|
How can we stop abortion? (Page 16)
|
| This topic is 25 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 |
| |
| Author | Topic: How can we stop abortion? |
|
gHari Member |
IP
posted 09-19-2000 09:59 PM
IS CONTRACEPTION ALSO ABORTION?Conversation: MadhudviSa: SrIla PrabhupAda, is there a jIva, is there a spirit soul in every sperm cell, or does that...? Does the spirit soul only come to a particular sperm cell, or is there one in every sperm cell, and the condition isn't right, so then it dies before, I mean, it leaves before it actually forms a body? Lectures: Then where is the difference between KRSNa and us? Yes, there is difference. What is that? That KRSNa, singular number, nityo nityAnAm...nityAnAm, this is plural number. Cetanaz cetanAnAm. CetanAnAm, this is plural number. So there is one person, singular number. Others, they are plural number, we jIvas. AnantyAya kalpate. JIvas, that is described, the dimension of the jIva. I have several times explained, kezAgra-zata-bhAgasya zatadhA kalpitasya ca [Cc. Madhya 19.140]. First of all, divide the tip of the hair into hundred parts. Then take one of the parts, one hundredth part, again divide into hundred parts. That small, less than atom, that is the magnitude of the jIva. And they are anantyAya kalpate. There is no limit. There is no limit how many living entities are there. If you search out, after passing stool, if you search out stool, you'll find millions of living entities, germs. Even from the hole of your room, there is small hole, and there are ants, hundreds and thousands will come out. So similarly, within the hole, within the earth, within the air, within the fire even, there are germs, worms in the fire. These rascals, they do not know. They simply think... Because nitya, nitya means ever-existing. So in the fire the living entities does not die. They sterilize. "Now it is sterilized." That is all nonsense. Sterilized means the body is killed, but not this... There is abortion. The body is killed. Contraception... The body is killed. But the soul, he's not killed. If you make some inconvenience to the soul, who has taken shelter in the womb, and you kill the body, then he'll have to search out another body. This is going on. Just see how the rascal civilization is going on. They're thinking they're killing. This way killed, that way killed. No. You, it is sinful because you create inconvenience to that particular soul. He was taking shelter, karmaNA daiva-netreNa jantur dehopapattaye [SB 3.31.1]. By his karma he was given shelter to develop a body, and if you kill that body, that means you go against the order of the Supreme. Daiva-netreNa, suppose you are destined to occupy some room, and somebody does not allow you to enter that room, is it not criminal? It is criminal, unlawful detention, unlawful... It is unlawful, even in the state. Similarly, a living entity is developing one body, and if you kill that, you become immediately criminal, punishable. And the living entity who is checked to develop the body, he's put into inconvenience, he's also sinful. He's also sinful. Therefore it may be simply he's wandering from one womb to another, one womb to another. Because he committed that sinful activity abortion. Now the man who causes his abortion, he also being punished, that "You'll never see the light of this world. You'll simply have to live one womb to another, one womb to another. Go on." So nature's punishment is like that. But these foolish people they do not know. Srimad Bhagavatam 3.31.1-48: The Personality of Godhead said: Under the supervision of the Supreme Lord and according to the result of his work, the living entity, the soul, is made to enter into the womb of a woman through the particle of male semen to assume a particular type of body. SB 5.14.9: Sometimes, as if blinded by the dust of a whirlwind, the conditioned soul sees the beauty of the opposite sex, which is called pramadA. Being thus bewildered, he is raised upon the lap of a woman, and at that time his good senses are overcome by the force of passion. He thus becomes almost blind with lusty desire and disobeys the rules and regulations governing sex life. He does not know that his disobedience is witnessed by different demigods, and he enjoys illicit sex in the dead of night, not seeing the future punishment awaiting him. SB 6.16.14: Queen KRtyadyuti's co-wives, who had poisoned the child, were very much ashamed, and they lost all their bodily luster. While lamenting, O King, they remembered the instructions of AGgirA and gave up their ambition to bear children. Following the directions of the brAhmaNas, they went to the bank of the YamunA, where they bathed and atoned for their sinful activities. SB 11.2.2 Purport: Nowadays some people, desiring material sense gratification but hoping to avoid the inconvenience of family life, try to enjoy "free" sexual relations with women, without the trouble of marriage. Through birth control and abortion they eliminate the disturbance of caring for children. In this way they hope to enjoy material sense gratification without any material impediment. By the laws of nature, however, such persons become bound in a network of sinful reactions by avoiding their real duty to the Supreme Personality of Godhead and by thoughtlessly causing violence and suffering to others for increasing their own sense gratification. Caught in a network of impious activities, they drift further and further away from their original pure consciousness and gradually lose all power to understand the laws of nature. Therefore it is stated here, sarvato-mRtyuH. MRtyu means "death." Death suddenly appears, startling such confident sense gratifiers, and destroys their entire program of so-called material happiness. Often such persons are afflicted with ghastly diseases and undergo inconceivable suffering, which ends in death. If a sincere well-wisher points these facts out to them, trying to inform them of the reality, they become angry and accuse him of being a pessimist or a religious fanatic. In this way they blindly ignore the laws of nature until these laws inevitably smash them down and drag them out of their fool's paradise. Because of an excessive accumulation of sinful results, they are forced into situations of great distress by the laws of karma. Sinking down into the lower species of life, they lose all awareness of that which lies beyond their gross material senses.
