remembered by all of us and I do believe it marks a new
depth of understanding between our two communities. The Common
Statement ended with the proposal that a continuing framework of liaison
should be established to maintain relationships and to facilitiate co-operation
in matters of mutual concern and in fact this liaison is still very
active. Henry Tankel
and his wife Judith have both had the distinction of serving as Presidents
of the Representative Council, Henry from 1974 to 1977 and Judith, the
only woman to hold the post, from
1989 to 1992. On Christmas
Eve 1970 Jack Miller was one of a party of Jews who held a 24-hour vigil in George Square in support of
two Russian Jews sentenced to death by firing squad after they were
found guilty at a secret trial
in Leningrad for the attempted hijacking to Sweden of an airliner. If
you look closely at the protesters carrying placards you can see yours
truly. Protest
meetings were also held about the treatment of Jews in Arab countries.
In January 1969 Iraq hanged nine of its Jewish citizens for allegedly
spying for Israel. A three-hour protest vigil by Glasgow Jews in George
Square attracted more than 1200 people to the scene, including a large
number of prominent churchman. The churchmen
also turned out in force to a shop in fashionable Buchanan Street to
sample the type of breakfast given to Jewish prisoners of conscience
in the Soviet Union, two slices of black bread, an ounce of herring,
and a cup of unsweetened hot water. My job was to ensure national press
coverage for the events. Some years
later, with the co-operation of another imaginative President, Bernard
Sakol, a furniture manufacturer, I
devised a public write-in to our co-religionists in Russia to encourage
them in their struggle for civil liberties and human rights, including
the right to leave the country to live somewhere else, preferably Israel.
The write-in
turned out to be the biggest event of its kind ever staged in Britain.
A thousand leaders of religious groups, writers, trade unionists, politicians,
academics, and many others came to the Representative Council offices
in Glasgow one Sunday afternoon to write letters to people in the Soviet
Union whose names and addresses we had compiled. We even supplied the
notepaper and pens. Actually
the supporters didn't have to write more than their own names and addresses
because members of the council's executive supplied drafts of various
types of letters. The event was reported internationally by newspapers,
radio and television. Later I
sent a comprehensive report about the project to every other Jewish
Representative Council in Britain
suggesting they mount a similar operation, but not one reponded, a fact
which disappointed us greatly in Glasgow. That was the kind of response
that, unjustly, earned representative councils a reputation for being mere 'talking shops'
where people liked to sound off about everything but didn't want actually
to do anything. I served
under seven Representative Council
Presidents until 1994 when I lost my place on the executive committee,
although I am still a delegate to the council on behalf of the Association of Jewish Ex-servicemen. My departure from the executive
committee did not upset me very much as it meant I would no longer have
to sit through lengthy, boring meetings although as a delegate I still
attend the council's plenary sessions which last hours and are often
even more boring. Successive
Presidents have been far too democratic in allowing council members and delegates who really have nothing to add to discussions to pollute the
air with the dullest of thoughts at extraordinary length and on a disconcerting
number of occasions I have said to colleagues after meetings, "What
did we decide?" to receive the answer, "I don't know."
One of
the most excrutiatingly boring subjects was the council's constitution
to which an incredible amount of time was devoted. Over the decades
council members had initiated countless useful, effective projects without
even being aware that the council had
a constitution. This unhealthy preoccupation with, and manipulation
of, constitutions is exactly the kind of thing that damages the credibility
of political parties, too. The council
is currently involved in a nation-wide project, Jewish Continuity, designed
to persuade Jews generally to take a greater interest in their religious
heritage. In Glasgow's case an enormous amount of time and money is
being devoted to an attempt to bring many of its largely indifferent
sons and daughters of Abraham,
Isaac and Jacob back into the fold. Regular reports of the progress
of Jewish Continuity contain a very high fog factor.
It is the
council's misfortune that whatever it does the Jewish community at large
is still cynically ignorant of its work.
One of the main reasons is that a lot of useful work is done
outwith committees and the public meetings are not the stuff of newspaper
headlines, even in the very few Jewish newspapers which cater for our
community in Britain. Another reason is that the hierarchy of the community
have little skill in communicating with their
public in a way that is intelligible to them. The last
President I served with on the executive committee was Harvey Livingston,
managing director of a furniture manufacturing company, a conscientious,
hard-working man and the only Scottish Jew to be introduced to the Pope.
Thomas Winning, Archbishop of Glasgow, invited him to Rome, along with
others, to see him installed as a cardinal in November 1994.
This was an acknowledgement of the Representative Councils' role
in Jewish affairs rather than a personal recognition of Livingston's
undoubted worth. Livingston is not the only Jew to attend a Mass, though.