|
|
darwin Member |
posted 09-19-2000 08:52 PM
A very nice post, but people on this forum need to stop making generalizations about men(and women too). Listen, a man could also write a nice long heart wrenching post and sprinkle it with a few bigoted statements toward women, but that wouldn't be right either. darwin does not like bigotry and will continue to go into a monkey frenzy each time he hears it. darwin was banned for years from the Boston Temple by Sadhusangananda, because he stood up to him when he was abusing a woman devotee. darwin is not now going to sit back and listen to hate and lies being spread against men. Your delinquent servant, darwin [This message has been edited by darwin (edited 09-19-2000).]
|
|
priestess New Member |
posted 09-19-2000 07:53 PM
Dear devotees, Please let's step back from our emotions to become honest about this whole issue. It is too important to relegate it to tit for tat. It is the foundation of society or the destruction of society; which will we make it??? I for one, recently decided to stop pleading with my godbrothers about the whole man/woman eternal battle of the sexes. But here I go again!! I am begging, with straw between my teeth, let us get over it so we can talk constructively. I for one have never personally felt sex was such a big all-consuming issue. I didn't find celibacy hard, nor did I ever put my self forward as a renunciate. In fact I REFUSED to be false and put on a white sari. For that I was labelled a women's libber by misogynistic men. For wanting to serve a man in marriage I was called a libber!!! I was not even a libber as a karmi. Sticks and stones. Abortion IS a form of misogyny--hatred of women. There is NO getting around that, Darwin prabhu, and please forgive me, but I hope you will bear with me as I explain myself. And so is contraception of any kind. Women want babies. Even career women are thinking they will have babies later(most of them), but this unnatural state creates an atmosphere for the less pleasant qualities of women to grow. Society has begun a vast propoganda program to make women feel guilty and ashamed of this desire. And the reason is exactly like VdK has stated, refusal to take responsibility. The truth is that it is innate in women to WANT a pregnancy to occur from sex. Period. We want babies. That does not mean that many 'modern' women have not decided they want other things more, career, power etc. But inside, no matter how independent a woman appears, she still wants a baby(except in very rare persons, and even then they likely secretly want one). Of course, if a woman can stay in her intelligence, she will not want a baby in a situation where she couldn't take care of it, but that situation only exists due to the man she is with not taking responsibility. And it is still there underneath it all. It is our nature. Our society DOES still hate women and children, in fact more than ever, and that IS the root cause of mass abortion. Women are joining in the hatred too, but that has been a gradual effect of conditioning over generations. Please look honestly at history. Consider the age old idea that a young girl gets pregnant ON PURPOSE to TRAP a man!!! That girls father doesn't see it that way does he??? Not if he's a decent man he doesn't. If a young girl wants a baby, it is only natural, and the act of having sex often can't be separated from the desire to conceive for the woman. It can't for me. Never in my life did I have sex and not want the child to come with it. When I was young I wanted it so much I wished I could get raped, because I thought no man would ever marry me(ages 12-16). I had no idea what that would mean, just had a fantasy I would run away with my baby, as I knew society and my parents would condemn me for it. To desire a child through sex is not only natural to women, it is also 'vedic'(though I hate using that word for its abusive uses in iskcon). To think that a young girl or woman is using pregnancy to 'trap' a man is about as low as thinking can go, and it's called misogynism. And it IS a refusal to take responsiblity. When a man has sex with a woman, he OWES it to her to be prepared to accept fatherhood for the child she can't help but to hope will occur. If he is thinking like this, only then can he claim to be free, totally free, from misogynist anarthas. Misogynism faults a girl or woman for desiring conception. Yet to desire conception, is Krsna's arrangement for sex, at least for most women, if not all, if they are being honest with themselves. I have used birth control in my life, including the pill for a matter of months. Now if anyone wishes to misconstrue my words as hatred for men, they simply do not know me. And forget that fetus-hostage idea, Darwin prabhu, that is your emotive reaction. Please stop throwing that out as some kind of absolute for anyone who does not see it as you do. I do not believe anyone here is looking to hold fetuses hostages. And that's talking politics anyway. Or have I misunderstood the topic, and was it meant to be a political debate? If so, I don't belong here. I understood the idea of how we can stop abortion as an attempt at honest dialogue looking for real solutions. But if there is only one real solution perceived, we just end up back at the tit for tat door again; a waste of time. I do not condem or judge the use of non-violent birth control, but as I've already said, I also don't believe it is THE one and only answer, or even a very good solution over