I have attended quite a number of them over the years for one official
reason or another. Every Representative
Council President wants to be remembered for some achievement or innovation
during his term of office. Some have done very valuable work for
the community. Others have left behind them only relief that
they have gone. Livingston
introduced the idea of 'key
topic' discussions which enabled delegates and members of the community
to air their views on things like education, welfare, defence, youth
affairs, and the role of the council itself. He also
conceived the admirable idea of inviting
the London-based Board of Deputies of British Jews to have one of their
meetings in Glasgow in March 1994 to mark the 80th anniversary of the
Representative Council. It was the Board's first meeting in Scotland
since it was established 234 years earlier. Some of the Londoners seemed
to be surprised we northerners did not run about smeared in woad and
clad in loincloths. The guest
speaker was Mr Malcolm Rifkind, Secretary of State for Defence, who
was personally known to many of the delegates and of course to us in
Scotland as he came from a well-known Edinburgh family and was a former
Secretary of State for Scotland. He's now Foreign Secretary . Mr Rifkind
was having a pleasant Sunday among us when his day was clouded by the
resignation of Sir Peter Harding, Chief of the Defence Staff, who had
been revealed by the News of the World to have had a torrid romance
with Lady Bienvenida Buck, the ex-wife wife of Sir Anthony Buck, a former
Defence Minister. Like Lord
Provosts some Representative Council Presidents have more to offer than
others. One or two gave me the impression they just liked to sit at
the top table in the centre of their executive officers and be looked
at by an admiring audience. Their contributions certainly did not add
much to the sum total of the world's knowledge. Many years
ago it was suggested I become honorary secretary of the Representative
Council and work my way up the hierarchical ladder to the Presidency
but there are certain conventions one must obey to be lay leader of
the Glasgow Jewish community and I was never very good at obeying rules.
Among them
are strict adherence to religious observance, going to synagogue on
every Jewish festival, eating only food prepared in accordance with
Jewish dietary laws, and taking certain courses of action, not necessarily
because they are productive, or even sensible,
but because the President of the Representative Council is expected
to be seen to be doing something about a given situation
whether there is any point in his efforts or not. On many
occasions there isn't. Time after time over the more recent years the
President of the Representative Council has been persuaded to issue
pronouncements about international events because our community thought
this was the right thing to do or because they thought their tiny voices
should be heard. I really cannot see that anyone in the international
corridors of power gives two hoots about the opinions of even a vociferous
ethnic minority in Glasgow. I don't know how anyone can be so naive, or
arrogant, to believe otherwise. The campaign for Soviet Jewry was entirely
different as it was part of a world-wide campaign which went on for
years. For a time
I was chairman of the council's public relations committee but I gave up the post when I quickly discovered that
I was the only one actually doing anything while everyone else just
talked. The same thing applied to the Media Committee whose function
was to monitor the Scottish news media and respond to anything which
we thought mistepresented any aspect of Judaism or the policiies and
activities of our co-religionists in Israel. No-one on the committee
was prepared to buy a large number of newspapers and listen to every
radio or television news broadcast so the only thing the committee could
decide, after lengthy deliberation, was when to hold the next meeting.
The Jewish
community is not an easy one to serve. Golda Meir, a former Prime Minister
of Israel, once told a visitor that Israel had three million prime ministers,
all of whom thought they could do the job better than she. The Glasgow
Jewish community also has experts on every subject, a failing shared
with every other Jewish community I have ever known. The less they know
about a subject the more expert they are. It is no secret that I am
sometimes not a patient man and I don't like to do things merely for
the sake of appearances, nor do I like to be told to how to do my job
by people who know nothing about it. It was
an event in Russia which brought the Representative Council into existence.
A Jew named Mendel Beiliss was put on trial in Kiev in October 1913
for allegedly killing a small boy, Andrew Yushinksy, for the purpose
of obtaining from his body blood to be used in Jewish sacrificial rites.