all. I think the selfishness is only increasing, and birth control is not helping that. Increased selfishness will only lead to more horrors. Do you not agree to that, at least? GHari prabhu, I accept your statements of sex as a lower taste for a vaisnava, and certainly agree as I have clearly stated on the Tao thread. But I also see with your wording that it pushes MAJOR buttons for those of us who witnessed many years of out and out misogynism, hatred of women, which was based on the same type of terminology of giving sex the position of vileness. This vileness idea is corrupting on society at large, even among devotees. I am always appreciating your posts and your highly realised contributions of pure KC. But I suspect that perhaps you are naive as to the despicable behaviours in iskcon based on attributing vileness to sex. Literally, young mothers with babies have been villified by 'celibates' because they had to have sex to conceive the child. So we carry our babies, an advertisement to the artifically repressed, and they slam the doors in our faces. And I mean purposely, as a statement of the scarlet letter they believe we deserve. I am not saying all men, but too, too many. And way too many for a society which preaches protection of women, with a philosophy that includes seeing the children as the joy of society. Myself and my godsisters begged these kind of men, too, too many times, til most of us gave up. Which is what I did; some however felt compelled to sell out, but also in an attempt to stay in SP's movement. I am going to start a new thread on this topic, 'The use of 'hatred' of sex for abuse by misogynists', as this is a thread for stopping abortion, I won't go further into it here. Again, I do NOT think your words have abusive intent, but I totally understand how they feel to those of us who've been through the social destruction of our beloved spiritual master's movement first hand, at least in the external sense. We watched the misogyny grow like a cancer, out of control of sane persons, supported over and over by the vilification of sex and cosequently of women as existing only as mayadevis. This was never Srila Prabhupada's intention, yet his name is now being dragged through court because of it. The problem is that to vilify sex supports abusive persons, not that it creates abuse in and of itself, or that only abusive persons would speak so. I hope I am not offending you. Finally, there are many wonderful devotee men; I hope none of you will take offense. Or be insulted for my stressing what I perceive as a MAJOR problem among devotees, as well as society at large. The society we are trying to effect by sharing the enlightenment we have been benedicted with. In his loving memory,
|
|
darwin Member |
posted 09-19-2000 07:48 PM
darwin's little brother's life was saved by an illegal abortion. darwins' mother had a bad pregnancy in between darwin's and darwin's baby brother's, that was going to miscarry and damage her ability to have more kids. She had to go to Mexico City to get the abortion, this was in 1966. She still had a hard time carrying darwin's brother to term and had to be sewn shut. Without the illegal abortion darwin's baby brother would not have survived.
|
|
darwin Member |
posted 09-19-2000 06:30 PM
darwin, where does it state in my posts thatI hold fetuses hostage? You said that you are against nonviolent birth control to prevent abortion, because you think using nonviolent birth control isn't being "responsible"? Who is at risk in this bizarre social experiment? The unwanted fetus. That's what darwin calls holding fetuses hostage. your projections upon others are tiring, childish and not promoting discussion. It's got you talking. Go back to your monkeys. Innuendo and slanderous remarks towards the doctor who does not like abortion, darwin would much rather be a rude monkey who is speaking the truth, than a doctor who is so irresponsible that they against nonviolent birth control to prevent abortion. but promotes responsibility does not amount to either promoting hate for women or men, You promote bigotry by saying "What needs to be addressed is man's lack of responsibility", implying that "men" are to blame? If the monkey is wrong on this point, he is sorry. does not hold any fetus in thrall but in your fertile filthy mind, which is only out to offend, at all cost, those who are genuinely interested in the subject. You are the one who tried to change the subject by saying "Sex is ok, but I think using contraceptives is just an easy way out of responsibility, in the same or similar vein as abortion. It marks the refusal to deal with the results of our action. It is immature, hypocritical and cowardly. These are the real issues, of which abortion is but a symptom.". Abortion is not "but a symptom", it is the topic of this forum, and darwin and others are here to discuss how to prevent it. We are not here to promote being "responsible" by putting a fetus at risk. You are a fault-finder, who seeks to put words and ideas in people's mouth without any of those words and ideas coming from the person accusaed, but from your own dirty mind. You are against nonviolent birth control to prevent abortion? Spare us your childish antics or go to some chatroom for puerile delinquents Then come over to darwin's side and fight to prevent unwanted pregnancies and prevent abortion. You can help monkey darwin by arguing in a non puerile way. [This message has been edited by darwin (edited 09-19-2000).]