The charge was so ludicrous that Jews, and Christians, throughout the
world protested to their own political leaders and to the Russian
Government. In Glasgow
the Lord Provost and a number of other local politicians signed a protest
which was sent by leaders of the Jewish community to the Russian ambassador
in London. Beiliss was eventually cleared of the charge against him
and as a direct result of the "blood libel" against Beiliss
Glasgow Jewish Representative Council was formed in February 1914. It's ironic
to note that in April 1981 when I was working 12 or more hours a day
to promote the city of Glasgow I also helped to get Dundee some of the
worst publicity in its history. The Labour-controlled city council had
created considerable anguish to Jews and non-Jews alike by twinning with the Israeli-occupied West Bank town of
Nablus, flying the flag of the Palestine Liberation Organisation
in the City Chambers, and sending Lord Provost James Gowans and councillors
Colin Rennie, Ken Fagan, and Ian Mortimer on a 'courtesy visit' to Nablus. A leader
in The Scotsman commented, To take part in a well publicised love-in
with the Palestine Liberation Organisation is a strange way for any
group of Scottish politicians to behave, even if they all come from
Dundee. The Lord
Provost and his colleagues demonstrated their razor-sharp intellect
and awareness of the rightness of things by presenting the mayor of
Nablus, Mr Bassam al-Shaka, with a bottle of whisky
he could not drink because he was a Muslim and a kilt he could not wear
because his legs had been amputated after an extremist bomb attack on
his car. One of
the prime movers in the "love-in" with the PLO was the young
secretary of Dundee Labour Party, Mr George Galloway, who 13 years later
as Member of Parliament for Hillhead, Glasgow, created considerably
anguish in the Labour Party by going to Baghdad and appearing on Iraqi
state television with the butcher of Iraq, Saddam Hussain, to salute
his "courage, power, and indefatigability." Mr Galloway was
understandably severely reprimanded by chief whip Mr Derek Foster and
warned to behave in future. The flagrant
disregard by the city council of the feelings of most of the people
of Dundee, and a great many outside it, prompted Glasgow Jewish Representative
Council to stage a protest meeting in Dundee. Among the people invited
to join the meeting was Mr Greville Janner, Q.C., M.P., who was also
President of the Board of Deputies of British Jews. I wrote a story
about the impending visit and sent it to all the major news media. Mindless
vandals chose the day of the visit to cover the walls of Dundee Synagogue
with swastikas and other anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist slogans, escalating
what might have been an ordinary news story into an event of international
interest. In the weeks that followed the news media gave wide coverage
to Dundee's indiscretions. Among
the milder comments about the city was one by Tom Brown in the Daily
Express who wrote that Dundee was now the city of jute, journalism and
jackasses. Greville
Janner wrote to me later to tell me, Thanks for all you have done and
are doing to ensure that the Dundee episode will provide a sufficiently
nasty shock to the people concerned, at least to minimise the chance
of a repetition elsewhere. I'm
glad my Labour masters in Glasgow didn't know what I was doing otherwise
my local government career might have been cut dramatically short. Another
event for which I managed to achieve a great deal of publicity was the
50th anniversary in November 1988 of Kristallnacht, night of the broken
glass, when the Nazis ran amok in German and Austria and murdered and
arrested thousands of Jews. Reporters flocked to a commemorative service
organised by Glasgow Jewish Youth Council and hundreds of Jewish homes
in the city had lighted candles in memory of their co-religionists who
suffered the night of mindless violence and terror when 36 Jews were
killed, 40 seriously injured, and 30,000 arrested and sent to concentration
camps, 191 synagogues were set ablaze, 76 demolished and more than 800
Jewish shops and 170 homes were destroyed. I supplied the press with
the names and address of several Glasgow people who had survived that
terrible night, November 9, 1938. Although
I try not to be obtrusive about it I am one of those people who think
that people living in comfort and safety, including my fellow Jews,
should not be allowed to forget the things that have happened to our
co-religionists over the decades, and even centuries. My own community
was by no means the only ethnic community for whom I handled publicity
projects. I took the view that it would do my community no harm if a
Jew was known to be willing to help others, too, and over the years
I helped the Chinese, French and Muslim communities with publicity projects.
In November 1986 Bashir Maan, a leader of Glasgow's Muslim community
and at the time a district councillor (he is again now) asked me for help in publicising a feat achieved
by eight-year-old Jamil Moghul. Jamil had
memorised the 86,430 words of the Koran, the sacred book of Mohammedans,
and had successfully passed a test of random passages. My story of his
achievement went round the world. Bashir told me later that my story
appeared in the newspapers of most Islamic countries, in America, and
even in Japan. The book,
written in Arabic, is regarded as the word of God as revealed to the
prophet Mahomet through the angel Gabriel. Its various parts were written
down from the prophet's lips on dried leaves, bits of leather and whatever
else came to hand. Those who could not write memorised the words, which
consists of history, legends, prophecies, moral precepts and laws. Only
about one per cent of the world's Muslims (the faithful) memorise the
Koran these days, Bashir told me. The histories
are chiefly about Old Testament characters and many of the doctrines
and laws are the same as those of Judaism or of Christianity. Moses,
Jesus, and Mahomet are named as the greatest of the line of prophets
sent by God to lead mankind in the path of truth. All of which makes
me wonder why there is such hostility between many of the devotees of
three of the world's leading religions.
There was
one occasion in which I had to turn down a request for my help. In May
1984 the Central Mosque was opened in Glasgow at a cost of £2,750,000, in what was the old Gorbals area and Bashir Maan asked
me if I would do some Public Relations work for it. At that
time I was what the news media described as "a leading member of
the Jewish community," and as Muslim countries, including Pakistan, did not, and still doesn't, recognise the State
of Israel which means so much to people like me I had to decline the
invitation. It's interesting that an ethnic community other
than my own had to come to me at all. The reason was that although they
had spokesmen these were only called upon by the news media when "something
bad" happened in their communities. "Very little of the positive things that
happen among us, in cultural, social,
communal activities appear in print," said Bashir. Some years
ago I was one of several members of the executive of the Jewish Representative
Council who met, at their request, with a number of Asian leaders who
were interested in forming a representative council. After the formal talks were over one of our
visitors told me, "We can't form an organisation like yours. We
would start a war between ourselves over who would be the President." Nowadays
there are a number of Asian journalists among their 150,000-strong community
in Scotland but apparently still no-one who can supply the news media
with the more positive type of material about the community's activities, a lack which I think is rather sad. |