|
|
VdK Member |
posted 09-19-2000 04:54 PM
darwin, where does it state in my posts thatI hold fetuses hostage? your projections upon others are tiring, childish and not promoting discussion. Go back to your monkeys. Innuendo and slanderous remarks towards the doctor who does not like abortion, but promotes responsibility does not amount to either promoting hate for women or men, does not hold any fetus in thrall but in your fertile filthy mind, which is only out to offend, at all cost, those who are genuinely interested in the subject. You are a fault-finder, who seeks to put words and ideas in people's mouth without any of those words and ideas coming from the person accusaed, but from your own dirty mind. Spare us your childish antics or go to some chatroom for puerile delinquents
|
|
bhutabhavana New Member |
posted 09-19-2000 03:32 PM
darwin thinks BB is referring to Adam Clymer bb concedes darwin thinks correctly on occasion.
|
|
darwin Member |
posted 09-19-2000 02:08 PM
And you are a delusional clymer if you really believe your fantasies and projections. Could you be more specific, or is that just something you heard someone else say, and thought sounded good? Good luck finding happiness in this life, clymer. darwin thinks BB is referring to Adam Clymer, the reporter that George Bush referred to as a "major league ***hole". [This message has been edited by darwin (edited 09-19-2000).]
|
|
bhutabhavana New Member |
posted 09-19-2000 01:25 PM
quote: And you are a delusional clymer if you really believe your fantasies and projections. Good luck finding happiness in this life, clymer.
|
|
darwin Member |
posted 09-19-2000 12:47 PM
VdK wrote: Sex is ok, but I think using contraceptives is just an easy way out of responsibility, You are not in favor of using fetuses as hostages to prevent sex? You are in favor of using fetuses as hostages to promote "responsibility"? Do you tell your patients to not wear seat belts in their car, because that's "just an easy way out of responsibility"? in the same or similar vein as abortion. Nonviolent birth control is not at all similar to abortion. Nonviolent birth control prevents abortion. It marks the refusal to deal with the results of our action. Great! We now have a doctor who is against nonviolent birth control to prevent abortion? A doctor who wants to use fetuses a hostages to promote "responsibility"? It is immature, hypocritical and cowardly. These are the real issues, of which abortion is but a symptom. You admit you just want to use the abortion issue to promote "responsibility"? And hatred of men? What needs to be addressed is man's lack of responsibility, not whether he is 'jealous'of someone who has sex or whether he produces 'hatred of women'. Great! Our forum has attracted another bigot? Only this one hates men? That is the stupidist argument I have so far seen here. As if devotees think sex is the devil and woman his agaent - what a joke! You think all men are at fault? So let us stick to the issue: how to stop abortion.1 do not do it.2 be responsible and teach others to be so. 3 dont waste time in discussing side issues. That's right. Don't use this forum to promote hatred of men. don't try to use fetuses a hostages to promote "responsibility" 4 dont go on a personal crusade towards those that have different ideas on the subject. What do you think the subject is? Promoting "responsibility", using fetuses as hostages? Promoting bigotry toward men?
|
|
VdK Member |
posted 09-19-2000 11:03 AM
Sex is ok, but I think using contraceptives is just an easy way out of responsibility, in the same or similar vein as abortion. It marks the refusal to deal with the results of our action. It is immature, hypocritical and cowardly. These are the real issues, of which abortion is but a symptom. What needs to be addressed is man's lack of responsibility, not whether he is 'jealous'of someone who has sex or whether he produces 'hatred of women'. That is the stupidist argument I have so far seen here. As if devotees think sex is the devil and woman his agaent - what a joke! So letus stick to the issue: how tpo stop abortion. 1 do not do it.2 be responsible and teach others to be so. 3 dont waste time in discussing side issues.4 dont go on a personal crusade towards those thathavedifferent ideas on the subject.
|
|
darwin Member |
posted 09-19-2000 10:48 AM
Originally posted by gHari: Darwin is foolish if he thinks a vaisnava is jealous of people who are having sex. darwin doesn't know if someone is a vaisnava, but he thinks that some people on this forum are jealous of people who are having sex, though. The monkey and pigeons have sex three times in the hour. Some people can have sex seven times in one hour. Sex is a much lower taste. So don't be jealous. No vaisnava would enjoy it. They just have to grin and bear it. [This message has been edited by darwin (edited 09-19-2000).]
|
|
darwin Member |
posted 09-19-2000 10:28 AM
quote:
|
|
JRdd New Member |
posted 09-19-2000 01:57 AM
quote: Yes, one would indeed think so. always,
|
|
Maitreya Member |
posted 09-19-2000 01:38 AM
The alternative to abortion is not to commit the abortion. A middle way? Like being half pregnant? Half aborted?
|
This topic is 25 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 |